Skip to main content

The Multiple Lives of the General Relativity Community, 1955–1974

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biographies in the History of Physics

Abstract

The history of general relativity presents intriguing challenges for historians and philosophers of science. Its origins and receptions have figured prominently in debates about conceptual transformations, the dynamics of theory change, relationships between theory and experiment and, of course, physical and philosophical notions of space and time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See correspondence between Howard P. Robertson and J. L. Synge, H. P. Robertson Papers, 100240MS, Caltech Archives, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, box 5, folder 25.

  2. 2.

    “Conférence pour l’Organisation des Etudes concernant la Création d’un Laboratoire europée de Physique nucléaire, Paris, 17–21 Décembre 1951” UNESCO/NS/NUC/4, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001540/154028fb.pdf. Accessed 13 February 2017; and “Minutes of the First Session of the CERN European Council for Nuclear Research,” Paris, 5–8 May 1952, http://cds.cern.ch/record/19494/files/CM-P00075404-e.pdf. Accessed 13 February 2017.

  3. 3.

    A. Mercier, Sur la Théorie de la Gravitation et de la Relativité Générale GRG, p. 15. Handakten Prof. André Mercier (1934–1998), Staatsarchiv Bern, Bern, folder BB 8.2 1556, Dossier on GRG.

  4. 4.

    See also Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman to Werner Heisenberg, 9 November 1954, Nachlaß Werner Heisenberg, Rep. 93, Abteilung III, Max Planck Archiv, Berlin, folder 1704.

  5. 5.

    See also A. Mercier, Sur la Théorie de la Gravitation et de la Relativité Générale GRG. Handakten Prof. André Mercier (1934–1998), Staatsarchiv Bern, Bern, folder BB 8.2 1556, Dossier on GRG.

  6. 6.

    See the correspondence concerning the Chapel Hill conference in Cécile DeWitt-Morette Papers, Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin, Box 4RM235.

  7. 7.

    “Pratiquement toutes les écoles de relativistes du monde furent représentées.” A. Mercier, Leçons sur la Théorie de la Gravitation et de la Relativité Générale GRG, p. 15, Handakten Prof. André Mercier (1934–1998), Staatsarchiv Bern, Bern, folder BB 8.2. 1556, Dossier on GRG.

  8. 8.

    Rosenfeld and Møller to members of the Committee on General Relativity and Gravitation, 2 January 1961, Vladimir Fock Papers, 1919–1974, Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. St. Petersburg Branch, St. Petersburg, Fond 1034, Inventaire 2, folder 180.

  9. 9.

    Minutes of the Meeting of the ICGRG, 30 June and 7 July 1965, Papers of the International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation (hereafter PISGRG), Library of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, folder 1.1.

  10. 10.

    Mercier to Scientists throughout the world who work in the field of GRG, 27 October 1969, Peter Bergmann Papers (unprocessed collection), Syracuse University Archives, Syracuse, NY (hereafter PBP).

  11. 11.

    Mercier to ICGRG members, 22 September 1969, PBP.

  12. 12.

    Bergmann to Bondi, 8 October 1969, PBP.

  13. 13.

    See also “Mercier Claims Science May Unite World Politics,” The Times Picayune, New Orleans, 14 December 1968, Handakten Prof. André Mercier (1934–1998), folder BB 8.2. 1579.

  14. 14.

    Minutes of the Meeting of the ICGRG, 30 June and 7 July 1965, PISGRG, folder 1.1.

  15. 15.

    See Footnote 14.

  16. 16.

    Bondi to all the members of the ICGRG, 12 July 1968, PBP.

  17. 17.

    Peres to Bergmann, 14 May 1968, PBP.

  18. 18.

    Bergmann to Bondi, 17 May 1968, PBP. See also Bergmann to Bondi, 3 May 1968, The Papers of Sir Hermann Bondi, GBR/0014/BOND, Churchill Archives Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge, UK (hereafter BOND), folder 4/4 A.

  19. 19.

    Bondi to the Members of the ICGRG, 12 July 1968, PBP.

  20. 20.

    Utiyama to Bondi, 18 July 1968; and Kilmister to Bondi, 24 July 1968, BOND, folder 4/4A, Bergmann to Bondi, 24 July 1968, PBP.

  21. 21.

    Telegram from Mercier to Bergmann, 26 August 1968, PBP. Mercier also sent a letter to all the scholars invited to the Tbilisi conference in which he reported the text of the telegram. Mercier to Scientist invited to partake in the Tiflis-Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity, 27 August 1968, BOND, folder 4/4A.

  22. 22.

    Telegram from Bondi to Members of the ICGRG, 29 August 1968, PBP, also in BOND, folder 4/4A.

  23. 23.

    Telegram from Peres to Bondi, 5 September 1968; telegram from Kereselidze to Bondi, 4 September 1968; Miss Speathe to Bondi, 4 September 1968, BOND, folder 4/4A; Rosen to Fock, 15 October 1968, PBP.

  24. 24.

    Telegram from Bondi to Bergmann, 6 September 1968, PBP. Various telegrams to ICGRG members, members of the Organizational Committee of the Tbilisi conference and to the Secretary of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, 6 September 1968, BOND, folder 4/4A.

  25. 25.

    Peter Havas to Bondi, 29 August 1968; Goldberg to Organizing Committee, 3 September 1968; telegram from Bergmann to Fock, 3 September 1968, PBP; Penrose to Bondi, 28 August 1968, Jules Géhéniau to Bondi, 30 August 1968; and telegram from Alfred Schild to Bondi, 30 August 1968, BOND, folder 4/4A.

  26. 26.

    Minutes of the ICGRG during the GR5 conference held in Tbilisi on 12 September 1965, PBP.

  27. 27.

    Robinson to Mercier, 5 April 1969, Engelbert Schucking Papers, Library of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Box 5, folder Ivor Robinson.

  28. 28.

    Møller to Bondi, 15 October 1968, Christian Møller Papers, Correspondence 1971–81, Niels Bohr Archive, Copenhagen (hereafter CMP), Box A-D, folder 3.

  29. 29.

    Bergmann to all members of the ICGRG, undated, probably November 1968 ca., PBP.

  30. 30.

    In a personal communication, Joshua Goldberg similarly stated that the ICGRG was increasingly seen by the younger scholars as a “self-appointed group” of experts without any right to administrate the GRG international community at the institutional level.

  31. 31.

    DeWitt to Mercier, 28 April 1971, GR6 Conference in Copenhagen, NORDITA Archive, Niels Bohr Archive, Copenhagen, 1971 (hereafter GR6P), Box A-L.

  32. 32.

    Bondi to the members of the Committee on GRG, “The events of summer 1968,” undated handwritten note, probably 4 September 1968. It is likely that it was actually sent to the ICGRG members. See Bondi to Mrs. Browne, 4 September 1968. See also Bondi to Mercier, undated handwritten note, BOND, folder 4/4A.

  33. 33.

    DeWitt to Mercier, 28 April 1971, GR6P, Box A-L.

  34. 34.

    “Minutes of the Meetings on the Committee on GRG, held on occasion of the GR6-Conference in Copenhagen,” p. 5, Papers of George Dautcourt, personal collection, Berlin (hereafter DAUT).

  35. 35.

    Mercier to members of the sub-committee on the foundation of the society, 18 May 1972; and Mercier to A. A. Sokolov and N. V. Mitskiévic, 1 February 1973, PISGRG, folder 1.2.

  36. 36.

    Georg Dautcourt to Møller, 29 October 1971, PISGRG, folder 1.3.

  37. 37.

    Ivanenko to Møller, 22 July 1971, PGR6, Box A-L. Dautcourt, “Bericht über die 6. Internationale Gravitationskonferenz in Kopenhagen,” DAUT.

  38. 38.

    “Minutes of the 1st Meetings of a General Assembly towards the foundation of Society for General Relativity and Gravitation GRG,” p. 4, DAUT; and Kip Thorne, personal communication.

  39. 39.

    Dautcourt, “Bericht über die 6. Internationale Gravitationskonferenz in Kopenhagen,” DAUT.

  40. 40.

    Soviet participants of the GR6 Conference to the Chairman of the Plenary GR6, 9 July 1971, GR6P, Box A-L.

  41. 41.

    “Minutes of the 1st Meetings of a General Assembly towards the foundation of Society for General Relativity and Gravitation GRG,” p. 4, DAUT.

  42. 42.

    Ivanenko to Møller, 22 July 1971, GR6P, Box A-L; Ivanenko to Mercier, undated, probably June 1972, attached to Mercier to sub-committee, 14 July 72, PISGRG, folder 1.3.

  43. 43.

    Wheeler to Møller, 4 April 1972, John Archibald Wheeler Papers, 1880–2008, Mss.B.W564, American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA, Box 18; Thorne to Mercier, 25 July 1972, PISGRG, folder 1.3.

  44. 44.

    Mercier to the members of the ICGRG, 30 May 1972, PISGRG, folder 1.2; Mercier to Rosen, 10 October 1972, PISGRG, folder 1.3.

  45. 45.

    Møller to Mercier, 5 February 1973, CMP, folder GR7 1974.

  46. 46.

    Thorne to Sciama, 1 November 1972, PISGRG, folder 1.3.

  47. 47.

    Draft Constitution of The International Society for General Relativity and Gravitation, attached to the letter from Mercier to the members of the ICGRG, 18 November 1972, PISGRG, folder 1.2.

  48. 48.

    Constitution of the International Society for General Relativity and Gravitation (as finalized by the ICGRG at its meeting in Paris on 22 June 1973), International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation Records, 1961–1982, AR235, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library and Archives, College Park, MD.

  49. 49.

    Mercier to Relativists throughout the World, 10 October 1973, PISGRG, folder 1.4.

  50. 50.

    Mercier to Christian Møller, 7 January 1974, PISGRG, folder 1.4.

  51. 51.

    Mercier to Members at large of the International Society on GRG, 28 March 1974. International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation Records, 1961–1982, AR235, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library and Archives, College Park, MD.

  52. 52.

    H. -J. Treder to Møller, 17 June 1971, GR6P, Box M-Z.

References

  • Aspelmeyer, M., Brukner, Č., Giulini, D., & Milburn, G. (2017). Focus on gravitational quantum physics. New Journal of Physics, 19, 050401. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa6fdc.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartusiak, M. (2015). Black hole: How an idea abandoned by Newtonians, hated by Einstein, and gambled on by Hawking became loved. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, P. G. (1956). Fifty years of relativity. Science, 123, 486–494.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardini, G. (1968). The origin of the European physical society. Physics Today, 25, 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3070996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. S., & Rickles, D. (Eds.). (2018). Quantum gravity in the first half of the twentieth century. Berlin: Edition Open Sources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., Giulini, D., Lalli, R., & Renn, J. (2017). Editorial introduction to the special issue “The renaissance of Einstein’s theory of gravitation.” The European Physical Journal H, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80023-3.

  • Blum, A. S., Lalli, R., & Renn, J. (2015). The reinvention of general relativity: A historiographical framework for assessing one hundred years of curved space-time. Isis, 106, 598–620.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. S., Lalli, R., & Renn, J. (2016). The renaissance of general relativity: How and why it happened. Annalen der Physik, 528, 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201600105.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. S., Lalli, R., & Renn, J. (2018). Gravitational waves and the ‘long relativity revolution’. Nature Astronomy, 2, 534–543.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bockris, J. O’M. (1991). The founding of the international society for electrochemistry. Electrochimica Acta, 36, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(91)85171-3.

  • Bonolis, L. (2017). Stellar structure and compact objects before 1940: Towards relativistic astrophysics. The European Physical Journal H, 42, 311–393. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80014-4.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, D. (1986). Understanding the history of special relativity. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 16, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/27757561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, C. M., & Rickles, D. (Eds.). (2011). The role of gravitation in physics: Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill conference. Berlin: Edition Open Sources.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt-Morette, C. (2011). The pursuit of quantum gravity: Memoirs of Bryce DeWitt from 1946 to 2004. Heidelberg: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J., & Glymour, C. (1980). Relativity and eclipses: The British eclipse expeditions of 1919 and their predecessors. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 11, 49–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/27757471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstaedt, J. (1986). La relativité générale à l’étiage: 1925–1955. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 35, 115–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357624.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstaedt, J. (1989). The low water mark of general relativity, 1925–1955. In D. Howard & J. Stachel (Eds.), Einstein and the history of general relativity (pp. 277–292). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, R. (1994). History of IUPAC, 1919–1987. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, T. F. (Ed.). (1987). The comparative reception of relativity. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goenner, H. F. M. (2004). On the history of unified field theories. Living Reviews in Relativity, 7, 2. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2004-2.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goenner, H. F. M. (2014). On the history of unified field theories. Part II. (ca. 1930–ca. 1965). Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 5. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-5.

  • Goldberg, J. N. (1992). US Air Force support of general relativity 1956–72. In J. Eisenstaedt & A. J. Kox (Eds.), Studies in the history of general relativity (pp. 89–102). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, F. (1996). Science international: A history of the International Council of Scientific Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. T. (2007). Writing scientific biography. Journal of the History of Biology, 40, 727–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutfreund, H., & Renn, J. (2017). The formative years of relativity: The history and meaning of Einstein’s Princeton lectures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Held, A., Leutwyler, H., & Bergmann, P. G. (1978). To André Mercier on the occasion of his retirement. General Relativity and Gravitation, 9, 759–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00760862.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel, K. (1990). Interpretationen und Fehlinterpretationen der speziellen und der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie durch Zeitgenossen Albert Einsteins. Boston: Birkhäuser.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, A., Belloni, L., Mersits, U., Pestre, D., & Krige, J. (1987). History of CERN, Volume I: Launching the European Organization for nuclear research. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollings, C. D. (2016). Scientific communication across the iron curtain. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1969). Einstein, Michelson, and the “Crucial” experiment. Isis, 60, 133–197.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, K. (2002). Science after stalin: Forging a new image of soviet science. Science in Context, 15, 317–338.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D. (1998). A ψ is just a ψ? Pedagogy, practice, and the reconstitution of general relativity, 1942–1975. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 29, 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00010-0.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D. (2000). Making theory: Producing physics and physicists in postwar America. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D. (2002). Cold war requisitions, scientific manpower, and the production of American physicists after World War II. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 33, 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsps.2002.33.1.131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D. (2012). Booms, busts, and the world of ideas: Enrollment pressures and the challenge of specialization. Osiris, 27, 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/667831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D., & Rickles, D. (2018). The price of gravity: Private patronage and the transformation of gravitational physics after World War II. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 48, 338–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennefick, D. (2007). Traveling at the speed of thought: Einstein and the quest for gravitational waves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kennefick, D. (2012). Not only because of theory: Dyson, Eddington, and the competing myths of the 1919 eclipse expedition. In C. Lehner, J. Renn, & M. Schemmel (Eds.), Einstein and the changing worldviews of physics (pp. 201–232). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khalatnikov, I. M. (2012). From the Atomic Bomb to the Landau Institute: Autobiography. Top Non-Secret. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, H. (1996). Cosmology and controversy: The historical development of two theories of the universe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, H. (1999). Quantum generations: a history of physics in the twentieth century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lalli, R. (2016). ‘Dirty work’, but someone has to do it: Howard P. Robertson and the refereeing practices of physical review in the 1930s. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 70, 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2015.0022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalli, R. (2017). Building the general relativity and gravitation community during the cold war. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichnerowicz, A. (1992). Mathematics and general relativity: A recollection. In J. Eisenstaedt & A. J. Kox (Eds.), Studies in the history of general relativity (pp. 103–108). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichnerowicz, A., & Tonnelat, M.-A. (Eds.). (1962). Les théories relativistes de la gravitation. Paris: Éd. du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longair, M. S. (2006). The cosmic century: A history of astrophysics and cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J.-P. (2019). Soviet science as cultural diplomacy during the Tbilisi conference on general relativity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University History, 64, 120–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, W. H. (1955). Jubilee of relativity theory: Conference at Berne. Nature, 176, 330. https://doi.org/10.1038/176330a0.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A. (1950). De la science à l’art et à la morale. Paris: Neuchatel Éditions du Griffon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A. (1959). De l’amour et de l’etre. Paris: Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A. (1968). On the foundation of man’s rights and duties. Man and World, 1, 524–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A. (1970). Editorial. General Relativity and Gravitation, 1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759197.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A. (1979). Birth and rôle of the GRG-organization and the cultivation of international relations among scientists in the field. In P. C. Aichelburg & R. U. Sexl (Eds.), Albert Einstein: His influence on physics, philosophy and politics (pp. 177–188). Braunschweig: Vieweg Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91080-6_13.

  • Mercier, A. (1983). André Mercier, physicien et métaphysicien. Berne: Institut des sciences exactes de l’Université de Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A. (1992). General relativity at the turning point of its renewal. In J. Eisenstaedt & Anne J. Kox (Eds.), Studies in the history of general relativity (pp. 109–121). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A., & Kervaire, M. (Eds.). (1956). Fünfzig Jahre Relativitätstheorie: Jubilee of relativity theory. Helvetica Physica Acta. Supplementum IV. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, A., & Schaer, J. (1962). General information. Bulletin on General Relativity and Gravitation, 1, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983127.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Misner, C. W. (2010). John Wheeler and the recertification of general relativity as true physics. In I. Ciufolini & R. A. Matzner (Eds.), General relativity and John Archibald Wheeler (pp. 9–27). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3735-0_2.

  • Newman, E. T. (2005). A biased and personal description of GR at Syracuse University, 1951–61. In A. J. Kox & J. Eisenstaedt (Eds.), The universe of general relativity (pp. 373–383). Boston: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, J. D. (1965). The measure of the universe: A history of modern cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, W. (1956). Schlußwort den Präsidenten der Konferenz. In A. Mercier & M. Kervaire (Eds.), Fünfzig Jahre Relativitätstheorie: Jubilee of relativity theory (pp. 261–267). Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, W. (1999). Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg u.a. Band IV, Teil II: 1953–1954. In K. Meyenn (Ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peebles, P. J. E. (2017). Robert Dicke and the naissance of experimental gravity physics, 1957–1967. The European Physical Journal H, 42, 177–259. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2016-70034-0.

  • Renn, J. (2007). The genesis of general relativity. Dordrecht: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rickles, D. (2011). The chapel hill conference in context. In C. M. DeWitt & D. Rickles (Eds.), The role of gravitation in physics: Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill conference (pp. 7–21). Berlin: Edition Open Sources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, I., Schild, A., & Schucking, E. L. (Eds.). (1965). Quasi-stellar sources and gravitational collapse, including the proceedings of the First Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryckman, T. (2005). The reign of relativity: Philosophy in physics 1915–1925. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schucking, E. L. (2008). The first texas symposium on relativistic astrophysics. Physics Today, 42, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweber, S. S. (2006). Einstein and Oppenheimer: Interactions and intersections. Science in Context, 19, 513–559.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shortland, M., & Yeo, R. (1996). Introduction. In M. Shortland & R. Yeo (Eds.), Telling lives in science: Essays on scientific biography (pp. 1–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sponsel, A. (2002). Constructing a ‘revolution in science’: The campaign to promote a favourable reception for the 1919 solar eclipse experiments. The British Journal for the History of Science, 35, 439–467.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M. (2003). “An expedition to heal the wounds of war”: The 1919 Eclipse and Eddington as quaker adventurer. Isis, 94, 57–89. https://doi.org/10.1086/376099.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, B. J. (2009). The coproduction of neutral science and neutral state in cold war Europe: Switzerland and international scientific cooperation, 1951–69. Osiris, 24, 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/605974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenberg, H. (2000). From CITCE to ISE. Electrochimica Acta, 45, xxvii–xxviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, K. S. (1994). Black holes and time warps: Einstein’s outrageous legacy. New York: WW Norton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tromp, S. (1960). Report of the secretary-treasurer. International Journal of Bioclimatology and Biometeorology, 4, 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dongen, J. (2010). Einstein’s unification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. A., & Ford, Kenneth. (2000). Geons, Black Holes, and quantum foam: A life in physics. New York: WW Norton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Will, C. M. (1989). The renaissance of general relativity. In P. Davies (Ed.), The new physics (pp. 7–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, C. M. (1993). Was Einstein right? Putting general relativity to the test (2nd ed.). New York, NY: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (2017). Science’s imagined pasts. Isis, 108, 814–826. https://doi.org/10.1086/695603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. S. (2014). The advantages of bringing infinity to a finite place. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 44, 99–139. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2014.44.2.99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Lalli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lalli, R. (2020). The Multiple Lives of the General Relativity Community, 1955–1974. In: Forstner, C., Walker, M. (eds) Biographies in the History of Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48509-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics