Skip to main content

Assessment of Energy and Emission Reduction Measures in Container Terminals using PROMETHEE for Portfolio Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operations Research Proceedings 2019

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

Abstract

In this paper we present an approach to assess energy and emission reduction measures in container terminals. A modified PROMETHEE V approach is used to select suitable portfolios of these measures based on the decision makers preferences and further inter-dependencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barbati, M., Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Panaro, S.: A Multiple Criteria Methodology for Prioritizing and Selecting Portfolios of Urban Projects (13.12.2018). http://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.10410v2

  2. Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B.: Promethee methods. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 163–186. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.: Note—a preference ranking organisation method: (the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manag. Sci. 31(6), 647–656 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 233, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. IHATEC—Innovative Hafentechnologien: Sustenergyport—simulationsbasierte bewertung von maßnahmen zur steigerung der energienachhaltigkeit im hafenbetrieb (2017). https://www.innovativehafentechnologien.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Projektsteckbrief_SustEnergyPort.pdf

  6. Klöpffer, W., Grahl, B.: Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice. Wiley, New York (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Mladineo, M., Veza, I., Gjeldum, N.: Solving partner selection problem in cyber-physical production networks using the humant algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(9), 2506–2521 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pictet, J., Bollinger, D.: The silent negotiation or how to elicit collective information for group MCDA without excessive discussion. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 13(5–6), 199–211 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scharpenberg, C., Pohl, E., Lauven, L.P., Geldermann, J.: Ecological assessment of port equipment for container terminals. In: Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL) 2018, pp. 3–20. epubli (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Pohl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pohl, E., Scharpenberg, C., Geldermann, J. (2020). Assessment of Energy and Emission Reduction Measures in Container Terminals using PROMETHEE for Portfolio Selection. In: Neufeld, J.S., Buscher, U., Lasch, R., Möst, D., Schönberger, J. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2019. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48439-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics