Abstract
Soil consumption refers to the decrease of fertile soil, naturalness, occupation of agricultural space for extra-agricultural uses, for urban diffusion, for the expansion of the urban footprint, for landscape contamination, for the loss of quality and beauty. The Environmental Terminology and Discovery Service (ETDS) of the European Environment Agency identifies unambiguous definitions of the concepts and indicators inherent to the consumption of the soil, in particular: Land Use, Land Cover, Landscape Fragmentation, Soil Sealing, Urban Sprawl and Land Take. The interpretative possibilities and the consequent effects on the physical planning choices of the territory are neither trivial nor discounted. Information sources are essential for monitoring the consumption of land, recording its evolution over time and space. About 50% of the world population lives in the cities, in Europe this percentage rises to 80% at least. Almost 70% of harmful emissions is caused by the cities even though the urbanized areas occupy only 2% of the earth’s surface. According to the United Nations, within the 2030, 59% of the world population will be concentrated in urban areas (Global Report on Human Settlements 2011). For these reasons, the battle for a sustainable development takes place in the cities and especially in the areas of urban/metropolitan suburbs and urban sprawl. There are two categories of interventions to counteract these effects: compensation actions to mitigate the effects and preventive measures to tackle the causes. Both represent the aims of urban planning. In order to contribute to the debate on the formalization of new eco-planning techniques, the paper offers an interpretive reading of the environmental sustainability criteria applicable to urban planning. The revision of the classical economistic finalization of the dynamics of transformation requires the search for new settlement patterns. The city itself extends more and more into the territory even if it changes the concept of the traditional city: changes new cities with a proper integration between the new and the existing one.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cities and Biodiversity Outlook, p. 12. http://bit.ly/1p9nemW (2012). UN, World Urbanization Prospects, p.13. http://bit.ly/1p9nemW. EC (2014 Revision), Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing, p. 55. http://bit.ly/1gPhvig (2012)
UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2016. Urbanization and development. Emerging futures, UN-Habitat, Nairobi (2016)
Salzano, E.: Fondamenti di Urbanistica, p. 7. Roma-Bari, Laterza Edizioni (2004)
European Commission: Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2012)
European Commission: ESPD European Spatial Development Perpective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1999)
Prokop, G., et al.: Overview of best practices for limiting soil sealing or mitigating its effects in EU-27 Final Report. Technical Report for European Commission (2011)
European Commission: Overview of best practices for limiting soil sealing or mitigating its effects in EU-27, SWD (2012) 101. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2012)
European Environment Agency, Joint Research Centre: The State of Soil in Europe. A contribution of the JRC to the European Environment Agency’s Environment State and Outlook Report, SOER 2010. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg (2012)
European Environment Agency: The European environment. State and outlook 2010. Land use, EEA, Copenhagen, 2010a. European Environment Agency, The European environment. State and outlook 2010. Soil, EEA, Copenhagen (2010b)
European Environment Agency, Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge EEA, Copenhagen (2006b)
ISTAT - Population and housing census, Roma (2011)
Andreucci, M.B.: Progettare Green Infrastructure, pp. 69–70. Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano (2017)
Cusinato, A.: Una ipotesi interpretativa della frammentazione urbana. In: XXV Conferenza Italiana di Scienze Regionali (2004). https://aisre.it/images/old_papers/023-Cusinato.PDF
Vidal, R.: MetrĂ³polis en recomposiciĂ³n: elementos para una teorĂa de la fragmentaciĂ³n urbana. Observatorio GeogrĂ¡fico de AmĂ©rica Latina (1997)
Volpe, C.: Frammentazione Urbana (2018). https://carminevolpe.wordpress.com/2018/02/22/frammentazione-urbana/
Urban Index - Indicatori per le Politiche Urbane. https://www.urbanindex.it/. Accessed 31 Jan 2020
Ecologiae. http://ecologiae.com/ecologia-del-paesaggio/25838/. Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Childe, G.: Man Makes Himself. Watts and Co., London (1936)
Yeang, K.: Ecomasterplanning, pp. 15–39. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., London (2009)
Farr, D.: Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with Nature, pp. 182–384. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Hoboken (2008)
Losco, S.: Urban planning and environmental dimension: the sustainable quarter. Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl. 36, 41–49 (2012). Coral Gables - Miami
Losco, S.: Campagne urbanizzate e periferie metropolitane: Un Parco agricolo-urbano nell’area nord della provincia di Napoli, pp. 1648–1678. Topscape Paysage (2012)
Losco, S.: Quando non si valutava: urbanesimo e periferie negli ultimi quattro decenni. In: Colombo, L., Losco, S., Bernasconi, F., Pacella, C., (a cura di): L. Colombo, Pianificazione Urbanistica e Valutazione Ambientale, pp. 89–148 (2012)
Secchi, B.: Un problema urbano: l’occasione dei vuoti. In: Casabella, vol. 503, pp. 18–31. Milano (1984)
Robson, B.: Those Inner Cities. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)
Reicher, C, Kunzmann, K.R., Polivka, F., Roost, F., Utku, Y. (eds.) Schichten einer Region. KartenstĂ¼cke zur räumliken Struktur des Rhurgebeits, pp. 130–131 (2011)
Giani, E.: Concept Ruhr-Operazione Landschaftspark-Emscher Park. Parco del paesaggio. In: Giornale IUAV, no.134, pp. 1–7. Venezia (2013)
Tira, M.: Per un assetto territoriale a geometria variabile. UPL J. Urban Plan. Landscape Environ. Des. 1(1), 257–272 (2016). Department of Architecture University of Naples Federico II, Naples
Losco, S, Macchia, L.: Ecologia e Pianificazione del Territorio verso l’Eco-Planning. In: Aa, V (ed.) Atti della XXI Conferenza Nazionale SIU-Società Italiana degli Urbanisti, Confini, Movimenti Luoghi. Politiche e progetti per città e territori in transizione, Firenze, 6–8 giugno 2018, pp. 1–10. Planum Publisher, Roma- Milano (2019)
Losco, S.: Teoria e Tecnica nella Pianificazione Urbanistica: Temi e questioni emergenti, In: (a cura di): Losco, S.: Teoria e Tecnica nella Pianificazione Urbanistica. Tradizione e innovazione. In: Documenti per un dibattito, vol. 1, pp. 104–140. Poseidon Editore, Napoli (2003)
Colombo, L.: Il metodo in Urbanistica. Tradizione e rinnovamento nel piano, pp. 158–162. Masson Editore, Milano (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Losco, S., de Biase, C. (2021). Land Consumption Versus Urban Regeneration. In: Bevilacqua, C., CalabrĂ², F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48278-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48279-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)