Skip to main content

Land Consumption Versus Urban Regeneration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (NMP 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 178))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Soil consumption refers to the decrease of fertile soil, naturalness, occupation of agricultural space for extra-agricultural uses, for urban diffusion, for the expansion of the urban footprint, for landscape contamination, for the loss of quality and beauty. The Environmental Terminology and Discovery Service (ETDS) of the European Environment Agency identifies unambiguous definitions of the concepts and indicators inherent to the consumption of the soil, in particular: Land Use, Land Cover, Landscape Fragmentation, Soil Sealing, Urban Sprawl and Land Take. The interpretative possibilities and the consequent effects on the physical planning choices of the territory are neither trivial nor discounted. Information sources are essential for monitoring the consumption of land, recording its evolution over time and space. About 50% of the world population lives in the cities, in Europe this percentage rises to 80% at least. Almost 70% of harmful emissions is caused by the cities even though the urbanized areas occupy only 2% of the earth’s surface. According to the United Nations, within the 2030, 59% of the world population will be concentrated in urban areas (Global Report on Human Settlements 2011). For these reasons, the battle for a sustainable development takes place in the cities and especially in the areas of urban/metropolitan suburbs and urban sprawl. There are two categories of interventions to counteract these effects: compensation actions to mitigate the effects and preventive measures to tackle the causes. Both represent the aims of urban planning. In order to contribute to the debate on the formalization of new eco-planning techniques, the paper offers an interpretive reading of the environmental sustainability criteria applicable to urban planning. The revision of the classical economistic finalization of the dynamics of transformation requires the search for new settlement patterns. The city itself extends more and more into the territory even if it changes the concept of the traditional city: changes new cities with a proper integration between the new and the existing one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cities and Biodiversity Outlook, p. 12. http://bit.ly/1p9nemW (2012). UN, World Urbanization Prospects, p.13. http://bit.ly/1p9nemW. EC (2014 Revision), Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing, p. 55. http://bit.ly/1gPhvig (2012)

  2. UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2016. Urbanization and development. Emerging futures, UN-Habitat, Nairobi (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salzano, E.: Fondamenti di Urbanistica, p. 7. Roma-Bari, Laterza Edizioni (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission: Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission: ESPD European Spatial Development Perpective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prokop, G., et al.: Overview of best practices for limiting soil sealing or mitigating its effects in EU-27 Final Report. Technical Report for European Commission (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission: Overview of best practices for limiting soil sealing or mitigating its effects in EU-27, SWD (2012) 101. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Environment Agency, Joint Research Centre: The State of Soil in Europe. A contribution of the JRC to the European Environment Agency’s Environment State and Outlook Report, SOER 2010. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Environment Agency: The European environment. State and outlook 2010. Land use, EEA, Copenhagen, 2010a. European Environment Agency, The European environment. State and outlook 2010. Soil, EEA, Copenhagen (2010b)

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Environment Agency, Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge EEA, Copenhagen (2006b)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISTAT - Population and housing census, Roma (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andreucci, M.B.: Progettare Green Infrastructure, pp. 69–70. Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cusinato, A.: Una ipotesi interpretativa della frammentazione urbana. In: XXV Conferenza Italiana di Scienze Regionali (2004). https://aisre.it/images/old_papers/023-Cusinato.PDF

  14. Vidal, R.: MetrĂ³polis en recomposiciĂ³n: elementos para una teorĂ­a de la fragmentaciĂ³n urbana. Observatorio GeogrĂ¡fico de AmĂ©rica Latina (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Volpe, C.: Frammentazione Urbana (2018). https://carminevolpe.wordpress.com/2018/02/22/frammentazione-urbana/

  16. Urban Index - Indicatori per le Politiche Urbane. https://www.urbanindex.it/. Accessed 31 Jan 2020

  17. Ecologiae. http://ecologiae.com/ecologia-del-paesaggio/25838/. Accessed 1 Feb 2020

  18. Childe, G.: Man Makes Himself. Watts and Co., London (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yeang, K.: Ecomasterplanning, pp. 15–39. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Farr, D.: Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with Nature, pp. 182–384. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Hoboken (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Losco, S.: Urban planning and environmental dimension: the sustainable quarter. Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl. 36, 41–49 (2012). Coral Gables - Miami

    Google Scholar 

  22. Losco, S.: Campagne urbanizzate e periferie metropolitane: Un Parco agricolo-urbano nell’area nord della provincia di Napoli, pp. 1648–1678. Topscape Paysage (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Losco, S.: Quando non si valutava: urbanesimo e periferie negli ultimi quattro decenni. In: Colombo, L., Losco, S., Bernasconi, F., Pacella, C., (a cura di): L. Colombo, Pianificazione Urbanistica e Valutazione Ambientale, pp. 89–148 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Secchi, B.: Un problema urbano: l’occasione dei vuoti. In: Casabella, vol. 503, pp. 18–31. Milano (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robson, B.: Those Inner Cities. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reicher, C, Kunzmann, K.R., Polivka, F., Roost, F., Utku, Y. (eds.) Schichten einer Region. KartenstĂ¼cke zur räumliken Struktur des Rhurgebeits, pp. 130–131 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Giani, E.: Concept Ruhr-Operazione Landschaftspark-Emscher Park. Parco del paesaggio. In: Giornale IUAV, no.134, pp. 1–7. Venezia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tira, M.: Per un assetto territoriale a geometria variabile. UPL J. Urban Plan. Landscape Environ. Des. 1(1), 257–272 (2016). Department of Architecture University of Naples Federico II, Naples

    Google Scholar 

  29. Losco, S, Macchia, L.: Ecologia e Pianificazione del Territorio verso l’Eco-Planning. In: Aa, V (ed.) Atti della XXI Conferenza Nazionale SIU-Società Italiana degli Urbanisti, Confini, Movimenti Luoghi. Politiche e progetti per città e territori in transizione, Firenze, 6–8 giugno 2018, pp. 1–10. Planum Publisher, Roma- Milano (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Losco, S.: Teoria e Tecnica nella Pianificazione Urbanistica: Temi e questioni emergenti, In: (a cura di): Losco, S.: Teoria e Tecnica nella Pianificazione Urbanistica. Tradizione e innovazione. In: Documenti per un dibattito, vol. 1, pp. 104–140. Poseidon Editore, Napoli (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Colombo, L.: Il metodo in Urbanistica. Tradizione e rinnovamento nel piano, pp. 158–162. Masson Editore, Milano (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Losco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Losco, S., de Biase, C. (2021). Land Consumption Versus Urban Regeneration. In: Bevilacqua, C., CalabrĂ², F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics