Skip to main content

Enabling Inclusive Occupational Therapy through the Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources, and Environments (CORE) Approach

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Inclusion

Abstract

Occupation, or the things that people do in life that are meaningful, purposeful, and accord dignity, is a complex phenomenon. Globally, people participate in occupations every day in contexts that support and enable such participation, or constrain and militate against it. When one considers occupational participation as being fundamental to social inclusion, this is an important area for research and transformative practice. This is especially true in the profession of occupational therapy where social inclusion has been identified as an end goal of person- and community-centered action for some time. In this chapter, the authors introduce the concept of inclusive occupational therapy, and consider such a process in context with viewing practice through an inclusive lens, and doing occupational justice work which upholds and promotes the occupational and human rights of people seeking to equitably participate in occupations. The chapter then present narratives from applied research to demonstrate how lived experiences of entrenched disadvantage characterized by poverty, disability, and other social complexities, could be transformed through doing occupational justice work using the Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources, and Environments (CORE) approach, which is introduced and considered against the narratives. Linking theory and research to inclusive and strengths-based practice through the CORE approach can promote inclusive occupational therapy and enable the “ends” of social inclusion through culturally and contextually sensitive – as well as appropriate – means. Finally, the authors contend that the CORE approach can inform person- and community-centered practices aimed at tackling occupational injustices, and enhancing peoples’ capabilities to do, be, become, belong, aspire, and flourish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angell, A. M., Frank, G., & Solomon, O. (2016). Latino families’ experiences with autism services: Disparities, capabilities, and occupational justice. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216666062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailliard, A. (2016). Justice, difference, and the capability to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.957886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailliard, A., & Aldrich, R. (2017). Occupational justice in everyday occupational therapy practice. In N. Pollard & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders: Integrating justice with practice (Vol. 2, pp. 83–94). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailliard, A. L., Dallman, A. R., Carroll, A., Lee, B. D., & Szendrey, S. (2020). Doing occupational justice: A central dimension of everyday occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 87(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419898930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, D. D., Ghirardi, M. I. G., Lopes, R. E., & Galheigo, S. (2011). Brazilian experiences in social occupational therapy. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders, Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices (pp. 209–215). Edinburgh: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. L., Pereira, R. B., Byrnes, J., Guida, A., Gielen, C., & Stevens, J. (2019). Exploring clinician and consumer experiences of integrated, values-based care within the hospital admission risk program. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(S1), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakman, A. (2007). Occupation and social complexity. Journal of Occupational Science, 14(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2007.9686588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. G. (2013). Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(3), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2012.754492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A., & Bray-Jones, K. (2017). Occupational therapy intervention process model. In J. Hinojosa, P. Kramer, & C. Royeen (Eds.), Perspectives on human occupation: Theories underlying practice (2nd ed., pp. 237–286). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, A. J. (2015). Sharpening our critical edge: Occupational therapy in the context of marginalized populations. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417415571730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2008). Reflections on…wellbeing and occupational rights. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 61–64. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2015a). Occupational rights and critical occupational therapy: Rising to the challenge. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62, 449–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2015b). Participation and occupation: The need for a human rights perspective. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417414567636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2015c). Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2017). Opportunities for Well-being: The right to occupational engagement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(4–5), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417417734831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2018). Considering the possibility of globally relevant occupational therapy. Ergoterapeuten, 4, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2020a). Ações nos determinantes sociais de saúde: avançando na equidade ocupacional e nos direitos ocupacionais [Action on the social determinants of health: Advancing occupational equity and occupational rights]. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 28(1), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoARF2052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W. (2020b). Engagement in living: Critical perspectives on occupation, rights, and wellbeing. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammell, K. W., & Iwama, M. K. (2012). Well-being and occupational rights: An imperative for critical occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19, 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselkus, B. R. (2011). The meaning of everyday occupation (2nd ed.). Thorofare: SLACK Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, C. (2017). Occupational justice as social justice: The moral claim for inclusion. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1294016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, C. (2020). Occupation in context: A reflection on environmental influences on human doing. Journal of Occupational Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1708434.

  • Hocking, C., & Hammell, K. W. (2017). Process of assessment and evaluation. In M. Curtin, M. Egan, & J. Adams (Eds.), Occupational therapy for people experiencing illness, injury or impairment: Promoting occupation and participation (7th ed., pp. 171–184). Edinburgh: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, C., & Townsend, E. (2015). Driving social change: Occupational therapists’ contributions to occupational justice. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 71(2), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1179/2056607715Y.0000000002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2019). Re-imagining occupational therapy clients as communities: Presenting the community-centred practice framework. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1423374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kantartzis, S. (2019). The Dr Elizabeth Casson memorial lecture 2019: Shifting our focus. Fostering the potential of occupation and occupational therapy in a complex world. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(9), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022619864893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnakumar, J., & Nogales, R. (2015). Public policies for wellbeing with justice: A theoretical discussion based on capabilities and opportunities. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(3), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i3.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiepek, N. C., Beagan, B., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Phelan, S. (2019). Silences around occupations framed as unhealthy, illegal, and deviant. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1499123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, B. H. (2015). Muriel driver lecture 2015 – Transforming values into action: Advocacy as a professional imperative. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(4), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417415601395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte Rudman, D., & Aldrich, R. (2016). “Activated, but stuck”: Applying a critical occupational lens to examine the negotiation of long-term unemployment in contemporary socio-political contexts. Societies, 6(28), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6030028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, M., Cooper, B., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749606300103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, N. A. (2014). Sylvia Docker lecture: The practice, research, policy nexus in contemporary occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 61(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malfitano, A. P. S., de Souza, R. G. d. M., Townsend, E. A., & Lopes, R. E. (2019). Do occupational justice concepts inform occupational therapists’ practice? A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419833409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malfitano, A. P., Lopes, R. E., Magalhães, L., & Townsend, E. A. (2014). Social occupational therapy: Conversations about a Brazilian experience. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(5), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417414536712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malfitano, A. P. S., & Lopes, R. E. (2018). Social occupational therapy: Committing to social change. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(1), 20–26. Retrieved from https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=779763971754213;res=IELNZC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, T., Dharamsi, S., Forwell, S., & Dean, E. (2015). Occupational therapists’ views of Nussbaum’s life capability: An exploratory study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(4), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449215601010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, T., Forwell, S., Dharamsi, S., & Dean, E. (2015a). Conceptualizing occupation using the capabilities approach. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, T., Forwell, S., Dharamsi, S., & Dean, E. (2015b). Occupational therapists’ views of Nussbaum’s practical reason and affiliation capabilities. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2014.1003265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, T., Forwell, S., Dharamsi, S., & Dean, E. (2015c). The historical shift towards human rights in occupational therapy with special reference to the capabilities approach and its implications. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 71(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1179/2056607715Y.0000000005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, B. E. (1997). Including hope in occupational therapy practice: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(3), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.51.3.228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. (2012). The potential of occupational therapy services for students with disabilities within tertiary education settings. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(5), 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.01037.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. (2013). The politics of participation: A critical occupational science analysis of social inclusion policy and entrenched disadvantage (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sydney: Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. (2014). Using critical policy analysis in occupational science research: Exploring Bacchi‘s methodology. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.806207.

  • Pereira, R. B. (2015a). A critical occupational science analysis of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS): Implications for occupational therapy and capability enablement. Paper presented at the occupational therapy Australia 26th National Conference and exhibition, Melbourne, July 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. (2015b). Occupare, to seize: Expanding the potential of occupation in contemporary practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62(3), 208–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. (2017). Towards inclusive occupational therapy: Introducing the CORE approach for inclusive and occupation-focused practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(6), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. (2020). Participating in telehealth is a complex occupation. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 67(3), 284–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. & Naismith, J. (2018). Applying the capabilities, opportunities, resources and environments (CORE) approach to the inclusive occupational therapy process: Introducing a new Australian values-based practice model. Paper presented at the occupational therapy Australia VIC-TAS regional conference, Melbourne, June 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. & Whiteford, G. (2012). Where economics meets occupational science: Expanding occupational deprivation discourse through Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Paper presented at the Canadian Society of Occupational Scientists Conference, Edmonton, May 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B., & Whiteford, G. E. (2013). Understanding social inclusion as an international discourse: Implications for enabling participation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802213X13603244419392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B. & Whiteford, G. E. (2020). Advancing understandings of inclusion and participation through situated research. In H. van Bruggen, S. Kantartzis & N. Pollard (Eds.), And a seed was planted – Occupation based approaches for social inclusion – Volume one: Theoretical views and shifting perspectives (Critical Studies in Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science; pp. 129–145). London: Whiting & Birch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B., Byrnes, J., Brown, T. L., & Stevens, J. (2018). A mixed-methods study into the quality and effectiveness of a regional care coordination service for people living with complex needs: Implications for inclusive occupational therapy. Paper presented at the occupational therapy Australia VIC-TAS regional conference Melbourne, June 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B., Whiteford, G., Hyett, N., Weekes, G., Di Tommaso, A., & Naismith, J. (2020). Capabilities, opportunities, resources and environments (CORE): Using the CORE approach for inclusive, occupation-centred practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 67(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, R. B., Brown, T. L., Guida, A., Hyett, N., Nolan, M., Oppedisano, L., Riley, K., & Walker, G. (2021). Consumer experiences of care coordination for people living with chronic conditions and other complex needs: An inclusive and co-produced research study. Australian Health Review, 45(4), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20108.

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500120491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadnyk, R. L., Townsend, E. A., & Wilcock, A. A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 328–358). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taff, S. D., Bakhshi, P., & Babulal, G. M. (2014). The accountability–well-being–ethics framework: A new philosophical foundation for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(5), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417414546742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, E. A., Beagan, B., Kumas-Tan, Z., Versnel, J., Iwama, M., Landry, J., Stewart, D., & Brown, J. (2007). Enabling: Occupational therapy’s core competency. In E. A. Townsend & H. J. Polatajko (Eds.), Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, Well-being, & justice through occupation (pp. 87–171). Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centred practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Paris: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Available: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf

  • Whiteford, G. (2011). From occupation deprivation to social inclusion: Retrospective insights. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(12), 545–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G. (2014). Enacting occupational justice in research and policy development. In D. Pierce (Ed.), Occupational science for occupational therapy (pp. 169–178). Thorofare: SLACK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G., Jones, K., Rahal, C., & Suleman, A. (2018). The participatory occupational justice framework as a tool for change: Three contrasting case narratives. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(4), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1504607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G., & Townsend, E. (2011). Participatory occupational justice framework (POJF 2010): Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders – Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices (pp. 65–84). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G., Townsend, E., Bryanton, O., Wicks, A., & Pereira, R. (2017). The participatory occupational justice framework: Salience across contexts. In N. Pollard & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders: Integrating justice with practice (Vol. 2, pp. 163–174). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G. E. (2019). Sylvia docker memorial lecture: Together we go further – Service co-design, knowledge co-production and radical solidarity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(6), 682–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G. E., & Pereira, R. B. (2012). Occupation, inclusion and participation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 187–207). Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, A. A., & Hocking, C. (2015). An occupational perspective of health (3rd ed.). Thorofare: Slack.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, A. A., & Townsend, E. A. (2009). Occupational justice. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. Boyt Schell (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 192–199). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2019). WFOT Position Statement: Occupational Therapy and Human Rights (revised). Available: https://wfot.org/resources/occupational-therapy-and-human-rights

  • World Federation of Occupational Therapists (2021). About occupational therapy. Retrieved from https://wfot.org/about/about-occupational-therapy

  • World Health Organization (2020). Social determinants of health. Available: https://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/

  • Wright-St Clair, V., & Seedhouse, D. (2005). The moral context of practice and professional relationships. In G. Whiteford & V. Wright-St Clair (Eds.), Occupation & practice in context (pp. 16–33). Marrickville: Elsevier Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerxa, E. J. (1991). Seeking a relevant, ethical, and realistic way of knowing for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert B. Pereira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pereira, R.B., Whiteford, G.E. (2021). Enabling Inclusive Occupational Therapy through the Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources, and Environments (CORE) Approach. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Social Inclusion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48277-0_97-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48277-0_97-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48277-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48277-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics