Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Through a “Route Planner”: Human-Computer Information Retrieval for Automatic Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology Supported Innovations in School Education

Part of the book series: Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age ((CELDA))

  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents innovative technologies for enhancing web-based strategies available to educators willing to enhance students’ self-paced and self-regulated learning processes for scientific education. Various strategies for clarifying and disseminating shared resources and structured domain models help human experts in planning appropriate educational paths for individual learners: the chapter focuses on methodologies for organizing automatic assessment resources on top of natural language metadata. Learning management systems enable interaction, content integration, and communication via collaboration tools; they are environments where instructors expand formative assessment and web-based teaching strategies in virtual communities of practice. System integrations enable to organize and dispatch digital contents: clustering techniques, formal concept analysis, natural language processing, and knowledge representation models are new means for adaptively providing students with online activities. Theoretical bases from up-to-date studies for augmenting human-computer interaction at community level start from a generic framework for e-learning systems, up to practical implications and potential of related researches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adjei, S., Botelho, A., & Heffernan, N. (2016). Predicting student performance on post-requisite skills using prerequisite skill data: An alternative method for refining prerequisite skill structures. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, LAK ‘16 (p. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, A. (2005). Stakeholders in web-based education. In Encyclopedia of distance learning (Vol. 19). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc (IGI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., & Bloom, B. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, US: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(1), 292–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Brancaccio, A., Marchisio, M., & Pardini, C. (2015). L’efficacia della metodologia del “problem posing and solving” con l’utilizzo delle tic nella didattica della matematica e delle materie tecnico-scientifiche. Bricks, 5(3), 106–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Conte, A., Marchisio, M., Fioravera, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018). A model of formative automatic assessment and interactive feedback for STEM. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 42nd annual computer software and applications conference, COMPSAC 2018 (pp. 1016–1025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018a). Developing competence assessment systems in e-learning communities. In Proceedings of EDEN 2018 annual conference (pp. 879–888).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018b). Ontology development for competence assessment in virtual communities of practice. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on artificial intelligence in education, AIED 2018 (pp. 94–98).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018c). Sharing system of learning resources for adaptive strategies of scholastic remedial intervention. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on higher education advances, HEAd’18 (pp. 1495–1503).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Fioravera, M., & Marchisio, M. (2017). Developing problem solving competences through the resolution of contextualized problems with an advanced computing environment. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on higher education advances, HEAd’17, (pp. 1015–1023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2017). Adaptive teaching supported by ICTs to reduce the school failure in the project “Scuola Dei Compiti”. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 41st annual computer software and applications conference, COMPSAC 2017 (pp. 432–437).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., & Marchisio, M. (2015). “Testi digitali interattivi” per il recupero nella matematica nel progetto per la riduzione della dispersione scolastica “Scuola Dei Compiti”. Form@re – Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 15, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., & Marchisio, M. (2016). Ten good reasons to adopt an automated formative assessment model for learning and teaching mathematics and scientific disciplines. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 608–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., & Marchisio, M. (2018). Developing problem solving competences with CLIL methodology through innovative technologies. In Proceedings of EM&M ITALIA 2018 multi conference (pp. 30–37).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barana, A., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2015). Automated assessment in mathematics. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 39th annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC) (pp. 670–671).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, P., & Campbell, L. (2010). Metadata for learning materials: An overview of existing standards and current developments. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning. (vol. 7(3–4), pp. 225–243).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, P., & Campbell, L. (2016). Technology strategies for open educational resource dissemination. In P. Blessinger & T. Bliss (Eds.), Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education, Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beevers, C., & Paterson, J. (2003). Automatic assessment of problem-solving skills in mathematics. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4, 127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, US: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst, W. (1997). Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse, Enschede, NL: Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourekkache, S., & Kazar, O. (2009). Agent-based approach for e-learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) (vol.4(4), pp.57–63).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourekkache, S., Kazar, O., Kahloul, L., Aloui, A., & Benharkat, A.-N. (2015). Semantic annotation approach using ontology for e-learning. In Proceedings of the 5th international symposium ISKO-Maghreb knowledge organization in the perspective of digital humanities: Researches and applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancaccio, A., Demartini, C., Marchisio, M., Pardini, C., & Patrucco, A. (2014). Il progetto pp&s. informatica a scuola. Mondo Digitale, 565–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancaccio, A., Esposito, M., Marchisio, M., & Pardini, C. (2016). L’efficacia dell’apprendimento in rete degli immigrati digitali. l’esperienza smart per le discipline scientifiche. Mondo Digitale, 15, 803–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancaccio, A., Marchisio, M., Palumbo, C., Pardini, C., Patrucco, A., & Zich, R. (2015). Problem posing and solving: Strategic Italian key action to enhance teaching and learning mathematics and informatics in the high school. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 39th annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC) (vol. 2, pp. 845–850).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavagnero, S., Gallina, M., & Marchisio, M. (2015). Scuola dei compiti. didattica digitale per il recupero dell’insuccesso scolastico. Mondo Digitale, 14, 834–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-M., Peng, C.-J., & Shiue, J.-Y. (2008). Ontology-based concept map for planning personalized learning path. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE conference on cybernetics and intelligent systems (1337–1342).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, A., Segovia Cifuentes, Y., & Yadira Rincón Rodríguez, H. (2007). Toward an instructional design model based on learning objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 671–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comoglio, M. (2018). Insegnare e valutare competenze, proceedings of the seminar “valutare e certificare le competenze” in la valutazione degli apprendimenti (3a ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J., Gianopulos, G., McGowan, W., Shah, M., & Belcher, M. (2017). Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49, 717–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. [Online; last accessed 2019, March 31] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:32006H0962

  • Council of the European Union. (2018). Council recommendation of 22 may 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (text with EEA relevance). [Online; last accessed 2019, March 31] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)

  • De Marcos, L., Pagés, C., Martínez, J., & Mesa, J. (2007). Competency-based learning object sequencing using particle swarms. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (pp. 111–116).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M., & Navigli, R. (2009). A software engineering approach to ontology building. Information Systems, 34(2), 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2017). A model for structuring shared learning materials within a virtual community. In Proceedings of EM&M ITALIA 2018 Multi conference (pp. 613–621).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018a). A model for enriching automatic assessment resources with free-text annotations. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference CELDA 2018, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 186–193).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018b). Alignment of content, prerequisites and educational objectives: Towards automated mapping of digital learning resources. In Proceedings of the 14th international scientific conference eLearning and software for education, eLSE 2018 (pp. 335–342).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018c). Towards adaptive systems for automatic formative assessment in virtual learning communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 42nd annual computer software and applications conference, COMPSAC 2018 (pp. 1000–1005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietze, S., Sanchez-Alonso, S., Ebner, H., Yu, H., Giordano, D., Marenzi, I., & Pereira Nunes, B. (2013). Interlinking educational resources and the web of data – a survey of challenges and approaches. Emerald Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K., Linder, J. R., & Dooley, L. M. (2006). Advanced methods in distance education: Applications and practices for educators, administrators and learners, chapter VII (pp. 118–131)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan, D., & Nirmala, K. (2016). Semantic search of e-learning documents using ontology based system. International Journal of Business Intelligents, 5, 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizarov, A., Kirillovich, A., Lipachev, E., Nevzorova, O., Solovyev, V., & Zhiltsov, N. (2014). Mathematical knowledge representation: Semantic models and formalisms. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics., 35, 348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizarov, A., Zhizhchenko, A., Zhil’tsov, N., Kirillovich, A., & Lipachev, E. (2016). Mathematical knowledge ontologies and recommender systems for collections of documents in physics and mathematics. Doklady Mathematics, 3(2), 231–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Press release – commission presents new rethinking education strategy. [Online; last accessed 2019, March 31] http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-1233_en.htm

  • Fernández-López, M., Gomez-Perez, A., & Juristo, N. (1997). Methontology: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. Engineering Workshop on Ontological Engineering (AAAI97).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1968). Learning hierarchies. Classic Writings on Instructional Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganter, B., & Wille, R. (1997). Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R. (2016). Metadata: Shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerry, S., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning, chapter XIV (pp. 479–500). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierl, M., Changjiang, W., & Jiawen, Z. (2008). Using the attribute hierarchy method to make diagnostic inferences about examinees’ cognitive skills in algebra on the sat©. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment (vol. 48(2), pp. 165–187).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Jaurena, I., & Softic, S. (2016). Aligning learning outcomes and assessment methods: A web tool for e-learning courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, L. (2010). What teachers really need to know about formative assessment. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. (1994). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (vol. 43(5–6), pp. 907–928).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N., Oberle, D., & Staab, S. (2019). What is an ontology? chapter I (pp. 1–17). Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, W. (2009). An ontology-based e-learning scenario. In Methods and applications for advancing distance education technologies: International issues and solutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). ‘Distance education’ and ‘e-learning’: Not the same thing. Higher Education, 49, 467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heras, J., Pascual, V., & Rubio, J. (2009). Using open mathematical documents to interface computer algebra and proof assistant systems. In Proceedings of intelligent computer mathematics. CICM 2009. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5625, pp. 467–473).

    Google Scholar 

  • Humm, B., & Ossanloo, H. (2017). Cost-effective semi-automatic ontology development from large domain terminology. In Proceedings of collaborative European research conference, CERC 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatov, D. (2015). Introduction to formal concept analysis and its applications in information retrieval and related fields. In Proceedings of the Russian Summer School in Information Retrieval, RuSSIR 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihantola, P. (2011). Automated assessment of programming assignments: Visual feedback, assignment mobility, and assessment of students’ testing skills. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science of Aalto University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ion, P., Trott, M., Weisstein, E., & Wiedijk, F. (2016). White paper – Semantic representation of mathematical knowledge workshop. [Online; last accessed 2019, March 31] http://www.fields.utoronto.ca//sites/default/files/whitepaper.pdf

  • Ivanova, T. (2011). Adaptive open corpus e-learning and authoring, using collaborative ontology learning. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE international conference on Emerging E-learning Technologies and Applications, ICETA 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, T., & Ivanova, M. (2011). Ontology-driven e-learning system in support of knowledge gathering. In Proceedings of the 7th international scientific conference E-learning and software for education.

    Google Scholar 

  • JJackson, P., & Moulinier, I. (2003). Natural language processing for online applications: Text retrieval, extraction and categorization. Computational Linguistics (vol. 29(3), pp. 510–511).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K., & Dubes, R. C. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. New York, US: Pearson College Div.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Grabinger, S., & Harris, N. (1990). Analyzing and selecting instructional strategies and tactics. Originally published in 1991, PIQ 4.2. Performance Improvement Quarterly (vol. 10(1), pp. 34–54).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamareddine, F., & Wells, J. (2008). Computerizing mathematical text with mathlang. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 205, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, B. (2008). Campus content: An infrastructure for sharing and reuse of teaching experience and e-content. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society (vol. 4, pp. 133–156).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniriho, P., & Effendi, A. (2018). Examining the performance of k-means clustering algorithm. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management (vol. 1, pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maple T.A. 10 Online Help. (2015). Maple T.A. Instructor help – Question designer. [Online; last accessed 2019, March 31] https://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/MapleTA2017/MapleTAInstructor/ch04s03.aspx#ManagingContent_QuestionDesigner

  • Marchisio, M., Barana, A., Fioravera, M., Brancaccio, A., Esposito, M., Pardini, C., & Rabellino, S. (2017). Problem solving competence developed through a virtual learning environment in a European context. In Proceedings of the international scientific conference E-learning and software for education, eLSE 2017 (pp. 455–463).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín, A., & León, C. (2012). An intelligent e-learning scenario for knowledge retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE global engineering education conference, EDUCON 2012 (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, A., Parsons, S., & Cohen Burrowbridge, S. (2010). Preparing teachers for high-needs schools: A focus on thoughtfully adaptive teaching. Bank Street Occasional Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitkov, R., & Navigli, R. (2016). Ontologies. In The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, C., & Brookhart, S. (2012). Learning targets: Helping students aim for understanding in today’s lesson. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouromtsev, D., Kozlov, F., Parkhimovich, O., & Zelenina, M. (2013). Development of an ontology-based e-learning system. In P. Klinov & D. Mouromtsev (Eds.) Knowledge Engineering and the Semantic Web. KESW 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science (vol. 394, pp. 273–280). Heidelberg, GE: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, H., Kerr, D., Iseli, M., & Zaniolo, C. (2014). Harvesting Domain Specific Ontologies from Text. In the Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (pp. 211–218).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Smith, T., Garden, R., Gregory, K., Gonzalez, E., et al. (2003). 2003 TIMSS assessment frameworks and specifications (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevzorova, O., Zhiltsov, N., Kirillovich, A., & Lipachev, E. (2014). OntoMathPRO ontology: A linked data hub for mathematics. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on knowledge engineering and the semantic web, KESW 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, N., & Mcguinness, D. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Knowledge Systems Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, R. (2017). A review of tools and techniques for data-enabled formative assessment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(4), 505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagael, R. and Schubotz, M. (2014). Mathematical language processing project. In Proceedings of the MathUI, OpenMath and ThEdu Workshops and Work in Progress track at CICM 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phobun, P., & Vicheanpanya, J. (2010). Adaptive intelligent tutoring systems for e-learning systems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4064–4069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, J. (2011). Transformative assessment in action: An inside look at applying the process. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proitz, T. (2010). Learning outcomes: What are they? Who defines them? When and where are they defined? Educational Assessment. Evaluation and Accountability, 22(2), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaee Harandi, S. (2015). Effects of e-learning on students’ motivation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences (vol. 181, pp. 432–430).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons. SAGE Open, 6, 215824401668068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasila, A., Harjula, M., & Zenger, K. (2007). Automatic assessment of mathematics exercises: Experiences and future prospects. The second ReflekTori 2007 symposium of Engineering Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasila, A., Malinen, J., & Tiitu, H. (2015). On automatic assessment and conceptual understanding. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 34, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravotto, P., Fulantelli, G., & Oprea, L. (2011). Preparing the teachers for a competence-based education system. Galati, RO: Europlus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, L., Ballejos, L., Gutiérrez, M., & Caliusco, M. (2015). Stakeholder’s analysis in e-learning software process development. EAI Endorsed Transactions on e-Learning, 2(5), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasu, R., & Thyagharajan, K. K. (2014). Concept-based annotation and retrieval of e-learning materials. WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies, 60, 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubotz, M., Grigorev, A., Leich, M., Cohl, H., Meuschke, N., Gipp, B., Youssef, A. S., & Markl, V. (2016). Semantification of identifiers in mathematics for better math information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 39th international ACM SIGIR conference (pp. 135–144).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmelev, V., Karpova, M., & Dukhanov, A. (2015). An approach of learning path sequencing based on revised bloom’s taxonomy and domain ontologies with the use of genetic algorithms. Procedia Computer Science, 66, 711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. In P. Durlach & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education (pp. 7–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalka, J., & Drlík, M. (2018). Conceptual framework of microlearning-based training mobile application for improving programming skills. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interactive collaborative learning (pp. 213–224).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skopljanac Macina, F., & Blaskovic, B. (2014). Formal concept analysis - overview and applications. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1258–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. (1977). Individual differences and instructional theory. Educational Researcher, 6, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeiro, A., Lossenko, J., Softic, S., & Gil-Jaurena, I. (2014). Time to assess learning outcomes in e-learning (TALOE) – e-assessment practices. In Proceedings of EDEN 2014 annual conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovyev, V., & Zhiltsov, N. (2011). Logical structure analysis of scientific publications in mathematics. In Proceedings of the international conference on web intelligence, mining and semantics, WIMS 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, A., & Richard Movik, H. (2017). Atomized feedback, an approach to automatic formative assessment. In Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference of education (pp. 5206–5214).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger, C. (2017). In search of reusable educational resources in the web. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on higher education advances, HEAd’17 (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, V., Lam, E., & Fung, S. (2014). A new framework of concept clustering and learning path optimization to develop the next-generation e-learning systems. Journal of Computers in Education, 1, 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms. New York, US: Pearson College Div.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinchero, R. (2017). Costruire e certificare competenze con il curricolo verticale nel primo ciclo. Milano, IT: Rizzoli Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugsgerel, B., Anane, R., & Theodoropoulos, G. (2010). An integrated approach to learning object sequencing. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, ICALT 2010 (pp. 105–109).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Li, X., Lei, W., Huang, C., Yin, M., & Pong, T.-C. (2015). Constructing learning maps for lecture videos by exploring Wikipedia knowledge. Proceedings of the Pacific Rim conference on Multimedia, PCM 2015, pages 559–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, S. (2016). How to build a global digital mathematics library. In 2016 18th international symposium on symbolic and numeric algorithms for scientific computing (SYNASC) (pp. 37–40).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. (2014). Bloom’s taxonomy in mathematics education. In Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 63–68). Dordrecht, NE: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Tian, Y. (2015). A comprehensive survey of clustering algorithms. Annals of Data Science, 2, 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, A. (2017). Part-of-math tagging and applications. In Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent computer mathematics 2017 (pp. 356–374).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Kwon, Y., Kramer, J., Kim, E., & Agogino, A. (2017). Concept clustering in design teams: A comparison of human and machine clustering. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(11).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Turin (TO), Italy

    Michele Fioravera & Marina Marchisio

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Turin, Turin (TO), Italy

    Luigi Di Caro & Sergio Rabellino

Authors
  1. Michele Fioravera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina Marchisio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luigi Di Caro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergio Rabellino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Fioravera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems and Technology Management (ISTM) School, UNSW Sydney, Kensington Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Pedro Isaias

  2. Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, Bentley, Perth, WA, Australia

    Demetrios G. Sampson

  3. Learning, Design and Technology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Dirk Ifenthaler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., Di Caro, L., Rabellino, S. (2020). Learning Through a “Route Planner”: Human-Computer Information Retrieval for Automatic Assessment. In: Isaias, P., Sampson, D.G., Ifenthaler, D. (eds) Technology Supported Innovations in School Education. Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48194-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48194-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48193-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48194-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation