Abstract
PBL researchers confirm that scaffolding is an essential tool to support students during the problem-solving process. However, PBL has traditionally been conducted in face-to-face settings using collaborative learning groups. Less is known regarding the successful implementation and facilitation of PBL in online learning environments. This chapter explains how an interactive content development tool was used to design, develop, implement, and evaluate three self-directed, computer-based modules to support scaffolding in an online graduate-level course utilizing problem-/project-based learning (PBL). Design-based research was used to study the effectiveness of the learning materials. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed to assess the utility of computer-supported scaffolding in assisting students in conceptual and domain-specific knowledge and skills of argumentation. The results show that conceptual hard scaffolds provided an opportunity for students to question their knowledge when solving the problem and encouraged them to dig deeper into the content. However, students’ reasoning skills did not seem to improve in the first iteration of the learning materials.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrows, H. S. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
Barrows, H. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & W. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. New Directions For Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–9. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barrows, H. S. (1996a). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–9.
Barrows, H. S. (1996b). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–9.
Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding in STEM education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0.
Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Armbrust, S., & Cook, B. (2013). Using generic and context-specific scaffolding to support authentic science inquiry. In Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2013) (pp. 185–192). Fort Worth: IADIS.
Belland, B. R., Walker, A., Kim, N., & Lefler, M. (2014). A preliminary meta-analysis on the influence of scaffolding characteristics and study and assessment quality on cognitive outcomes in STEM education. Presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Québec City, Canada.
Belland, B. R., Walker, A., Olsen, M. W., & Leary, H. (2015). A pilot meta-analysis of computer-based scaffolding in STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 183–197.
Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12.
Cho, K., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22.
Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819–837.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39, 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02205.x.
Ge, X., Planas, L. G., & Er, N. (2010). A cognitive support system to scaffold students’ problem-based learning in a web-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1093.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 115–140). Mahway: Erlbaum Publishers.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 215–239). New York: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 95–119.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, K., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313–351.
Kumar, R., & Refaei, B. (2017). Problem-based learning pedagogy fosters students’ critical thinking about writing. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1670.
Means, B. (1994). Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2–16.
Protopsaltis, S., & Baum, S. (2019). Does online education live up to its promise? A look at the evidence and implications for federal policy. Retrieved from https://mason.gmu.edu/~sprotops/OnlineEd.pdf
Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
Quintana, C., Eng, J., Carra, A., Wu, H.-K., & Soloway, E. (1999). Symphony: A case study in extending learner-centered design through process space analysis. In M. G. Williams, M. W. Altom, K. Ehrlich, & W. Newman (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI 99 conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 473–480). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.
Savery, J. R. (2009). Problem-based approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). New York: Routledge.
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–96.
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45, 792–806.
Şendağ, S., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2009). Effects of an online problem-based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 53(1), 132–141.
Simons, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Scaffolding disciplined inquiry in problem-based environments. International Journal of Learning, 12(6), 297–305.
Sockalingam, N., Rotgans, J., & Schmidt, H. (2011). Student and tutor perceptions on attributes of effective problems in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 62(1), 1–16.
Swanson, H. L., & Deshler, D. (2003). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: Converting a meta-analysis to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940303600205.
Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321–363. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002321.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). What students learn in problem-based learning: A process analysis. Instructional Science, 40(2), 371–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moallem, M., Igoe, E. (2020). Problem-Based Learning and Computer-Based Scaffolds in Online Learning. In: Isaias, P., Sampson, D.G., Ifenthaler, D. (eds) Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48190-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48190-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48189-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48190-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)