Abstract
Independent system operators (ISOs) plan the electric power transmission system over large geographic areas. A wide range of modeling tools is available, including production cost planning models, large-scale optimization models, and reliability models. Each model addresses different aspects of the optimal planning process. This paper reviews the current approach for transmission planning and investment in a competitive environment and presents a modeling approach for regional planning and investment in a competitive generation environment. The framework proposed can be used in an auction to award investment contracts or as a part of a more detailed policy analysis. The result yields the set of transmission projects that have the highest expected benefits, while also representing generic generation expansions.
Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or the USA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See also Léautier’s chapter in this book (chapter “Regulated Expansion of the Power Transmission Grid”).
- 2.
See also Vogelsang’s paper in this book (chapter “A Simple Merchant-Regulatory Incentive Mechanism Applied to Electricity Transmission Pricing and Investment: The Case of H-R-G-V”).
References
M. Alguacil, Conejo, Transmission expansion planning: a mixed-integer LP approach. Power Syst. IEEE Trans. 18(3), 1070–1077 (2003)
Astrape Consulting, The Economic Ramifications of Resource Adequacy. For EISPC and NARUC Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (2013)
L. Bahiense, G.C. Oliveira, M. Pereira, S. Granville, A mixed integer disjunctive model for transmission network expansion. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16(3), 560–565 (2001)
M.L. Baughman, S.N. Siddiqi, J.W. Zarnikau, Integrating transmission into IRP part I: analytical approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 10(3), 1652–1659 (1995)
T. Bone, The Disconnect Between Transmission Policies and Planning. California Public Utilities Commission (2018)
E. Boyd, Power Sector Modeling (2016). www.energy.gov/ta
T. Clark, Order No. 1000 at the Crossroads: Reflections on the Rule and Its Future (2018). https://www.wbklaw.com/uploads/file/Articles-%20News/2018%20articles%20publications/WBK-%20TC-Order%201000%20whitepaper%20Final.pdf
S. De la Torre, A.J. Conejo, J. Contreras, Transmission expansion planning in electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23(1) (February 2008)
Y.P. Dusonchet, A. El-Abiad, Transmission planning using discrete dynamic optimizing. Syst. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. PAS-92(4), 1358–1371 (1973)
H. Faria, Jr., S. Binato, M.G. Resende, D.M. Falcão, Transmission network design by greedy randomized adaptive path relinking, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(1) (February 2005)
E.B. Fisher, R.P. O’Neill, M.C. Ferris, Optimal transmission switching. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23(3), 1346–1355 (2008)
R.A. Gallego, A. Monticelli, Transmission system expansion planning by simulated annealing. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 11(1), 364–369 (1996)
R.A. Gallego, A. Monticelli, R. Romero, Transmission system expansion planning by an extended genetic algorithm. IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. 145(3), 329–335 (1998)
L.L. Garver, Transmission network estimation using linear programming. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. PAS-89(7), 1688–1697 (1970)
K.W. Hedman, R.P. O’Neill, E.B. Fisher, S.S. Oren, Optimal transmission switching—sensitivity analysis and extensions. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23(3), 1469–1479 (2008)
K.W. Hedman, R.P. O’Neill, E.B. Fisher, S.S. Oren, Optimal transmission switching with contingency analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24(3), 1577–1586 (2009)
K.W. Hedman, M.C. Ferris, R.P. O’Neill, E.B. Fisher, S.S. Oren, Co-optimization of generation unit commitment and transmission switching with N-1 reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(2), 1052–1063 (2010)
M.R. Hesamzadeh, J. Rosellón, S.A. Gabriel, I. Vogelsang, A simple regulatory incentive mechanism applied to electricity transmission pricing and investment. Energy Economics 75, 423–439 (2018)
W. Hogan, Transmission Cost Allocation (Presentation to the Harvard Electricity Policy Group, 2010)
S. Huntoon, Reliability Costs Fox-Henhouse Regulation (RTO Insider, 2019)
P.L. Joskow, R. Schmalensee, Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electrical Utility Deregulation (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1983)
A.K. Kazerooni, J. Mutale, Transmission network planning under security and environmental constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(2), 1169–1178 (2010)
S.O. Kimbrough, F. Murphy, Y. Smeers, Extending Cournot: When Does Insight Dissipate?, Fox School of Business Research Paper No. 14-036 (October 15, 2014)
T.-O. Léautier, Regulation of an electric power transmission company. Energy J. 21(4) (2000)
T.-O. Léautier, V. Thelen, Optimal expansion of the power transmission grid: why not? J. Regul. Econ. 36, 127–153 (2009)
M. Loeb, W.A. Magat, A decentralized method for utility regulation. J. Law Econ. 22(2), 399–404 (1979)
S.C. Littlechild, E.A. Ponzano, Transmission Expansion in Argentina 5 The Regional Electricity Forum of Buenos Aires Province (2 December 2007). http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/1810/195431/1/0762&EPRG0729.pdf
A. Liu, B.H. Hobbs, J. Ho, J.D. McCalley, V. Krishnan, M. Shahidehpour, Q. P. Zheng, Co-optimization of Transmission and Other Supply Resources (Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2013)
E. Nicholson, M. Stone, D. Powers, Building New Transmission Experience To-Date Does Not Support Expanding Solicitations, prepared for: Ameren, Eversource Energy, ITC Holdings Corp., National Grid USA, and PSE&G (June 2019)
R.P. O’Neill, P.M. Sotkiewicz, B.F. Hobbs, M.H. Rothkopf, W.R. Stewart Jr., Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164(1), 269–285 (2005a)
R.P. O’Neill, R. Baldick, U. Helman, M.H. Rothkopf, W. Stewart, Dispatchable transmission in RTO markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20, 171–179 (2005b)
R.P O’Neill, E.A. Krall, K.W. Hedman, S.S. Oren. A model and approach to the challenge posed by optimal power systems planning. Math. Program. Ser. B 140, 239–266 (2013)
J. Pfeifenberger, J. Chang, A. Sheilendranath, Transmission Competition Under FERC Order No. 1000: What we Know About Cost Savings to Date (October 25, 2018)
R. Romero, A. Monticelli, A hierarchical decomposition approach for transmission network expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 9(1), 373–380 (1994)
E.E. Sauma, S.S. Oren, Economic criteria for planning transmission investment in restructured electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(4) (2007)
R. Villasana, L.L. Garver, S.J. Salon, Transmission network planning using linear programming. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-104(2), 349–356 (1985)
I. Vogelsang, Can simple regulatory mechanisms realistically be used for electricity transmission investment? The case of H-R-G-V. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 7(1) (2018)
H.P Young, Cost Allocation: Methods, Principles, Applications, North-Holland (1985)
H.P. Young, Equity: In Theory and Practice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Glossary
- B/C
-
Expected benefit/expected cost ratio
- DFAX
-
Distribution factor
- EPAct
-
Energy Policy Act
- ERIS
-
Energy resource interconnection service
- FGR
-
Flowgate right that entitles the holder to the marginal value of a flowgate (FMV)
- Flowgate
-
A transmission line or collection of tightly interconnected transmission assets
- FMV
-
Flowgate marginal value is the value of another unit of capacity on the flowgate
- FTR
-
Financial transmission right obligation to pay/receive the difference in nodal energy prices. It is a portfolio of purchases and sale of flowgate rights. The value of the portfolio is determined by the flowgate marginal values
- FUA
-
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act
- IPP
-
An independent power producer not owned by the interconnected utility
- ISO
-
Independent system operator (an RTO is also an ISO.)
- LGIA
-
Large generator interconnection agreement
- NITS
-
Network Integration Transmission Service allows a network customer to integrate and economically dispatch and regulate its current and planned network resources to serve its network load in a manner comparable to the way a transmission provider uses its transmission system to serve its native load customers. Order No. 676-H, 2014
- NRIS
-
Network resource interconnection service
- OATT
-
Open access transmission tariff
- Option FTR
-
Financial transmission right the right to receive flowgate rights. It is a portfolio of purchases and subsequent sale of flowgate rights
- PMU
-
Phasor measurement unit
- Pseudo tie
-
is a transmission service that allows the generator to be dispatched by the receiving BA. The energy transfer is updated in real time and included in the actual net interchange term like tie line in the affected BAs’ control ACE equations or alternate (NERC)
- PURPA
-
Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act
- RAS
-
Remedial action scheme that generally relies on control mechanisms to satisfy reliability
- Resource adequacy
-
Occurs when all generators are available there is enough generation to serve forecasted non-price-responsive load and have sufficient reserves taking into account the transmission constraints and outages
- RTO
-
Regional transmission operator
- Specific delivery
-
is a contract between a generator and load that requires energy injected into the system to be delivered to the load. This is physically impossible except in simple systems. A milder form of contract requires the injections correspond to the withdrawals
- Sunk cost
-
is a cost that has already been incurred and has no value in an alternative use
- TLR
-
Transmission line loading relief
- TO
-
Transmission owner
- VOLL
-
Value of lost load
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Neill, R.P. (2020). Transmission Planning, Investment, and Cost Allocation in US ISO Markets. In: Hesamzadeh, M.R., Rosellón, J., Vogelsang, I. (eds) Transmission Network Investment in Liberalized Power Markets. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 79. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47929-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47929-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47928-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47929-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)