Skip to main content

Social Media and the Concept of Dissidence in Zimbabwean Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The History and Political Transition of Zimbabwe

Part of the book series: African Histories and Modernities ((AHAM))

Abstract

Zimbabwe’s founding president, Robert Mugabe, was ousted following a military coup led by now vice-president, Constantine Chiwenga (former Zimbabwe National Army commander) and foreign affairs minister Sibusiso Moyo (then Major-General), with a civilian face of the incumbent president Emmerson Mnangagwa. Other than the toppling of political actors closely linked to Mugabe’s last days, largely christened Generation 40 (G40), three prominent names being Professor Jonathan Moyo, Savior Kasukuwere and Patrick Zhuwao, the regime has not registered any departure from the late Mugabe’s despotic rule. Miles-Tendi (“The Motivations and Dynamics of Zimbabwe’s 2017 Military Coup”, African Affairs, 2019) and Chap. 8 of this volume succinctly debunk the myth that Mnangagwa was propelled into power by what was largely described by the media and diplomatic circles in Zimbabwe and beyond as a military assisted transition, instead of what it really was: a military coup. The sharpening of dictatorship under Mnangagwa has worsened polarisation, which is extensively explored in Chap. 4. In fact, there is convincing evidence to show that Zimbabwe has regressed from civilian dictatorship to military dictatorship. For the first time since independence, and twice under Mnangagwa’s rule, civilians were shot at with live ammunition within a six-month period (August 2018 and January 2019) claiming at least 18 lives and injuring hundreds. At the centre of this is the death of independent media and independent journalism, which gave an alternative voice and view, as some journalists have become part of the regime’s propaganda drive. This change in the media landscape did not occur in a vacuum. In December 2017, the independent Alphamedia Holdings (AMH) group became the outright owner after a New York-based non-profit group, Media Development Investment Fund (MDIF), ceded its shareholding, preferring to retain full control of the South African-based Mail and Guardian. The departure of MDIF forced AMH to reconfigure its approach to covering Zimbabwe’s complex politics, and this has seen the company’s owner, Trevor Ncube, becoming part of the state, and by extension part of the governance structure of the Zimbabwe African National Union–Patriotic Front, under a controversial structure, the Presidential Advisory Council. There were strong indications that Mnangagwa’s son in law, Gerald Mlotshwa, is buying a stake in AMH, which will further undermine the paper’s independence. Ruhanya (Journal of African Media Studies 10: 201–214, 2018) has extensively looked at the political economy of private media, largely the Associated Newspapers of Zimbabwe that publishes the Daily News and AMH’s NewsDay/Southern Eye, the Zimbabwe Independent and The Standard, which helps to explain the reconfiguration of state actors and private media’s relations. These changes, to a greater extent, leave Zimbabwe with depleted space for articulating alternative views, with social media offering a ray of hope. It is within this context that this chapter is located.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, K.N., and R. Medaglia. 2009. The Use of Facebook in National Election Campaigns: Politics as Usual? In International Conference on Electronic Participation, 101–111. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P.S. 2012. US Support for Democracy in Authoritarian Regimes. Near East South Asia Center for Strategic Studies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atton, C., and H. Mabweazara. 2011. New Media and Journalism Practice in Africa: An Agenda for Research. Journalism 12 (6): 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banda, F. 2010. Citizen Journalism & Democracy in Africa. An Exploratory Study, 1–93. Grahamstown: Highway Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, T. 2010. Digital Journalism and Online Public Spheres in South Africa. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research 36 (2): 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, G.M., Jr. 2010. Netnography: A Method Specifically Designed to Study Cultures and Communities Online. The Qualitative Report 15 (5): 1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2010. The Information Age. Media Studies: A Reader 2 (7): 152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, G. 2014. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. London/New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltart, D. 2017. The Struggle Continues: 50 Years of Tyranny in Zimbabwe. Auckland: Jacana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H. 2014. Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship. Information Communication and Society 17 (2): 279–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. 2003. Why the Net Is Not a Public Sphere. Constellations 10 (1): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plooy, G.M. 2009. Communication Research: Techniques, Methods and Applications. Cape Town: Juta and Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards, J., and M.S. Schäfer. 2010. Is the Internet a Better Public Sphere? Comparing Old and New Media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society 12 (1): 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. 2010. Small Change. The New Yorker 4 (2010): 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, N. 2012. The Subtle Nature of Facebook Politics: Swedish Social Network Site Users and Political Participation. New Media & Society 14 (7): 1111–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1962. English translation 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwami, M. 2012. Settlers, Sell-Outs and Sons of the Soil: The Creation of Aliens in Zimbabwe and the Challenge for Higher Education. Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry 4 (1): 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. 2000. Globalization and New Social Movements: Lessons for Critical Theory and Pedagogy. na.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. American Nightmare: Donald Trump, Media Spectacle, and Authoritarian Populism. Vol. 117. Springer: The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mare, A. 2014. Social Media: The New Protest Drums in Southern Africa? In Social Media in Politics, 315–335. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mascaro, C.M., and S.P. Goggins. 2011. Brewing Up Citizen Engagement: The Coffee Party on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (pp. 11–20). ACM, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuka, B., T. Matenda, J. Chipomho, N. Mapope, S. Mupeti, S. Tatsvarei, and W. Ngezimana. 2016. Mobile Phone Use by Small-Scale Farmers: A Potential to Transform Production and Marketing in Zimbabwe. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 44 (2): 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matingwina, S. 2018. Social Media Communicative Action and the Interplay with National Security: The Case of Facebook and Political Participation in Zimbabwe. African Journalism Studies 39 (1): 48–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsilele, T. 2019. Social Media Dissidence in Zimbabwe. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. University of Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazango, E. 2005. Media Games and Shifting of Spaces for Political Communication in Zimbabwe. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 2: 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlambo, A.S. 2006. The Zimbabwean Crisis and International Response. Journal for Contemporary History 31 (2): 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. 2009. Citizen Journalism and the Parallel Market of Information in Zimbabwe’s 2008 Election. Journalism Studies 10 (4): 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, L. 2011. Blogging Down a Dictatorship: Human Rights, Citizen Journalists and the Right to Communicate in Zimbabwe. Journalism 12 (6): 745–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpofu, S. 2014. Public and Diasporic Online Media in the Discursive Construction of National Identity: A Case of ‘Zimbabwe’. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutsvairo, B. 2016. Digital Activism in the Social Media Era. New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mutsvairo, B., and L.A. Sirks. 2015. Examining the Contribution of Social Media in Reinforcing Political Participation in Zimbabwe. Journal of African Media Studies 7 (3): 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, A.C. 1966. The Story of Our South African Flag. Cape Town: Purnell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftopoulos, B. 2000. The Labour Movement and the Emergence of Opposition Politics in Zimbabwe. Labour, Capital and Society/Travail, capital et société, pp. 256–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape, D., and L. Spencer. 2003. The Foundations of Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Research Practice, ed. J. Ritchie and J. Lewis. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1994. Grounded Theory Methodology. Handbook of qualitative research 17: 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, D. 2009. Dissent Made Safer-How anonymity technology could save free speech on the Internet. Technology Review, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J., and R.W. Copson. 2005. Zimbabwe: Current Issues. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, W. 2019. ‘The Politics of Things’: Digital Media, Urban Space, and the Materiality of Publics. Media, Culture & Society, p. 0163443719831594.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mpofu, S., Matsilele, T. (2020). Social Media and the Concept of Dissidence in Zimbabwean Politics. In: Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J., Ruhanya, P. (eds) The History and Political Transition of Zimbabwe. African Histories and Modernities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47733-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47733-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47732-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47733-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics