Skip to main content

Assessment of Fetal Growth in Twins and Multiple Pregnancy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Twin and Higher-order Pregnancies
  • 632 Accesses

Abstract

Twins and higher-order multiple pregnancies are at higher risk of perinatal complications. Due to the nature of multiple pregnancies, abdominal palpation and symphysial-fundal height measurements cannot be reliably used to monitor their growth. Ultrasound is currently the best tool for growth surveillance, and due to the high complication rates, this must be performed on a regular basis. The traditional practice is to use singleton growth charts to track the growth velocity of multiples; however, these pregnancies do not follow the same trend in growth. Therefore, it is recommended to use twin-specific growth charts to ensure accurate growth assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gielen M, Lindsey PJ, Derom C, Loos RJ, Souren NY, Paulussen AD, Zeegers MP, Derom R, Vlietinck R, Nijhuis JG. Twin-specific intrauterine ‘growth’ charts based on cross-sectional birthweight data. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008;11:224–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Min SJ, Luke B, Min L, Misiunas R, Nugent C, Van de Ven C, Martin D, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Eardley S, Witter FR, Mauldin JG, Newman RB. Birth weight references for triplets. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):809–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine; ACOG Joint Editorial Committee. ACOG Practice Bulletin #56. Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:869–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Twin and triplet pregnancy. NICE clinical guideline 137. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morin L, Lim K. Ultrasound in twin pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33:643–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Antonio F, Odibo AO, Prefumo F, Khalil A, Buca D, Flacco ME, Liberati M, Manzoli L, Acharya G. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Townsend R, Khalil A. Twin pregnancy complicated by selective growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;28(6):485–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Valsky DV, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, Crispi F, Gratacós E. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management dilemmas. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15:342–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Townsend R, Khalil A. Fetal growth restriction in twins. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;49:79–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton E, Platt R, Morin L, Usher R, Kramer M. How small is too small in a twin pregnancy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:682–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D’Antonio F, Thilaganathan B. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):301–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D’Antonio F, Thilaganathan B. STORK. Patterns of Second and Third Trimester growth and discordance in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41(2):100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalafat E, Sebghati M, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):193–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander G, Kogan M, Martin J, Papiernik E. What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41(1):115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blickstein I, Jacques D, Keith L. Total and individual triplet birth weights as function of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1372–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vora NL, Ruthazer R, House M, Chelmow D. Triplet ultrasound growth parameters. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(3):694–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khalil A, D’Antonio F, Dias T, Cooper D, Thilaganathan B. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:210–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sklar C, Yaskina M, Ross S, Naud K. Accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in detecting growth abnormalities in triplets: a retrospective cohort study. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2017;20(1):84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;128:881–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181:129–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. ISUOG. Practice guidelines: the role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:247–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mari G, Hanif F. Fetal doppler: umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and venous system. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32:253–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman C, Galan HL. Assessing the ‘at-risk’ fetus: Doppler ultrasound. Med Sci Res. 2009;21:161–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaponis A, Harada T, Makrydimas G, Kiyama T, Arata K, Adonakis G, Harada T. The importance of venous doppler velocimetry for evaluation of intrauterine growth restriction. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:529–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aditya I, Tat V, Sawana A, Mohamed A, Tuffner R, Mondal T. Use of Doppler velocimetry in diagnosis and prognosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): a review. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2016;9(2):117–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. D’Antonio F, Khalil A, Dias T, Thilaganathan B. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:643–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khalil A, Beune I, Hecher K, Wynia K, Ganzevoort W, Reed K, Lewi L, Oepkes D, Gratacós E, Thilaganathan B, Gordijn SJ. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Key Reading

  • D’Antonio F, Khalil A, Dias T, Thilaganathan B. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:643–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISUOG. Practice guidelines: the role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:247–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalafat E, Sebghati M, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):193–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Twin and Triplet Pregnancy. NICE clinical guideline 137. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D’Antonio F, Thilaganathan B. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):301–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asma Khalil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, B., Khalil, A. (2021). Assessment of Fetal Growth in Twins and Multiple Pregnancy. In: Khalil, A., Lewi, L., Lopriore, E. (eds) Twin and Higher-order Pregnancies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47652-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47652-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47651-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47652-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics