Skip to main content

A New Finance Capital? Theorising Corporate Governance and Financial Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rudolf Hilferding

Part of the book series: Luxemburg International Studies in Political Economy ((LISPE))

  • 210 Accesses

Abstract

Hilferding’s work provides important theoretical foundations for a much-needed ‘Institutional Marxist’ theory of corporate governance. By tracing the evolution of state and corporate organisation since the late nineteenth century, this chapter illustrates that such a theory constitutes a key basis for the periodisation of capitalist development. Drawing on Hilferding’s theorisation of ‘finance capital’ as a fusion of financial and industrial capital dominated by money-capital, we suggest that the restructuring of capitalism since the 2008 crisis has led to the emergence of a ‘new finance capital.’ Through a process linking the internal restructuring of ‘non-financial’ corporations with new forms of concentration and centralisation of finance across the economy, new institutional linkages between finance and industry have been consolidated, constituting a new organisational form of corporate power. Finally, we reflect on the implications of this theory for the democratic socialist movement today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    And, it should be said, were both greatly influenced by Hilferding.

  2. 2.

    See Karl Marx, Grundrisse, Introduction, Part III: The Method of Political Economy. The consequence of reifying the most abstract level as the essence of concrete history is the formulation of an Idealist Marxist, as in the work of Louis Althusser. See Maher 2016.

  3. 3.

    For a thorough elaboration of the Institutional Marxist framework, see Maher and Aquanno 2018.

  4. 4.

    As of 2017 one of Vanguard, BlackRock, or State Street was the largest shareholder in 88 per cent of the S&P 500 companies.

  5. 5.

    Jahnke provides a good empirical description of this new form of corporate control. He shows that while 6 per cent of S&P 500 companies reported investor engagement in 2010, this rose to 23 per cent in 2012, 50 per cent in 2014, and 72 per cent in 2017. His research also finds that from June 2016 to June 2017, Vanguard, a major passive investment firm, reported 954 engagements with corporate managers.

  6. 6.

    It has been widely reported that Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase and Co., spearheaded this shift.

  7. 7.

    For a thorough discussion of these proposed policies, see Maher et al. 2019.

References

  • Bank of International Settlements. 2018. Structural Change in Banking After the Crisis. Committee on the Global Financial System, January 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomore, T. 1985. Theories of Modern Capitalism. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, D., and R. Rafferty. 2006. Capitalism with Derivatives: A Political Economy of Financial Derivatives, Capital and Class. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W.K., and J.P. Sapinski. 2011. Corporate Elite and Intercorporate Networks. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, ed. P.J. Carrington and J. Scott. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A., Jr. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. 1977. Competition and the Evolution of the Capitalist Mode of Production. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordiner, R. 1956. New Frontiers for Professional Managers. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. 1976. The Unseen Revolution: How Pension Fund Socialism Came to America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner, J., E. Heemskery, and J. Garcia-Bernardo. 2017. These Three Firms Own Corporate America. The Conversation, May 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasberg, D.S., and M. Schwartz. 1983. Ownership and Control of Corporations. Annual Review of Sociology 9 (1): 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E.S. 1982. Corporate Control, Corporate Power: A Twentieth Century Fund Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilferding, R. [1910] 1981. Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1918a] 2017. Revolutionary Trust. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds. M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1918b] 2017. Clarity! In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds. M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1919a] 2017. The Socialisation Question. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds. M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1919b] 2017. Expand the Council System! In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds. M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1920] 2017. Political and Economic Power Relations and Socialization. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds. M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1924] 2017. Problems of Our Time. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World the Politics - of Austro-Marxism, eds. M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1925] 2017. The Heidelberg Programme. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds. M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1927] 2017. The Tasks of Social Democracy in the Republic. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds., M.E. Blum and W. Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1931] 2017. Social Control or Private Control over the Economy. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity: Changing the World - the Politics of Austro-Marxism, eds. Mark Blum and William Smaldone, vol. II. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1941] 1981. The Materialist Conception of History. In Modern Interpretations of Marx, ed. T. Bottomore. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L. 2012. Rethinking the Postwar Corporation. In What’s Good for Business: Business and American Politics Since World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahnke, P. 2017. Voice Versus Exit: The Causes and Consequences of Increasing Shareholder Concentration. SSRN, September 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Ownership Concentration and Institutional Investors’ Governance Through Voice and Exit. Business and Politics 21: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, D.M. 1978. Bank Control of Large Corporations in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, S. 2016. Escaping Structuralism’s Legacy: Renewing Theory and History in Historical Materialism. Science & Society 80: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, S., and S.M. Aquanno. 2018. Conceptualizing Neoliberalism: Foundations of an Institutional Marxist Theory of Capitalism. New Political Science 40: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, S., S. Gindin, and L. Panitch. 2019. Class Politics, Socialist Policies, Capitalist Constraints. In Socialist Register 2020: Beyond Market Dystopia, ed. L. Panitch and G. Albo. London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, K., and M. Schramm. 2019. Morningstar Direct Fund Flows Commentary: United States. Morningstar.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, C.D. 1995. The Origins of Modern Management Consulting. Business and Economic History 24: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. [1956] 2000. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, B.A., and M. Schwartz. 1986. Capital Flows and the Process of Financial Hegemony. Theory and Society 15: 1/2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The Power Structure of American Business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, T.F. 1998. At Any Cost: Jack Welch, General Electric, and the Pursuit of Profit. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, L., and S. Gindin. 2012. The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, R. 1955. A Case Study of Management Planning and Control at General Electric Company. New York: Controllership Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J., and R. Barber. 1978. The North Will Rise Again. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritholtz, B. 2019. Stakeholder Capitalism Will Fail If It’s Just Talk. Bloomberg, 21 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, W.E. 2007. The Secret to GE’s Success. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. et al. 2019. Review and Analysis of 2018 US Shareholder Activism. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, April 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 1997. Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M.C. 1998. The Rise and Fall of Bank Control in the United States, 1890–1939. American Economic Review 88: 1077–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Business Roundtable. 1997. Statement on Corporate Governance: White Paper, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. 1993. Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, D. 2004. Here a Chief, There a Chief: The Rise of the CFO in the American Firm. American Sociological Review 69: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maher, S., Aquanno, S.M. (2020). A New Finance Capital? Theorising Corporate Governance and Financial Power. In: Dellheim, J., Wolf, F.O. (eds) Rudolf Hilferding. Luxemburg International Studies in Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47344-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47344-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47343-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47344-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics