Skip to main content

In Search of Long-Term Conservation: Objectives, Effectiveness, and Participation Schemes in Protected Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Socio-ecological Studies in Natural Protected Areas

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are instruments designed to ensure in situ long-term conservation. However, the selection of their objectives, design, and implementation strategies has changed over time according to different environmental value systems. In this sense, the Mexican environmental value system has changed from preservation to conservation, contributing to the development of different categories such as National Parks, Biosphere Reserves, Voluntary Conservation Areas, and Biocultural Landscapes. This chapter aims to historically describe these environmental value systems and their effect in the pursuit of long-term conservation in protected areas. To achieve this, we relate the environmental value system with each stage of Mexican conservation and we describe the objective of PAs and we address the effectiveness, participation, and access to power mechanisms in decision-making of each stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams WM, Hutton J (2007) People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Soc 5(2):147–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Org Behav Human Decision Proc 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

  • Alcorn J, Toledo VM (1998) Resilient resource management in Mexico’s forest ecosystems: the contribution of property rights. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds) Linking social and ecological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 216–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya FC, Espírito-Santo MM (2018) Protected areas and territorial exclusion of traditional communities: analyzing the social impacts of environmental compensation strategies in Brazil. Ecol Soc 23(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09850-230108

  • Andrade GSM, Rhodes JR (2012) Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecol Soc 17(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05216-170414

  • Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J, Berlow EL, Brown JH, Fortelius M, … others (2012) Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486(7401): 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11018

  • Beresford AE, Buchanan GM, Donald PF, Butchart SHM, Fishpool LDC, Rondinini C (2011) Poor overlap between the distribution of protected areas and globally threatened birds in Africa. Anim Conserv 14(2):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00398.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):621–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2009) Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conserv Lett 2(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00040.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boege E (2008) El patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de México: hacia la conservación in situ de la biodiversidad y agrodiversidad en los territorios indígenas. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas (CDI) Mexico City: Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Boege E (2017) El patrimonio biocultural y los derechos culturales de los pueblos indígenas, comunidades locales y equiparables. Diario de Campo 0(1):39–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Kothari A & Oviedo G (2004) Indigenous and Local Communities and Protected Areas: Towards Equity and Enhanced Conservation IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. xviii + 111pp. 2–8317–0675-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Dudley N, Jaeger T, Lassen B, Broome NP, Phillips A, Sandwith T (2013) Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner L (2010) Gobernanza ambiental, actores sociales y conflictos en las Áreas Naturales Protegidas mexicanas. Rev Mex Sociol 2(55):283–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington D, Wilkie D (2015) Protected areas and poverty. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 370(1681). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0271

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, Strien A, Bastian B, Brown C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(May):1164–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carabias J, De la Maza J, Cadena R (2015) Conservación y desarrollo sustentable en la Selva Lacandona. Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos AC, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S, Brook A (2005) Can psychology help save the world? A model for conservation psychology. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy 5(1):87–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00057.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNDH (2019) Estudios sobre el cumplimiento e impacto de las recomendaciones generales, informes especiales y pronunciamientos de la CNDH (2001–2017) TOMO VI. Áreas naturales protegidas y derechos humanos Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Cordinación de Humanidades, UNAM; Programa Universitario de Derechos Humanos, UNAM; Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos, México City: México

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad L, Watson JEM, Geldmann J, Leverington F, Hockings M, Knights K, Di Marco M (2019) Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing. Front Ecol Environ 17(5):259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONANP (2019) Áreas Destinadas Voluntariamente a la Conservación. Retrieved from the web https://advc.conanp.gob.mx/listado-de-advc/

  • CONANP (2020) Listado de las Áreas Naturales Protegidas de México (LISTANP) Retrieved form the web site: http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/listanp/

  • De la Maza ER (1999) Una historia de las áreas naturales protegidas en México. Gaceta Ecológica 51:15–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovers S, Feary S, Martin A, McMillan L, Morgan D Tollefson M (2015) Engagement and participation in protected area management: who, why, how and when. Protected Area Governance and Management 413–440 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt1657v5d.21.pdf

  • Dudley N (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Ali N, Ketiunen M, MacKinnon K (2017) Editorial essay: protected areas and the sustainable development goals. Parks 23(2):10–12. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-23-2ND.en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand L, Figueroa F, Trench T (2014) Inclusion and exclusion in participation strategies in the montes azules biosphere reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Conserv Soc 12(2):175–189. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.138420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund J, Cabeza M (2017) Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: crucial concepts for conservation planning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1399(1):27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa F, Sánchez-Cordero V (2008) Effectiveness of natural protected areas to prevent land use and land cover change in Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 17(13):3223–3240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9423-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett ST, Burgess ND, Fa JE, Fernández-llamazares Á, Molnár Z, Robinson CJ et al (2018) Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat Sustain 1(July):369–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Burgess ND (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol Conserv 161:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geldmann J, Coad L, Barnes M, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Knights K et al (2015) Changes in protected area management effectiveness over time: a global analysis. Biol Conserv 191:692–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M (2003) Systems for Assessing the effectiveness of Management in Protected Areas. Bioscience 53(9):823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J (2006) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas, 2nd edn. IUCN, Gland/Cambridge UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes G (2007) Protection, politics and protest: understanding resistance to conservation. Conserv Soc 5(2):184–201

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Partner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Pan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds.) Global warming of 1.5°C. an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Ginebra

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Sierra C, Torres-Orozco D, Martínez JC, Toledo-Guzmán AD (2017) A socioecosystemic view to the natural reserves: Case Study of Metztitlan’s Biosphere Reserve. In Calderón-Contreras (Coordinator) In: Los sistemas socioecológicos y su resiliencia: casos de estudio. Mexico City Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones NA, Shaw S, Ross H, Witt K, Pinner B (2016) The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 21(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones KR, Venter O, Fuller RA, Allan JR, Maxwell SL, Negret PJ, Watson JEM (2018) One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 791(May):788–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1996) The value of life: biological diversity and human society. Island Press, Washington, DC, 263 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverington F, Costa KL, Courrau J, Pavese H, Nolte C, Marr M et al (2010) Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas – a global study second edition – 2010 (Second). University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • LGEEPA (2018) Diario Oficial de la Federación. Ultima reforma publicada DOF 05–06-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM (2014) Changes in the perception and goals of nature conservation require a solid scientific basis. Science 345:1558. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Esponda FX, García-Maning G, Vázquez-Quesada B, Colmenero S, Bracamontes-Nájera L (2019) In: Tornel C (Coordinator) Alternativas para limitar el calentamiento global en 1.5°C. Henrich Böll-Stiftung, Mexico City, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Merçon J, Vetter S, Tengö M, Cocks M, Balvanera P, Rosell JA, Ayala-Orozco B (2019) From local landscapes to international policy: contributions of the biocultural paradigm to global sustainability. Global Sustain 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.4

  • Mitchell R (2006) Environmental governance in Mexico: two case studies of Oaxaca’s community forest sector. J Lat Am Stud 38:519–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monterrubio-Solís C (2019) Formalización de Áreas Destinadas Voluntariamente a la Conservación en territorios comunitarios e indígenas, avances y reveses. EntreDiversidades Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 6(12):79–110. https://doi.org/10.31644/ed.12.2019.a03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M (2006) Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol Evol 21(12):681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolte C, Agrawal A, Silvius KM, Britaldo SSF (2013) Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(13):4956–4961. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214786110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oldekop JA, Holmes G, Harris WE, Evans KL (2016) A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conserv Biol 30(1):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke, Berkes (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paz-Salinas MF (2005) La participación en el manejo de áreas naturales protegidas. Actores e intereses en conflicto en el Corredor Biológico Chichinautzin, Morelos. Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias, Cuernavaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Reser JP, Bentrupperba JM (2005) What and where are environmental values? Assessing the impacts of current diversity of use of ‘environmental’ and ‘world heritage’ values. J Environ Psychol 25:125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson JP (2007) Local approaches to biodiversity conservation: lessons from Oaxaca, southern Mexico. Int J Sustain Dev 10(3):267–286. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2007.017647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL (2006) Are global conservation efforts successful? Science 313(5790):1051–1052. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Mallén I, Corbera E (2013) Community-based conservation and traditional ecological knowledge. Ecol Soc 18(4):12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05867-180412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders CD (2003) The emerging field of conservation psychology. Hum Ecol Rev 10(2):137–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton S, Campbell B, Wollenberg E, Edmunds D (2002) Devolution and community-based natural resource management: creating space for local people to participate and benefit? Nat Resour Persp 76(76):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel TD, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Res Human Ecol 6(2):81–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2083693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolton S, Hockings M, Dudley N, MacKinnon K, Whitten T, Leverington F (2007) Management effectiveness tracking tool (second). WWF International, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiderska K, Palmer M (2015) Climate change and biocultural adaptation in mountain communities. Second international learning exchange of the international network of mountain indigenous people. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (2005) Repensar la conservación : ¿áreas naturales protegidas o estrategia bioregional ? Gaceta Ecológica 77(77):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (2015) ¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de sustentabilidad? Una propuesta ecológico política. Interdisciplina 3(7):35–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM, Barrera-Bassols N (2008) La memoria biocultural. Junta de Andalucía, Icaria editorial, Perspectivas Ecológicas, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP-WCMC (2020) Protected area country profile for Mexico from the world database of protected areas. Available at: www.protectedplanet.net

  • UNEP-WCMC IUCN & NGS (2018) Protected planet report 2018. UNEP-WCMC IUCN NGS, Cambridge UK/Gland/Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP-WCMC IUCN & NGS (2020) Protected planet live report 2020. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS, Cambridge UK/Gland/Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1999) Human domination of earth’ s ecosystems. Science 277(5325):494–499. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkid E (2011) Revolutionary Parks. Conservation, social justice, and Mexico’s National parks 1910–1940. The University of Arizona press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JEM, Dudley N, Segan DB, Hockings M (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West P, Igoe J, Brockington D (2006) Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annu Rev Anthropol 35(1):251–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Torres-Orozco Jiménez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vázquez-Quesada, B., Torres-Orozco Jiménez, D. (2020). In Search of Long-Term Conservation: Objectives, Effectiveness, and Participation Schemes in Protected Areas. In: Ortega-Rubio, A. (eds) Socio-ecological Studies in Natural Protected Areas. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47264-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics