Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Barbed Displacement: Walls to the Disciplined Migrant

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Handbook of Displacement

  • 1740 Accesses

Abstract

Migration policies are closely linked to the forced movement of foreign nationals. Far from being only a marginal aspect of international migration control, these mobilities are a highly valued tool in migration policies and an end in themselves. Michalon synthesises the state of knowledge on the governmental power of displacements carried out within migration control. First, this theme is placed at the intersection of studies on the carceral, mobility, and borders. Second, the main themes of study about the power and the restriction of individual freedom through governmental mobility are outlined. Third, a typology of governmental mobility is presented, showing how the barbed wire surrounding the detention places also characterises, materially or metaphorically, the displacements of foreign nationals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The information concerning the European procedure was collected by Emilie Hétreau within the ARRECO project on relocation of refugees in Europe (https://arreco.hypotheses.org/). I thank her and Estelle d’Halluin for kindly sharing it with me.

References

  • Adey, P. (2017). Mobility. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agier, M. (2008). Gérer les indésirables. Des camps de réfugiés au gouvernement humanitaire. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agier, M., Bouagga, Y., Galisson, M., Hanappe, C., Pette, M., & Wannesson, P. (2018). La jungle de Calais. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M., & Callon, M. (2004). L’intrusion des entreprises privées ans le monde carcéral français : le Programme 13 000. In P. Artières & P. Lascoumes (Eds.), Gouverner, enfermer. La prison, un modèle indépassable ? (pp. 295–317). Paris: Press de Sciences Po.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amilhat-Szary, A.-L., & Giraut, F. (2015). Borderities and the politics of contemporary mobile borders. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bærenholdt, J. O. (2013). Governmobility: The powers of mobility. Mobilities, 8(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blot, J., & Spire, A. (2014). Déguerpissements et conflits autour des légitimités citadines dans les villes du Sud. L’Espace Politique, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/espacepolitique.2893.

  • Blue, E. (2015). Strange passages: Carceral mobility and the liminal in the catastrophic history of American deportation. National Identities, 17(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2012). Subjectivity and identity in detention: Punishment and society in a global age. Theoretical Criminology, 16(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612441116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2017). Immigration detention, punishment and the transformation of justice. Social & Legal Studies, 28(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917747341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burridge, A., Gill, N., Kocher, A., & Martin, L. (2017). Polymorphic borders. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1297253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clochard, O. (2015). Enfermés à bord des navires de la marine marchande. Annales de géographie, 702–703 (2–3), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.702.0185.

  • Clochard, O. (2016). Révoltes, protestations et ‘résistances du quotidien’: Des étrangers à l’épreuve de la détention. Migrations Société, 164(2), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, M. (2008). Doing time together. Love and family in the shadow of the prison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, D., & Hiemstra, N. (2014). Examining the everyday micro-economies of migrant detention in the United States. Geographica Helvetica, 69(5), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-335-2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousin, G., & Legros, O. (2014). Gouverner par l’évacuation ? L’exemple des ‘campements illicites’ en Seine-Saint-Denis. Annales de géographie, 700(6), 1262–1284. https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.700.1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move. Mobility in the modern Western world. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Cunha, M. I. P. (2008). Closed circuits: Kinship, neighborhood and incarceration in urban Portugal. Ethnography, 9(3), 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108094974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, M., Lancelevée, C., & Michalon, B. (2013). Où sont les murs? Penser l’enfermement en sciences sociales. Cultures & Conflits, 90(2), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, J. (2011). Domopolitics, governmentality and the regulation of asylum accommodation. Political Geography, 30(5), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.04.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, J. (2016). Forced migration and the city: Irregularity, informality, and the politics of presence. Progress in Human Geography, 41(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516629004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, N. (2002). Migrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 419–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVerteuil, G. (2003). Homeless mobility, institutional settings, and the new poverty management. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(2), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disney, T. (2017). The orphanage as an institution of coercive mobility. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(8), 1905–1921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17711181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drotbohm, H., & Hasselberg, I. (2015). Introduction. Deportation, anxiety, justice: New ethnographic perspectives. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(4), 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2001). ‘Préface’ in Jackson (B.), Leurs prisons. Autobiographies de prisonniers américains, Paris, Plon, 1975 (texte n°144). In D. Defert, F. Ewald, & J. Lgrange (Eds.), Dits et écrits I. 1954–1975 (pp. 1556–1559). Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, M. J. (2008). Asylum and the expansion of deportation in the United Kingdom. Government and Opposition, 43(2), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00249.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, M. J. (2013). Is deportation a form of forced migration? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 32(2), 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, N. (2009). Governmental mobility: The power effects of the movement of detained asylum seekers around Britain’s detention estate. Political Geography, 28(3), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, N. (2016). Nothing personal? Geographies of governing and activism in the British asylum system. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, N., Conlon, D., Moran, D., & Burridge, A. (2016). Carceral circuitry: New directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516671823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S. (2012). Gefangen in der Mobilität. Prekäre Zonierungsprozesse an den Rändern Europas. Behemoth. A Journal on Civilisation, 5(1), 8–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra, N. (2013). ‘You don’t even know where you are’: Chaotic geographies of US migrant detention and deportation. In D. Moran, N. Gill, & D. Colon (Eds.), Carceral geographies: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention (pp. 57–75). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeandesboz, J. (2016). Smartening border security in the European Union: An associational inquiry. Security Dialogue, 47(4), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616650226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. (1991). Borders and boundaries of state and self at the end of empire. Journal of Historical Sociology, 4(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.1991.tb00116.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A., & Williams, L. (2012). Immigration detention in the community: Research on the experiences of migrants released from detention centres in the UK. Population, Space and Place, 18(6), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Larminat, X. (2014). Hors des murs. L’exécution des peines en milieu ouvert. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, J. M., & Mountz, A. (2018). Boats, borders, and bases. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Makaremi, C., & Kobelinsky, C. (2008). Editorial. Confinement des étrangers: Entre circulation et enfermement. Cultures & Conflits, 71(3), 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makaremi, C., & Kobelinsky, C. (2009). Enfermés dehors. Enquêtes sur le confinement des étrangers. Bellecombe-en-Bauge, France: Editions du Croquant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maquet, P. (2014). Passages clandestins, les assureurs s’en mêlent. Plein Droit, 2(101), 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maquet, P., & Burtin, J. (2012). Les passagers clandestins sur les navires de marine marchande : de la gestion d’un événement à la production d’un risque. L’Espace Politique, 16(1). Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/2279.

  • Michalon, B. (2013). Mobility and power in detention: The management of internal movement and governmental mobility in Romania. In D. Moran, N. Gill, & D. Colon (Eds.), Carceral geographies: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention (pp. 37–55). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalon, B. (2017). Accommodation for asylum seekers and ‘tolerance’ in Romania. Governing foreigners by mobility? In J. Turner & K. Peters (Eds.), Carceral mobilities: Interrogating movement in incarceration (pp. 57–70). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincke, C. (2013). Mobilité et justice pénale. L’idéologie mobilitaire comme soubassements du managérialisme. Droit et société, 2(84), 359–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincke, C. (2017). Prison. Legitimacy through mobility? In J. Turner & K. Peters (Eds.), Carceral mobilities: Interrogating movement in incarceration (pp. 236–249). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. (2015). Carceral geography: Spaces and practices of incarceration. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D., Piacentini, L., & Pallot, J. (2012). Disciplined mobility and carceral geography: Prisoner transport in Russia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(3), 446–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountz, A. (2011a). Specters at the port of entry: Understanding state mobilities through an ontology of exclusion. Mobilities, 6(3), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountz, A. (2011b). The enforcement archipelago: Detention, haunting, and asylum on islands. Political Geography, 30(3), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountz, A., Coddington, K., Catania, R. T., & Loyd, J. M. (2012). Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512460903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, J. A., & Sheller, M. (2016). Race and the politics of mobility. Introduction. Transfers, 6(1). Retrieved from https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/transfers/6/1/trans060102.xml.

  • Packer, J. (2003). Disciplining mobility. Governing and Safety. In J. Bratich, J. Packer, & C. McCarthy (Eds.), Foucault, cultural studies, and governmentality (pp. 135–161). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peutz, N. (2006). Embarking on an anthropology of removal. Current Anthropology, 47(2), 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philo, C. (2014). ‘One must eliminate the effects of … diffuse circulation [and] their unstable and dangerous coagulation’: Foucault and beyond the stopping of mobilities. Mobilities, 9(4), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, S. (2014). Floating carceral spaces: Border enforcement and gender on the high seas. Punishment & Society, 16(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474513517018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, J. (2009). Civil modalities of refugee trauma, death and necrological transport. Social Identities, 15(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630802693687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V., Andersson, R., & Musterd, S. (2003). Spreading the ‘burden’? (1st ed.). Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t894cb.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, D. (2016). Condamnés à l’immobilité. La prison contemporaine en quête de discipline. SociologieS. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/5176.

  • Schliehe, A. K. (2016). Tracing outsideness: Young women’s institutional journeys and the geographies of closed space. Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoll, C. (2014). Gendered spatialities of power in ‘borderland’ Europe: An approach through mobile and immobilised bodies. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 1(2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1998). Refugees in a carceral age: The rebirth of immigration prisons in the United States. Public Culture, 10(3), 577–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tazzioli, M. (2016). The government of migrant mobs: Temporary divisible multiplicities in border zones. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016658894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tazzioli, M. (2017). Containment through mobility: Migrants’ spatial disobediences and the reshaping of control through the hotspot system. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(16), 2764–2779. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1401514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tissier Raffin, M. (2018). Entretien avec Pascal Brice, Directeur général de l’OFPRA : ‘Entre continuité et modernisation : la diversification des missions de l’OFPRA’. La Revue des droits de l’homme, 13. Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/revdh/3681.

  • Turner, J. (2016). The prison boundary. Between society and carceral space. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., & Peters, K. (Eds.). (2016). Carceral mobilities: Interrogating movement in incarceration. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. (2015). Migration, vehicles, and politics: Three theses on viapolitics. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014554859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. (2017). Aviation as deportation infrastructure: Airports, planes, and expulsion. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(16), 2796–2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1401517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, F. (2011). How voluntary are voluntary returns? Race & Class, 52(4), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396810396606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. French CNRS, Bordeaux, France

    Bénédicte Michalon

Authors
  1. Bénédicte Michalon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bénédicte Michalon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK

    Peter Adey , Janet C. Bowstead , Katherine Brickell , Vandana Desai , Mike Dolton  & Alasdair Pinkerton , , , ,  & 

  2. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Ayesha Siddiqi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Michalon, B. (2020). Barbed Displacement: Walls to the Disciplined Migrant. In: Adey, P., et al. The Handbook of Displacement. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47178-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47178-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47177-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47178-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation