Skip to main content

On Hyperbolic Initial-Boundary Value Problems with a Strictly Dissipative Boundary Condition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematics of Wave Phenomena

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

  • 572 Accesses

Abstract

The well-posedness of the initial-boundary value problems for symmetric hyperbolic systems with strictly dissipative boundary conditions is proved. The regularity assumptions on the coefficients of the differential operator and the boundary condition as well as the boundary itself are quite minimal. Characterizations of strictly dissipative boundary operators are given and the example of Maxwell’s equations is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benzoni-Gavage, S., Serre, D.: Multidimensional Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007). First-order systems and applications

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cagnol, J., Eller, M.: Boundary regularity for Maxwell’s equations with applications to shape optimization. J. Differ. Eq. 250(2), 1114–1136 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chazarain, J., Piriou, A.: Introduction to the theory of linear partial differential equations. In: Studies in Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 14. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982). Translated from the French

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eller, M.: On symmetric hyperbolic boundary problems with nonhomogeneous conservative boundary conditions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 4(1), 1925–1949 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Eller, M.: Loss of derivatives for hyperbolic boundary problems with constant coefficients. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 23(3), 1347–1361 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedrichs, K.O.: Symmetric hyperbolic linear differential equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 7, 345–392 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Guès, O., Métivier, G., Williams, M., Zumbrun, K.: Uniform stability estimates for constant-coefficient symmetric hyperbolic boundary value problems. Comm. Partial Differ. Eq. 32(4–6), 579–590 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kato, T.: Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1976). Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 132

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lax, P.D., Phillips, R.S.: Local boundary conditions for dissipative symmetric linear differential operators. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13, 427–455 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Majda, A., Osher, S.: Initial-boundary value problems for hyperbolic equations with uniformly characteristic boundary. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 28(5), 607–675 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Métivier, G.: Stability of multidimensional shocks. In: Advances in the Theory of Shock Waves. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, vol. 47, pp. 25–103. Birkhäuser, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Métivier, G.: On the L 2 well posedness of hyperbolic initial boundary value problems. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 67(5), 1809–1863 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rauch, J.: \(\mathcal {L}_2\) is a continuable initial condition for Kreiss’ mixed problems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 25, 265–285 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schnaubelt, R., Spitz, M.: Local wellposedness of quasilinear Maxwell equations with absorbing boundary conditions. Evol. Equ. Control Theory (2018). arXiv.org 1812.03803

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank J. Naumann (Berlin) for asking the author about the complete proof of Proposition 1.1 in [2] and for reading and commenting on earlier versions of the manuscript. Thanks are also due to the anonymous referee of this paper for a number of helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Eller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The singular value decomposition of B is B = UTV H where \(V\in L^\infty (\Sigma ,\mathbb {C}^{N\times N})\) and \(U \in L^\infty (\Sigma ,\mathbb {C}^{p\times p})\) are unitary matrices and \(T \in L^\infty (\Sigma , \mathbb {R}^{p\times N})\) is of the form

since B is strictly dissipative. The singular values \(s_1,\ldots ,s_{N_-}\) are uniformly positive a.e. (t, x) ∈ Σ. Define now E = −UT # V H A where

The unitary matrix V = [v 1v N] is structured as follows. The first N columns span N(B) and the last N − N + − N columns span N(A). This can be done since N(A) ⊂ N(B). Introduce two N + × N matrices G and F by

and observe that N(G) = N(B)⊕ N(A). One computes

and

since the first N  + N columns of V  are an orthonormal basis of N(A) = Im A. This proves the first statement.

For the second statement we start by proving N(F) = AN(B) and N(F) = [AN(B)]. Let y ∈ N(F). Then GAy = 0, that is Ay ∈ N(G) and hence, 〈y, Az〉 = 〈Ay, z〉 = 0 for all z ∈ N(B). This shows N(F) ⊂ [AN(B)]. Now let y ∈ [AN(B)]. Then 0 = 〈y, Az〉 for all z ∈ N(B), which implies Ay ∈ N(G). But this means y ∈ N(F). Note that \(\dim N(F)^\perp = N_+\).

Let z ∈ N(B) ∩ N(F). Then 〈Az, z〉 = 0 and by the strictly dissipativity of B we have 〈Az, z〉≳|Az|2. Hence Az = 0 and we have established N(A) = N(B) ∩ N(F). Let now \(w_1,w_2,..,w_{N_-},v_{N_+ + N_-+1},\ldots ,v_N\) be a basis for N(F). Then \(w_1,w_2,..,w_{N_-},v_{N_-+1},\ldots ,v_N \) is a basis for \(\mathbb {C}^N\) and the square matrix W, whose columns are the vectors of this basis, block-diagonalizes A, that is

By the strict dissipativity of B the matrix A + is uniformly positive definite. Hence, since the matrix A is assumed to have constant signature independent of (t, x) ∈ Σ almost everywhere, we infer that A must be uniformly negative definite. Thus \(\langle Az,z \rangle \lesssim -|Az|{ }^2\) for all z ∈ N(F).

Finally, observe that F H F = AG H GA where the matrix G H G is the orthogonal projection onto N(B) ⊖ N(A). By the strict dissipativity A is uniformly positive definite on N(B) ⊖ N(A). Thus, the matrix F H F has N + positive eigenvalues bounded away from zero, a.e. (t, x) ∈ Σ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Eller, M. (2020). On Hyperbolic Initial-Boundary Value Problems with a Strictly Dissipative Boundary Condition. In: Dörfler, W., et al. Mathematics of Wave Phenomena. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47174-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics