Abstract
The adaptive reuse of heritage buildings is a complex decision problem because of the coexistence of different objectives and constraints, such as the preservation of the tangible and intangible value of the building, the limited number of resources, the needs of the community and the interests of private investors. According to the New Urban Agenda, the safeguard of cultural heritage sites and inclusive urbanization are key actions in the global commitment for sustainable urban development. The aim of this study is to identify an interdisciplinary methodology to address adaptive reuse in the earliest planning phases by combining several techniques, such as situation analysis, stakeholder mapping, value assessment and multi-criteria decision-making. Our model has been tested on an Italian case study in Arezzo, an industrial building listed as a national heritage site. With the deindustrialization of the area, its industrial operations ceased and it was later abandoned under threat of demolition. After years of unsustainable redevelopment driven by economic factors, this study is the first attempt to evaluate the adaptability of the building for new uses while negotiating the interests of the stakeholders. This approach makes it possible to effectively compare different scenarios and identify the most satisfactory use of historic buildings. After mapping stakeholder demands, this research proposes a sensitivity analysis which explores the influence of stakeholders on the multi-criteria decision-making method. The results confirm the importance of including many stakeholders in the process and prove the potential of the methodology in managing the adaptive reuse of historic buildings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bandarin F, Van Oers R (2012) The historic urban landscape: managing heritage in an urban century. Wiley, Oxford
Biagini C, Secchi S (2006) Curare il moderno. Il silos granario di Ubaldo Cassi ad Arezzo. Progettando 2, pp 39–49
Binnekamp R, van Gunsteren LA, van Loon PP, Barendse P (2006) Open design, a stakeholder-oriented approach in architecture, urban planning, and project management, vol 1. Ios Press, Amesterdam
Bourne L, Walker DHT (2005) Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Manag Decis 43(5):649–660
Bryan BA, Grandgirard A, Ward JR (2010) Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems 13(4):539–555
Bullen PA, Love PE (2010) The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: views from the field. Cities 27(4):215–224
Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura (CCIAA) di Arezzo (2005) L’economia Aretina nel Primo Semestre del 2005
Chapperon R (1936) Silos e magazzini per ammassi granari. Istituto delle Edizioni Accademiche
Chitty G (ed) (2016) Heritage, conservation and communities: engagement, participation and capacity building. Routledge, London
Council of Europe (2005) Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, European Treaty Series, 199. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/199.htm
Cresti C (2003) In margine alla querelle sul silos di Pescaiola. Notizie di Storia, notiziario della Società Storica Aretina, 9, pp 5–6
De Bruijn H, Ten Heuvelhof E (2010) Process management: why project management fails in complex decision-making processes. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Douglas J (2006) Building adaptation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam
Dutta M, Husain Z (2009) An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The case of Calcutta. J Cult Herit 10(2):237–243
Giove S, Rosato P, Breil M (2010) An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 17(3–4):85–99
Giuliani F, De Falco A, Landi S, Bevilacqua MG, Santini L, Pecori S (2018) Reusing grain silos from the 1930s in Italy. A multi-criteria decision analysis for the case of Arezzo. J Cult Herit 29:145–159
Gosling J, Sassi P, Naim M, Lark R (2013) Adaptable buildings: a systems approach. Sustain Cities Soc 7:44–51
Herazo B, Lizarralde G (2016) Understanding stakeholders’ approaches to sustainability in building projects. Sustain Cities Soc 26:240–254
Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 409(19):3578–3594
ICCROM (2015) People-centred approaches to the conservation of cultural heritage: living heritage
Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R (2008) Exploring corporate strategy: text & cases. Pearson Education, Harlow
Kohler N, Hassler U (2002) The building stock as a research object. Build Res Inf 30(4):226–236
Landi S (2015) Italian grain silos in the 1930s. Which reuse? In: Proceedings of REUSO 2015. III Congreso Internacional sobre Documentación Conservación y Reutilización del Patrimonio Arquitectónico y PaisajÃstico 22–24 October 2015. Editorial Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia
Lensi F (2012) Futurismo e razionalismo nell’archivio dell’ingegner Ubaldo Cassi. In: Schegge futuriste. LS Olschki, pp 141–154
McElroy B, Mills C (2000) Managing stakeholders. In: Gower handbook of Project Management edited by: turner, R. J and sinister, S. J. 757–75, 3rd edn. Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot
Mendelow AL (1981) Environmental scanning-the impact of the stakeholder concept. ICIS, p 20
Mitchell RK, Bradley RA, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886
Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione (1972) Carta italiana del restauro. Circ. n. 117 del 6 aprile 1972
Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H (2013) Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning. Elsevier, New York
Olander S (2007) Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Constr Manag Econ 25(3):277–287
Olander S, Landin A (2005) Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. Int J Proj Manag 23(4):321–328
Papagiannakis G, Voudouris I, Lioukas S (2014) The road to sustainability: exploring the process of corporate environmental strategy over time. Bus Strateg Environ 23(4):254–271
Petzet M (2004) Principles of preservation: an introduction to the international charters for conservation and restoration 40 years after the Venice charter
Plimmer F, Pottinger G, Harris S, Waters M, Pocock Y (2008) Knock it down or do it up. BRE Trust
Rhee SK, Lee SY (2003) Dynamic change of corporate environmental strategy: rhetoric and reality. Bus Strateg Environ 12(3):175–190
Rodwell D (2008) Urban regeneration and the management of change: Liverpool and the historic urban landscape. J Archit Conserv 14(2):83–106
Roseland M (2012) Toward sustainable communities: solutions for citizens and their governments, vol 6. New Society Publishers, Bariola Island
Schmidt R III, Eguchi T, Austin S, Gibb A (2010) What is the meaning of adaptability in the building industry. In: 16th International conference on open and sustainable building, pp 17–19
Slaughter ES (2001) Design strategies to increase building flexibility. Build Res Inf 29(3):208–217
Stubbs M (2004) Heritage-sustainability: developing a methodology for the sustainable appraisal of the historic environment. Plan Pract Res 19(3):285–305
Tweed C, Sutherland M (2007) Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landsc Urban Plan 83(1):62–69
UN (2018) The sustainable development goals report 2018. Pub. United Nations, New York
UN Habitat (2016) World cities report 2016. Urbanization and development: emerging futures. United Nations, New York
UNESCO (2011) Recommendation on the historic urban landscape
United Nations (2017) New urban agenda. UN-HABITAT, Nairobi
van den Heuvel D, Mesman M, Quist W (eds) (2008) The challenge of change: dealing with the legacy of the modern movement: proceedings of the 10th international DOCOMOMO conference. IOS Press, Amesterdam
Wang HJ, Zeng ZT (2010) A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1241–1249
Wilkinson S, James K, Reed R (2009) Delivering sustainability through the adaptive reuse of commercial buildings: the Melbourne CBD challenge. In: PRRES 2008: proceedings of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society 15th annual conference. Pacific Rim Real Estate Society, pp 1–19
Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction, vol 104. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Municipality of Arezzo, the Office for Cultural Heritage Protection and the Historical Archive of Arezzo for their support during documentation and the interviews.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giuliani, F., De Falco, A., Santini, L. (2020). A Stakeholder Analysis for the Adaptive Reuse Assessment of Architectural Heritage: Towards an Integrated Approach. In: Nunes Silva, C., Trono, A. (eds) Local Governance in the New Urban Agenda. Local and Urban Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47135-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47135-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47134-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47135-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)