Skip to main content

A Stakeholder Analysis for the Adaptive Reuse Assessment of Architectural Heritage: Towards an Integrated Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local Governance in the New Urban Agenda

Part of the book series: Local and Urban Governance ((LUG))

  • 433 Accesses

Abstract

The adaptive reuse of heritage buildings is a complex decision problem because of the coexistence of different objectives and constraints, such as the preservation of the tangible and intangible value of the building, the limited number of resources, the needs of the community and the interests of private investors. According to the New Urban Agenda, the safeguard of cultural heritage sites and inclusive urbanization are key actions in the global commitment for sustainable urban development. The aim of this study is to identify an interdisciplinary methodology to address adaptive reuse in the earliest planning phases by combining several techniques, such as situation analysis, stakeholder mapping, value assessment and multi-criteria decision-making. Our model has been tested on an Italian case study in Arezzo, an industrial building listed as a national heritage site. With the deindustrialization of the area, its industrial operations ceased and it was later abandoned under threat of demolition. After years of unsustainable redevelopment driven by economic factors, this study is the first attempt to evaluate the adaptability of the building for new uses while negotiating the interests of the stakeholders. This approach makes it possible to effectively compare different scenarios and identify the most satisfactory use of historic buildings. After mapping stakeholder demands, this research proposes a sensitivity analysis which explores the influence of stakeholders on the multi-criteria decision-making method. The results confirm the importance of including many stakeholders in the process and prove the potential of the methodology in managing the adaptive reuse of historic buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandarin F, Van Oers R (2012) The historic urban landscape: managing heritage in an urban century. Wiley, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biagini C, Secchi S (2006) Curare il moderno. Il silos granario di Ubaldo Cassi ad Arezzo. Progettando 2, pp 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Binnekamp R, van Gunsteren LA, van Loon PP, Barendse P (2006) Open design, a stakeholder-oriented approach in architecture, urban planning, and project management, vol 1. Ios Press, Amesterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne L, Walker DHT (2005) Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Manag Decis 43(5):649–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan BA, Grandgirard A, Ward JR (2010) Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems 13(4):539–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullen PA, Love PE (2010) The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: views from the field. Cities 27(4):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura (CCIAA) di Arezzo (2005) L’economia Aretina nel Primo Semestre del 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapperon R (1936) Silos e magazzini per ammassi granari. Istituto delle Edizioni Accademiche

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty G (ed) (2016) Heritage, conservation and communities: engagement, participation and capacity building. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2005) Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, European Treaty Series, 199. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/199.htm

  • Cresti C (2003) In margine alla querelle sul silos di Pescaiola. Notizie di Storia, notiziario della Società Storica Aretina, 9, pp 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn H, Ten Heuvelhof E (2010) Process management: why project management fails in complex decision-making processes. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J (2006) Building adaptation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta M, Husain Z (2009) An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The case of Calcutta. J Cult Herit 10(2):237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giove S, Rosato P, Breil M (2010) An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 17(3–4):85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani F, De Falco A, Landi S, Bevilacqua MG, Santini L, Pecori S (2018) Reusing grain silos from the 1930s in Italy. A multi-criteria decision analysis for the case of Arezzo. J Cult Herit 29:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling J, Sassi P, Naim M, Lark R (2013) Adaptable buildings: a systems approach. Sustain Cities Soc 7:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herazo B, Lizarralde G (2016) Understanding stakeholders’ approaches to sustainability in building projects. Sustain Cities Soc 26:240–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 409(19):3578–3594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICCROM (2015) People-centred approaches to the conservation of cultural heritage: living heritage

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R (2008) Exploring corporate strategy: text & cases. Pearson Education, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler N, Hassler U (2002) The building stock as a research object. Build Res Inf 30(4):226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landi S (2015) Italian grain silos in the 1930s. Which reuse? In: Proceedings of REUSO 2015. III Congreso Internacional sobre Documentación Conservación y Reutilización del Patrimonio Arquitectónico y Paisajístico 22–24 October 2015. Editorial Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lensi F (2012) Futurismo e razionalismo nell’archivio dell’ingegner Ubaldo Cassi. In: Schegge futuriste. LS Olschki, pp 141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy B, Mills C (2000) Managing stakeholders. In: Gower handbook of Project Management edited by: turner, R. J and sinister, S. J. 757–75, 3rd edn. Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelow AL (1981) Environmental scanning-the impact of the stakeholder concept. ICIS, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Bradley RA, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione (1972) Carta italiana del restauro. Circ. n. 117 del 6 aprile 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H (2013) Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olander S (2007) Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Constr Manag Econ 25(3):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olander S, Landin A (2005) Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. Int J Proj Manag 23(4):321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannakis G, Voudouris I, Lioukas S (2014) The road to sustainability: exploring the process of corporate environmental strategy over time. Bus Strateg Environ 23(4):254–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petzet M (2004) Principles of preservation: an introduction to the international charters for conservation and restoration 40 years after the Venice charter

    Google Scholar 

  • Plimmer F, Pottinger G, Harris S, Waters M, Pocock Y (2008) Knock it down or do it up. BRE Trust

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee SK, Lee SY (2003) Dynamic change of corporate environmental strategy: rhetoric and reality. Bus Strateg Environ 12(3):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell D (2008) Urban regeneration and the management of change: Liverpool and the historic urban landscape. J Archit Conserv 14(2):83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseland M (2012) Toward sustainable communities: solutions for citizens and their governments, vol 6. New Society Publishers, Bariola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R III, Eguchi T, Austin S, Gibb A (2010) What is the meaning of adaptability in the building industry. In: 16th International conference on open and sustainable building, pp 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter ES (2001) Design strategies to increase building flexibility. Build Res Inf 29(3):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs M (2004) Heritage-sustainability: developing a methodology for the sustainable appraisal of the historic environment. Plan Pract Res 19(3):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed C, Sutherland M (2007) Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landsc Urban Plan 83(1):62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2018) The sustainable development goals report 2018. Pub. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Habitat (2016) World cities report 2016. Urbanization and development: emerging futures. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2011) Recommendation on the historic urban landscape

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2017) New urban agenda. UN-HABITAT, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel D, Mesman M, Quist W (eds) (2008) The challenge of change: dealing with the legacy of the modern movement: proceedings of the 10th international DOCOMOMO conference. IOS Press, Amesterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HJ, Zeng ZT (2010) A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1241–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson S, James K, Reed R (2009) Delivering sustainability through the adaptive reuse of commercial buildings: the Melbourne CBD challenge. In: PRRES 2008: proceedings of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society 15th annual conference. Pacific Rim Real Estate Society, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction, vol 104. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Municipality of Arezzo, the Office for Cultural Heritage Protection and the Historical Archive of Arezzo for their support during documentation and the interviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Giuliani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giuliani, F., De Falco, A., Santini, L. (2020). A Stakeholder Analysis for the Adaptive Reuse Assessment of Architectural Heritage: Towards an Integrated Approach. In: Nunes Silva, C., Trono, A. (eds) Local Governance in the New Urban Agenda. Local and Urban Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47135-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47135-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47134-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47135-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics