Skip to main content

Applying Statistical Methods to Compare Frontiers: Are Organic Dairy Farms Better Than the Conventional?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (NAPW 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Malmquist index is widely used in empirical studies of productivity change over time. The index is based on estimates of the frontier obtained from the convex envelopment of the data as in DEA. The statistical properties of the Malmquist index and its components, i.e. the frontier shift and the efficiency change, have until recently only been subject to a limited number of studies. The asymptotic properties of the geometric mean of the individual Malmquist indexes have been studied in the literature. Permutation tests for performing statistical inference in finite samples have recently been proposed and are easily performed. In the present paper we illustrate the permutation methods by an analysis of data comprising organic and conventional dairy farms in Denmark from 2011–2015. Further, differences between the frontiers of the production possibility sets for two separate samples are studied, specifically those of the organic and the conventional producers. We suggest to use jackknife methods when estimating the differences to ensure that these are not affected by the well-known bias originating from estimation of the frontier. In summary, the paper offers an illustration of how to analyse productivity data, in particular a comparison of two independent groups, and furthermore an analysis of how the separate groups evolve over time is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is here worth noting that these angles are not scale invariant. Therefore, one should ensure that all input (output) variables are measured in similar metrics, like, e.g. in the present case where all inputs are costs and the outputs are revenues.

  2. 2.

    Note that since there are only two outputs, the angles are complementary and therefore the test statistics and p values for the two output angles are identical.

References

  • Asmild, M., Balezentis, T., & Hougaard, J. L. (2019). Industry competitiveness indicators. IFRO Working Paper 2019/01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmild, M., Kronborg, D., & Matthews, K. (2016). Introducing and modeling inefficiency contributions. European Journal of Operational Research, 248, 725–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild, M., Kronborg, D., & Rønn-Nielsen, A. (2018). Testing productivity change, frontier shift, and efficiency change. IFRO Working Paper 2018/07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmild, M., & Tam, F. (2007). Estimating global frontier shifts and global Malmquist indices. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D., Christensen, L., & Diewert, E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Milk Market Observatory. (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/market-observatory/milk/latest-statistics/prices-margins_en

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, T. V. (2017). Økologi, økonomi og din strategi (in Danish). https://www.agrinord.dk/UserFiles/file/Nyheder%202017/oekonomi_i_oekologi.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneip, A., Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2018). Inference in dynamic, nonparametric models of production: central limit theorems for Malmquist indices. Discussion Paper #2018/10. Institut de Statistique, Biostatistique et Sciences Actuarielles, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillethorup, T. R. (2017). Linking animal welfare and yields to economic performance in Danish dairy production: A non-parametric approach using data envelopment analysis. Unpublished MSc dissertation, IFRO, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1999). Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2015). Statistical approaches for non-parametric frontier models: A guided tour. International Statistical Review, 83, 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mette Asmild .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Asmild, M., Kronborg, D., Rsønn-Nielsen, A. (2021). Applying Statistical Methods to Compare Frontiers: Are Organic Dairy Farms Better Than the Conventional?. In: Parmeter, C.F., Sickles, R.C. (eds) Advances in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. NAPW 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47106-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics