Skip to main content

The Construction of an International Order in the Work of Jan Tinbergen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Economy and International Order in Interwar Europe

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought ((PHET))

Abstract

This paper analyzes the reasons why Jan Tinbergen was initially hostile to European integration, which he regarded as a poor substitute for an international order. His conviction had three important sources. First his coming of age in The Hague, a government city in a small open country the Netherlands, known for its international institutions such as the Peace Palace. Second his work on economic order on the national level, based on the ideal of social peace supplemented with economic expertise. Third his work at the League of Nations which convinced him of the need for a truly international order. When global economic integration failed to make the desired progress, he gradually became convinced that European integration could be a steppingstone toward international integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Van Cleeff to Tinbergen 24 August 1935, Tinbergen Letters, see https://tinbergenletters.eur.nl/theletters/.

  2. 2.

    Correspondence with Loveday, and draft Report of the ‘third volume’, League of Nations Archives, Geneva.

  3. 3.

    It might also explain some of the dissatisfaction of the more politically minded economists of the time. Keynes wrote highly critical reviews not just of the Tinbergen volume, but also of the preceding Haberler study.

References

  • Boianovsky, Mauro, and Hans-Michael Trautwein. 2006. “Haberler, the League of Nations, and the Quest for Consensus in Business Cycle Theory in the 1930s.” History of Political Economy 38 (1): 45–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boumans, Marcel. 2019. “Econometrics: The Keynes-Tinbergen Controversy.” In The Elgar Companion to John Maynard Keynes, edited by Robert W. Dimand and Harald Hagemann, 283–89. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavin, Patricia. 2015. Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavin, Patricia, and Jens Wilhelm Wessels. 2005. “Transnationalism and the League of Nations: Understanding the Work of Its Economic and Financial Organisation.” Contemporary European History 14 (4): 465–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commissie uit N.V.V. en S.D.A.P. 1936. “Het Plan van de Arbeid.” Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, Erwin. 2021. Jan Tinbergen (1903-1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Butter, Frank A. G. 2011. “The Industrial Organisation of Economic Policy Preparation in the Netherlands.” In The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance, edited by J. Lentsch and P. Weingart, 177–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, J. B. D., and Jan Tinbergen. 1945. “Berekeningen over de Economische Betekenis van Nederlands-Indië Voor Nederland.” Maandschrift van Het C.B.S. 40 (10/12): 210–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Peter. 1979. Hendrik de Man, Socialist Critic of Marxism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Don, F. J. H. 2019. “The Influence of Jan Tinbergen on Dutch Economic Policy.” De Economist 167 (3): 259–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-019-09333-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyffinger, Arthur, and Jan den Hengst. 1988. Het Vredespaleis. Amsterdam: Sijthoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberler, Gottfried, James E. Meade, Roberto Oliveira de Campos, and Jan Tinbergen. 1958. Trends in International Trade. Geneva: GATT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberler, Gottfried von. 1937. Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Geneva: League of Nations: Economic Intelligence Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Peo, and Stefan Jonsson. 2015. Eurafrica, the Untold History of European Integration and Colonialism. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen van Galen, John. 1985. “Doorbraak: Het Plan in de Herinnering van Tijdgenoten.” In Het Moet, Het Kan! Op Voor Het Plan!, 156–93. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John Maynard. 1939. “Professor Tinbergen’s Method.” The Economic Journal 49 (195): 558–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • League of Nations. 1943. The Transition from War to Peace Economy. Geneva: League of Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1945. Economic Stability in the Post-War World. Geneva: League of Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linneman, H. J., P. Pronk, and Jan Tinbergen. 1965. Convergence of Economic Systems in East and West. Rotterdam: Netherlands Economic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Man, Hendrik. 1927. Zur Pscyhologie Des Sozialismus. Jena: Eugen Diederichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, Neil. 1991. “League of Nations Economists and the Ideal of Peaceful Change in the Decade of the Thirties.” In Economics and National Security, edited by Crauford D. Goodwin, 143–78. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, Dick. 1985. “Hendrik de Man En de Ideologie van Het Planisme.” In Het Moet, Het Kan! Op Voor Het Plan!, edited by J. Th. J. Van den Berg, 124–55. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodian, Quinn. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, Glenda. 2013. Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia: Penn University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Quantitative Fragen Der Konjunkturpolitik.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 42: 366–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936a. “Fascistische Economie.” Anti-Fascistische Stemmen 1 (2): 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936b. “Kan Hier Te Lande, Al Dan Niet Na Overheidsingrijpen, Een Verbetering van de Binnenlandse Conjunctuur Intreden, Ook Zonder Verbetering van Onze Exportpositie?” In Prae-Adviezen Voor de Vereeniging Voor de Staatshuishoudkunde En de Statistiek, 62–108. Den Haag: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1945. International Economic Co-Operation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1950. “Het Evenwicht in de Dollarbalans.” Internationale Spectator 4 (17): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1954. Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1957. “Internationale Socialistische Politiek.” Socialisme En Democratie 14 (11): 666–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1959. “The Theory of the Optimum Regime.” In Selected Papers, edited by L. H. Klaassen, L. M. Koyck, and H. J. Witteveen, 264–304. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960. “The Impact of the European Economic Community on Third Countries.” In Sciences Humaines et Intégration Européene, edited by H. Brugmans, L. Cerych, and M. J. Lory, 386–98. Leyde: A.W. Sythoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. Shaping the World Economy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963a. “Introductory Remarks on the ‘Ization Problem.’” Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 119 (2): 328–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963b. The European Community: Conservative or Progressive? Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1966. “Ontwikkelingshulp in Wereldperspectief.” In 10 Jaar Novib 10 Jaar Ontwikkelingshulp, 52–55. ’s-Gravenhage: NOVIB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. “The Optimal International Division of Labour.” Acta Oeconomica 3: 257–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Jan, H. Linneman, and J. P. Pronk. 1966. “The Meeting of the Twain.” The Columbia Journal of World Business 2 (1): 139–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwey-Jonker, Hilda. 1936. “Plan En Internationalisme.” In Handboek Voor Het Plan van de Arbeid, edited by Floor Wibaut, 135–42. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erwin Dekker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dekker, E. (2021). The Construction of an International Order in the Work of Jan Tinbergen. In: M. Cunha, A., Suprinyak, C.E. (eds) Political Economy and International Order in Interwar Europe. Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47102-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47102-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47101-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47102-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics