Abstract
This paper analyzes the reasons why Jan Tinbergen was initially hostile to European integration, which he regarded as a poor substitute for an international order. His conviction had three important sources. First his coming of age in The Hague, a government city in a small open country the Netherlands, known for its international institutions such as the Peace Palace. Second his work on economic order on the national level, based on the ideal of social peace supplemented with economic expertise. Third his work at the League of Nations which convinced him of the need for a truly international order. When global economic integration failed to make the desired progress, he gradually became convinced that European integration could be a steppingstone toward international integration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Van Cleeff to Tinbergen 24 August 1935, Tinbergen Letters, see https://tinbergenletters.eur.nl/theletters/.
- 2.
Correspondence with Loveday, and draft Report of the ‘third volume’, League of Nations Archives, Geneva.
- 3.
It might also explain some of the dissatisfaction of the more politically minded economists of the time. Keynes wrote highly critical reviews not just of the Tinbergen volume, but also of the preceding Haberler study.
References
Boianovsky, Mauro, and Hans-Michael Trautwein. 2006. “Haberler, the League of Nations, and the Quest for Consensus in Business Cycle Theory in the 1930s.” History of Political Economy 38 (1): 45–89.
Boumans, Marcel. 2019. “Econometrics: The Keynes-Tinbergen Controversy.” In The Elgar Companion to John Maynard Keynes, edited by Robert W. Dimand and Harald Hagemann, 283–89. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Clavin, Patricia. 2015. Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clavin, Patricia, and Jens Wilhelm Wessels. 2005. “Transnationalism and the League of Nations: Understanding the Work of Its Economic and Financial Organisation.” Contemporary European History 14 (4): 465–92.
Commissie uit N.V.V. en S.D.A.P. 1936. “Het Plan van de Arbeid.” Amsterdam.
Dekker, Erwin. 2021. Jan Tinbergen (1903-1994) and the Rise of Economic Expertise. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Den Butter, Frank A. G. 2011. “The Industrial Organisation of Economic Policy Preparation in the Netherlands.” In The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance, edited by J. Lentsch and P. Weingart, 177–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Derksen, J. B. D., and Jan Tinbergen. 1945. “Berekeningen over de Economische Betekenis van Nederlands-Indië Voor Nederland.” Maandschrift van Het C.B.S. 40 (10/12): 210–16.
Dodge, Peter. 1979. Hendrik de Man, Socialist Critic of Marxism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Don, F. J. H. 2019. “The Influence of Jan Tinbergen on Dutch Economic Policy.” De Economist 167 (3): 259–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-019-09333-1.
Eyffinger, Arthur, and Jan den Hengst. 1988. Het Vredespaleis. Amsterdam: Sijthoff.
Haberler, Gottfried, James E. Meade, Roberto Oliveira de Campos, and Jan Tinbergen. 1958. Trends in International Trade. Geneva: GATT.
Haberler, Gottfried von. 1937. Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Geneva: League of Nations: Economic Intelligence Service.
Hansen, Peo, and Stefan Jonsson. 2015. Eurafrica, the Untold History of European Integration and Colonialism. London: Bloomsbury.
Jansen van Galen, John. 1985. “Doorbraak: Het Plan in de Herinnering van Tijdgenoten.” In Het Moet, Het Kan! Op Voor Het Plan!, 156–93. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
Keynes, John Maynard. 1939. “Professor Tinbergen’s Method.” The Economic Journal 49 (195): 558–77.
League of Nations. 1943. The Transition from War to Peace Economy. Geneva: League of Nations.
———. 1945. Economic Stability in the Post-War World. Geneva: League of Nations.
Linneman, H. J., P. Pronk, and Jan Tinbergen. 1965. Convergence of Economic Systems in East and West. Rotterdam: Netherlands Economic Institute.
De Man, Hendrik. 1927. Zur Pscyhologie Des Sozialismus. Jena: Eugen Diederichs.
De Marchi, Neil. 1991. “League of Nations Economists and the Ideal of Peaceful Change in the Decade of the Thirties.” In Economics and National Security, edited by Crauford D. Goodwin, 143–78. Durham: Duke University Press.
Pels, Dick. 1985. “Hendrik de Man En de Ideologie van Het Planisme.” In Het Moet, Het Kan! Op Voor Het Plan!, edited by J. Th. J. Van den Berg, 124–55. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
Slobodian, Quinn. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Sluga, Glenda. 2013. Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia: Penn University Press.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Quantitative Fragen Der Konjunkturpolitik.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 42: 366–99.
———. 1936a. “Fascistische Economie.” Anti-Fascistische Stemmen 1 (2): 2–3.
———. 1936b. “Kan Hier Te Lande, Al Dan Niet Na Overheidsingrijpen, Een Verbetering van de Binnenlandse Conjunctuur Intreden, Ook Zonder Verbetering van Onze Exportpositie?” In Prae-Adviezen Voor de Vereeniging Voor de Staatshuishoudkunde En de Statistiek, 62–108. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
———. 1945. International Economic Co-Operation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
———. 1950. “Het Evenwicht in de Dollarbalans.” Internationale Spectator 4 (17): 1–4.
———. 1954. Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North Holland.
———. 1957. “Internationale Socialistische Politiek.” Socialisme En Democratie 14 (11): 666–71.
———. 1959. “The Theory of the Optimum Regime.” In Selected Papers, edited by L. H. Klaassen, L. M. Koyck, and H. J. Witteveen, 264–304. Amsterdam: North Holland.
———. 1960. “The Impact of the European Economic Community on Third Countries.” In Sciences Humaines et Intégration Européene, edited by H. Brugmans, L. Cerych, and M. J. Lory, 386–98. Leyde: A.W. Sythoff.
———. 1962. Shaping the World Economy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
———. 1963a. “Introductory Remarks on the ‘Ization Problem.’” Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 119 (2): 328–33.
———. 1963b. The European Community: Conservative or Progressive? Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
———. 1966. “Ontwikkelingshulp in Wereldperspectief.” In 10 Jaar Novib 10 Jaar Ontwikkelingshulp, 52–55. ’s-Gravenhage: NOVIB.
———. 1968. “The Optimal International Division of Labour.” Acta Oeconomica 3: 257–82.
———. 1976. Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome. New York: New American Library.
Tinbergen, Jan, H. Linneman, and J. P. Pronk. 1966. “The Meeting of the Twain.” The Columbia Journal of World Business 2 (1): 139–49.
Verwey-Jonker, Hilda. 1936. “Plan En Internationalisme.” In Handboek Voor Het Plan van de Arbeid, edited by Floor Wibaut, 135–42. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dekker, E. (2021). The Construction of an International Order in the Work of Jan Tinbergen. In: M. Cunha, A., Suprinyak, C.E. (eds) Political Economy and International Order in Interwar Europe. Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47102-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47102-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47101-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47102-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)