Skip to main content

Commentary on Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery

Abstract

For a successful orthognathic surgical procedure, an exact diagnosis and treatment plan based on the collection of clinical data are required.

Within the conventional surgical plan designing for orthognathic surgery, facial analysis is performed via facial photographs and two-dimensional radiographs. Moreover, mounted plaster dental casts on the articulator are necessary for mocking up the jaw movements and for preparing surgical splints before the operation.

This traditional method contains possible sources of random errors including occlusal plane transfer and bite wax recording, mounting of a dental cast onto the articulator, and the model surgery process (alterations between hinge axis and condylar rotation, or natural head position inconsistencies while creating the splints and lack of soft-tissue parameters) all of which may lead to imprecisions in the treatment plan process. Furthermore, it is difficult to accurately diagnose occlusal cant and any asymmetric deformity of the bony skeleton, even with precise occlusal plane recreation.

By developing a computer-assisted surgical simulation, a paradigm shift is created in surgical planning for patients suffering from cranio-maxillofacial deformities; moreover, the maxillofacial surgeons are allowed to suppress most of these inherent errors. Regarding orthognathic surgery, these protocols were greatly improved by incorporating of three-dimensional imaging techniques including CBCT or CT, dental 3D scanning, facial 3D scanning, and computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. Virtual osteotomies and simulating the orthognathic surgery on the PC and then the surgical templates or splints are virtually processed and created by a fast prototyping machine. Over the surgery, the digital intermediate splints are utilized to precisely reposition the bony segments. Even though some studies have shown that these advances correspond with better results in comparison to the standard two-dimensional planning and regular fabrication of the splints, it has some limitations for routine employment yet. On the other hand, it seems using of the navigation systems has been introduced also. It seems in the near future the using of navigation computer-assisted systems will be more popular, although according to armaments’ complexity and expensive equipment, it is limited to some academic research and training maxillofacial centers now.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Farrell BB, Franco PB, Tucker MR. Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014;26(4):459–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2014.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hammoudeh JA, Howell LK, Boutros S, Scott MA, Urata MM. Current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: traditional methods versus 3D surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(2):e307. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoang D, Perrault D, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A. Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(23):456. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwon TG. Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional computer-assisted planning for orthognathic surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;40(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-018-0154-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Park JH, Lee YB, Kim SY, Kim HJ, Jung YS, Jung HD. Accuracy of modified CAD/CAM generated wafer for orthognathic surgery. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ritto FG, Schmitt ARM, Pimentel T, Canellas JV, Medeiros PJ. Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary position between conventional model surgery and virtual surgical planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(2):160–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinhuber T, Brunold S, Gartner C, Offermanns V, Ulmer H, Ploder O. Is virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery faster than conventional planning? A time and workflow analysis of an office-based workflow for single- and double-jaw surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(2):397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.07.162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wrzosek MK, Peacock ZS, Laviv A, Goldwaser BR, Ortiz R, Resnick CM, et al. Comparison of time required for traditional versus virtual orthognathic surgery treatment planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(9):1065–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.03.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang N, Liu S, Hu Z, Hu J, Zhu S, Li Y. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in two-jaw orthognathic surgery: comparison of planned and actual results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122(2):143–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Sailer HF, Zoller JE. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: feasibility study using multiple CAD/CAM surgical splints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(5):673–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M, Sasamoto S, Iijima M, Mizoguchi I. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(4):628–33. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sukegawa, S, . Kannoa, T,. Furuki, Y. Application of computer-assisted navigation systems in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Jpn Dent Sci Rev; 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.03.005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keyhan, S.O., Poorian, B. (2021). Commentary on Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery. In: Keyhan, S.O., Fattahi, T., Bagheri, S.C., Bohluli, B., Amirzade-Iranaq, M.H. (eds) Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46993-1_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46993-1_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46992-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46993-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics