Abstract
Few researchers of the past made sense of the collapse of representations in the quantum domain, and looked for a new process of sense-making below the level of representations: the level of the phenomenology of perception and action; the level of the elaboration of knowledge out of experience. But some recent philosophical readings of quantum physics all point in this direction. They all recognize the fact that the quantum revolution is a revolution in our conception of knowledge.
In these recent readings of quantum physics (such as QBism), quantum states are primarily generators of probabilistic valuations. Accordingly, they should not be seen as statements about what is the case, but as statements about what each agent can reasonably expect to be the case.
Three features of such non-interpretational, non-committal approaches to quantum physics strongly evoke the phenomenological epistemology. These are: (1) their deliberately first-person stance; (2) their suspension of judgment about a presumably external domain of objects, and subsequent redirection of attention towards the activity of constituting these objects; (3) their perception-like conception of quantum knowledge.
But beyond phenomenological epistemology, these new approaches of quantum physics also make implicit use of a phenomenological ontology. Chris Fuch’s participatory realism thus formulates a non-external variety of realism for one who is deeply immersed in reality. But participatory realism strongly resembles Merleau-Ponty’s endo-ontology, which is a phenomenological ontology for one who deeply participates in Being.
This remarkable analogy is supported by Merleau-Ponty himself. Indeed, 50 years before QBism, Merleau-Ponty acknowledged the strong kinship between the status of quantum mechanics and his phenomenology of embodiment. He did so in two texts that remained unpublished until after his death: Visible and invisible, and the Lectures on Nature. The final part of this article is then devoted to a study of Merleau-Ponty’s conception of quantum physics.
This work was supported by the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR-16-CE91-0005-01).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbaras, R. (1993). De l’être du phénomène. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.
Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bitbol, M. (1996). Schrödinger’s philosophy of quantum mechanics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Bitbol, M. (Ed.). (2009). Théorie quantique et sciences humaines. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Brukner, C., & Zeilinger, A. (2009). Information invariance and quantum probabilities. Foundations of Physics, 39, 677–689.
Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, C. J., & Klusch, M. (Eds.). (2009a). Quantum interaction. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Bruza, P. D., Kitto, K., Nelson, D., & McEvoy, C. (2009b). Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon? Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 362–377.
de la Tremblaye, L. (2020). QBism from a phenomenological point of view. In H. A. Wiltsche & P. Berghofer (Eds.), Phenomenological approaches to physics,Synthese Library, 429. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
de Saint-Aubert, E. (2006). Vers une ontologie indirecte: sources et enjeux critiques de l’appel à l’ontologie chez Merleau-Ponty. Paris: Vrin.
Destouches-Février, P. (1951). La structure des théories physiques. Paris: P.U.F.
Fuchs, C. (2016). On participatory realism. ArXiv: 1601.04360v3 [quant-ph].
Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D., & Schack, R. (2014). An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 82, 749–754.
Fuchs, C. A., & Peres, A. (2000). Quantum theory needs no interpretation. Physics Today, 3, 70–71.
Grinbaum, A. (2007). Reconstructing instead of interpreting quantum theory. Philosophy of Science, 74, 761–774.
Healey, R. (2017). The quantum revolution in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henry, M. (1963). L’essence de la manifestation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Henry, M. (1985). Généalogie de la psychanalyse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Henry, M. (2000). Incarnation. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (2007). De la réduction phénoménologique. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.
Kant, I. ([1770] 2004). Inaugural dissertation of 1770. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1985). L’œil et l’esprit. Paris: Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). La nature, Notes. Cours du collège de France. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Scheler, M. (1993). Problèmes de sociologie de la connaissance. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Schrödinger, E. (1951). Science and humanism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schrödinger, E. (1954). Nature and the Greeks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stengers, I. (1997). Cosmopolitiques 4: Mécanique quantique, la fin du rêve. Paris: La Découverte.
Thom, R. (1993). Prédire n’est pas expliquer. Paris: Flammarion.
Wheeler, J. A. (1978). The ‘past’ and the ‘delayed-choice double-slit experiment’. In A. R. Marlow (Ed.), Mathematical foundations of quantum theory. New York: Academic.
Wheeler J. A. (2016). Interview, quoted by C. Fuchs, “On participatory realism”, ArXiv: 1601.04360v3 [quant-ph].
Wittgenstein, L. ([1953] 1968). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Zwirn, H. (2009). Formalisme quantique et préférences indéterminées en théorie de la décision. In M. Bitbol (Ed.), Théorie quantique et sciences humaines. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bitbol, M. (2020). A Phenomenological Ontology for Physics: Merleau-Ponty and QBism. In: Wiltsche, H.A., Berghofer, P. (eds) Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Synthese Library, vol 429. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46973-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46973-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46972-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46973-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)