Skip to main content

Threading the Weft, Testing the Warp: Population Concepts and the European Upper Paleolithic Chronocultural Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Culture History and Convergent Evolution

Abstract

Interpretations of the European Upper Paleolithic archaeological record have long relied on concepts of past populations. In particular, cultural taxonomic units—which are used as a framework for describing the archaeological record—are commonly equated with past populations. However, our cultural taxonomy is highly historically contingent, and does not necessarily accurately reflect variation in the archaeological record. Furthermore, we lack a secure theoretical basis for the description of past human populations based on taxonomic units. In order to move past these problems and satisfactorily address questions of Upper Paleolithic populations, we need to entirely revise our approach to chronocultural framework building. Here, I outline a specific way of describing the archaeological record that deliberately avoids the use of cultural taxonomic units and instead concentrates on individual features of material culture. This approach may provide a more appropriate basis for the archaeological study of Upper Paleolithic populations and for comparisons with genetic data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramova, Z. A. (1995). L’art paléolithique d’Europe orientale et de Sibérie. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramova, Z. A., Grigorieva, G. V., & Zaitseva, G. I. (2001). The age of Upper Paleolithic sites in the Middle Dnieper River basin of Eastern Europe. Radiocarbon, 42, 1077–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. Y., & Adams, E. W. (2009). Archaeological typology and practical reality: A dialectical approach to artifact classification and sorting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirkhanov, Kh. A. (2000). Zaraiskaia stoianka. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirkhanov, Kh. A. (Ed.). (2009). Issledovaniia paleolita v Zaraiske 1999–2005. Moscow: Paleograf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirkhanov, Kh. A., & Lev, S. Iu. (2008). New finds of Paleolithic art from the Zaraisk site. Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, 46, 24–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghelinu, M., & Niţă, L. (2014). What’s in a name: The Aurignacian in Romania. Quaternary International, 351, 172–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghelinu, M., Niţă, L., & Murătoreanu, G. (2018). Le Gravettien et l’Épigravettien de l’Est de la Roumanie: une réévaluation. L’anthropologie, 122, 183–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baales, M., Grimm, S., & Jöris, O. (2001). Hunters of the “Golden Mile”: The late Allerød Federmessergruppen Site at Bad Breisig, Central Rhineland, Germany. Notae Praehistoricae, 21, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, W. E. (2015). Constructing chronologies for the late Middle Paleolithic and Upper Paleolithic: Limitations and means to overcome them. World Archaeology, 47, 585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, W. E., d’Errico, F., Townsend Peterson, A., Vanhaeren, M., Kageyama, M., Sepulchre, P., et al. (2008). Human ecological niches and ranges during the LGM in Europe derived from an application of eco-cultural niche modeling. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 481–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, W. E., d’Errico, F., & Zilhão, J. (2013a). Human–climate interaction during the Early Upper Paleolithic: Testing the hypothesis of an adaptive shift between the Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian. Journal of Human Evolution, 64, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, W. E., d’Errico, F., & Zilhão, J. (2013b). Revisiting the chronology of the Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian in Europe: A reply to Higham et al.’s comments on Banks et al. (2013). Journal of Human Evolution, 65, 810–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M. (1997). Stone tools, style, and social identity: An evolutionary perspective on the archaeological record. In C. M. Barton & G. Clark (Eds.), Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary theory and archaeological explanation (pp. 141–156). Washington, DC: Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, No. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M. J. (2009). Archaeological data analysis and fuzzy clustering. Archaeometry, 51, 1035–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beliaeva, V. I. (2002). Kremnëvaia industriia Pushkarei 1. In N. D. Praslov (Ed.), Verkhnii paleolit – verkhnii pleistotsen: dinamika prirodnykh sobytii i periodizatsiia arkheologicheskikh kul’tur. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi 90-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia A. N. Rogachëva (pp. 132–137). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocquet-Appel, J. P., & Demars, P. Y. (2000). Population kinetics in the Upper Palaeolithic in western Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 551–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodu, P. (1998). Magdalenians-Early Azilians in the centre of the Paris Basin: A filiation? The example of Le Closeau (Rueil-Malmaison, France). In S. Milliken (Ed.), The organization of lithic technology in Late Glacial and Early Postglacial Europe (BAR International Series 700) (pp. 131–147). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, J.-G. (2006). News from the West: A reevaluation of the classical Aurignacian sequence of the Périgord. In O. Bar-Yosef & J. Zilhão (Eds.), Towards a definition of the Aurignacian, Proceedings of the Symposium held in Lisbon, Portugal, June 25–30, 2002 (Trabalhos de Arqueologia 45) (pp. 147–171). Lisbon: Instituto Português de Arqueologia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, J.-G., Bachellerie, F., le Brun-Ricalens, F., & Michel, A. (2011). Towards a new “transition”: New data concerning the lithic industries from the beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic in Southwestern France. In A. P. Derevianko & M. Shunkov (Eds.), Characteristic features of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic Transition in Eurasia, Proceedings of the International Symposium, “Characteristic features of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic Transition in Eurasia: Development of Culture and Evolution of Homo Genus” (July 4–10, Denisova Cave, Altai) (pp. 116129). Novosibirsk: Department of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourrillon, R., White, R., Tartar, E., Chiotti, L., Mensan, R., Clark, A., et al. (2018). A new Aurignacian engraving from Abri Blanchard, France: Implications for understanding Aurignacian graphic expression in Western and Central Europe. Quaternary International, 491, 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradtmöller, M., Pastoors, A., Weninger, B., & Weniger, G.-C. (2012). The repeated replacement model—Rapid climate change and population dynamics in Late Pleistocene Europe. Quaternary International, 247, 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, F., & Higham, T. F. G. (2009). AMS radiocarbon dating of Paleolithic-aged charcoal from Europe and the Mediterranean rim using ABOx-SC. Radiocarbon, 51, 839–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, F., Higham, T., Ditchfield, P., & Bronk Ramsey, C. (2010). Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon, 52, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, F., Geoghegan, V., Thomas, B., Jurkschat, K., & Higham, T. F. G. (2013). Analysis of bone “collagen” extraction products for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon, 55, 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, F., Dee, M., Hughes, A., Snoeck, C., Staff, R., & Bronk Ramsey, C. (2018). Testing the effectiveness of protocols for removal of common conservation treatments for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon, 60, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T., & Leach, P. (2004). Towards high-precision AMS: Progress and limitations. Radiocarbon, 46, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brughmans, T. (2013). Thinking through networks: A review of formal network methods in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20, 623–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulochnikova, E. V. (1998). Vchera i segodnia poniatiia “vostochnyi gravet’en”. In Kh. A. Amirkhanov (Ed.), Vostochnoi gravett (pp. 67–72). Moscow: Nauchnyi mir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulochnikova, E. V. (2008). Khronologiia verkhnepaleoliticheskikh stoianok v sisteme arkheologicheskikh i estestvennonauchnykh dannykh. In G. A. Khlopachëv (Ed.), Khronologiia, periodizatsiia i krosskul’turnye sviazi v kamennom veke: Zamiatninskii sbornik. Vypusk 1 (pp. 63–73). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdukiewicz, J. M. (2001). The last Ice Age and settlement break in the northern past of Central Europe. Fontes Archaeologici Posnanienses, 39, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdukiewicz, J. M. (2011). Late Glacial hunter-gatherer reactions to the Younger Dryas cooling event in the southern and eastern Baltic regions of Europe. Quaternary International, 242, 302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, M., & Childe, V. G. (1932). A chronological table of prehistory. Antiquity, 6, 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, W., Lengyel, G., Zeeden, C., Péntek, A., Kaminská, L., & Mester, Z. (2018). Early Upper Paleolithic surface collections from loess-like sediments in the northern Carpathian Basin. Quaternary International, 485, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., & Riel-Salvatore, J. (2006). Observations on systematics in Paleolithic archaeology. In E. Hovers & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition (pp. 29–56). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. L. (1968). Analytical archaeology (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collar, A., Coward, F., Brughmans, T., & Mills, B. J. (2015). Networks in archaeology: Phenomena, abstraction, representation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard, M., Shennan, S. J., Buchanan, B., & Bentley, R. A. (2009). Evolutionary biological methods and cultural data. In R. A. Bentley, H. D. G. Maschner, & C. Chippindale (Eds.), Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 203–223). Lanham: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, G. L. (1928). The Aurignacians and their culture. Beloit: Logan Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard, N. J., & Bolus, M. (2003). Radiocarbon dating the appearance of modern humans and timing of cultural innovations in Europe: New results and new challenges. Journal of Human Evolution, 44, 331–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Peña, P., & Vega Toscano, G. (2013). The Early Upper Palaeolithic puzzle in Mediterranean Iberia. Quartär, 60, 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demars, P.-Y. (1990). Proposition pour une nouvelle liste typologique des outillages lithiques du Paléolithique supérieur. Paléo, 2, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demars, P.-Y., & Laurent, P. (1992). Types d’outils lithiques du Paléolithique supérieur en Europe. Paris: Presses du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Errico, F., & Banks, W. E. (2015). Tephra studies and the reconstruction of Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic cultural trajectories. Quaternary Science Reviews, 118, 182–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1966). L’évolution du Paléolithique supérieur en Europe occidentale et sa signification. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 63, 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sonneville Bordes, D., & Perrot, J. (1954). Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 51, 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sonneville Bordes, D., & Perrot, J. (1955). Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 52, 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sonneville Bordes, D., & Perrot, J. (1956a). Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 53, 408–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sonneville Bordes, D., & Perrot, J. (1956b). Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 53, 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deviese, T., Comeskey, D., McCullagh, J., Bronk Ramsey, C., & Higham, T. (2018). New protocol for compound-specific radiocarbon analysis of archaeological bones. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 32, 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L. (1995). Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of the evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 299–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L., Holdaway, S. J., Lin, S. C., Braun, D. R., Douglass, M. J., Iovita, R., et al. (2016). Major fallacies surrounding stone artifacts and assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 813–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnis, R., Bessudnov, A., Reynolds, N., Devièse, T., Pate, A., Sablin, M., et al. (2019). New data for the Early Upper Paleolithic of Kostenki (Russia). Journal of Human Evolution, 127, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Discamps, E., Gravina, B., & Teyssandier, N. (2015). In the eye of the beholder: Contextual issues for Bayesian modelling at the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition. World Archaeology, 47, 601–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djindjian, F. (2016). Territories and economies of hunter–gatherer groups during the last glacial maximum in Europe. Quaternary International, 412, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djindjian, F., Kozlowski, J., & Otte, M. (1999). Le Paléolithique supérieur en Europe. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-A. (1999). Technology’s links and chaînes: The processual unfolding of technique and technician. In M.-A. Dobres & C. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The social dynamics of technology: Practice, politics, and world views (pp. 124–146). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyon, L. (2019). On the shape of things: A geometric morphometrics approach to investigate Aurignacian group membership. Journal of Archaeological Science, 101, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, S. (2012). What is left of the Badegoulian “interlude”? New data on cultural evolution in southern France between 23,500 and 20,500 cal. BP. Quaternary International, 272–273, 150–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, S., & Langlais, M. (2007). Entre Badegoulien et Magdalénien, nos coeurs balancent… Approche critique des industries lithiques du Sud de la France et du Nord-Est espagnol entre 19000 et 16500 BP. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 104, 771–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1971). Systematics in prehistory. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1986). Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 9, 149–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efimenko, P. P. (1958). Kostënki I. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Es’kova, D. K. (2015). Tekhnologiia rasshchepleniia kamnia na stoiankakh vostochnogo gravetta Russkoi ravniny. Ph.D Dissertation avtoreferat, Institut Arkheologii RAN, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fat Cheung, C., Chevallier, A., Bonnet-Jacquement, P., Langlais, M., Ferrié, J.-G., Costamagno, S., et al. (2014). Comparaison des séquences aziliennes entre Dordogne et Pyrénées: état des travaux en cours. In M. Langlais, N. Naudinot, & M. Peresani (Eds.), Les groupes culturels de la transition Pléistocène-Holocène entre Atlantique et Adriatique. Actes de la séance de la Société préhistorique française de Bordeaux, 24–25 mai 2012 (pp. 17–44). Paris: Société préhistorique française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, C., & Carrión, J. S. (2007). Rapid ecological turnover and its impact on Neanderthal and other human populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. C. (2015). The demography of the Upper Palaeolithic hunter–gatherers of Southwestern France: A multi-proxy approach using archaeological data. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 39, 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouin, M., Guérin, G., Lahaye, C., Mercier, N., Huot, S., Aldeias, V., et al. (2017). New luminescence dating results based on polymineral fine grains from the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic site of La Ferrassie (Dordogne, SW France). Quaternary Geochronology, 39, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Q., Posth, C., Hajdinjak, M., Petr, M., Mallick, S., Fernandes, D., et al. (2016). The genetic history of Ice Age Europe. Nature, 534, 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C., Davies, W., Pettitt, P., Hazelwood, L., & Richards, M. (2005). The archaeological and genetic foundations of the European population during the Late Glacial: Implications for ‘agricultural thinking’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 15, 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, D. A. E. (1938). The Upper Palaeolithic in the light of recent discovery. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 4, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudzinski-Windheuser, S., & Jöris, O. (2015). Contextualising the female image—Symbols for common ideas and communal identity in Upper Palaeolithic societies. In F. Coward, R. Hosfield, M. Pope, & F. Wenban-Smith (Eds.), Settlement, society and cognition in human evolution: Landscapes in mind (pp. 288–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilov, K. N. (2016). Verkhnii paleolit basseina Desny: preemstvennost’ i variabel’nost’ v razvitii material’noi kul’tury. Moscow: Nestor-Istoriia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilov, K. N., Voskresenskaya, E. V., Maschenko, E. N., & Douka, K. (2015). East Gravettian Khotylevo 2 site: Stratigraphy, archeozoology, and spatial organization of the cultural layer at the newly explored area of the site. Quaternary International, 359–360, 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goutas, N. (2013). De Brassempouy À Kostienki: l’exploitation technique des ressources animales dans l’Europe gravettienne. In M. Otte (Ed.), Les Gravettiens (pp. 105–160). Paris: Éditions Errance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goutas, N. (2016). Gravettian projectile points: Considerations about the evolution of osseous hunting weapons in France. In M. Langley (Ed.), Osseous Projectile Weaponry (pp. 89–107). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravina, B., Bachellerie, F., Caux, S., Discamps, E., Faivre, J.-P., Galland, A., et al. (2018). No reliable evidence for a Neanderthal-Châtelperronian association at La Roche-à-Pierrot. Saint-Césaire. Scientific Reports, 8, 15134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigor’ev, G. P. (1993). The Kostenki-Avdeevo archaeological culture and the Willendorf–Pavlov–Kostenki–Avdeevo cultural unity. In O. Soffer & N. D. Praslov (Eds.), From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic—Paleo-Indian adaptations (pp. 51–65). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S. B., & Weber, M.-J. (2008). The chronological framework of the Hamburgian in the light of old and new 14C dates. Quartär, 55, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groucutt, H. S. (2020). Culture and convergence: The curious case of the Nubian Complex. In H. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 55–86). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gvozdover, M. V. (1998). Kremnëvyi inventar’ Avdeevskoi verkhnepaleoliticheskoi stoianki. In K. A. Amirkhanov (Ed.), Vostochnoi gravett (pp. 234–278). Moscow: Nauchnyi mir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haesaerts, P., Damblon, F., Nigst, P., & Hublin, J.-J. (2013). ABA and ABOx radiocarbon cross-dating on charcoal from Middle Pleniglacial loess deposits in Austria, Moravia, and western Ukraine. Radiocarbon, 55, 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haesaerts, P., Damblon, F., van der Plicht, J., Otte, M., & Nigst, P. R. (2017). Additional data to the stratigraphy and the chronology of the Kostenki 1 (Poliakov) sequence, Voronezh, Russia. In S. Vasilyev, A. Sinitsyn, & M. Otte (Eds.), Le Sungirien, Saint-Pétersbourg 2016 (pp. 135–142). Liège: ÉRAUL 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, J. (1988). Die Geißenklösterle-Höhle im Achtal bei Blaubeuren I. Fundhorizontbildung und Besiedlung im Mittelpalaölithikum und im Aurignacien. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrold, F. B. (1993). Variability and function among Gravette points from southwestern France. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 4, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1984). Are emic types relevant to archaeology? Ethnohistory, 31, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, M. A., & Lucas, G. (2000). A technological and functional analysis of carinates from Le Flageolet I, Dordogne, France. Journal of Field Archaeology, 27, 455–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermon, S., & Niccolucci, F. (2017). Formally defining the time-space-archaeological culture relation: Problems and prospects. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 28, 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, T. F. G. (2011). European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look: Problems with previous dates and some remedies. Antiquity, 85, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, T., Basell, L., Jacobi, R., Wood, R., Bronk Ramsey, C., & Conard, N. J. (2012). Τesting models for the beginnings of the Aurignacian and the advent of figurative art and music: The radiocarbon chronology of Geißenklösterle. Journal of Human Evolution, 62, 664–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, T., Wood, R., Moreau, L., Conard, N., & Bronk Ramsey, C. (2013). Comments on ‘Human–climate interaction during the early Upper Paleolithic: Testing the hypothesis of an adaptive shift between the Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian’ by Banks et al. Journal of Human Evolution, 65, 806–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hřdlicka, A. (1927). The Neanderthal phase of man. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 57, 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hromadova, B. (2012). Ispol’zovanie syr’ia iz kosti, bivnia i roga na stoiankakh kostënkovsko-avdeevskoi kul’tury (vostochnoi gravett). Ph.D. Dissertation avtoreferat, MGU, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hublin, J. J. (2015). The modern human colonization of western Eurasia: when and where? Quaternary Science Reviews, 118, 194–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, T. D., & Rakita, G. F. M. (Eds.). (2001). Style and function: Conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iakovleva, L. (2003). Les habitats en os de mammouths du Paléolithique supérieur d’Europe orientale: les données et leur interprétation. In S. A. Vasiliev, O. Soffer, & J. K. Kozłowski (Eds.), Perceived landscapes and built environments: the cultural geography of late palaeolithic Eurasia. Actes du XIV° Congrès UISPP, Université de Liège, Belgique, 2–8 septembre 2001: colloques 6.2 & 6.5 (BAR International Series 1122) (pp. 47–57). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, M. A. (1985). Struktura Gmelinskogo paleoliticheskogo poselniia (po rezul’tatam planigraficheskogo i tipologicheskogo analiza kremnëvogo inventaria). Ph.D Dissertation avtoreferat, LOIA RAN, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P. (2015). Technology as human social tradition: Cultural transmission among hunter-gatherers. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khlopachev, G., Vercoutère, C., & Wolf, S. (2018). Les statuettes féminines en ivoire des faciès gravettiens et post-gravettiens en Europe centrale et orientale: modes de fabrication et de représentation. L’anthropologie, 122, 492–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaric, L. (2007). Regional groups in the European Middle Gravettian: A reconsideration of the Rayssian technology. Antiquity, 81, 176–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaric, L., Guillermin, P., & Aubry, T. (2009). Des armatures variées et des modes de productions variables. Gallia Préhistoire, 51, 113–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaric, L., Lev, S., Giria, Y., & Polanská, M. (2015). ‘Couteaux de Kostienki et lames aménagées par technique de Kostienki’. Retour sur un malentendu historique. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 112, 421–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knappett, C. (2011). An archaeology of interaction: Network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozłowski, J. K. (2015). The origin of the Gravettian. Quaternary International, 359, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. (1977). Pots and people. In L. D. Levine & T. C. Young (Eds.), Mountains and lowlands: Essays in the archaeology of greater Mesopotamia (pp. 91–112). Malibu: Undena Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacarrière, J., Goutas, N., Normand, C., Simonet, A., & Schwab, C. (2011). Vers une redéfinition des occupations gravettiennes de la grotte d’Isturitz (Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France): révision critique des collections «anciennes» par l’approche intégrée des données lithiques, fauniques et de l’industrie osseuse. In N. Goutas, L. Klaric, D. Pesesse, & P. Guillermin (Eds.), À la recherche des identités gravettiennes: actualités, questionnements et perspectives: actes de la table ronde sur le Gravettien en France et dans les pays limitrophes, Aix-en-Provence, 6–8 octobre 2008 (Mémoire SPF 52) (pp. 67–83). Paris: Société préhistorique française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlais, M., Sécher, A., Caux, S., Delvigne, V., Gourc, L., Normand, C., et al. (2016). Lithic tool kits: A metronome of the evolution of the Magdalenian in southwest France (19,000–14,000 cal BP). Quaternary International, 414, 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R. D., & Jones, G. T. (1987). Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 6, 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Brun-Ricalens, F., Bordes, J.-G., & Eizenberg, L. (2009). A crossed-glance between southern European and Middle-Near Eastern early Upper Palaeolithic lithic technocomplexes. Existing models, new perspectives. In M. Camps & C. Szmidt (Eds.), The Medterranean from 50 000 to 25 000 BP: Turning points and new directions (pp. 11–33). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengyel, G. (2016). Reassessing the Middle and Late Upper Palaeolithic in Hungary. Acta Archaeologica Carpathica, 51, 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan A. (1964–1965). Le geste et la parole, vols. 1 and 2. Paris: A. Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, S. Y. (2009). Kamennyi inventar’ Zaraiskoi stoianki: Tipologicheskii aspekt. In K. A. Amirkhanov (Ed.), Issledovaniia paleolita v Zaraiske 1999–2005 (pp. 37–185). Moscow: Paleograf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, S. Y., Klarik, L., & Giria, E. Y. (2011). Nozhi kostënkovskogo tipa i plastiny s podrabotkoi kontsa: fenomen konvergentnogo razvitiia ili rodstvo tekhnologii? In K. N. Gavrilov (Ed.), Paleolit i mezolit vostochnoi Evropy (pp. 235–279). Moscow: Institut arkheologii RAN/Taus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisitsyn, S. N. (2015). The late Gravettian of Borshevo 5 in the context of the Kostenki-Borshevo sites (Don basin, Russia). Quaternary International, 359–60, 372–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, J., Fuchs, M., Preusser, F., & Fiebig, M. (2014). Luminescence based loess chronostratigraphy of the Upper Palaeolithic site Krems-Wachtberg, Austria. Quaternary International, 351, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L., & O’Brien, M. J. (2004). A history of normative theory in Americanist archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 11, 369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macalister, R. A. S. (1921). A text-book of European archaeology. Vol. I: The Palaeolithic period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCurdy, G. G. (1914). La Combe, a Paleolithic cave in the Dordogne. American Anthropologist, 16, 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCurdy, G. G. (1915). [Book Review] Ancient hunters and their modern representatives. By WJ Sollas, D. Sc., FRS, Professor of Geology and Palaeontology in the University of Oxford. Second Edition. The American Historical Review, 21, 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, L. A., & Macdonald, D. A. (2020). Communities of interaction: Tradition and learning in stone tool production through the lens of the Epipaleolithic of Khareh IV, Jordan. In H. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 213–243). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, A. (2015). The central European Magdalenian: Regional diversity and internal variability. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A. E., Hietala, H. J., & Williams, J. K. (2001). Tool standardization in the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic: A closer look. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marom, A., McCullagh, J. S. O., Higham, T. F. G., Sinitsyn, A. A., & Hedges, R. E. M. (2012). Single amino acid radiocarbon dating of Upper Paleolithic modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109, 6878–6881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marom, A., McCullagh, J. S. O., Higham, T. F. G., & Hedges, R. E. M. (2013). Hydroxyproline dating: Experiments on the 14C analysis of contaminated and low-collagen bones. Radiocarbon, 55, 698–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, J. S. O., Marom, A., & Hedges, R. E. M. (2010). Radiocarbon dating of individual amino acids from archaeological bone collagen. Radiocarbon, 52, 620–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNabb, J. (2020). Problems and pitfalls in understanding the Clactonian. In H. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 29–53). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellars, P. (1989). Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology, 30, 349–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2009). Placing archaeology within a unified science of cultural evolution. In S. Shennan (Ed.), Pattern and process in cultural evolution (pp. 21–32). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, A. (2010). L’Aurignacien récent (post-ancien) dans le Sud-Ouest de la France: variabilité des productions lithiques. Révision taphonomique et techno-économique des sites de Caminade-Est, abri Pataud, Roc-de-Combe, Le Flageolet I, La Ferrassie et Combemenue. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université de Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihailovic, D., & Mihailovic, B. (2007). Considérations sur le Gravettien et l’Épigravettien ancien des Balkans de l’ouest. Paléo, 19, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, L. (2010). Geißenklösterle. The Swabian Gravettian in its European context. Quartär, 57, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E., Tsanova, T., Sirakov, N., Rendu, W., Mallye, J.-B., & Lévêque, F. (2005). Bone refits in stratified deposits: Testing the chronological grain at Saint-Césaire. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 1083–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussi, M., Cinq Mars, J., & Bolduc, P. (2000). Echoes from the mammoth steppe: The case of the Balzi Rossi. In W. Roebroeks, M. Mussi, J. Svoboda, & K. Fennema (Eds.), Hunters of the Golden Age (pp. 105–124). Leiden: University of Leiden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalawade-Chavan, S., McCullagh, J., & Hedges, R. (2014). New hydroxyproline radiocarbon dates from Sungir’, Russia, confirm early Mid Upper Palaeolithic burials in Eurasia. PLoS ONE, 9, e76896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudinot, N., Tomasso, A., Messager, E., Finsinger, W., Ruffaldi, P., & Langlais, M. (2017). Between Atlantic and Mediterranean: Changes in technology during the Late Glacial in Western Europe and the climate hypothesis. Quaternary International, 428 (B), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeley, M. P., & Barton, C. M. (1994). A new approach to interpreting late Pleistocene microlith industries in southwest Asia. Antiquity, 68, 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigst, P. R., Haesaerts, P., Damblon, F., Frank-Fellner, C., Mallol, C., Viola, B., et al. (2014). Early modern human settlement of Europe north of the Alps occurred 43,500 years ago in a cold steppe-type environment. PNAS, 111, 14394–14399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noiret, P. (2009). Le Paléolithique supérieur de Moldavie. Essai de synthèse d’une évolution multi-culturelle. Liège: ÉRAUL 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noiret, P. (2013). De quoi Gravettien est-il le nom ? In M. Otte (Ed.), Les Gravettiens (pp. 29–64). Paris: Éditions Errance.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M., & Holland, T. D. (1990). Variation, selection, and the archaeological record. Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 31–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. J., & Bentley, R. A. (2020). Learning strategies and population dynamics during the Pleistocene colonization of North America. In H. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 261–281). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, G. (1981). The morphological express at function junction: Searching for meaning in lithic tool types. Journal of Anthropological Research, 37, 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (1981). Le Gravettien en Europe Centrale. Bruges: De Tempel (Dissertationes Archaeologicae Gandenses, vol. XX).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (Ed.). (2010). Les Aurignaciens. Paris: Éditions Errance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (Ed.). (2013). Les Gravettiens. Paris: Éditions Errance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C., Deneuve, E., Fagnart, J.-P., Coudret, P., Antoine, P., Peschaux, C., et al. (2017). Premières observations sur le gisement gravettien à statuettes féminines d’Amiens-Renancourt 1 (Somme). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 114, 423–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. (1991). Les savoir-faire: une très longue histoire. Terrain, 16, 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. (2007). Réflexions sur la notion de spécialiste dans la taille de la pierre au Paléolithique. In R. Desbrosse & A. Thévenin (Eds.), Arts et cultures de la Préhistoire: hommages à Henri Delporte (pp. 315–318). Paris: Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. (2012). Sur les débitages laminaires du Paléolithique supérieur. In F. Delpech & J. Jaubert (Eds.), François Bordes et la Préhistoire: colloque international François Bordes, Bordeaux, 2224 avril 2009 (pp. 141–152). Paris: Éditions du Comité des Travaux historiques et scientifiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlès, C. (2013). Tempi of change: When soloists don’t play together. Arrhythmia in ‘continuous’ change. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20, 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesesse, D. (2013). Le Gravettien existe-t-il ? Le prisme du système technique lithique. In M. Otte (Ed.), Les Gravettiens (pp. 67–104). Paris: Éditions Errance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesesse, D. (2009–2010). La pointe de Font-Yves et les productions lithiques des derniers Aurignaciens. Paléo, 21, 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesesse, D., & Michel, A. (2006). Le burin des Vachons: apports d’une relecture technologique à la compréhension de l’Aurignacien final. Paléo, 18, 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeot, N. (1990). Technical and social actors in Prehistory. Flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian Étiolles. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 126–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanská, M., & Hromadová, B. (2015). Réflexion autour des industries gravettiennes «post-pavloviennes» de Slovaquie occidentale et de Moravie (25,500/24,500–22,000 BP non calibré). In S. Sázelová, M. Novák, & A. Mizerová (Eds.), Forgotten times and spaces: New perspectives in paleoanthropological, paleoetnological and archeological studies (pp. 132–154). Brno: Institute of Archeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences and Masaryk University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posth, C., Renaud, G., Mittnik, A., Drucker, D. G., Rougier, H., Cupillard, C., et al. (2016). Pleistocene mitochondrial genomes suggest a single major dispersal of non-Africans and a Late Glacial population turnover in Europe. Current Biology, 26, 827–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praslov, N. D., & Ivanova, M. A. (1982). Kostënki 21 (Gmelinskaia stoianka). In N. D. Praslov & A. N. Rogachëv (Eds.), Paleolit kostënkovsko-borshchëvskogo raiona na Donu 1879–1979: Nekotorye itogi polevykh issledovanii (pp. 198–210). Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. W. (1989). Intuitive typology and automatic classification: Divergence or full circle? Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 8, 158–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, C. (2011). Continuity or discontinuity in the Late Glacial Maximum of south-western Europe: The formation of the Solutrean in France. World Archaeology, 43, 726–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N. (2014). The Mid Upper Palaeolithic of European Russia: Chronology, culture history and context. A study of five Gravettian backed lithic assemblages. DPhil Dissertation, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N. (Accepted manuscript). The Gravettian is dead: Against equivocation and reification in chronocultural studies of the Upper Palaeolithic. In O. Touzé, N. Goutas, H. Salomon, & P. Noiret (Eds.), North-Western Europe During the Gravettian. Contributions of recent research to the understanding of the societies and their environments. Proceedings of the International congress of Liège (12-13 April 2018). Liège and Brussels: Presses universitaires de Liège and Royal Belgian Society of Anthropology and Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., & Green, C. (2019). Spatiotemporal modelling of radiocarbon dates using linear regression does not indicate a vector of demic dispersal associated with the earliest Gravettian assemblages in Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 27, 101958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., & Riede, F. (2019). House of cards: Cultural taxonomy and the study of the European Upper Palaeolithic. Antiquity, 93, 1350–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., Lisitsyn, S. N., Sablin, M. V., Barton, N., & Higham, T. (2015). Chronology of the European Russian Gravettian: New radiocarbon dating results and interpretation. Quartär, 62, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., Dinnis, R., Bessudnov, A. A., Devièse, T., & Higham, T. F. G. (2017). The Kostënki 18 child burial and the cultural and funerary landscape of Mid Upper Palaeolithic European Russia. Antiquity, 91, 1435–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., Germonpré, M., Bessudnov, A. A., & Sablin, M. V. (2019). The Late Gravettian site of Kostënki 21 Layer III, Russia: A chronocultural reassessment based on a new interpretation of the significance of intra-site spatial patterning. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 2, 160–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riede, F. (2011). Steps towards operationalizing an evolutionary archaeological definition of culture. In B. W. Roberts & M. Vander Linden (Eds.), Investigating archaeological cultures: Material culture, variability, and transmission (pp. 245–270). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riel-Salvatore, J., & Clark, G. A. (2001). Grave markers: Middle and Early Upper Paleolithic burials and the use of chronotypology in contemporary Paleolithic research. Current Anthropology, 42, 449–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud, S., Roussel, M., Rendu, W., Primault, J., Renou, S., Hublin, J.-J., et al. (2014). Les pratiques ornementales à l’Aurignacien ancien dans le Centre-Ouest de la France. L’apport des fouilles récentes aux Cottés (Vienne). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 111, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud, S., Manen, C., & García-Martínez de Lagrán, I. (2018). Symbols in motion: Flexible cultural boundaries and the fast spread of the Neolithic in the western Mediterranean. PLoS ONE, 13, e0196488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & Vander Linden, M. (2011). Investigating archaeological cultures: Material culture, variability, and transmission. In B. W. Roberts & M. Vander Linden (Eds.), Investigating archaeological cultures: Material culture, variability, and transmission (pp. 1–21). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogachëv, A. N. (1957). Mnogosloinye stoianki kostënkovsko-borshëvskogo raiona na Donu i problema razvitiia kul’tury v epokhu verkhnego paleolita na Russkoi ravnine. Materialy i issledovaniia po arkheologii SSSR, 59, 9–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogachëv, A. N., & Anikovich, M. V. (1982). Kostënki 9 (Biriuch’ii Log). In N. D. Praslov & A. N. Rogachëv (Eds.), Paleolit kostënkovsko-borshchëvskogo raiona na Donu 1879–1979: Nekotorye itogi polevykh issledovanii (pp. 109–113). Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogachёv, A. N., & Popov, V. V. (1982). Kostënki 11 (Anosovka 2). In N. D. Praslov & A. N. Rogachëv (Eds.), Paleolit kostënkovsko-borshchëvskogo raiona na Donu 1879–1979: Nekotorye itogi polevykh issledovanii (pp. 116–132). Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronchitelli, A., Mugnaini, S., Arrighi, S., Atrei, A., Capecchi, G., Giamello, M., et al. (2015). When technology joins symbolic behaviour: The Gravettian burials at Grotta Paglicci (Rignano Garganico–Foggia–Southern Italy). Quaternary International, 359–360, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1982). Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 59–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1985). Style and ethnicity in the Kalahari: A reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity, 50, 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, F., & Riede, F. (2019). A critical reassessment of cultural taxonomies in the Central European Late Palaeolithic. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 26, 155–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. M. L., Drake, N. A., Jennings, R., & Groucutt, H. S. (2014). Earliest evidence for the structure of Homo sapiens populations in Africa. Quaternary Science Reviews, 101, 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, I., Bradtmöller, M., Kehl, M., Pastoors, A., Tafelmaier, Y., Weninger, B., et al. (2012). Rapid climate change and variability of settlement patterns in Iberia during the Late Pleistocene. Quaternary International, 274, 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabedissen, H. (1954). Die Federmesser-Gruppen des nordwesteuropäischen Flachlandes: Zur Ausbreitung des Spät-Magdalénien (Offa-Bücher 9). Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serwatka, K., & Riede, F. (2016). 2D geometric morphometric analysis casts doubt on the validity of large tanged points as cultural markers in the European Final Palaeolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 9, 150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2014). Sink the Mousterian? Named stone tool industries (NASTIES) as obstacles to investigating hominin evolutionary relationships in the Later Middle Paleolithic Levant. Quaternary International, 350, 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (2020). Style, function and cultural transmission. In H. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 291–298). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J., Crema, E. R., & Kerig, T. (2015). Isolation-by-distance, homophily, and “core” vs. “package” cultural evolution models in Neolithic Europe. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikora, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Sousa, V. C., Albrechtsen, A., Korneliussen, T., Ko, A., et al. (2017). Ancient genomes show social and reproductive behavior of early Upper Paleolithic foragers. Science, 358, 659–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonet, A. (2012). Brassempouy (Landes, France) ou la matrice gravettienne de l’Europe. Liège: ÉRAUL 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsyn, A. A. (2007). Variabilité du Gravettien de Kostienki (bassin moyen du Don) et des territoires associés. Paléo, 19, 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsyn, A. A. (2010). The Early Upper Palaeolithic of Kostenki: Chronology, taxonomy, and cultural affiliation. In C. Neugebauer-Maresch & L. R. Owen (Eds.), New aspects of the Central and Eastern European Upper Palaeolithic—Methods, chronology, technology and subsistence (Symposium by the Prehistoric Commission of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, November 9–11, 2005) (pp. 27–48). Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsyn, A. A. (2013). Gravett Kostënok v kontekste gravetta Vostochnoi Evropy. In G. V. Sinitsyna (Ed.), Problemy zaseleniia severo-zapada Vostochnoi Evropy v verkhnem i final’nom paleolite (kul’turno-istoricheskie protsessy) (pp. 4–32). Saint Petersburg: IIMK RAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsyn, A. A. (2014). K probleme kul’turnoi prinadlezhnosti Pushkarei 1. In D. G. Savinov & A. I. Murashkin (Eds.), Problemy arkheologii epokhi kamnia: k 70-letiiu Valentiny Ivanovny Beliaevoi: Sbornik nauchnykh statei (Trudy istoricheskogo fakul’teta SPbGU, Vol. 18) (pp. 234–244). Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo SPbGU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsyn, A. A. (2015). Perspectives on the Palaeolithic of Eurasia: Kostënki and related sites. In N. Sanz (Ed.), Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia, vol. 1 (HEADS 4) (pp. 163–189). Paris & Mexico City: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsyn, A. A., Praslov, N. D., Svezhentsev, Iu. S., & Sulerzhitskii, L. D. (1997). Radiouglerodnaia khronologiia verkhnego paleolita Vostochnoi Evropy. In A. A. Sinitsyn & N. D. Praslov (Eds.), Radiouglerodnaia khronologiia paleolita Vostochnoi Evropy i Severnoi Azii. Problemy i perspektivy (pp. 21–66). Sankt-Peterburg: IIMK RAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1980). Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 47, 350–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobkowiak-Tabaka, I. (2017). Rozwój społecznośti Federmesser na Nizinie Środkowoeuropejskiej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobkowiak-Tabaka, I., & Winkler, Katja. (2017). The Ahrensburgian and the Swiderian in the area around the middle Oder River: Reflections on similarities and differences. Quartär, 64, 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, O., Adovasio, J. M., & Hyland, D. C. (2000). The “Venus” figurines: Textiles, basketry, gender, and status in the Upper Paleolithic. Current Anthropology, 41, 511–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, M. L. S. (2014). The archaeological culture concept: Hot or cold understandings. In H. Alexandersson, A. Andreeff, & A. Bünz (Eds.), Med Hjärta Och Hjärna: En Vänbok till Professor Elisabeth Arwill-Nordbladh (pp. 247–258). Gothenburg: Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, S. (1998). Les microgravettes du Périgordien de Rabier à Lanquais (Dordogne): analyse technologique fonctionnelle. Gallia préhistoire, 40, 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, L. G. (2000). A quarter-century of research on the Solutrean of Vasco-Cantabria, Iberia and beyond. Journal of Anthropological Research, 56, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda, J. A. (2007). The Gravettian on the Middle Danube. Paléo, 19, 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda, J. (2015). Perspectives on the Upper Palaeolithic in Eurasia: The Case of the Dolní Vestonice-Pavlov Sites. In N. Sanz (Ed.), Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia (Vol. 1, pp. 190–204)., HEADS 4 Paris & Mexico City: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda, J. A., & Novák, M. (2004). Eastern Central Europe after the Upper Pleniglacial: Changing points of observation. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt, 34, 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallavaara, M., Luoto, M., Korhonen, N., Järvinen, H., & Seppä, H. (2015). Human population dynamics in Europe over the Last Glacial Maximum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 8232–8237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarasov, L. M. (1979). Gagarinskaia stoianka i eë mesto v paleolite Evropy. Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarassov [Tarasov], L. M. (1971). La double statuette paléolithique de Gagarino. Quartär, 22, 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tejero, J.-M. (2016). Spanish Aurignacian projectile points: An example of the first European Paleolithic hunting weapons in osseous materials. In M. Langley (Ed.), Osseous projectile weaponry (pp. 55–69). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teyssandier, N., & Zilhão, J. (2018). On the entity and antiquity of the Aurignacian at Willendorf (Austria): Implications for modern human emergence in Europe. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 1, 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teyssandier, N., Bon, F., & Bordes, J.-G. (2010). Within projectile range: Some thoughts on the appearance of the Aurignacian in Europe. Journal of Anthropological Research, 66, 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tixier, J. (2012). A method for the study of stone tools: Guidelines based on the work of J. Tixier = Méthode pour l’étude des outillages lithiques: notice sur les travaux scientifiques de J. Tixier. Luxembourg: Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art/Centre National de Recherche Archeologique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomášková, S. (2003). Nationalism, local histories and the making of data in archaeology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 485–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsanova, T., Zwyns, N., Eizenberg, L., Teyssandier, N., Le Brun-Ricalens, F., & Otte, M. (2012). Le plus petit dénominateur commun: réflexion sur la variabilité des ensembles lamellaires du Paléolithique supérieur ancien d’Eurasie. Un bilan autour des exemples de Kozarnika (Est des Balkans) et Yafteh (Zagros central). L’anthropologie, 116, 469–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Linden, M., & Roberts, B. W. (2011). A tale of two countries: Contrasting archaeological culture history in British and French archaeology. In B. W. Roberts & M. Vander Linden (Eds.), Investigating archaeological cultures: Material culture, variability, and transmission (pp. 23–40). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaeren, M., & d’Errico, F. (2006). Aurignacian ethno-linguistic geography of Europe revealed by personal ornaments. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1105–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oyen, A. (2015). Actor-Network Theory’s take on archaeological types: Becoming, material agency and historical explanation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 25, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oyen, A. (2017). Material culture and mobility: A brief history of archaeological thought. In C. Heitz & R. Stapfer (Eds.), Mobility and pottery production: Archaeological & anthropological perspectives (pp. 53–65). Leiden: Sidestone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verpoorte, A. (2009). Limiting factors on early modern human dispersals: The human biogeography of late Pleniglacial Europe. Quaternary International, 201, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1997). Perspectives technologiques sur la «double statuette» de Gagarino. Techne, 5, 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierer, U. (2013). Variability and standardization: The early Gravettian lithic complex of Grotta Paglicci, Southern Italy. Quaternary International, 288, 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1985). Style or isochrestic variation? A reply to Sackett. American Antiquity, 50, 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczyński, J. (2015). Lithic artefacts. In J. Wilczyński (Ed.), A Gravettian site in southern Poland: Jaksice II (pp. 33–62). Krakow: ISEA PAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczyński, J., Wojtal, P., Łanczont, M., Mroczek, P., Sobieraj, D., & Fedorowicz, S. (2015). Loess, flints and bones: Multidisciplinary research at Jaksice II Gravettian site (southern Poland). Quaternary International, 359–60, 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, M., & Mackay, A. (2020). A matter of space and time: How frequent is convergence in lithic technology in the African archaeological record over the last 300 kyr? In H. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 103–126). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In C. E. Cleland (Ed.), For the director: Research essays in honor of James B. Griffin (Anthropological Papers 61) (pp. 317–342). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtal, P., Wilczyński, J., Wertz, K., & Svoboda, J. A. (2018). The scene of a spectacular feast (part II): Animal remains from Dolní Věstonice II, the Czech Republic. Quaternary International, 466 B, 194–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanevich, A. (2014). Les occupations gravettiennes de Buran-Kaya III (Crimée): contexte archéologique. L’anthropologie, 118, 554–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheltova, M. N. (2015). Kostenki 4: Gravettian of the east—Not Eastern Gravettian. Quaternary International, 359–360, 362–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilhão, J., & d’Errico, F. (2003). The chronology of the Aurignacian and Transitional technocomplexes. Where do we stand? In J. Zilhão & F. d’Errico (Eds.), The chronology of the Aurignacian and of the transitional technocomplexes: Dating, stratigraphies, cultural implications. (Trabalhos de Arqueologia 33) (pp. 313–349). Lisbon: Instituto Português de Arqueologia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Will Banks, Julia Kotthaus and Felix Riede for conversations and correspondence that helped me to clarify many of the arguments put forward in this chapter, and to Huw Groucutt for the invitation to contribute to this volume. I also thank the anonymous reviewers and HG for their comments, which were very helpful in improving the manuscript. This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 747400. All figures in this chapter were created by NR and are used under a CC-BY 4.0 licence; original figures are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7770986.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natasha Reynolds .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, N. (2020). Threading the Weft, Testing the Warp: Population Concepts and the European Upper Paleolithic Chronocultural Framework. In: Groucutt, H. (eds) Culture History and Convergent Evolution. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46126-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics