Skip to main content

The Biological Basis of Craniofacially Conjoined Twins

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamentals of Craniofacial Malformations
  • 1032 Accesses

Abstract

Conjoined twins are suggested to result from aberrant embryogenesis. The incidence rate is 1 in 50,000 births; however, since about 60% of the cases are stillborn, the true incidence is approximated at 1 in 400,000. There is a higher predisposition towards female than male gender with a ratio of 3:1. Conjoined twinning, however, only arises when the twinning event occurs at about the primitive streak stage of development, at about 13–14 days after fertilization in the human, and is exclusively associated with the monoamniotic monochorionic type of placentation. In the craniofacial region, three types of twinning can be present: craniopagus, diprosopus (facial duplication), or parasites. When the skull is mainly involved, they are termed craniopagus, whereas if the face is mainly involved they are termed cephalopagus or facial duplication (diprosopus). If there is an asymmetrical twinning, such phenotypes are termed parasites. The two main theories proposed to explain the phenomena are fission and fusion. Whereas both theories could potentially be extrapolated from embryological adjustments exclusively seen in conjoined twins, these theories cannot be applied to the full range of conjunction possibilities and thus remain a matter of persistent inconclusiveness. Conjoined twins are classified based upon the site of attachment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pachajoa H, Hernandez-Amaris MF, Porras-Hurtado GL, Rodriguez CA. Siamese twins with craniofacial duplication and bilateral cleft lip/palate in a ceramic representation of the Chimú culture (Peru): a comparative analysis with a current case. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2014;17:211–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufman MH. The embryology of conjoined twins. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20:508–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spencer R. Conjoined twins: developmental malformations and clinical implications. Baltimore and London: JHU Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mutchinick OM, Luna-Muñoz L, Amar E, Bakker MK, Clementi M, Cocchi G, da Graça DM, Feldkamp ML, Landau D, Leoncini E, Li Z, Lowry B, Marengo LK, Martínez-Frías ML, Mastroiacovo P, Métneki J, Morgan M, Pierini A, Rissman A, Ritvanen A, Scarano G, Siffel C, Szabova E, Arteaga-Vázquez J. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the international clearinghouse for birth defects surveillance and research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C:274–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boer LL, Schepens-Franke AN, Oostra RJ. Two is a crowd: two is a crowd: on the enigmatic etiopathogenesis of conjoined twinning. Clin Anat. 2019;32(5):722–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmadi F, Keramat N, Haghighi H. Conjoined twin. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012;6:135–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Casale P, Grady RW, Waldhausen JH, Joyner BD, Wright J, Mitchell ME. Cloacal exstrophy variants. Can blighted conjoined twinning play a role? J Urol. 2004;172:1103–6. discussion 1106–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Millar AJW, Rode H, Thomas J, Hewitson J. Thoracopagus conjoined twins. In: Parikh DH, DCG C, Auldist AW, Rothenberg SS, editors. Pediatric Thoracic Surgery. London: Springer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berrin K, Larco M. The Spirit of Ancient Peru: Treasures from the Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera. New York: Thames and Hudson; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Canfield D, Brignolo L, Peterson PE, Hendrickx AG. Conjoined twins in a rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). J Med Primatol. 2000;29:427–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beckwith JB. Congenital malformations: from superstition to understanding. Virchows Arch. 2002;461:609–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Opitz JM, Herrmann J, Pettersen JC, Bersu ET, Colacino SC. Terminological, diagnostic, nosological, and anatomical-developmental aspects of developmental defects in man. Adv Hum Genet. 1979;9:71–164.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spranger J, Benirschke K, Hall JG, Lenz W, Lowry RB, Opitz JM, Pinsky L, Schwarzacher HG, Smith DW. Errors of morphogenesis: concepts and terms. Recommendations of an international working group. J Pediatr. 1982;100:160–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DeSesso JM. The arrogance of teratology: a brief chronology of attitudes throughout history. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111:123–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma G, Mobin SS, Lypka M, Urata M. Heteropagus (parasitic) twins: a review. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:2454–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oostra RJ, Baljet B, Verbeeten BW, Hennekam RC. Congenital anomalies in the teratological collection of museum Vrolik in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. V: Conjoined and acardiac twins. Am J Med Genet. 1998;80:74–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yahaya RS, Suwaid MA, Hassan S, Lawal Y, Hassan I, Gwaram BA, et al. “Three-eyed” infant: a case of partial facial duplication (Diprosopus monocephalous triophthalmos) west Afr. J Radiol. 2018;25:79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suryawanshi P, Deshpande M, Verma N, Mahendrakar V, Mahendrakar S. Craniofacial duplication: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2025–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hähnel S, Schramm P, Hassfeld S, Steiner HH, Seitz A. Craniofacial duplication (diprosopus): CT, MR imaging, and MR angiography findings case report. Radiology. 2003;226:210–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hemachandran M, Radotra BD. Partial duplication of head—a rare congenital anomaly. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2004;47:537–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weber MA, Sebire NJ. Genetics and developmental pathology of twinning. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15:313–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guttmacher AF, Nichols BL. Teratology of conjoined twins. Birth Defects Orig Art Ser. 1967;3:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kapur RP, Jack RM, Siebert JR. Diamniotic placentation associated with omphalopagus conjoined twins: implications for a contemporary model of conjoined twinning. Am J Med Genet. 1994;52:188–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bidondo MP, Groisman B, Tardivo A, Tomasoni F, Tejeiro V, Camacho I, Vilas M, Liascovich R, Barbero P. Diprosopus: systematic review and report of two cases. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106:993–1007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martyn I, Kanno TY, Ruzo A, Siggia ED, Brivanlou AH. Self-organization of a human organizer by combined Wnt and nodal signalling. Nature. 2018;558:132–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barr M Jr. Facial duplication: case, review, and embryogenesis. Teratology. 1982;25:153–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gorlin RJ. Craniotubular bone disorders. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24(6):392–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Murdoch JN, Copp AJ. The relationship between sonic hedgehog signaling, cilia, and neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:633–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Townsend R, Khalil A. Ultrasound surveillance in twin pregnancy: an update for practitioners. Ultrasound. 2018;26(4):193–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Alkhateeb M, Mashaqbeh M, Magableh S, et al. Early prenatal diagnosis of thoracopagus twins by ultrasound. Acta Inform Med. 2015;23:60–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuillier F, Dillon KC, Grochal F, et al. Conjoined twins: what ultrasound may add to management. J Prenat Med. 2012;6:4–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen C-P, Hsu C-Y, Su J-W, et al. Conjoined twins detected in the first trimester: a review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;50:424–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Spitz L. Conjoined twins. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:814–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kompanje EJ. Very rare congenital malformations: responsibilities of scientists. The case of rachipagus conjoined twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006;21:319–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meyer, U. (2021). The Biological Basis of Craniofacially Conjoined Twins. In: Meyer, U. (eds) Fundamentals of Craniofacial Malformations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46024-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46024-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46023-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46024-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics