Skip to main content

Focus on Cross-Cultural Models of Love

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Love

Abstract

Our paper is part of a larger research project on cross—cultural analyses of emotions. It focuses on a comparison between the concepts of love in English and its Polish equivalent miłość as well as love cluster emotions as they are used in both languages. Analyses were performed with the use of the GRID instrument, online emotions sorting task as well as the British National Corpus and National Corpus of Polish language materials, particularly with reference to collocational patterns in both languages. Reference to figurative language, mainly metaphor and metonymy, is also discussed. In the conclusions we propose a typology of love emotion models in both cultures and observe differences in the dimension of novelty as well as the clustering structure in Polish and British English love, which can be considered to be associated with a more collectivistic versus individualistic profile in these respective cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The main theses of the present paper were presented at Love & Time conference, Galilee (Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & Wilson, 2015). We very much appreciate comments from the conference participants and the invitation from Professor Aaron Ben-Ze’ev of Haifa University (see his chapter in this book).

References

  • Beckstein, A. (2014). Native American subjective happiness: An overview. Indigenous Policy Journal, XXV (2). Retrieved 10 September, from http://indigenouspolicy.org/index.php/ipj/article/view/251/0

  • Camfield, L., Choudhury, K., & Devine, J. (2009). Well-being, happiness and why relationships matter: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L., & Le Bel, J. (2003). The content and structure of laypeople’s concept of pleasure. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 263–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, J. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., Setiadi, B., & Markham, S. S. (2002). Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands. Cognition and Emotion, 16(1), 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, J. J. R., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (2013). Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. (1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, K. G. (1991). Landscapes of emotion: Mapping three cultures of emotion in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede Insights. Accessed on 26 April, 2019. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/

  • Kim, J., & Hatfield, E. (2004). Love types and subjective well-being: A cross-cultural study. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(2), 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts (Pragmatics and Beyond, VII:8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kral, M. J., & Idlout, L. (2012). It’s all in the family: Well-being among Inuit in Artic Canada. In S. Helaine & G. Davey (Eds.), Happiness across cultures: Views of happiness and quality of life in non-western cultures (pp. 387–398). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. W. (1987/1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1 and 2). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2012). Approximative spaces and the tolerance threshold in communication. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 2(2), 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Wilson, P. A. (2013). English ‘fear’ and Polish ‘strach’ in contrast: GRID approach and cognitive corpus linguistic methodology. In J. J. R. Fontaine, K. R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 425–436). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Wilson, P. A. (2015). It’s a date: Love and romance in time and space. Paper presented at an international workshop “Love and Time”, University of Haifa. March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Wilson, P. A. (2016). Physical and moral disgust in socially believable behaving systems in different cultures. In: A. Esposito, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Toward robotic socially believable behaving systems—Vol. I. Intelligent systems reference library, vol 105 (pp. 105–132). Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. S. (1960). The four loves. Ireland: Geoffrey Bles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and conceptions of happiness: Individual oriented and social oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencken, H. L. (1916). A little book in C Major. New York: John Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion: Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44, 693–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szarota, P., Cantarero, K., & Matsumoto, D. (2015). Emotional frankness and friendship in Polish culture. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Linguistic investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe & R. Rhees (Eds.), G. E. M. Anscombe (transl.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk or P. A. Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., Wilson, P.A. (2021). Focus on Cross-Cultural Models of Love. In: Mayer, CH., Vanderheiden, E. (eds) International Handbook of Love. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45996-3_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics