Skip to main content

Reducing Aspects of Collaborative Governance in Standardization Processes in Israel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Governance
  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the field of standardization in Israel from the perspective of the collaborative governance approach, in light of the specific characteristics of this field, which effectively constitutes an instance of this model. This chapter discusses the public criticism focusing on the collaborative governance dimensions of the standardization process—criticism that formed part of the motivation for the changes that have occurred in the field in Israel in recent years, including the reduction of aspects of collaborative governance. This reduction occurred in spite of well-known advantages linked to the collaborative process. The standardization processes and its changes are discussed in reference to standardization processes in other countries, international standardization processes, and aspects of collaborative governance these embody while raising debates as of democratic legitimacy. The discussion offers insights into the significance and ramification of these changes, including a general perspective on the implementation of collaborative governance in Israel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Russell 2005, pp. 247–260; Borraz 2007, pp. 57–84; Orviska et al. 2013, pp. 36–59; Büthe and Mattli 2011; Rudder et al. 2016. The latter source includes standardization as part of “private governance”—the use of various bodies from the field of private law to determine various governance arrangements. In our opinion, this does not contradict the assertion that standardization maintains the collaborative governance model—the authors identify private bodies in the US as an integral part of governance in various fields and advocate the expansion of the democratic aspects of their operations. It seems that this draws their model close to that of collaborative governance.

  2. 2.

    Amendments 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13 to the Standards Law, 5713-1953 (hereinafter “the Standards Law”), enacted between 2000 and 2018 https://www.nevo.co.il/law_html/Law01/232_001.htm; Government Presentation to the Knesset Committee during the deliberations on Amendment 12 to the Standards Law: http://main.knesset.gov.il/Activity/committees/Economics/Pages/CommitteeMaterial.aspx?ItemID=2008682

  3. 3.

    http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/standardization.html; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standardization; https://www.iso.org/sites/ConsumersStandards/1_standards.html

  4. 4.

    Russell 2005, p. 2, footnote 2 and the reference to Ken Alder.

  5. 5.

    SB 5713 No. 116, 29 Jan. 1953, p. 30; Proposed Law 5712 No. 103, p. 110.

  6. 6.

    Explanatory comments to the proposed law; Knesset Protocols, Session 60, 26 Feb. 1952, Session 171, 2 Jan. 1953, pp. 495, 499.

  7. 7.

    Standards Rules (Formulation of Israeli Standards), 5751-1991.

  8. 8.

    ANSI Essential Requirements: Due Process Requirements for American National Standards, The American National Standards Institute, January 2016: https://share.ansi.org/shared%20documents/Standards%20Activities/American%20National%20Standards/Procedures,%20Guides,%20and%20Forms/2016_ANSI_Essential_Requirements.pdf (section 1.2) (accessed March 9, 2018).

  9. 9.

    See “Standards in Regulations” on the website of ANSI: http://www.nist.gov/standardsgov/standards-in-regulations.cfm; US-EU High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Forum, Report on the Use of Voluntary Standards in Support of Regulation in the United States, October 2009: http://gsi.nist.gov/global/docs/Voluntary_Standards_USRegs.pdf

  10. 10.

    For a similar approach, see Axelrod 1981.

  11. 11.

    For an analysis of economic inefficiencies and other distortions in international standardization proceedings, see Abbott and Snidal 2001.

  12. 12.

    Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European Standardisation, Amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal of the European Union L 316/12 (14.11.12). See the EU legislation website: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32012R1025

  13. 13.

    Government Presentation to the Knesset Committee during the deliberations on Amendment 12 to the Standards Law: http://main.knesset.gov.il/Activity/committees/Economics/Pages/CommitteeMaterial.aspx?ItemID=2008682

  14. 14.

    By way of example, see HCJ 7428/01 Association of Chambers of Commerce v Minister of Industry and Trade.

  15. 15.

    See also the media reports of the State Comptroller and the position of government and public players, including the Minister of Economy and the Chairperson of the Knesset Reforms Committee: https://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001219707; https://www.israelhayom.co.il/article/521989; https://www.themarker.com/smb/1.2079684; https://www.themarker.com/news/macro/1.4552092

  16. 16.

    For example, see http://www.davar1.co.il/22658/; https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5121968,00.html; http://www.mako.co.il/news-channel2/Economy-Newcast-q3_2017/Article-b4788c05e285e51004.htm?Partner=rss

  17. 17.

    Section 7(B)(1) of the Standards Law.

  18. 18.

    http://www.sii.org.il/298-1002-he/SII.aspx?LastFolderId=288

  19. 19.

    See the report of the Knesset Research and Information Center on access to public transportation: https://www.knesset.gov.il/mmm/data/pdf/m04036.pdf

  20. 20.

    http://www.sii.org.il/44-14656-HE/SII.aspx; http://www.sii.org.il/44-3738-he/SII.aspx?pos=244

  21. 21.

    https://portal.sii.org.il/heb/standardization/InternationalStandard/.aspx

  22. 22.

    Ms. Ziva Patir, former director-general of the SII, served in senior positions in the ISO—deputy president and chair of the technical executive; she also served as a board member in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). These positions helped to enhance the senior status of the SII and of Israeli industry. https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%96%D7%99%D7%95%D7%94_%D7%A4%D7%AA%D7%99%D7%A8

  23. 23.

    Netafim, http://www.icid.org/res_irri_.isie.html; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drip_irrigation; Ceramic Protective Canvases, http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001200162

    Regarding the importance of involvement in international standardization for technological entrepreneurs, see the comments by Avi Licht, former Deputy Attorney General, at the Calcalist conference in June 2018: https://www.calcalist.co.il/conference/articles/0,7340,L-3740167,00.html

References

  • Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2001). International ‘Standards’ and International Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110056013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1981). The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists. American Political Science Review, 75(2), 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, D., & Newman, A. L. (2007). The European Regulatory State and the Global Public Policy: Micro-institutions, Macro-influence. Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 827–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak-Erez, D., & Perez, O. (2011). Hamishpat haminhali beyisrael vehaetgar haglobali [Israeli Administrative Law and the Global Challenge]. Iyunei Mishpat [TAU Law Review], 34, 93–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borraz, O. (2007). Governing Standards: The Rise of Standardization Processes in France and in the EU. Governance, 20, 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The New Global Rulers: The privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, ISBN 9780691144795 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel-Fisher, E. (2016). Haim titachen meshilut meshulevet bitchum haasdara beyisrael? [Is Collaborative Governance Possible in the Field of Regulation in Israel?]. Ma’asei Mishpat [Law and Social Change], 8, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (2014, November 11). The Committee to Enhance Competition and Remove Obstacles in the Field of Imports. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.gov.il/publications/publications/doclib/committeeconclusionsreport.pdf

  • Mattli, W., & Woods, N. (Eds.). (2009). The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rgmj.

  • Orviska, M., Nemec, J., & Hudson, J. (2013). Standardization and the European Standards Organizations. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(2), 36–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, N. (2016). Standardization and Inspection of Compatibility: Europe and the US – A Comparative Survey. Knesset Legal Office. Retrieved from: http://main.knesset.gov.il/Activity/Info/LegalDepartmentSurveys/Survey271116.doc

  • Rudder, C., Fritschler, A. L., & Choi, Y. J. (2016). Public Policymaking by Private Organizations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. L. (2005). Standardization in History: A Review Essay with an Eye to the Future. In S. Bolin (Ed.), The Standards Edge: Future Generations (pp. 247–260). Ann Arbor: Sheridan Press. [The copy cited was retreived from Russell’s site: arussell.org. pp. 1–17].

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. L. (2006). Industrial Legislatures: The American System of Standardization. In IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), International Standardization as a Strategic Tool: Commended Papers from the IEC Centenary Challenge 2006. IEC, Switzerland, ISBN 978-2-8318-8867-5, pp. 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (2001). Setting Compatibility Standards: Cooperation or Collusion? In R. Dreyfus, D. L. Zimmermann, & H. First (Eds.), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, H. (2001). The Supply and Demand of Governance in Standard Setting: Insights from the Past. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edna Harel-Fisher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harel-Fisher, E. (2021). Reducing Aspects of Collaborative Governance in Standardization Processes in Israel. In: Sher-Hadar, N., Lahat, L., Galnoor, I. (eds) Collaborative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45807-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics