Skip to main content

Collaborative Regulation: Collaborative Governance in Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Governance

Abstract

This chapter reviews the interrelation between collaborative governance (CG) and regulation and the way CG principles are reflected in the development of regulatory theory. CG is a governing method involving government and nongovernment partners. The use of CG can be found in many policy areas. The method is also used in regulation and in various models that can be framed as “collaborative regulation” (CR). Despite the close connection between CG and CR, they are discussed separately in the literature and without any reference as to how the two are interrelated. The regulatory literature is also missing an analytic overview of the roots and development of CR and its relation with voluntary regulation models. The chapter aims to fill this gap in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The literature on the changes in governance and its implications to the regulatory field deals with the local and international arena. This chapter discusses only the former. For general discussion on regulation in the international arena and the globalization of regulation, see Drahos and Braithwaite (2001), Mattli and Woods (2009), Abbott and Snidal (2009, 2013).

  2. 2.

    The full costs incurred by the regulatees and not only the regulator, including the rise in production costs and weakening competitiveness. Eventually, these have negative effect on the local economy.

  3. 3.

    The practice of regulatory negotiation in the US turned into a law. First in the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990 and later in the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 (Coglianese 1997).

  4. 4.

    In that regard, it is interesting to see the overlap in timetables between the beginning of the second period and the emergence of the discussion about the NPM in the early 1990s, and between the second section of the second period and the critical discussion about the results of the NPM (post-NPM).

  5. 5.

    Abbott and Snidal (2009) substantiate the argument in the international level. Although there aren’t equivalent figures in the local level about VR regimes, it is safe to assume that in this level the picture would not be different and might even be stronger. Since in the local level governments enjoy broad mandate (unlike international organizations), we may expect nongovernmental actors to find this avenue more natural.

  6. 6.

    Researchers do compare the use of VR between governments in Europe and the US and indicate a tendency to a lesser use of these methods in the US. This tendency is related to adversary tradition between state and business sectors, unlike the history of use in Corporatist and Neo-corporatist models in the continent. It is also claimed that when US government uses VR, it tends to use VR by the state—such as enforced self-regulation—unlike European states who also ally themselves with autonomous initiatives and grant them public recognition and support (Brouhle et al. 2005).

References

  • Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009). The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State. In W. Mattli & N. Woods (Eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (pp. 44–89). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Taking Responsive Regulation Transnational: Strategies for International Organizations. Regulation & Governance, 7, 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler, L. B. (2016). Collaborative Governance: Integrating Management, Politics, and Law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 700–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C. (2012). Collaborative Governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 498–511). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and in Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2010). Introduction: Regulation – The Field and the Developing Agenda. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, & M. Lodge (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. A. (1982). Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional Emergence in the Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2), 287–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (2001). Decentering Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in ‘Post-Regulatory’ World. Current Legal Problems, 54, 103–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booher, D. E. (2004). Collaborative Governance Practices and Democracy. National Civic Review, 93, 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouhle, K., Griffith, C., & Wolverton, A, (2005). The Use of Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policymaking in the US. The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. Springer, Dordrecht, 107–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coglianese, C. (1997). Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking. Duke Law Journal, 46(6), 1255–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croci, E. (Ed.). (2005). The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Búrca, Gráinne. (2010). New Governance and Experimentalism: An Introduction. Wis. L. Rev., 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahos, P. (Ed.). (2017). Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications. Acton: ANU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2001). The Globalization of Regulation. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(1), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, R. F., Fiorino, D. J., & O’Leary, R. (2017). Environmental Governance Reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, Alnoor. (2004). Institutional Preconditions to Collaboration: Indian Forest and Irrigation Policy in Historical Perspective. Administration & Society, 36 (May): 208–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2017). Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution. In R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino, & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered (pp. 263–296). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. J. (1995). Regulatory Negotiation as a Form of Public Participation. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation (pp. 223–138). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. J. (2017). Regulatory Innovation and Change. In R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino, & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered (pp. 307–337). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. J., & Kirtz, C. (1985). Breaking Down Walls: Negotiated Rulemaking in EPA. Temple Environmental Law & Tech Journal, 6, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State. UCLA Law Review, 45(1), 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, S. (2010). It Runs in the Family: Meta Regulation and its Sibling. Regulation & Governance, 4, 485–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. (2009). The New Collaborative Environmental Governance: The Localization of Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(1), 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, P. J. (1982). Negotiating Regulation: A Cure for the Malaise? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 3(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, P. J. (2000). The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking. NYU Environmental Law Journal, 9, 32–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haufler, V. (2001). A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C. (2017). Environmental Regulation and Governance. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (pp. 741–760). Acton: ANU Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. Annals of the American Academy, 598, 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, O. (2004). The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought. Minnesota Law Review, 89, 261–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1997). From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, W., & Woods, N. W. (Eds.). (2009). The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perritt, H. H. (1986). Negotiated Rulemaking in Practice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5(3), 482–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory, 8(2), 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New-York: Simon Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. T., Murray, D., & Heller, A. (2006). Regulating Sustainability in the Coffee Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Third-Party Environmental and Social Certification Initiatives. Agriculture and Human Values, 24, 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing Without Government (pp. 652–667). XLIV: Political Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28, 1243–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. (Eds.). (1992). Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (Ed.). (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., & McMahon, G. (1985). The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking. Yale Journal of Regulation, 3, 133–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talias, M. (2016). Voluntary Hotel Regulation as a Political Compromise. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 56, 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, J. (2017). Urban Sustainability and Resilience. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (pp. 725–740). Acton: ANU Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda, E. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2008). Private Global Business Regulation. Review in Advance, 11, 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative Government: Meaning, Dimensions, Drivers and Outcomes. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative Governance: A New Era in Public Policy in Australia (pp. 3–12). Canberra: The Australian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, K. (Ed.). (2004). Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation. Ottawa: Carleton Research Unit of Innovation, Science and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motti Talias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Talias, M. (2021). Collaborative Regulation: Collaborative Governance in Regulation. In: Sher-Hadar, N., Lahat, L., Galnoor, I. (eds) Collaborative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45807-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics