Abstract
This study observes environmental city diplomacy in the Global South through the example of the Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Network of Local Governments (PNLG). It offers several theoretical lessons: First, an environmental transnational city network can successfully expand membership into a politically restrictive state when the entry point is highly embedded in global capital flows and houses a strong specialized policy knowledge base. Such is the case of the Chinese city of Xiamen, which translated foreign trade management experience into international governance cooperation competence, leveraged its substantial local knowledge base in coastal management and thus came to be chosen as the home of the PNLG Secretariat. This preceded the expansion of Chinese city membership into PNLG thereafter. Second, the policy performance of member cities over time, including the frequency of implementation of new marine protection policies, is shown to be linked both to PNLG membership activities and frequency policy learning exchanges with other cities, independently of PNLG activities, domestically and internationally. Last, Global South cities, at least through the example of China, would appear to not be as dependent on Global North actors for policy knowledge as posited in existing literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A total of eight structured telephone interviews were conducted for this study with the following respondents: the State Oceanic Administration; PEMSEA headquarters; PNLG Secretariat and member city Xiamen, situated in the Oceanic Fisheries Bureau; and the following PNLG Chinese member cities via representatives in their respective Oceanic and Fisheries Bureaus: Dongying, Haikou, Fangchenggang, Lianyungang and Wenzhou. IRB approval was obtained for this research, IRB reference number 2015-2129 (UCI Office of Research). All respondents agreed to publication of their remarks, which involve minimal risk to respondents.
- 2.
The State Oceanic Administration also organizes “national Integrated Coastal Management training workshops” promoting best practices sharing and also attracting new candidate member cities. Interested non-members may directly express interest and enter themselves into the vetting process for new member selection.
- 3.
Additional searches were performed of each city’s main municipal government and Environmental Protection Bureau websites, as well as Google and Baidu searches in English and Mandarin to ensure that no recorded policies implemented nor exchanges carried out were not also reported on Oceanic and Fisheries Bureau websites.
References
Acuto, M. (2016). City diplomacy. In C. Constantino, P. Kerr, & P. Sharp (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of diplomacy (pp. 510–520). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Alderson, A., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Power and position in the world city system. American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), 811–851.
Backstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102.
Backstrand, K., Kuyper, J., Linner, B.-O., & Lovbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579.
Bansard, J., Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2017). Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(2), 229–246.
Borja, J., & Castells, M. (1997). Local and global: The management of cities in the information age. London: Earthscan.
Bouteligier, S. (2013). Inequality in new global governance arrangements: The north-south divide in transnational municipal networks. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 251–267.
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Backstrand, K., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Duffy, R., et al. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 591–612.
Chen, S., & Uitto, J. (2003). Governing marine and coastal environment in China: Building local government capacity through international cooperation. China Environment Series, 6, 67–80.
Chien, S.-S., & Ho, B. (2011). Globalization and the local government learning process in post-Mao China: A transnational perspective. Global Networks, 11(3), 315–333.
Chua, T.-E. (1998). Lessons learned from practicing integrated coastal management in Southeast Asia. AMBIO A Journal of the Human Environment, 27(8), 599–610.
Chua, T.-E., Bonga, D., & Bermas-Atrigenio, N. (2006). Dynamics of integrated coastal management: PEMSEA’s experience. Coastal Management, 43(3), 303–332.
Chung, J. H. (2016). Centrifugal empire: Central-local relations in China. New York: Columbia University Press.
De Jong, M., Stout, H., & Sun, L. (2017). Seeing the People’s Republic of China through the eyes of Montesquieu: Why Sino-European collaboration on eco city development suffers from European misinterpretations of ‘Good Governance’. Sustainability, 9(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020151.
Friedmann, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 17(1), 69–83.
GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2010a). State of the coast report of Dongying municipality, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Dongying Municipality.
GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2010b). State of the coast report of Haikou municipality, Hainan Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Haikou Municipality.
GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2010c). State of the coast report of Xiamen municipality, Fujian Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Xiamen Municipality.
GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2013). State of the coast report of Haikou municipality, Hainan Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Haikou Municipality.
Ghanem, D., & Zhang, J. (2014). Effortless perfection: Do Chinese cities manipulate air pollution data? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(2), 203–225.
Gordon, D. (2016). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 82–100.
Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2017). Domestic politics and Chinese participation in transnational climate governance. In China and global governance: The Dragon’s learning curve (pp. 250–271). London: Routledge.
Hale, T., Held, D., & Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Henry, A. D. (2009). The challenge of learning for sustainability: A prolegomenon to theory. Research in Human Ecology, 16(2), 131–140.
Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). World cities and climate change: Producing urban ecological security. New York: Open University Press.
Hsu, A., Weinfurter, A., & Xu, K. (2017). Aligning subnational climate actions for the new post-Paris climate regime. Climatic Change, 142(3–4), 419–432.
Keiner, M., & Kim, A. (2007). Transnational city networks for sustainability. European Planning Studies, 15(10), 1369–1395.
Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.
Koehn, P. (2016). China confronts climate change: A bottom-up perspective. London: Routledge.
Lee, T. (2013). Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 108–127.
Lee, T. (2015). Global cities and climate change: The translocal relations of environmental governance. New York: Routledge.
Lee, T., & Van de Meene, S. (2012). Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network. Policy Sciences, 45, 199–220.
Leffel, B. (2018). Animus of the underling: Theorizing city diplomacy in a world society. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13(4), 502–522.
Leffel, B., & Acuto, M. (2018). Economic power foundations of cities in global governance. Global Society, 32(1), 281–301.
Ma, H., Fang, C., Pang, B., & Li, G. (2014). The effect of geographical proximity on scientific cooperation among Chinese cities from 1990 to 2010. PLoS One, 9(11), e111705.
Mai, Q., & Francesch-Huidobro, M. (2014). Climate change governance in Chinese cities. New York: Routledge.
McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.
McFarlane, C. (2011). The city as a machine for learning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(3), 360–376.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.
PEMSEA. (2002). Proceedings of the forum of the regional network of local governments implementing integrated coastal management (RNLG). GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia.
Pichler, P.-P., Zwickel, T., Chavez, A., Kretschmer, T., Seddon, J., & Weisz, H. (2017). Reducing urban greenhouse gas footprints. Scientific Reports, 7(14659), 14659.
Sassen, S. (2006). Cities in a world economy (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Shin, S. (2007). East Asian environmental co-operation: Central pessimism, local optimism. Pacific Affairs, 80(1), 9–26.
Smith, D. A., & Timberlake, M. (1995). Cities in global matrices: Toward mapping the world-system’s city system. In P. Knox & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), World cities in a world system (pp. 79–97). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, P. J. (2001). Specification of the world city network. Geographical Analysis, 33(2), 181–194.
UN. (1993). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.
UN. (2003). The road from Johannesburg: What was achieved and the way forward DPI/2296. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.
Victor, D. (2017). Three-dimensional climate clubs: Implications for climate cooperation and the G20. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/three-dimensional_climate_clubs_victor_climate_and_energy_final_0.pdf
Xu, J. (2014). Environment as an evolving concept in China’s urban planning system. International Development Planning Review, 36(4), 391–412.
Zhan, C., & De Jong, M. (2017). Financing Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City: What lessons can be drawn for other large-scale sustainable city-projects. Sustainability, 9(2), 201.
Zheng, Y. (2015). The static and dynamic evaluation on ocean environment performance for Chinese coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research (JCR), 73, 660–665.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leffel, B. (2020). Marine Protection as Polycentric Governance: The PEMSEA Network of Local Governments. In: Amiri, S., Sevin, E. (eds) City Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45614-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45615-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)