Skip to main content

Marine Protection as Polycentric Governance: The PEMSEA Network of Local Governments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
City Diplomacy

Abstract

This study observes environmental city diplomacy in the Global South through the example of the Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Network of Local Governments (PNLG). It offers several theoretical lessons: First, an environmental transnational city network can successfully expand membership into a politically restrictive state when the entry point is highly embedded in global capital flows and houses a strong specialized policy knowledge base. Such is the case of the Chinese city of Xiamen, which translated foreign trade management experience into international governance cooperation competence, leveraged its substantial local knowledge base in coastal management and thus came to be chosen as the home of the PNLG Secretariat. This preceded the expansion of Chinese city membership into PNLG thereafter. Second, the policy performance of member cities over time, including the frequency of implementation of new marine protection policies, is shown to be linked both to PNLG membership activities and frequency policy learning exchanges with other cities, independently of PNLG activities, domestically and internationally. Last, Global South cities, at least through the example of China, would appear to not be as dependent on Global North actors for policy knowledge as posited in existing literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A total of eight structured telephone interviews were conducted for this study with the following respondents: the State Oceanic Administration; PEMSEA headquarters; PNLG Secretariat and member city Xiamen, situated in the Oceanic Fisheries Bureau; and the following PNLG Chinese member cities via representatives in their respective Oceanic and Fisheries Bureaus: Dongying, Haikou, Fangchenggang, Lianyungang and Wenzhou. IRB approval was obtained for this research, IRB reference number 2015-2129 (UCI Office of Research). All respondents agreed to publication of their remarks, which involve minimal risk to respondents.

  2. 2.

    The State Oceanic Administration also organizes “national Integrated Coastal Management training workshops” promoting best practices sharing and also attracting new candidate member cities. Interested non-members may directly express interest and enter themselves into the vetting process for new member selection.

  3. 3.

    Additional searches were performed of each city’s main municipal government and Environmental Protection Bureau websites, as well as Google and Baidu searches in English and Mandarin to ensure that no recorded policies implemented nor exchanges carried out were not also reported on Oceanic and Fisheries Bureau websites.

References

  • Acuto, M. (2016). City diplomacy. In C. Constantino, P. Kerr, & P. Sharp (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of diplomacy (pp. 510–520). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, A., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Power and position in the world city system. American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), 811–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backstrand, K., Kuyper, J., Linner, B.-O., & Lovbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansard, J., Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2017). Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(2), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja, J., & Castells, M. (1997). Local and global: The management of cities in the information age. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouteligier, S. (2013). Inequality in new global governance arrangements: The north-south divide in transnational municipal networks. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Backstrand, K., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Duffy, R., et al. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Uitto, J. (2003). Governing marine and coastal environment in China: Building local government capacity through international cooperation. China Environment Series, 6, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, S.-S., & Ho, B. (2011). Globalization and the local government learning process in post-Mao China: A transnational perspective. Global Networks, 11(3), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, T.-E. (1998). Lessons learned from practicing integrated coastal management in Southeast Asia. AMBIO A Journal of the Human Environment, 27(8), 599–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, T.-E., Bonga, D., & Bermas-Atrigenio, N. (2006). Dynamics of integrated coastal management: PEMSEA’s experience. Coastal Management, 43(3), 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. H. (2016). Centrifugal empire: Central-local relations in China. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, M., Stout, H., & Sun, L. (2017). Seeing the People’s Republic of China through the eyes of Montesquieu: Why Sino-European collaboration on eco city development suffers from European misinterpretations of ‘Good Governance’. Sustainability, 9(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 17(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2010a). State of the coast report of Dongying municipality, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Dongying Municipality.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2010b). State of the coast report of Haikou municipality, Hainan Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Haikou Municipality.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2010c). State of the coast report of Xiamen municipality, Fujian Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Xiamen Municipality.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA. (2013). State of the coast report of Haikou municipality, Hainan Province, People’s Republic of China. Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Haikou Municipality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem, D., & Zhang, J. (2014). Effortless perfection: Do Chinese cities manipulate air pollution data? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(2), 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (2016). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2017). Domestic politics and Chinese participation in transnational climate governance. In China and global governance: The Dragon’s learning curve (pp. 250–271). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T., Held, D., & Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. D. (2009). The challenge of learning for sustainability: A prolegomenon to theory. Research in Human Ecology, 16(2), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). World cities and climate change: Producing urban ecological security. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, A., Weinfurter, A., & Xu, K. (2017). Aligning subnational climate actions for the new post-Paris climate regime. Climatic Change, 142(3–4), 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiner, M., & Kim, A. (2007). Transnational city networks for sustainability. European Planning Studies, 15(10), 1369–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, P. (2016). China confronts climate change: A bottom-up perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. (2013). Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 108–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. (2015). Global cities and climate change: The translocal relations of environmental governance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T., & Van de Meene, S. (2012). Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network. Policy Sciences, 45, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leffel, B. (2018). Animus of the underling: Theorizing city diplomacy in a world society. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13(4), 502–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leffel, B., & Acuto, M. (2018). Economic power foundations of cities in global governance. Global Society, 32(1), 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H., Fang, C., Pang, B., & Li, G. (2014). The effect of geographical proximity on scientific cooperation among Chinese cities from 1990 to 2010. PLoS One, 9(11), e111705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, Q., & Francesch-Huidobro, M. (2014). Climate change governance in Chinese cities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, C. (2011). The city as a machine for learning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(3), 360–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEMSEA. (2002). Proceedings of the forum of the regional network of local governments implementing integrated coastal management (RNLG). GEF/UNDP/IMO Regional Programme on Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, P.-P., Zwickel, T., Chavez, A., Kretschmer, T., Seddon, J., & Weisz, H. (2017). Reducing urban greenhouse gas footprints. Scientific Reports, 7(14659), 14659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2006). Cities in a world economy (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. (2007). East Asian environmental co-operation: Central pessimism, local optimism. Pacific Affairs, 80(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., & Timberlake, M. (1995). Cities in global matrices: Toward mapping the world-system’s city system. In P. Knox & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), World cities in a world system (pp. 79–97). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2001). Specification of the world city network. Geographical Analysis, 33(2), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1993). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2003). The road from Johannesburg: What was achieved and the way forward DPI/2296. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. (2017). Three-dimensional climate clubs: Implications for climate cooperation and the G20. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/three-dimensional_climate_clubs_victor_climate_and_energy_final_0.pdf

  • Xu, J. (2014). Environment as an evolving concept in China’s urban planning system. International Development Planning Review, 36(4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, C., & De Jong, M. (2017). Financing Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City: What lessons can be drawn for other large-scale sustainable city-projects. Sustainability, 9(2), 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. (2015). The static and dynamic evaluation on ocean environment performance for Chinese coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research (JCR), 73, 660–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Leffel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leffel, B. (2020). Marine Protection as Polycentric Governance: The PEMSEA Network of Local Governments. In: Amiri, S., Sevin, E. (eds) City Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics