Skip to main content

A Data Integration Approach for Detecting Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Survivability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (IWBBIO 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 12108))

  • 1628 Accesses

Abstract

We introduce a network-based approach to identify subnets of functionally-related genes for predicting 5-year survivability of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and a combination of these. A gene expression dataset and a protein-protein interaction network are integrated to construct a weighted graph, where edge weight expresses the predictability of the two corresponding genes in predicting the class. We propose a scoring criterion to measure the density of a weighted sub-graph, which is also an estimation of its predictive power. Thus, we can identify an optimally-dense sub-network for each seed gene, and then evaluate that sub-network by classification method. Finally, among the sub-networks whose classification performance greater than a given threshold, we search for an optimal set of sub-networks that can further improve classification performance via a voting scheme. We significantly improved the results of existing approaches. For each type of treatment, our best prediction model can reach 85% accuracy or more. Many selected sub-networks used to construct the voting models contain breast/other cancer-related genes including SP1, TP53, MYC, NOG, and many more, providing pieces of evidence for down-stream analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeSantis, C.E., Ma, J., Goding Sauer, A., Newman, L.A., Jemal, A.: Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67(6), 439–448 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society: Breast cancer facts & figures 2017–2018 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Shaughnessy, J.: Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 10(Suppl. 3), 20–29 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van’t Veer, L.J., et al.: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415(6871), 530 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415530a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pereira, B., et al.: The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refine their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat. Commun. 7, 11479 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferroni, P., Zanzotto, F.M., Riondino, S., Scarpato, N., Guadagni, F., Roselli, M.: Breast cancer prognosis using a machine learning approach. Cancers 11(3), 328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11030328

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng, H., Long, F., Ding, C.: Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8, 1226–1238 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huy, P.Q., Ngom, A., Rueda, L.: PAFS-an efficient method for classifier-specific feature selection. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1–8. IEEE, December 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ssci.2016.7850131

  9. Chuang, H.Y., Lee, E., Liu, Y.T., Lee, D., Ideker, T.: Network‐based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3(1) (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100180

  10. Allahyar, A., De Ridder, J.: FERAL: network-based classifier with application to breast cancer outcome prediction. Bioinformatics 31(12), i311–i319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, X., Gulbahce, N., Yu, H.: Network-based methods for human disease gene prediction. Brief. Funct. Genomics 10(5), 280–293 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elr024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J., et al.: Mining disease genes using integrated protein–protein interaction and gene–gene co-regulation information. FEBS Open Bio 5, 251–256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2015.03.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Amgalan, B., Lee, H.: WMAXC: a weighted maximum clique method for identifying condition-specific sub-network. PLoS ONE 9(8), e104993 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. He, H., Lin, D., Zhang, J., Wang, Y.P., Deng, H.W.: Comparison of statistical methods for subnetwork detection in the integration of gene expression and protein interaction network. BMC Bioinform. 18(1), 149 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1567-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. van Dam, S., Vosa, U., van der Graaf, A., Franke, L., de Magalhaes, J.P.: Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions. Brief. Bioinform. 19(4), 575–592 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbw139

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mucaki, E.J., et al.: Predicting outcomes of hormone and chemotherapy in the molecular taxonomy of breast cancer international consortium (METABRIC) study by biochemically-inspired machine learning. F1000Res. 5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9417.3

  17. Wyner, A.D.: A definition of conditional mutual information for arbitrary ensembles. Inf. Control 38(1), 51–59 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(78)90026-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreno-Torres, J.G., Sáez, J.A., Herrera, F.: Study on the impact of partition-induced dataset shift on k-fold cross-validation. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 23(8), 1304–1312 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2199516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tarragona, M., et al.: Identification of NOG as a specific breast cancer bone metastasis-supporting gene. J. Biol. Chem. 287(25), 21346–21355 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.P112.355834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huy Quang Pham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Quang Pham, H., Rueda, L., Ngom, A. (2020). A Data Integration Approach for Detecting Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Survivability. In: Rojas, I., Valenzuela, O., Rojas, F., Herrera, L., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12108. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45385-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45385-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45384-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45385-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics