Skip to main content

Cultural Symmetry: From Group Theory to Semiotics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics
  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of research on symmetry dynamics in cultural creations around the world that shed light on human cognition. This is accomplished first of all by paying attention to a range of historical conceptual developments and their methodologies with an initial focus on the origins of mathematical group theory and group theory’s eventual applications within anthropology for the comparative analysis of symmetrical patterns between (and across) cultures. The chapter presents basic group theoretic classification schemes of finite patterns and tiling plane patterns that are enabled by thinking of symmetry as invariant correspondences related by generative transformations along an axis of translation or across an axis of reflection or rotation. This discussion is followed by a survey of key stages in the development of plane pattern analysis applied to folk art designs from material culture and related socio-cultural dynamics. The chapter then shifts to a range of other perspectives on symmetry dynamics at work in areas traditionally studied by the arts (including the humanities, social sciences, and fine arts). Theories of structural semiotics, rhetoric culture, process semiotics, embodied cognition, cognitive semiotics, and semiotic anthropology provide important leverage for understanding the functions and meanings of symmetry relations at work in everything from brand mark designs and literary structures to neurological lateralization and the evolution of upright posture. Recent research on the chiasmus figure receives special attention, along with the role of symmetry (and symmetry breaking) in ritual contexts. Ultimately the chapter suggests that this under-researched area of human culture and cognition holds much promise for understanding the nature and meaning of both cognitive mathematics and human experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blake, W. (1789–1794). Songs of innocence and songs of experience. William Blake.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1927). Primitive Art. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, G. W. (1942). Symmetry in primitive conventional design. American Antiquity, 8(2), 164–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/275508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, S. (Ed.). (1998). Infant learning by altercentric participation: The reverse of egocentric observation in autism. In intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 105–124). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, S. (2009). The intersubjective mirror in infant learning and evolution of speech. John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R. L. (2005). The history of mathematics: A brief course (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, D. W. (2004). Introduction to plane symmetries. In D. K. Washburn & D. W. Crowe (Eds.), Symmetry comes of age: The role of pattern in culture (pp. 3–17). University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (2009). Opposition theory and the interconnectedness of language, culture and cognition. Sign System Studies, 37(1/2), 11–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, E. (2011). Distinguishing three-dimensional forms from their mirror-images: Whorfian results from users of intrinsic frames of linguistic reference. Language Sciences, 33(6), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darvas, G. (2007). Symmetry: Cultural-historical and ontological aspects of science-arts relations: The natural and man-made world in an interdisciplinary approach. Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, P. (2004). Cognitive structures and body metaphors in the aesthetic and everyday discourse of Turkish-Yörük weavers. In D. K. Washburn & D. W. Crowe (Eds.), Symmetry comes of age: The role of pattern in culture (pp. 304–345). University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, M. W. B. (1990). Symmetry and entropy: Mathematical metaphors in the work of Levi-Strauss. Current Anthropology, 31(4), 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (2007). Thinking in circles: An essay on ring composition. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. F. (1977). Anatomical classification and the semiotics of the body. In J. Blacking (Ed.), The anthropology of the body (pp. 343–373). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewins, R. (2004). Symmetry and semiotics: The case of Fijian Barkcloth figuration. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Embedded symmetries: Natural and cultural (pp. 160–184). University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmer, M. (Ed.). (1993). The visual mind: art and mathematics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foolen, A. (2019). The value of left and right. In J. L. Mackenzie & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Emotion in discourse (pp. 139–158). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.06foo

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, M. (2004). Motion pictures: Symmetry as animator, classifier, and syntax in the Nasca embroideries of Peru. In D. K. Washburn & D. W. Crowe (Eds.), Symmetry comes of age: The role of pattern in culture (pp. 133–176). University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franquemont, E. M., & Franquemont, C. R. (2004). Tanka, Chongo, Kutij: Structure of the world through art. In D. K. Washburn & D. W. Crowe (Eds.), Symmetry comes of age: The role of pattern in culture (pp. 177–214). University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamwell, L. (2016). Mathematics and art: A cultural history. Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gasché, R. (1999). Reading Chiasms. In R. Gasché (Ed.), Of minimal things: Studies on the notion of relation (pp. 263–284). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, B. (2004). Periodic ornamentation of the fabric plane: Lessons from Peruvian fabrics. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Symmetry comes of age: The role of pattern in culture (pp. 18–64). University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, B., & Shephard, G. C. (1987). Tilings and patterns. W.H. Freeman.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, I. (Ed.). (1986). Symmetry: Unifying human understanding. Pergamon Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haüy, R. J. (1815). Memoire sur une loi de cristallisation appelée loi de symmétrie. Mémoires du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hon, G., & Goldstein, B. R. (2008). From summetria to symmetry: The making of a revolutionary scientific concept. Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. (2004). Symmetries in development: The eye is quicker than the hand. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Embedded symmetries: Natural and cultural (pp. 7–17). University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. (1872 [1893]). Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen. Mathematische Annalen, 43, 63–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M., & Strother, L. (2004). The perception of band patterns: Going beyond geometry. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Embedded symmetries: Natural and cultural (pp. 19–26). University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. L. (2018). The rhetoric of discourse: Chiasm and dialogue in communicology. In R. C. Arnett & F. Cooren (Eds.), Dialogic ethics (pp. 215–243). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, A.-M. (1794). Éléments de géométrie. F. Didot.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C., & Brown, P. (1994). Immanuel Kant among the Tenejapans: Anthropology as empirical philosophy. Ethos, 22(1), 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1954). The mathematics of man. International Social Science Bulletin, 6, 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955). The structural study of myth. Journal of American Folklore, 68(270), 428–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Anthropologie structurale. Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissner, P. A. (2007). Chi-thinking: Chiasmus and cognition [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg, C. (2007). ‘Damn mad’: Palindromic figurations in literary narratives. In E. Tabakowska, C. Ljungberg, & O. Fischer (Eds.), Insistent Images (Iconicity in Language and Literature 5), pp. 247–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg, C. (2020). Crisscrossing James Joyce’s Ulysses: Chiasmus and cognition. In P. Perniss, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Operationalizing Iconicity (Iconicity in Language and Literature 17), pp. 200–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, J., & Thomas, B. (2013). Brand values: Exploring the associations of symmetry within financial brand marks. Design Management Journal, 8(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmj.12004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, I. K. (2003). Vitruvius: Writing the body of architecture. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGilchrist, I. (2019). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western world (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, T., Trinick, T., & Allen, P. (2022). Ethnomathematics in education: The need for cultural symmetry. In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics (pp. 1–29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_4-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. ([c.1960]1968). The intertwining—the chiasm. In Le Visible et l’invisible: The Visible and the Invisible, C. Lefort (Ed.), trans. A. Lingis, pp. 130–155. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morava, J. (2003–2020). On the canonical formula of C. Lévi-Strauss I–II. arXiv preprint math/0306174v2, and arXiv preprint/2002.12813v1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nänny, M. (1988). Chiasmus in literature: Ornament or function? Word & Image, 4(1), 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R. (Ed.). (1973). Right & left: Essays on dual symbolic classification. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, W. (1994). Opposition at the root of semiosis. In W. Nöth (Ed.), Origins of semiosis: Sign evolution in nature and culture (pp. 37–60). Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palka, J. W. (2002). Left/right symbolism and the body in ancient Maya iconography and culture. Latin American Antiquity, 13(4), 419–443. https://doi.org/10.2307/972224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A. (2009). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Lessons from Macbeth. In I. Strecker & S. Tyler (Eds.), Culture and Rhetoric (pp. 104–114). Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. ([1861–1913] 1931–1958). In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 Vols). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as CP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2013a). Cognitive chiasmus: Embodied phenomenology in Dylan Thomas. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42(1), 79–114. https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2013-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2013b). Chiastic Antisymmetry in language evolution. The American Journal of Semiotics, 29(1), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2013291-43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2016). Symbiotic modeling: Linguistic anthropology and the promise of chiasmus. Reviews in Anthropology, 45(1), 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2016.1142294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2017a). Greimas embodied: How kinesthetic opposition grounds the semiotic square. Semiotica, 2017(214), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2017b). The semiotics of X: Chiasmus, cognition, and extreme body memory. Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2018). Upright posture and the meaning of meronymy: A synthesis of metaphoric and analytic accounts. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1) https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0003

  • Pelkey, J. (2020). Intercultural parallax: Comparative modeling, ethnic taxonomy, and the dynamic object. Semiotica, 2020(232), 147–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2021a). Embodied chiasmus: From alienation to participation. In J. Abbink & S. LaTosky (Eds.), Rhetoric in Social Relations: Dialectics of Bonding and Contestation, pp. 30–54 (Studies in Rhetoric and Culture 8). Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2022, in press). Tonal iconicity and narrative transformation: Transverse embodied chiasmus in Sylvia Plath and Dolly Parton. In O. Fischer, C. Ljungberg, E. Tabakowska and S. Lenninger (Eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey, J. (2021b). Zhuangzi, Peirce, and the butterfly dreamscape: Concentric meaning in the Qiwulun 齊物論. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 17(2), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2021-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, D. (1978). The plane symmetry groups: Their recognition and notation. The American Mathematical Monthly, 85(6), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2320063

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2003). Kinesthetic memory. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 7(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2003.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, A. O. (1948). The symmetry of abstract design with special reference to ceramic decoration. Carnegie Institution of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speiser, A. (1927). Die Theorie der Gruppen von Endlicher Ordnung: Mit Anwendungen auf Algebraische Zahlen und Gleichungen Sowie auf die Kristallographie. Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. (2014). Fearful symmetry. In The best writing on mathematics 2013 (pp. 23–31). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847990-004

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strecker, I. A. (2011). Ethnographic chiasmus: Essays on culture, conflict, and rhetoric. Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology. Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Strecker, I., & Tyler, S. (Eds.). (2009). Culture and rhetoric. Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. V. (1921). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere (2nd ed.). Verlag von Julius Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, H. (2003). Around Homo in 80 theses: A fundamental anthropogeny (M. Lo, Ed.; P. Lottefier, Trans.). Anthropogenie.com.

  • Van Lier, H. (2010). Anthropogénie. Impressions nouvelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitruvius Polio, M. ([c.25BCE] 1826). de Architectura: The Architecture of Marcus Vitruvius Pollio in Ten Books. Priestly and Weale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahedi, Z., Pelkey, J., Park, S., & Walsh Matthews, S. (2021). Testing Symmetrical Knot Tracing for Cognitive Priming Effects Rules out Analytic Analogy. Symmetry, 13(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13010034

  • Washburn, D. K. (Ed.). (2004). Embedded symmetries: Natural and cultural. University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K. (1986). Pattern symmetry and colored repetition in cultural contexts. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 12B(3–4), 767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K. (1988). Analysis of pattern structure by geometric symmetries. In J. Volmer (Ed.), Textiles as primary sources: Proceedings of the first symposium of the textile Society of America (pp. 40–49). Minneapolis Institute of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K. (1999). Perceptual anthropology: The cultural salience of symmetry. American Anthropologist, 101(3), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.3.547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K. (2006). Aesthetic universals in cultural perception and practice. In New directions in aesthetics, creativity and the arts (pp. 59–75). Baywood Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K., & Crowe, D. W. (Eds.). (2004). Symmetry comes of age: The role of pattern in culture. University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K., & Crowe, D. W. (Eds.). (1988). Symmetries of culture: Theory and practice of plane pattern analysis. University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, B. (2014). Chiasmus, mythical creation and H.C. Andersen’s ‘the shadow’. In B. Wiseman & A. Paul (Eds.), Chiasmus and culture (pp. 219–238). Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, B., & Paul, A. (Eds.). (2014). Chiasmus and culture. Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, B. (2009). Chiastic thought and culture: A reading of Claude Lévi-Strauss. In I. Strecker & S. Tyler (Eds.), Culture and rhetoric (pp. 85–103). Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, T. (2004). Evolutionary developments in the cognition of symmetry. In D. K. Washburn (Ed.), Embedded symmetries: Natural and cultural (pp. 47–57). University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirker, A. (2017). Performative iconicity. In A. Zirker, M. Bauer, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Dimensions of Iconicity (pp. 287–300). John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/ill.15.16zir

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamin Pelkey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pelkey, J. (2022). Cultural Symmetry: From Group Theory to Semiotics. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_46-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_46-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44982-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44982-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics