Skip to main content

Student Collaboration in Blending Digital Technology in the Learning of Mathematics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics

Abstract

The use of the Internet in educational contexts has been growing rapidly in recent years, and a prominent developing trend has been the use of digital technology to promote collaboration in the learning of mathematics. In this chapter, we describe how the Internet is transforming the mathematics classroom from the conventional confined cubical shape to expand into the lives of students in an increasingly informal sense, distinct from the more formalized contexts of previous years. We discuss the role of the Internet in the process of developing students into independent learners through the different forms of blended learning and how humans and media interact in the learning process. A variety of social learning networks, such as learning management systems and personal learning environments, are employed in this collaborative learning process. In today’s learning environment, social media are playing an increasingly important role. We elaborate on how social media tools can be combined with the best practices in teaching and contribute effectively to student engagement, for example, in the process of establishing communities of practice. Further, while social media and many of the Internet tools discussed have undoubted value in the promotion of collaboration, we raise some questions as to how this might contribute to better understanding of mathematics and how we might identify and develop such benefits. The use of hyperpersonalization of learning, a new trend that becomes possible when introducing adaptive hypermedia into the education process, is also addressed. Finally, we discuss the role of collaboration in online assessment. We conclude the chapter by identifying trends for future research regarding theoretical and methodological aspects and recognize new opportunities requiring further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: A review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning, 34(3), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attard, C., Calder, N., Holmes, K., Larkin, K., & Trenholm, S. (2020). Teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2016–2019 (pp. 319–347). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, V., Teoh, K. K., Pourshafie, T., & Liew, T. K. (2017). Social media and their use in learning: A comparative analysis between Australia and Malaysia from the learners’ perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassendowski, S., & Petrucka, P. (2013). The space between: Teaching with push–pull strategies that reflect ubiquitous technology. Journal of Modern Education Review, 3(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, J. J., Jewett, C., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2019). The pedagogy–andragogy–heutagogy continuum and technology-supported personal learning environments. In Open and distance education theory revisited (pp. 75–84). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bollier D. (2006). When push comes to pull: The new economy and culture of networking technology. Aspen Institute. http://www.cooperationcommons.com/taxonomy/term/44

  • Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization (Vol. 39). Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Sánchez Aguilar, M. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(5), 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., Chiari, A. S. S., & de Almeida, H. R. F. L. (2018). Interactions in virtual learning environments: New roles for digital technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98, 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., & Vassileva, J. (Eds.). (1998). Adaptive hypertext and hypermedia. Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buchem, I., Attwell, G., & Torres, R. (2011). Understanding personal learning environments: Literature review and synthesis through the activity theory lens. Paper presented at the the PLE conference 2011, Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatti, A. C., Agustiawan, M. R., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. (2010). Toward a personal learning environment framework. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, A., Karsenty, R., Beswick, K., Oates, G., & Lawan, A. (2019). The use of video for the learning of teachers of mathematics. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien, & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 107–136). PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 7–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(5), 825–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluck, A. E. (2019). An international review of eExam technologies and impact. Computers & Education, 132, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, L., & Hobohm, C. (2013). Students using digital technologies to produce screencasts that support learning in mathematics. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 322–329). MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Conde, M. Á., Alier, M., & Casany, M. J. (2011). Opening learning management systems to personal learning environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(9), 1222–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R., Legon, R., & Fredericksen, E. E. (2019). CHLOE 3 behind the numbers: The changing landscape of online education 2019. https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/articles-resources/CHLOE-3-report-2019

  • Gerstein, J. (2013, May 2013). Education 3.0 and the pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy of mobile learning. http://usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/education-3-0-and-the-pedagogy-andragogy-heutagogy-of-mobile-learning/

  • Gomez, E. A., Dezhi Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55(1), 378–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodband, J. H., Solomon, Y., Samuels, P. C., Lawson, D., & Bhakta, R. (2012). Limits and potentials of social networking in academia: Case study of the evolution of a mathematics Facebook community. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, V. A., Casey, A., & Kirk, D. (2014). Tweet me, message me, like me: Using social media to facilitate pedagogical change within an emerging community of practice. Sport, Education and Society, 19(7), 927–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2012). Connecting social perspectives on mathematics teacher education in online environments. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 705–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, P. (2019). Can personalized learning actually deliver?. https://www.forbes.com/sites/peter green e/2019/05/02/report-canperso

  • Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halupa, C. M. (2015). Pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy. In Transformative curriculum design in health sciences education (pp. 143–158). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A., Kaczynski, D., & Wood, L. (2005). Evaluation of blended learning: Analysis of qualitative data. In Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference) (Vol. 11), pp. 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, P. (2020). Universities need strategic investment in learning design. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200928134607579

  • Hofmann, H. (1948). The search for the real in the visual arts. In S. Weeks & B. Hayes Jr. (Eds.), Search for real and other essays: Addison Gallery of American Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (2013). How technology can encourage student collaboration: Find out how technology promotes teamwork and collaboration in the classroom. Common Sense Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, K., Perry, B., & Edwards, M. (2011). Becoming real: Using the artistic pedagogy technology of photovoice as a medium to becoming real to one another in the online educative environment. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 8(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–812). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2011). A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Dudai, V. (2009). Group-metacognitive support for online inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, S. (2020). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and scaffolding. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/vygotskys-zone-of-proximal-development-and-scaffolding/

  • Lalonde, C. (2012). How important is Twitter in your personal learning network? eLearn Magazine, 9(12). https://elearnmag.acm.org/featu red.cfm?aid=2379624

  • Larkin, K., & Jamieson-Proctor, R. (2015). Using transactional distance theory to redesign an online mathematics education course for pre-service primary teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(1), 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1993). Tecnologias da Inteligência: O futuro do pensamento na era da informática [Technologies of Intelligence: The future of thinking in the informatics era]. Editora 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightner, S., Bober, M. J., & Willi, C. (2007). Team-based activities to promote engaged learning. College Teaching, 55(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menninger, M. (2011). The classroom as a “Total work of art”: Pedagogy, performance, and “Gesamtkunstwerk”. Ubiquitous Learning, 3(3), 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, M. (2013). The future of all education is hyper-personalized. https://bestengagingcommunities.com/2013/12/14/the-future-of-all-education-is-hyper-personalized/

  • Mojica-Casey, M., Dekkers, J., & Thrupp, R. (2014). Research guided practice: Student online experiences during mathematics class in the middle school. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 469–476). MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, T., Bragg, L., Murphy, C., Oates, G., & Walsh, C. (2020). Dynamic approaches to online learning of numeracy for educators and families. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 25(4), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for digital learning in mathematics education? Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, R., & Latif, L. A. (2011). Social media and the teaching of mathematics in a lifelong learning environment. http://iclll2011.oum.edu.my

  • Oates, G. (2016). Technology in mathematics education: A stocktake & crystal-ball gazing. In W.-C. Yang, D. B. Meade, & K. Khairee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics, (pp. 103–119). Mathematics & Technology, LLC. http://mathandtech.org/

  • Olivier, B., & Liber, O. (2001). Lifelong learning: The need for portable personal learning environments and supporting interoperability standards. http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/uploads/6/67/Olivierandliber2001.doc

  • Palsolé, S., & Awalt, C. (2008). Team-based learning in asynchronous online settings. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 116, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paludan, J. P. (2006). In OECD/CERI (Ed.), Schooling for tomorrow: Personalising education. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. F. (2003). Online education and learning management systems: Global e-learning in a Scandinavian perspective. NKI Gorlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzi, M. A. (2014). Blended learning pedagogy: The time is now! Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28(3), 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, E., & Holmes, K. (2014). Online Students’ perceptions of interactive tools to support postgraduate learning of mathematics. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 525–533). MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, J., Smith, A. B., Higgins, D., Mills, R., Maier, A. G., & Howitt, S. M. (2017). Asking and answering questions: Partners, peer learning, and participation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rouhiainen, L. (2019). How AI and data could personalize higher education. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/10/how-ai-and-data-could-personalize-higher-education

  • Sandene, B., Horkay, N., Bennett, R. E., Allen, N., Braswell, J., Kaplan, B., & Oranje, A. (2005). Online assessment in mathematics and writing: Reports from the NAEP technology-based assessment project, research and development series, NCES 2005-457. National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangwin, C. (2012). Computer aided assessment of mathematics using STACK. In Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 695–713). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, R. (2014). Self-directed vs. self-determined learning: What’s the difference?. https://www.rtschuetz.net/2014/12/self-directed-vs-self-determined.html

  • Selwyn, N., & Stirling, E. (2016). Social media and education… now the dust has settled. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. (2018). It’s time to throw away the Dickensian culture of math education. https://medium.com/q-e-d/its-time-to-throw-away-the-dickensian-culture-of-math-education-6fa8cfa11e2

  • Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, Z., & Lauchs, M. (2013). Students’ engagement with Facebook in a university undergraduate policing unit. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 792–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasmanian Institute of Teaching and Learning (TILT). (2015). UTAS blended learning model 1–5 framework. https://www.teaching-learning.utas.edu.au/unit-design/blended-learning-model

  • The Open University. (2015). New MOOC – Enhancing teacher education through OER: Adapting and utilising OER from TESS-India. Resource document. The Open University. http://www.open.ac.uk/about/international-development/news/tess-india-mooc

  • Tobin, D. R. (2000). All learning is self-directed: How organisations can support and encourage independent learning. ASTD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C.-H., Sujo-Montes, L., Yen, C.-J., Chan, J.-Y., & Blocher, M. (2012). The integration of personal learning environments & open network learning environments. TechTrends, 56(3), 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bommel, J., & Liljekvist, Y. (2015). Facebook and mathematics teachers’ professional development: Informing our community. In Proceedings of CERME 9 – ninth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Charles University in Prague (pp. 2930–2936). hal-01289653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulos, P., Jan, S. K., & Buckton, R. (2020). A case for team-based learning as an effective collaborative learning methodology in higher education. College Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1816889

  • Voigt, M., Fredriksen, H., & Rasmussen, C. (2020). Leveraging the design heuristics of realistic mathematics education and culturally responsive pedagogy to create a richer flipped classroom calculus curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 1051–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, F., Kalz, M., & Palmér, M. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Mashup Personal Learning Environments, Barcelona. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-638/

  • Willems, J. (2009). Adding “pull” to “push” education in the context of neomillennial e-learning: YouTube and the case of “Diagnosis Wenckebach”. Colloquy, 18, 271–303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by funding from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES), in the scope of Programa Capes-PrInt – Funding code: 001” Process: 88887.194785/2018-00.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann Engelbrecht .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Engelbrecht, J., Oates, G. (2021). Student Collaboration in Blending Digital Technology in the Learning of Mathematics. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_37-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_37-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44982-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44982-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics