Abstract
The use of the Internet in educational contexts has been growing rapidly in recent years, and a prominent developing trend has been the use of digital technology to promote collaboration in the learning of mathematics. In this chapter, we describe how the Internet is transforming the mathematics classroom from the conventional confined cubical shape to expand into the lives of students in an increasingly informal sense, distinct from the more formalized contexts of previous years. We discuss the role of the Internet in the process of developing students into independent learners through the different forms of blended learning and how humans and media interact in the learning process. A variety of social learning networks, such as learning management systems and personal learning environments, are employed in this collaborative learning process. In today’s learning environment, social media are playing an increasingly important role. We elaborate on how social media tools can be combined with the best practices in teaching and contribute effectively to student engagement, for example, in the process of establishing communities of practice. Further, while social media and many of the Internet tools discussed have undoubted value in the promotion of collaboration, we raise some questions as to how this might contribute to better understanding of mathematics and how we might identify and develop such benefits. The use of hyperpersonalization of learning, a new trend that becomes possible when introducing adaptive hypermedia into the education process, is also addressed. Finally, we discuss the role of collaboration in online assessment. We conclude the chapter by identifying trends for future research regarding theoretical and methodological aspects and recognize new opportunities requiring further investigation.
References
Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: A review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning, 34(3), 223–240.
Attard, C., Calder, N., Holmes, K., Larkin, K., & Trenholm, S. (2020). Teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2016–2019 (pp. 319–347). Springer.
Balakrishnan, V., Teoh, K. K., Pourshafie, T., & Liew, T. K. (2017). Social media and their use in learning: A comparative analysis between Australia and Malaysia from the learners’ perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 81–97.
Bassendowski, S., & Petrucka, P. (2013). The space between: Teaching with push–pull strategies that reflect ubiquitous technology. Journal of Modern Education Review, 3(1), 1–7.
Bezemer, J. J., Jewett, C., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
Blaschke, L. M. (2019). The pedagogy–andragogy–heutagogy continuum and technology-supported personal learning environments. In Open and distance education theory revisited (pp. 75–84). Springer.
Bollier D. (2006). When push comes to pull: The new economy and culture of networking technology. Aspen Institute. http://www.cooperationcommons.com/taxonomy/term/44
Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization (Vol. 39). Springer.
Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Sánchez Aguilar, M. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(5), 589–610.
Borba, M. C., Chiari, A. S. S., & de Almeida, H. R. F. L. (2018). Interactions in virtual learning environments: New roles for digital technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98, 269–286.
Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., & Vassileva, J. (Eds.). (1998). Adaptive hypertext and hypermedia. Springer.
Buchem, I., Attwell, G., & Torres, R. (2011). Understanding personal learning environments: Literature review and synthesis through the activity theory lens. Paper presented at the the PLE conference 2011, Southampton.
Chatti, A. C., Agustiawan, M. R., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. (2010). Toward a personal learning environment framework. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 66–85.
Coles, A., Karsenty, R., Beswick, K., Oates, G., & Lawan, A. (2019). The use of video for the learning of teachers of mathematics. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien, & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 107–136). PME.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.
Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 7–55.
Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 253–276.
Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(5), 825–841.
Fluck, A. E. (2019). An international review of eExam technologies and impact. Computers & Education, 132, 1–15.
Galligan, L., & Hobohm, C. (2013). Students using digital technologies to produce screencasts that support learning in mathematics. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 322–329). MERGA.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Conde, M. Á., Alier, M., & Casany, M. J. (2011). Opening learning management systems to personal learning environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(9), 1222–1240.
Garrett, R., Legon, R., & Fredericksen, E. E. (2019). CHLOE 3 behind the numbers: The changing landscape of online education 2019. https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/articles-resources/CHLOE-3-report-2019
Gerstein, J. (2013, May 2013). Education 3.0 and the pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy of mobile learning. http://usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/education-3-0-and-the-pedagogy-andragogy-heutagogy-of-mobile-learning/
Gomez, E. A., Dezhi Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55(1), 378–390.
Goodband, J. H., Solomon, Y., Samuels, P. C., Lawson, D., & Bhakta, R. (2012). Limits and potentials of social networking in academia: Case study of the evolution of a mathematics Facebook community. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 236–252.
Goodyear, V. A., Casey, A., & Kirk, D. (2014). Tweet me, message me, like me: Using social media to facilitate pedagogical change within an emerging community of practice. Sport, Education and Society, 19(7), 927–943.
Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2012). Connecting social perspectives on mathematics teacher education in online environments. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 705–715.
Greene, P. (2019). Can personalized learning actually deliver?. https://www.forbes.com/sites/peter green e/2019/05/02/report-canperso
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30.
Halupa, C. M. (2015). Pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy. In Transformative curriculum design in health sciences education (pp. 143–158). IGI Global.
Harding, A., Kaczynski, D., & Wood, L. (2005). Evaluation of blended learning: Analysis of qualitative data. In Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference) (Vol. 11), pp. 56–62.
Hardman, P. (2020). Universities need strategic investment in learning design. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200928134607579
Hofmann, H. (1948). The search for the real in the visual arts. In S. Weeks & B. Hayes Jr. (Eds.), Search for real and other essays: Addison Gallery of American Art.
Jackson, S. (2013). How technology can encourage student collaboration: Find out how technology promotes teamwork and collaboration in the classroom. Common Sense Media.
Janzen, K., Perry, B., & Edwards, M. (2011). Becoming real: Using the artistic pedagogy technology of photovoice as a medium to becoming real to one another in the online educative environment. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 8(1), 1–17.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–812). Macmillan.
Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2011). A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 6–18.
Kramarski, B., & Dudai, V. (2009). Group-metacognitive support for online inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377–404.
Kurt, S. (2020). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and scaffolding. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/vygotskys-zone-of-proximal-development-and-scaffolding/
Lalonde, C. (2012). How important is Twitter in your personal learning network? eLearn Magazine, 9(12). https://elearnmag.acm.org/featu red.cfm?aid=2379624
Larkin, K., & Jamieson-Proctor, R. (2015). Using transactional distance theory to redesign an online mathematics education course for pre-service primary teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(1), 44–61.
Levy, P. (1993). Tecnologias da Inteligência: O futuro do pensamento na era da informática [Technologies of Intelligence: The future of thinking in the informatics era]. Editora 34.
Lightner, S., Bober, M. J., & Willi, C. (2007). Team-based activities to promote engaged learning. College Teaching, 55(1), 5–18.
Menninger, M. (2011). The classroom as a “Total work of art”: Pedagogy, performance, and “Gesamtkunstwerk”. Ubiquitous Learning, 3(3), 97–103.
Mohan, M. (2013). The future of all education is hyper-personalized. https://bestengagingcommunities.com/2013/12/14/the-future-of-all-education-is-hyper-personalized/
Mojica-Casey, M., Dekkers, J., & Thrupp, R. (2014). Research guided practice: Student online experiences during mathematics class in the middle school. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 469–476). MERGA.
Muir, T., Bragg, L., Murphy, C., Oates, G., & Walsh, C. (2020). Dynamic approaches to online learning of numeracy for educators and families. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 25(4), 25–30.
Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for digital learning in mathematics education? Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269.
Ng, R., & Latif, L. A. (2011). Social media and the teaching of mathematics in a lifelong learning environment. http://iclll2011.oum.edu.my
Oates, G. (2016). Technology in mathematics education: A stocktake & crystal-ball gazing. In W.-C. Yang, D. B. Meade, & K. Khairee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics, (pp. 103–119). Mathematics & Technology, LLC. http://mathandtech.org/
Olivier, B., & Liber, O. (2001). Lifelong learning: The need for portable personal learning environments and supporting interoperability standards. http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/uploads/6/67/Olivierandliber2001.doc
Palsolé, S., & Awalt, C. (2008). Team-based learning in asynchronous online settings. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 116, 87–95.
Paludan, J. P. (2006). In OECD/CERI (Ed.), Schooling for tomorrow: Personalising education. OECD.
Paulsen, M. F. (2003). Online education and learning management systems: Global e-learning in a Scandinavian perspective. NKI Gorlaget.
Pizzi, M. A. (2014). Blended learning pedagogy: The time is now! Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28(3), 333–338.
Prieto, E., & Holmes, K. (2014). Online Students’ perceptions of interactive tools to support postgraduate learning of mathematics. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 525–533). MERGA.
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65–83.
Rivers, J., Smith, A. B., Higgins, D., Mills, R., Maier, A. G., & Howitt, S. M. (2017). Asking and answering questions: Partners, peer learning, and participation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–10.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Springer.
Rouhiainen, L. (2019). How AI and data could personalize higher education. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/10/how-ai-and-data-could-personalize-higher-education
Sandene, B., Horkay, N., Bennett, R. E., Allen, N., Braswell, J., Kaplan, B., & Oranje, A. (2005). Online assessment in mathematics and writing: Reports from the NAEP technology-based assessment project, research and development series, NCES 2005-457. National Center for Education Statistics.
Sangwin, C. (2012). Computer aided assessment of mathematics using STACK. In Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 695–713). Springer.
Schuetz, R. (2014). Self-directed vs. self-determined learning: What’s the difference?. https://www.rtschuetz.net/2014/12/self-directed-vs-self-determined.html
Selwyn, N., & Stirling, E. (2016). Social media and education… now the dust has settled. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 1–5.
Singh, S. (2018). It’s time to throw away the Dickensian culture of math education. https://medium.com/q-e-d/its-time-to-throw-away-the-dickensian-culture-of-math-education-6fa8cfa11e2
Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Staines, Z., & Lauchs, M. (2013). Students’ engagement with Facebook in a university undergraduate policing unit. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 792–805.
Tasmanian Institute of Teaching and Learning (TILT). (2015). UTAS blended learning model 1–5 framework. https://www.teaching-learning.utas.edu.au/unit-design/blended-learning-model
The Open University. (2015). New MOOC – Enhancing teacher education through OER: Adapting and utilising OER from TESS-India. Resource document. The Open University. http://www.open.ac.uk/about/international-development/news/tess-india-mooc
Tobin, D. R. (2000). All learning is self-directed: How organisations can support and encourage independent learning. ASTD Press.
Tu, C.-H., Sujo-Montes, L., Yen, C.-J., Chan, J.-Y., & Blocher, M. (2012). The integration of personal learning environments & open network learning environments. TechTrends, 56(3), 13–19.
Van Bommel, J., & Liljekvist, Y. (2015). Facebook and mathematics teachers’ professional development: Informing our community. In Proceedings of CERME 9 – ninth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Charles University in Prague (pp. 2930–2936). hal-01289653.
Vlachopoulos, P., Jan, S. K., & Buckton, R. (2020). A case for team-based learning as an effective collaborative learning methodology in higher education. College Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1816889
Voigt, M., Fredriksen, H., & Rasmussen, C. (2020). Leveraging the design heuristics of realistic mathematics education and culturally responsive pedagogy to create a richer flipped classroom calculus curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 1051–1062.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wild, F., Kalz, M., & Palmér, M. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Mashup Personal Learning Environments, Barcelona. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-638/
Willems, J. (2009). Adding “pull” to “push” education in the context of neomillennial e-learning: YouTube and the case of “Diagnosis Wenckebach”. Colloquy, 18, 271–303.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by funding from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES), in the scope of Programa Capes-PrInt – Funding code: 001” Process: 88887.194785/2018-00.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Engelbrecht, J., Oates, G. (2021). Student Collaboration in Blending Digital Technology in the Learning of Mathematics. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_37-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_37-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44982-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44982-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering