Skip to main content

Engagement with Diversity Experiences: A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Learning for Social Justice and Equity in Higher Education

Abstract

In this chapter, we use a self-regulated learning perspective to examine how students respond to the cognitive and emotional challenges of diversity experiences. Self-regulated learning (SRL) is the cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral strategies students use to help themselves learn (Zimmerman and Labuhn in APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 399–425, 2012). We present a new process model of learning and resistance that describes how a student’s previous beliefs and experiences interact with the classroom environment and how, when students perceive a threat to their goals, values, or well-being, they choose one of three pathways to bring the environment back in alignment: learning strategies, learning-focused coping, or learning-resistant coping. We describe the process model in depth and give examples of how a student’s strategies and coping affect the learning environment. We conclude with implications for instructors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arao, B., & Clemens, K. (2013). From safe spaces to brave spaces. In L. M. Landreman (Ed.), The art of effective facilitation: Reflections from social justice educators. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (2007). Understanding students’ affective processes in the classroom. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 37–56). Burlington, NJ: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50004-6.

  • Boekaerts, M., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Emotions and emotion regulation in academic settings. In Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 76–90). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, N. A. (2010). Disequilibrium and resolution: The nonlinear effects of diversity courses on well-being and orientations toward diversity. The Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, N. A. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 29–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310383047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, N. A., & Brandenberger, J. W. (2012). Experiencing the unexpected: Toward a model of college diversity experiences and attitude change. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascallar, E., Boekaerts, M., & Costigan, T. (2006). Assessment in the evaluation of self-regulation as a process. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9023-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denson, N. (2009). Do curricular and cocurricular diversity activities influence racial bias? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 805–838. http://dx.doi.org.oca.ucsc.edu/10.3102/0034654309331551.

  • Denson, N., & Bowman, N. A. (2017). Do diversity courses make a difference? A critical examination of college diversity coursework and student outcomes. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 35–84). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48983-4_2.

  • DiAngelo, R. J. (2010). Why can’t we all just be individuals?: Countering the discourse of individualism in anti-racist education. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engberg, M. E. (2004). Improving intergroup relations in higher education: A critical examination of the influence of educational interventions on racial bias. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 473–524. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004473.

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992.

  • Garcia, B., & Van Soest, D. (2000). Facilitating learning on diversity. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 9(1–2), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J051v09n01_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (1997). Introductory module for the single issue courses. In Maurianne Adams, Lee Ann Bell, & Pat Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook (pp. 78–79). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–367. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P., Nagda, B. R. A., & Zuniga, X. (2013). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B. W. (n.d.). PASK: Framework for multicultural competency. Amherst, MA: New Perspectives. Mimeograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplowitz, D. R., & Griffin, S. S. S. R. (2019). Race dialogues: A facilitator’s guide to tackling the elephant in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, A. (2010). Latina/o culture centers: Providing a sense of belonging and promoting student success. In L. D. Patton (Ed.), Culture centers in higher education: Perspectives on identity, theory, and practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matias, C. E. (2013). On the “flip” side: A teacher educator of color unveiling the dangerous minds of white teacher candidates. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40(2), 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matias, C. E. (2014). “And our feelings just don’t feel it anymore”: Re-feeling whiteness, resistance, and emotionality. Understanding and Dismantling Privilege, 4(2), 134–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, K. E., Fisher, R. B., Thompson, M. C., & Behling, C. (2011). Training peer facilitators as social justice educators. In Facilitating intergroup dialogues: Bridging differences, catalyzing change (pp. 41–54). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. J., & Engberg, M. E. (2010). Diversity and moral reasoning: How negative diverse peer interactions affect the development of moral reasoning in undergraduate students. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(4), 459–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. J., & King, P. (2008). How curricular content and pedagogical strategies affect moral reasoning development in college students. Journal of Moral Education, 37(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240701803668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildred, J., & Zúñiga, X. (2004). Working with resistance to diversity issues in the classroom: Lessons from teacher training and multicultural education. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 74(2), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377310409517721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, L. D. (2010). A call to action: Historical and contemporary reflections on the relevance of campus culture centers in higher education. In L. D. Patton (Ed.), Culture centers in higher education: Perspectives on identity, theory, and practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. N. (2000). Life in the mindful classroom: Nurturing the disposition of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapses Wertheim, S. (2014). From a privileged perspective: How White undergraduate students make meaning of cross-racial interaction (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). New York University, New York. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1512217631/abstract/183B4D9914F2425DPQ/1.

  • Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self-Affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Leu, J., & Shoda, Y. (2011). When the seemingly innocuous “stings”: Racial microaggressions and their emotional consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1666–1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211416130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Labuhn, A. S. (2012). Self-regulation of learning: Process approaches to personal development. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 399–425). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-014.

  • Zúñiga, X., Nagda, B. (Ratnesh) A., & Sevig, T. D. (2002). Intergroup dialogues: An educational model for cultivating engagement across differences. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845248.

Recommended Reading

  • Boekaerts, M., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Emotions and emotion regulation in academic settings. In Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 76–90). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. G. (2001). Privilege, power, and difference. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Labuhn, A. S. (2012). Self-regulation of learning: Process approaches to personal development. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 399–425). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christy M. Byrd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Lesson Plan

Appendix: Lesson Plan

Materials needed: Sheet of paper and writing utensil for each student, copy of Fig. 8.1, and area for recording class guidelines and regulation strategies.

Part 1: Goals and Threats

In this section, students identify the goals and values they bring to the experience.

Instructor::

“Everyone has different goals when they come to an activity like this. Of course, our hope is that you want to learn as much as possible, but as learners we usually have more than one goal. Make a list of three to four goals that you have for today, and then rank them in order of what’s most important to you.”

After giving students 2–3 minutes to list and rank their goals, the instructor should explain the learning objectives for the day and the content that will be covered. Then give students a few minutes to identify beliefs and values that are relevant to the day’s learning objectives.

Instructor::

“Since my main goal is to have you meet our learning objectives, this activity is going to be structured toward those goals and this content. Sometimes what happens in the class will conflict with one of your goals or values. When you experience a conflict, you might feel confused, or uncomfortable, or angry, or sad. We call this experiencing a sense of threat or being triggered. On your page, write down some ways that you might feel threatened today.”

Part 2: Process Model

In this section, students learn about the process model. The instructor may want to supplement this section with the idea of comfort zones and learning edges. Introduce the model in Fig. 8.1 and explain the multiple pathways.

Instructor::

“When people experience threat, they try to cope with the threat to make themselves feel better. People respond to threat in different ways. Some people lash out. Some people become silent. Other people try to reason with themselves. We call these responses coping. Some coping is directed at trying to get back to a place where you can learn, and other coping is about just trying to feel better. How you choose to cope will influence me and everyone else in the class. Then we start the cycle again. Can someone give me an example of each type of coping?”

Part 3: Group Norms and Regulation Strategies

In this section, students think about how to help themselves and each other self-regulate. Try to create strategies that students can use on their own as well as ways for students to hold each other accountable. Note that some students may feel uncomfortable with other students “calling them out,” so be sure to discuss individual preferences and come to a consensus or majority view on the collective strategies.

Instructor::

“As I said, going through these cycles is a part of the learning process. Our goal is to help each other spend as much time using learning strategies rather than having to cope. However, sometimes we will feel threatened and need to cope. Fortunately, we can use each other as resources. Let’s make a list of guidelines for behavior to minimize threats to each other. Let’s then identify learning-focused coping strategies to use if we find ourselves or another person on feeling threatened.”

After identifying group strategies, have students identify specific strategies that they want to use throughout the activity and write those down. Encourage students to keep their lists visible to them.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Byrd, C.M., Rastogi, R., Elliot, E.R. (2020). Engagement with Diversity Experiences: A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective. In: Parson, L., Ozaki, C. (eds) Teaching and Learning for Social Justice and Equity in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44939-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44939-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44938-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44939-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics