Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Importance of Feminist Theories: Gender, Race, Sexuality and IPV

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intimate Partner Violence and the LGBT+ Community

Abstract

Feminist theory is a collection of feminist approaches that have provided important insights to understanding how power and violence operate in intimate partner relationships. Often credited with ending a husband’s right to abuse , second wave feminist theory upheld that women—specifically in (heterosexual) marriages—have the right not to be assaulted regardless of whether the perpetrator is their legal spouse. Recent advances in feminist theory—such as intersectionality , black feminist thought, poststructuralist feminist and queer theories—have sought to center the experiences of women of color and LGBT people. In doing so, they have shed light on the innerworkings of particular systems of oppression (namely racism, homophobia, and transphobia), increasing our knowledge of how power and violence are shaped, and how they shape intimate relationships. This chapter will trace a history of feminist theories from the second wave through black feminist thought to intersectionality and poststructuralist feminist theories to queer theory to illustrate their contributions to knowledge of IPV . Specifically, the chapter will explore how different feminist theories’ conceptions of power and identity enhance our understanding of intimate partner violence .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. J. (2006). Pedagogies of crossing: Meditations on feminism, sexual politics, memory, and the sacred. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L., & Freeman, E. (1993). Queer nationality. In M. Warner (Ed.), Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory (pp. 193–229). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., & Black, M. C. (2014). Intimate partner violence in the United States—2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40, 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calton, J. M., Cattaneo, L. B., & Gebhard, K. T. (2016). Barriers to help seeking for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer survivors of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17, 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015585318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, C. (2019). What services exist for LGBTQ perpetrators of intimate partner violence in batterer intervention programs across North America? A qualitative study. Partner Abuse, 10(2), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.10.2.222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, C. E. B., & Buttell, F. (2015). Illusion of inclusion: The failure of the gender paradigm to account for IPV in LGBT relationships. Partner Abuse, 6(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.1.65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, C., & Buttell, F. P. (2016). The social construction of roles in intimate partner violence: Is the victim/perpetrator model the only viable one? Journal of Family Violence, 31, 967–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9900-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, C., Hamel, J., Buttell, F., & Ferreira, R. J. (2016). A survey of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the United States and Canada: Findings and implications for policy and intervention. Partner Abuse, 7(3), 226–276. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.3.226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, C., Lauve-Moon, K., & Buttell, F. (2015). Re-theorizing intimate partner violence through post-structural feminism, queer theory, and the sociology of gender. Social Sciences, 4, 668–687. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4030668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carasthathis, A. (2013). Identity categories as potential coalitions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38, 941–965. doi: 10.1086/669573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbado, D. W. (2013). Colorblind intersectionality. Signs, 38, 811–845. https://doi.org/10.1086/669666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38, 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1986.33.6.03a00020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combahee River Collective. (1995). A Black feminist statement. In B. Guy-Sheftall (Ed.), Words of fire: An anthology of African American thought (pp. 231–240). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cor, D. N., & Chan, C. D. (2017). Intersectional feminism and LGBTIQQA+ psychology: Understanding our present by exploring our past. In R. Ruth & E. Santacruz (Eds.), LGBT psychology and mental health: Emerging research and advances (pp. 109–132). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, E. P., & Plummer, S.-B. (2009). People of color with disabilities: Intersectionality as a framework for analyzing intimate partner violence in social, historical, and political contexts. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770802675635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (2016). Postscript. In H. Lutz, M. T. Herrera Vivar, & L. Supik (Eds.), Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies (pp 221–233). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (1983). Women, race, & class. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1992.39.1.03x0064l.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, L. (1993). Stone butch blues: A novel. Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction, Volume 1 (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy-Sheftall, B. (Ed.). (1995). Words of fire: An anthology of African-American feminist thought. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, D. M. (1990). One hundred years of homosexuality: And other essays on Greek love (New Ancient World Series). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris-Perry, M. V. (2011). Sister citizen: Shame, stereotypes, and Black women in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. C. M. (2003). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). AA Dordrecht, NL: Kluwet Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. New York, NY: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: South End Press Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hust, S. J. T., Rodgers, K. B., & Bayly, B. (2017). Scripting sexual consent: Internalized traditional sexual scripts and sexual consent expectancies among college students. Family Relations, 66(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, U. A. (2011). Theories of intimate partner violence: From blaming the victim to acting against injustice: Intersectionality as an analytic framework. ANS, Advances in Nursing Science, 34(3), E29–E51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e3182272388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagose, A. (1997). Queer theory: An introduction. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (2005). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender—or is it? Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1126–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00204.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Misra, T. A., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. L. (2012). Rates of bi-directional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. New York, NY: Ten Speed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. A., & Huffman, D. J. (2005). The decentering of second wave feminism and the rise of the third wave. Science & Society, 69(1), 56–91. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.69.1.56.56799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiuro, R. D., & Eberle, J. A. (2008). State standards for domestic violence perpetrator treatment: Current status, trends, and recommendations. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.2.133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under western eyes. Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30(1), 61–88. doi: 10.1057/fr.1989.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (Eds.). (1983). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (2nd ed.). Latham, New York: Kitchen Table/Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J., & Humphreys, C. (2010). Marshalling the evidence: Using intersectionality in the domestic violence frame. Social Politics, 17(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxq003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, C. A. (2014). I don’t like passing as a straight woman: Queer negotiations of identity and social group membership. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/677197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In R. R. Recter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–209). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1992). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–293). London, UK: Pandora Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzinger, L. (2003). Genders in production: Making workers in Mexico’s global factories. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, L. (2013). Backward, dumb, and violent hillbillies? Rural geographies and intersectional studies on intimate partner violence. Affilia, 28, 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109913504153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, N., & Lynch, I. (2018). You have to bow right here: Heteronormative scripts and intimate partner violence in women’s same-sex relationships. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1338755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, M., & Sapp, E. G. (2012). Reading Pulp Fiction: Embodied femininity and power second and third wave feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 13(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700111429900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (Ed.). (1996). Queer theory/sociology. New York, NY: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204271476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1987). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. London, UK: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (2013). Intersectional and cross-movement politics and policies: Reflections on current practices and debates. Signs, 38, 893–915. https://doi.org/10.1086/669572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violence Against Women Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 13701-14040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (Ed.). (1993). Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (1977). Coming out: Homosexual politics in Britain from the nineteenth century to the present. London, UK: Quartet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. M. (2004). Black women and intimate partner violence: New directions for research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1487–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C. M. (2012). Partner abuse in ethnic minority and gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender populations. Partner Abuse, 3(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.3.336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C. M. (2019). Toward an ecological model of violence among African Americans. In W. S. DeKeseredy, C. M. Rennison, & A. K. Hall-Sanchez (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of violence studies (pp. 190–209). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. (1993). One is not born a woman. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 103–109). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

    Clare Cannon

  2. Department of Social Work, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

    Clare Cannon

Authors
  1. Clare Cannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare Cannon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Pennsylvania State University, Berks, Reading, PA, USA

    Brenda Russell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cannon, C. (2020). On the Importance of Feminist Theories: Gender, Race, Sexuality and IPV. In: Russell, B. (eds) Intimate Partner Violence and the LGBT+ Community. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44762-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44762-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44761-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44762-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation