Skip to main content

The Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing Process: A General Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing
  • 2652 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter expands upon the previously presented evidence-based psychoeducational assessment and report writing framework and provides an overview of the fourth pillar of evidence-based psychoeducational assessment and report writing—the mechanics of the psychoeducational assessment and report writing process. Chapter 4 discusses interviewing and gathering of additional sources of data including rating forms, records, and background information. Chapter 5 furnishes an overview of how to conduct an observation. The remaining chapters in the book are devoted to further explicating the fourth pillar of psychoeducational assessment and report writing including integrating information, conceptualizing a classification, writing a report, and providing oral feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dombrowski, S. C. (2014). Child Development Questionnaire (CDQ). Unpublished Document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutting, J. J., Oakland, T., & McDermott, P. A. (1989). Observing child behavior during testing: Constructs, validity, and situation generality. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, W. T., & Kerns, M.-D. (1999). Magnitude and moderators of bias in observer ratings: A meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.4.403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, J. D., & Dozier, J. E. (1985). A honeymoon effect in child psychiatric hospitalization: A research note. Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 26(3), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1985.tb01948.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger, H. A. (1958). Hawthorne revisited. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConaughy, S. H., Harder, V. S., Antshel, K. M., Gordon, M., Eiraldi, R., & Dumenci, L. (2010). Incremental validity of test session and classroom observations in a multimethod assessment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Adolescent Psychology, 39, 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.501287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. A., Watkins, M. W., & Rhoad, A. (2014). Whose IQ is it? Assessor bias variance in high-stakes psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 26, 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrazik, M., Janzen, T. M., Dombrowski, S. C., Barford, S. W., & Krawchuk, L. L. (2012). Administration and scoring errors of graduate students learning the WISC-IV: Issues and controversies. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27(4), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573512454106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Sadoff, S. (2008). Statistical inference when classroom quality is measured with error. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740801982104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, G. L. (2004). Temporal stability of WISC-III subtest composite: Strengths and weaknesses. Psychological Assessment, 16, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan C. Dombrowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dombrowski, S.C. (2020). The Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing Process: A General Overview. In: Dombrowski, S. (eds) Psychoeducational Assessment and Report Writing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44641-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics