Abstract
In this chapter, we contribute some insights from project SimTeach (Herbst P, Chieu VM, SIMTEACH: What can practical knowledge modeled in a teaching simulator contribute to support mathematics teacher learning? National Science Foundation Grant, EHR, DRL-1420102, 2014) concerning the role that technologically mediated teaching simulations can play in learning to teach. We examine opportunities to learn about the teaching of mathematics afforded by the use of a digital simulation of a lesson in the context of simulation-based apprenticeship encounters between a novice teacher and four different experienced teachers who, in paired encounters, mentored her by sharing their thinking as they went through the simulation. These encounters gave opportunities to connect abstract concepts of teaching to practical ways in which they might be experienced in classrooms. We present this as a contribution to the perennial problem of connecting theory and practice in learning to teach.
In memoriam Karen King
Work described in this chapter was done with resources from NSF grant DRL-1420102 (P. Herbst, PI). An earlier version of part of this material was shared at the 2017 NCTM Research Conference, San Antonio, TX.
Vu-Minh Chieu participated of this work when he was an Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Michigan. He is currently a Software Development Engineer at Amazon.com, Inc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
CPCTC stands for corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent.
References
Anderson, D., Lawson, B., & Mayer-Smith, J. (2006). Investigating the impact of a practicum experience in an aquarium on pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 17(4), 341–353.
Bain, R., & Moje, E. (2012). Mapping the teacher education terrain for novices. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(5), 62–65.
Balacheff, N. (1994). Didactique et intelligence artificielle. Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques, 14, 9–42.
Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2010). Modeling students’ conceptions: The case of function. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 16, 207–234.
Ball, D., & Forzani, F. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach and connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17–21, 38–39.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bradley, E. G., & Kendall, B. (2014). A review of computer simulations in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(1), 3–12.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des Mathématiques 1970–1990. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Butler, B. M., & Cuenca, A. (2012). Conceptualizing the roles of mentor teachers during student teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 296–308.
Carroll, C., & Mumme, J. (2007). Learning to lead mathematics professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Chazan, D., Callis, S., & Lehman, M. (2009). Embracing reason: Egalitarian ideals and the teaching of high school mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chazan, D., Herbst, P., & Clark, L. (2016). Research on the teaching of mathematics: A call to theorize the role of society and schooling in mathematics. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 1039–1097). Washington, DC: AERA.
Chieu, V. M., & Herbst, P. (2011). Designing an intelligent teaching simulator for learning to teach by practicing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 105–117.
Chieu, V. M., Luengo, V., Vadcard, L., & Tonetti, J. (2010). Student modeling in orthopedic surgery training: Exploiting symbiosis between temporal Bayesian networks and fine-grained didactic analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20(3), 269–301.
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Tyler-Wood, T., & Gibson, D. (2011). simSchool: An online dynamic simulator for enhancing teacher preparation. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 201–220.
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.
Crespo, S., Oslund, J. A., & Parks, A. N. (2011). Imagining mathematics teaching practice: Prospective teachers generate representations of a class discussion. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 119–131.
Dewey, J. (1965). The relation of theory to practice in education. In M. Borrowman (Ed.), Teacher education in America: A documentary history (pp. 140–171). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. (Original work published 1904).
Dieker, L. A., Rodriguez, J. A., Lignugaris, B., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. E. (2013). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33.
Dieker, L. A., Straub, C. L., Hughes, C. E., Hynes, M. C., & Hardin, S. (2014). Learning from virtual students. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 54–58.
Earnest, D., & Amador, J. M. (2019). Lesson planimation: Prospective elementary teachers’ interactions with mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(1), 37–68.
Fairbanks, C. M., Freedman, D., & Kahn, C. (2000). The role of effective mentors in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 102–112.
FeimanNemser, S. (1996). Teacher mentoring: A critical review. ERIC Digest, 95, 2.
Fernandez, M. L. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 351–362.
Ferry, B., & Kervin, L. (2007). Developing an online classroom simulation to support a preservice teacher education program. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning (pp. 189–205). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
Francis, A. T. (2017). Reforming only half: A study of practice-based teacher education in traditional field placements. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 29(3), 235–260.
Gibson, D., Aldrich, C., & Prensky, M. (Eds.). (2006). Games and simulations in online learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science.
Gibson, D., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Knezek, G. (2011, March). SimSchool: Enhancing teacher preparation through simulated classrooms. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1504–1510). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Girod, M., & Girod, G. R. (2008). Simulation and the need for practice in teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 307–337.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Publishing Company.
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.
Herbst, P. (2006). Teaching geometry with problems: Negotiating instructional situations and mathematical tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 313–347.
Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2011). Research on practical rationality: Studying the justification of actions in mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 405–462.
Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2012). On the instructional triangle and sources of justification for actions in mathematics teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(5), 601–612.
Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C., Chieu, V. M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 91–103.
Herbst, P., Chazan, D., & Milewski, A. (2020). Technology tools for mathematics teacher learning: How might they support the development of capacity for specific teaching assignments? In O. Chapman & S. Llinares (Eds.), Handbook of research in mathematics teacher education (pp. 223–251). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Brill-Sense.
Herbst, P., Chen, C., Weiss, M., Gonzalez, G., Nachlieli, T., Hamlin, M., & Brach, C. (2009). “Doing proofs” in geometry classrooms. In M. Blanton, D. Stylianou, & E. Knuth (Eds.), The teaching and learning of proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective (pp. 250–268). New York, NY: Routledge.
Herbst, P., & Chieu, V. M. (2014). SIMTEACH: What can practical knowledge modeled in a teaching simulator contribute to support mathematics teacher learning? Proposal to the National Science Foundation, EHR, DRL-1420102.
Herbst, P., & Milewski, A. (2020, February). Using story Circles to inquire into the social and representational infrastructure of lesson-centered teacher collaboration. In H. Borko & D. Potari (Eds.), Teachers of mathematics working and learning in collaborative groups: Proceedings from ICMI Study 25 (pp. 629–636). Lisbon, Portugal: University of Lisbon.
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow’s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: Holmes Group.
Jaworski, B., & Watson, A. (Eds.). (2014). Mentoring in mathematics teaching. London, UK: Routledge.
Khasnabis, D., Goldin, S., & Ronfeldt, M. (2018). The practice of partnering: Simulated parent–teacher conferences as a tool for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 40(1), 77–95.
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31.
Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(178–194), 1985.
Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 21–34.
Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., … Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386.
Michigan Education. (2019). Designing the future of STEM education… and educators. Michigan Education Magazine, Fall issue, 21–23.
Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rougée, A. and Herbst, P. (2018). Does the medium matter? A comparison of secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ representations of practice created in text and storyboarding media. In R. Zazkis and P. Herbst (Eds.), Scripting approaches in mathematics education: Mathematical dialogues in research and practice (pp. 265–292). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2015). How we think: A theory of human decision making, with a focus on teaching. In S. H. Cho (Ed.), The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 229–2243). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Shaughnessy, M., & Boerst, T. A. (2018). Uncovering the skills that preservice teachers bring to teacher education: The practice of eliciting a student’s thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 40–55.
Shin, S. J. (2006). Learning to teach writing through tutoring and journal writing. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 325–345.
Thompson, M., Owho-Ovuakporie, K., Robinson, K., Kim, Y. J., Slama, R., & Reich, J. (2019). Teacher moments: A digital simulation for preservice teachers to approximate parent–teacher conversations. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(3), 144–164.
Tyler-Wood, T., Estes, M., Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Gibson, D. (2015). SimSchool: An opportunity for using serious gaming for training teachers in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34(3), 17–20.
Vadcard, L. (2013). Étude didactique de la dialectique du travail et de la formation au bloc opératoire. Éducation et Didactique, 7(1), 117–146.
van Es, E. A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 340–356.
van Ginkel, G., Oolbekkink, H., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2016). Adapting mentoring to individual differences in novice teacher learning: The mentor’s viewpoint. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 198–218.
Vincent, A., & Shepherd, J. (1998). Experiences in teaching Middle East politics via internet-based role-play simulation. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(11), 1–35.
Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Lesson plays: Planning teaching versus teaching planning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(1), 40–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herbst, P., Boileau, N., Shultz, M., Milewski, A., Chieu, VM. (2020). What Simulation-Based Mentoring May Afford: Opportunities to Connect Theory and Practice. In: Bradley, E. (eds) Games and Simulations in Teacher Education. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44526-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44526-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44525-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44526-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)