Skip to main content

The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and its Methodical Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy

Part of the book series: Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences ((WHPS,volume 3))

Abstract

Women who are deprived of their histories can be compared to people who have lost their memories. They are unable to build a personal identity. This analogy may be the leading paradigm for my paper, which is primarily dedicated to epistemological questions. Throughout the last 40 years, many scholars have dedicated their endeavors to conserving the writings of women philosophers. Now we have access to valuable sources that show that the history of women philosophers stretches back as far as the history of philosophy itself. Using the history of women philosophers as a methodical approach to philosophy is a unique and indispensable means to widen and to change philosophical insights. Re-reading the history of philosophy and including the ideas of women philosophers, however, does not only add some more narratives but challenges the methodology of philosophy. The history of philosophy that we are traditionally educated in the western world is simply not true to the facts. Thus, I demand a rewriting of the history of philosophy that takes into account the ideas that are incorporated in the writings of women philosophers and that have been denied by the narratives and fabric of sexualized and patriarchally influenced thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Songe-Moeller’s contribution in this volume. See also (Acker 2013). 

  2. 2.

    “Several major Greek works, above all the Almagest owe their survival to her. Her commentary on the works of Apollonius was also important. Since Copernicus could not have worked without the Almagest, Hypatia must be regarded as a significant contributor to modern astronomy”, Grafton 1997, 261.

  3. 3.

    This article was accessable till September 2014: plato.stanford.eduentriesfeminism-femhistbib.html#Gen (extracted September 10, 2014). It was substantially changed and presented a considerable bibliography on women in the history of philosophy in 2015, see now (Witt and Shapiro 2019).

References

  • Acker, C. (2013). Femmes, fêtes et philosophie en Grèce ancienne. Paris (L’Harmattan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alarabi, N. (2012). Constance Naden’s philosophical poetry. Literature Compass, 11, 848–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. (1997a). The pluralists. Aspasia. The Concept of Woman. The Aristotelian Revolution, 750 B.C.A.D. 1250. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. (1997b). The concept of women, vol. 2: The Early Humanist Reformation, 1250–1500. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (1976). Plato’s Republic and Feminism. Philosophy, 51(197), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asimopulos, P. (2011). The authenticity of Pericles’ funeral oration in the European historical thought. Facta Universitatis Series Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, issue, 2, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astell, M. (1986). The first English feminist. Reflections upon marriage and other writings. B. Hill (Ed.), Aldershot: Maurice Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astell, M. (2013). The Christian religion, as professed by a daughter of the Church of England. J. Broad (Ed.), Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies and Iter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar On, B.-A. (Ed.) (1994). Engendering origins: Critical feminist readings in Plato and Aristotle. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaney, M., & Chapman, S. (2017). “Susan Stebbing”. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/stebbing. Accessed 28 May 2019.

  • Beauvoir, S. de (2011). The second sex. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, F. C. (2012). Diotima’s children. German aesthetic rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford Universal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, A. A. (2002). Hedwig Conrad-Martius and the phenomenology of nature. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, E. (2012). Plato’s dialectic on woman. Equal, therefore inferior. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodkin, R. G. (1999). Women’s agency in classical economic thought. In A. Smith, H. Taylor Mill, & J. S. Mill (Eds.), Feminist Economics, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, E.-J. (2010). Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia and Descartes’ Letters (1650–1665). Historia Mathematica, issue, 3, 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britting, J. (2004). Ayn Rand. New York: Overlook Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brucker, J. (1745). Pinacoteca scriptorium nostra aetate literis illustrium, vol. IV. Augsburg (J. J. Haidium).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcagno, A. (2007). The philosophy of Edith Stein. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcagno, A. (Ed.) (2018). Gerda Walther’s phenomenology of sociality, psychology, and religion. Dordrecht (Springer Women in the History of Philosophy and Science, no. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M. W. (2010). The persistent problems of philosophy. Norwood: Nabu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavarero, A. (1995). In spite of Plato. A feminist rewriting of ancient philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, M. (2001). Observations upon experimental philosophy. E. O’Neill (Ed.), Oxford: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, M. (2003). Political writings. S. James (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, M. (2004). The blazing world and other writings. K. Lilley (Ed.), New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceranski, B. (1996). Und sie fürchtet sich vor niemandem: Die Physikerin Laura Bassi (1711–1778). Frankfurt; New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. (2013). Susan Stebbing and the language of common sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciempiel, A. (2008). Wise and devoted or shrewd and shameless? The true face of Aspasia of Miletus. Scripta Classica, issue, 5, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J. J. (2002). The suspicion of virtue: Women philosophers in neoclassical France. New York, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A., (1992). The Conway letters.  The correspondence of Anne, viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their friends, 1642–1684. S. Hutton & M. Hope Nicolson (Eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, G., & Kevin (1989). The life of saint Macrina. Eugene, Or: Wipf & Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, L. (1997). Philosophy and Rhetoric in the Menexenus. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, issue, 109, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craciun, A. (2002). A Routledge literary sourcebook on Mary Wollstonecraft’s A vindication of the rights of woman. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, C., & Golomb, J. (Eds.) (2009). Beauvoir and Sartre. The Riddle of Influence. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascăl, R. (2005). On Christine de Pizan’s Feminism. Gender Studies, issue, 4, 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Baar, M. et al. (Eds.) (1996). Choosing the better part. Anna Maria van Schurman (1607–1678). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M. (2007). Hypatia of Alexandria. Mathematician and martyr. Amherst Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Châtelet, É. (2007). Selected philosophical and scientific writings. In J. P. Zinnser & I. Bour (Eds.), Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Châtelet, É. (2011). Examens de la Bible. Bertram Eugene Schwarzbach (Ed.), Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Châtelet, É. (2018). La correspondence d’Emilie du Châtelet. In U. Kölving & A. Brown (Eds.), Ferney (Voltaire Centre International d’Études du XIIIe Siècle).

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Châtelet, É., & Newton, I. (2015). Principes mathématiques de la philosophie naturelle. La traduction française des Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. 2. vol., Édition critique du manuscrit par M. Toulmonde. Ferney (Voltaire Centre International d’Études du XIIIe Siècle).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzielska, M. (1995). Hypatia of Alexandria. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, E. (1997). Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elisabeth of Bohemia (2007). The correspondence between Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. Edited by Lisa Shapiro, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falco, M. J. (Ed.) (1996). Feminist interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, B. (2010). Conversing with Stalin, surviving the terror: The diaries of Aleksandra Kollontai and the internal life of politics. Slavic Review, 4, 944–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonte, M. (1997). The worth of women. Wherein is clearly revealed their nobility and their superiority to men. V. Cox (Ed.), Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, G. (2000). Macrina’s scar. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 4, 511–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, L. (1989). Damaris Cudworth Masham. Hypatia, 1, 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, L. (1991). Damaris Cudworth Masham. In M. E. Waithe (Ed.), A History of Women Philosophers, vol. III. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furumoto, L. (1994). Christine Ladd-Franklin’s color theory: Strategy for claiming scientific authority? Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 727(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, C. P. (1975). Women and economics: A study of the economic relation between men and women as a factor in social evolution. New York: Gordon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (1999). Amazons and apprentices: Women and the German Parnassus in the early enlightenment. Rochester: Camden House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (2009). Adieu Divine Comtesse: Luise Gottsched, Charlotte Sophie Gräfin Bentinck und Johann Christoph Gottsched in ihren Briefen. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouges, O. de (1979). The declaration of the rights of woman. In H. B. Applewhite, M. D. Johnson & D. G. Levy (Eds.), Women in Revolutionary Paris, 1789–1795: Selected Documents Translated With Notes and Commentary. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouges, O. de (2013). Ainsi soit Olympe de Gouges: La déclaration des droits de la femme et autres textes politiques. Benoîte Groult (Ed.), Paris (Grasset. Impr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gournay, M. Le, J. de (2002). Apology for the woman writing and other works. R. Hillman & C. Quesnel (Eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, A. (1997). From apotheosis to analysis: Some late Renaissance histories of classical astronomy. In D. R. Kelley (Ed.), History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge (pp. 261–276). Rochester New York: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. (2014). A history of women’s political thought in Europe, 1700–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K., & Hagengruber, R. (Eds.) (2015). The history of women's ideas. The Monist 98 (1).  

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, B. N. (1989). The life of saint Macrina. K. Corrigan, transl.,  Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagengruber, R. (Ed.) (2011). Émilie du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagengruber, R. (2015). Soziale Organisation und enzyklopädisches Interesse.  Campanellas metaphysische Grundlegung der Sonnenstadt, In O. Höffe (Ed.) Politische Utopien der Neuzeit (pp. 139–157). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagengruber, R. (2018). Relocating women in the history of philosophy and science: Emilie Du Châtelet (1706–1749), Laura Bassi (1711–1778), and Luise Gottsched (1713–1762) in Brucker’s Pinacotheca. In S. Plastina, E. M. De Tommaso (Eds.), Filosofe e scienziate in età moderna. Bruniana&Campanelliana, Supplemento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagengruber, R., & Rodrigues, A. (Eds.) (2010). Von Diana zu Minerva. Philosophierende Aristokratinnen des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagengruber, R., & Hecht, H. (Eds.) (2019). Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harth, E. (1992). Cartesian women: Versions and subversions of rational discourse in the old regime. New York, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, E. (2005). Philosophy, rhetoric, and cultural memory. Rereading Plato’s Menexenus and Isocrates’ Panegyricus. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 1, 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. M. (1995). Prisoner of history. Aspasia of Miletus and her biographical tradition. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildegard, B. (1997). The book of the rewards of life: Liber vitae meritorum (B. W. Hozeski, transl.). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. (1993). Damaris Cudworth, lady Masham. Between Platonism and enlightenment. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 1, 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. (2004). Anne Conway. A woman philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. (2012). Women philosophers and the early reception of Descartes. Anne Conway and Princess Elizabeth. In T. M. Schmaltz (Ed.), Receptions of Descartes. Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilsley, M. H. (1963). A daughter of the Renaissance. Marie le Jars de Gournay, her life and works. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1992). Sorcerer Love. A Reading of Plato’s Symposium, Diotima’s Speech. In S. L. Bartky & N. Fraser (Eds.), Revaluing French Feminism. Critical Essays on Difference, Agency, and Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 64-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karafili Steiner, E. (2014). Called to civil existence. Mary Wollstonecraft’s A vindication of the rights of woman. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerby-Fulton, K. (2010). Hildegard of Bingen. In Medieval Holy Women in the Christian Tradition c.1100–c.1500. Alastair Minnis and Rosalynn Voaden (Eds.), Turnhout (pp. 343–369), Belgium: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. L. (1991). Women of the renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. L. (2005). Humanism, Venice, and women. Essays on the Italian Renaissance. Aldershot & Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klens, U. (1996). Mathematikerinnen im 18. Jahrhundert: Maria Gaetana, Agnesi, Gabrielle-Emilie du Châtelet, Sophie Germain. Fallstudien zur Wechselwirkung von Wissenschaft und Philosophie im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölving, U., & Courcelle, O. (2008). Émilie Du Châtelet: Éclairages & documents nouveaux. Ferney (Voltaire Centre International d’Études du XIIIe Siècle).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, K. (2002). The political theory of Christine de Pizan. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazaroiu, G. (2013). Pythagorean women. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 2, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebech, M. (2015). The philosophy of Edith Stein. From Phenomenology to Metaphysics: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerius, J. (2017). Hildegard von Bingen on autonomy. In S. Berges, A. L. Siani (Eds.), Women philosophers on autonomy: Historical and contemporary perspectives, (pp .17-31)London: Routledge, pp. 17-31. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1993/2013). From the creation of feminist consciousness: From the middle ages to eighteen-seventy. In S. M. Harris & L. K. Hughes (Eds.), A Feminist Reader. Feminist thought from Sappho to Satrapi, vol. IV (pp. 302-337) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. (1984). Man of reason. London: Methuen Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokaneeta, J. (2001). Alexandra Kollontai and Marxist veminism. Economic and Political Weekly, 17, 1405–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, S., & Hagengruber, R. (2018). Women phenomenologists on social ontology. We-experiences, communal life and joint action. Dordrecht (Springer History of Women Philosophers and Scientists no. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madigan, S., & O’Hara, R. (1992). Short-term memory at the turn of the century: Mary Whiton Calkins’ memory research. American Psychologist, 2, 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier-Katkin, D. (2010). Stranger from abroad. Hannah Arendt, Martin Heidegger, friendship and forgiveness. New York (W.W. Norton & Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. K. (1998). The winter queen. The Life of Elizabeth of Bohemia, 1596–1662. Edinburgh: National Galleries of Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masham, D. C. (2004). The philosophical works. introduced by J. G. Buickerood. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzotti, M. (2007). The world of maria Gaetana Agnesi, mathematician of God. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, L. L. (1989). Some remarks on exploring the history of women in philosophy. Hypatia, 4(1–5), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, L. L. (1992). Dr. Gerda Walther: German feminist philosopher. In M. Pellikaan-Engel (Ed.), Against patriarchal thinking (pp. 65–69). Amsterdam: VU University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. N. (2007). Differing conceptions of personhood within the psychology and philosophy of Mary Whiton Calkins. In Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 4, pp. 753–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWeeny, J. (2011). Princess Elizabeth and the mind–body problem. In S. Barbone & M. Bruce (Eds.), Just the Arguments. 100 of the most important arguments in Western philosophy (pp. 297–300). Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménage, G. (1690/1984). The history of women philosophers. B. H. Zedler (Ed.), Lanham, MD: University Press of America Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1979). The vitalism of Anne Conway. Its impact on Leibniz’s concept of the monad. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 3, 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, H. T. (1998). The complete works of Harriet Taylor Mill. Ed. by J. E. Jacobs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, H. T., & Mill, J. S. (1970). Essays on sex equality. A. S. Rossi (Ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, C., & Bocquet, J.-L. (2012). Olympe de Gouges. Paris: Casterman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munslow, A. (2012). A history of history. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naden, C. C. (1890). Induction and deduction: A historical and critical sketch of successive philosophical conceptions respecting the relations between inductive and deductive thought and other essays. London: Bickers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nails, D. (2002). The people of Plato. Indianapolis: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, H. (1965). Diotima's Concept of Love. The American Journal of Philosophy 86, 33–59. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogarola, I. (2004). Complete writings. Letterbook, Dialogue on Adam and Eve, Orations. M. King & D. M. Robin (Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, A. (1989). The hidden host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato’s ‘Symposium’. Hypatia, 3, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olympe, G. de (1979). The declaration of the rights of woman. In H. B. Applewhite, M. D. Johnson & D. G. Levy (Eds.), Women in Revolutionary Paris, 1789–1795: Selected Documents Translated With Notes and Commentary (pp. 87–96). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olympe, G. de (2013). Ainsi soit Olympe de Gouges: La Déclaration des droits de la femme et autres textes politiques. B. Groult (Ed.), Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, P. (2010). The origin of the olive. On the Dynamics of Plato’s ‘Menexenus’. Polis: The Journal of Ancient Greek Political Thought, 1, 38–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornes, S. (2009). Sophie Germain. Greensboro, NC: Morgan Reynolds Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S., & Welby, V. (2001). Semiotic and significs. The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. C. S. Hardwick (Ed.), Elsah, IL: Arisbe Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. (1986). The celebrated Mary Astell: An early English feminist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrilli, S. (2009). Signifying and understanding: Reading the works of Victoria Welby and the signific movement. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizan, C. de (1999). The book of the city of ladies. R. Brown-Grant (Ed.), London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, S. B. (1984). Women in classical antiquity. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, S. B. (2002). Spartan women. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, S. B. (2013). Pythagorean women. Their history and writings. Baltimore John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. (2014). Alexandra Kollontai: A biography. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasch, R. E., & Sheth, F. A. (1996). Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Reassessing her significance for feminism and social economics. Review of Social Economy, 3, 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A. (1961). For the new intellectual. The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York (Random House). 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschenbach, B. (2000). Der Traum und sein Schatten. Frühfeministin und geistige Verbündete Montaignes: Marie de Gournay und ihre Zeit. Königstein/Taunus: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ready, K. J. (2002). Damaris Cudworth Masham, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, and the feminist legacy of Locke’s theory of personal identity. Eighteenth-century Studies, 4, 563–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, E. L. E. (2003). Margaret Cavendish. Gender, genre, exile. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeser, T. W. (2016). Setting Plato straight: Translating ancient sexuality in the renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisel Gladstein, M., & Sciabarra, C. M. (Eds.) (2003). Feminist interpretations of Ayn Rand. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. G. (2005). America’s first women philosophers. Transplanting Hegel, 1860–1925. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkever, S. G. (1993). Socrates’ Aspasian oration. The play of philosophy and politics in Plato’s Menexenus. The American Political Science Review, 1, 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C., Skinner, Q., & Kessler, E. (Eds.). (1988). The Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, R. M. (2007). Feminism and the history of philosophy. Reprinted In L. Alcoff & E. F. Kittay (Eds.) The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy (pp. 43–59). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, H. (1995). Olympe de Gouges. Mensch und Bürgerin. Die Rechte der Frau. Aachen: Ein-Fach-Verlag. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. (1999). Princess Elizabeth and Descartes. The union of soul and body and the practice of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 3, 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, P. (2007). Reflection, nature, and moral law. The extent of Catharine Cockburn’s Lockeanism in her defence of Mr. Locke’s Essay. Hypatia, 3, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, C. L. (2013). Reading Olympe de Gouges. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. J. (1992). Reading Julia Kristeva: Estrangement and the female intellectual. A thesis submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctorate in Philosophy in the University of Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. L. (2007). Women intellectuals and intellectual history: Their paradigmatic separation. Women’s History Review, 16, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springborg, P. (1995). Mary Astell (1666–1731), Critic of Locke. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann, H. (1910). Aspasia. In G. Wissowa & W. Kroll (Eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 3 (pp. 1716–1722). Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (1989). On the problem of empathy. L. Gelber (Ed.), Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (1990–2014). Edith-Stein-Gesamtausgabe, vol. 1–10. Mariéle-Claudia Wulf, Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz et al. (eds.), Freiburg im Breisgau (Verlag Herder).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (2006). An investigation concerning the state. L. Gelber (Ed.), Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopczyk, A. (1980): Was Philosophen über Frauen denken. München: Matthes & Seitz Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohmeyr, A. (2006). Sophie von La Roche. Leipzig (Reclam): Eine Biografie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapuová, M. (2006). Women in philosophy. The case of Harriet Taylor Mill. Human Affairs, 2, 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theano. (2010). Briefe einer antiken Philosophin. Kai Brodersen (Ed.), Stuttgart (Reclam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. (2000). Mary Wollstonecraft: A revolutionary life. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, N. (Ed.) (1994). Feminist interpretations of Plato. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, D. (1995). Arendt and Heidegger. The fate of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waithe, M. E. (Ed.) (1987–1995). A history of women philosophers, vol. I–IV. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. A. (2004). Mary Astell: Including Women’s voices in political theory. Hypatia, 3, 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, L. (2000). Rahel Varnhagen: The life of a Jewess. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, C. M. (1796). Die pythagoreischen Frauen. Ehrenrettung der Aspasia, Julia und Faustina. In Sämtliche Werke, vol. 24. Leipzig: Göschen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, K. (2003). Mad Madge. The extraordinary life of Margaret Cavendish, duchess of Newcastle, the first woman to live by her pen. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wider, K. (1986). Women philosophers in the ancient Greek world. Donning the mantle. Hypatia, 1, 21–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willard, C. C. (1990). Christine de Pizan. New York (Persea): Her Life and Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, C., & Shapiro, L. (2019). Feminist history of philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/feminism-femhist Accessed 28 May 2019.

  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1989). The works of Mary Wollstonecraft. M. Butler, E. Rees-Mogg & J. Todd (Eds.), London: Pickering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. A. (1983). The Italian academies. In Renaissance and reform: The Italian contribution. Collected essays. London: Routledge, pp. 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnser, J. & Candler Hayes, J. (Eds.) (2006). Emilie Du Châtelet: Rewriting enlightenment philosophy and science. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Edith Hagengruber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hagengruber, R.E. (2020). The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and its Methodical Implications. In: Thorgeirsdottir, S., Hagengruber, R. (eds) Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics