Skip to main content

Robust Tracking with Model Mismatch for Fast and Safe Planning: An SOS Optimization Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XIII (WAFR 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics ((SPAR,volume 14))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the pursuit of real-time motion planning, a commonly adopted practice is to compute trajectories by running a planning algorithm on a simplified, low-dimensional dynamical model, and then employ a feedback tracking controller that tracks such a trajectory by accounting for the full, high-dimensional system dynamics. While this strategy of planning with model mismatch generally yields fast computation times, there are no guarantees of dynamic feasibility, which hampers application to safety-critical systems. Building upon recent work that addressed this problem through the lens of Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability, we devise an algorithmic framework whereby one computes, offline, for a pair of “planner” (i.e., low-dimensional) and “tracking” (i.e., high-dimensional) models, a feedback tracking controller and associated tracking bound. This bound is then used as a safety margin when generating motion plans via the low-dimensional model. Specifically, we harness the computational tool of sum-of-squares (SOS) programming to design a bilinear optimization algorithm for the computation of the feedback tracking controller and associated tracking bound. The algorithm is demonstrated via numerical experiments, with an emphasis on investigating the trade-off between the increased computational scalability afforded by SOS and its intrinsic conservativeness. Collectively, our results enable scaling the appealing strategy of planning with model mismatch to systems that are beyond the reach of HJ analysis, while maintaining safety guarantees.

Singh, Chen, and Pavone were supported by NASA under the Space Technology Research Grants Program, Grant NNX12AQ43G, and by the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). Herbert and Tomlin were supported by SRC under the CONIX Center and by ONR under the BRC program in Multibody Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmadi, A.A., Majumdar, A.: DSOS and SDSOS optimization: LP and SOCP-based alternatives to sum of squares optimization. In: IEEE Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadi, A.A., Majumdar, A.: Some applications of polynomial optimization in operations research and real-time decision making. Optim. Lett. 20(4), 709–729 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. ApS, M.: MOSEK optimization software (2017). https://mosek.com/

  4. Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Burridge, R.R., Rizzi, A.A., Koditschek, D.E.: Sequential composition of dynamically dexterous robot behaviors. Int. J. Robot. Res. 18(6), 534–555 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, M., Bansal, S., Fisac, J.F., Tomlin, C.J.: Robust sequential path planning under disturbances and adversarial intruder. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. (2018, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, M., Herbert, S., Tomlin, C.J.: Fast reachable set approximations via state decoupling disturbances. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, M., Herbert, S.L., Vashishtha, M.S., Bansal, S., Tomlin, C.J.: Decomposition of reachable sets and tubes for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control (2018, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chitsaz, H., LaValle, S.M.: Time-optimal paths for a Dubins airplane. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coddington, E.A., Levinson, N.: Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. McGraw-Hill, New York (1955)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbert, S.L., Chen, M., Han, S., Bansal, S., Fisac, J.F., Tomlin, C.J.: FaSTrack: a modular framework for fast and guaranteed safe motion planning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iwasaki, T., Hara, S.: Generalized KYP lemma: unified frequency domain inequalities with design applications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 50(1), 41–59 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Janson, L., Schmerling, E., Clark, A., Pavone, M.: Fast marching tree: a fast marching sampling-based method for optimal motion planning in many dimensions. Int. J. Robot. Res. 34(7), 883–921 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karaman, S., Frazzoli, E.: Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. Int. J. Robot. Res. 30(7), 846–894 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kousik, S., Vaskov, S., Johnson-Roberson, M., Vasudevan, R.: Safe trajectory synthesis for autonomous driving in unforeseen environments. In: Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. LaValle, S.M.: Motion planning: wild frontiers. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 18(2), 108–118 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LaValle, S.M., Kuffner, J.J.: Randomized kinodynamic planning. Int. J. Robot. Res. 20(5), 378–400 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, Y., Littlefield, Z., Bekris, K.E.: Asymptotically optimal sampling-based kinodynamic planning. Int. J. Robot. Res. 35(5), 528–564 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Majumdar, A., Ahmadi, A.A., Tedrake, R.: Control design along trajectories with sums of squares programming. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Majumdar, A., Tedrake, R.: Robust online motion planning with regions of finite time invariance. In: Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics X. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Majumdar, A., Tedrake, R.: Funnel libraries for real-time robust feedback motion planning. Int. J. Robot. Res. 36(8), 947–982 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Owen, M., Beard, R.W., McLain, T.W.: Implementing Dubins airplane paths on fixed-wing UAVs. In: Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, Dordrecht (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parrilo, P.A.: Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Posa, M., Koolen, T., Tedrake, R.: Balancing and step recovery capturability via sums-of-squares optimization. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Putinar, M.: Positive polynomials on compact semi-algebraic sets. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 42(3), 969–984 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Rajamani, R.: Vehicle Dynamics and Control, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Ratliff, N., Zucker, M., Bagnell, J.A., Srinivasa, S.: CHOMP: gradient optimization techniques for efficient motion planning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schmerling, E., Janson, L., Pavone, M.: Optimal sampling-based motion planning under differential constraints: the drift case with linear affine dynamics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schmerling, E., Janson, L., Pavone, M.: Optimal sampling-based motion planning under differential constraints: the driftless case. In: Proceedingd of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (2015). Extended version http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2483/

  30. Schmerling, E., Pavone, M.: Evaluating trajectory collision probability through adaptive importance sampling for safe motion planning. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schulman, J., Ho, J., Lee, A., Awwal, I., Bradlow, H., Abbeel, P.: Finding locally optimal, collision-free trajectories with sequential convex optimization. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Singh, S., Chen, M., Herbert, S.L., Tomlin, C.J., Pavone, M.: Robust tracking with model mismatch for fast and safe planning: an SOS optimization approach. In: Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00649

  33. Singh, S., Majumdar, A., Slotine, J.J.E., Pavone, M.: Robust online motion planning via contraction theory and convex optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (2017). Extended Version http://asl.stanford.edu/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/Singh.Majumdar.Slotine.Pavone.ICRA17.pdf

  34. Steinhardt, J., Tedrake, R.: Finite-time regional verification of stochastic non-linear systems. Int. J. Robot. Res. 31(7), 901–923 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tanabe, K., Chen, M.: Beacls Library. https://github.com/HJReachability/beacls

  36. Tedrake, R., Manchester, I.R., Tobenkin, M., Roberts, J.W.: LQR-trees: feedback motion planning via sums-of-squares verification. Int. J. Robot. Res. 29(8), 1038–1052 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tobenkin, M.M., Permenter, F., Megretski, A.: SPOTLESS polynomial and conic optimization (2013). https://github.com/spottoolbox/spotless

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumeet Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, S., Chen, M., Herbert, S.L., Tomlin, C.J., Pavone, M. (2020). Robust Tracking with Model Mismatch for Fast and Safe Planning: An SOS Optimization Approach. In: Morales, M., Tapia, L., Sánchez-Ante, G., Hutchinson, S. (eds) Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XIII. WAFR 2018. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44051-0_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics