Abstract
This provision has been introduced after the modifications produced by the Lisbon Treaty, and it literally reproduces Article III-272 TCE. Nevertheless, the pre-existing Articles 2 and 29 TEU stated that crime prevention was among the aims to be developed in order to have “an area of freedom, security and justice”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
See The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe, COM(2010) 673 final. See also First Annual Report on the implementation of the EU Internal Security Strategy, COM(2011) 790 final.
- 3.
- 4.
See Council Regulation (EU) No 1382/2013 establishing a Justice Programme for the period 2014 to 2020, O.J. L 354/73 (2013).
- 5.
The European added value of actions shall be assessed in the light of criteria such as their contribution to the consistent and coherent implementation of Union law and to wide public awareness about the rights deriving from it. Or their potential to develop mutual trust among MS and to improve cross-border cooperation, their transnational impact, their contribution to the elaboration and dissemination of best practices or their potential to create practical tools and solutions that address cross-border or Union-wide challenges.
- 6.
See Council Regulation (EU) No 513/2014 establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management and repealing Council Decision 2007/125/JHA, O.J. L 150/93 (2014).
- 7.
See Council Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 laying down general provisions on the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and on the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management, O.J. L 150/112 (2014).
References
Amalfitano, C. (2014). Commento all’art. 84 TFUE. In A. Tizzano (Ed.), Trattati dell’Unione europea. Giuffrè: Milano.
Bernardi, A. (2012). La competenza penale accessoria dell’Unione europea: problemi e prospettive. Diritto penale contemporaneo, 43 et seqq.
Damato, A., De Pasquale, P., & Parisi, N. (2014). Argomenti di diritto penale. Torino: Giappichelli.
De Pasquale, P. (2014). Criminalità organizzata. In A. Damato, P. De Pasquale, & N. Parisi (Eds.), Argomenti di diritto penale (p. 207 et seqq.). Torino: Giappichelli.
Luchtman, M. (2012). The principles of European criminal law: Jurisdiction, choice of forum, and the legality principle in the area of freedom, security and justice. European Review of Private Law, 20, 347 et seqq.
Miettinen, S. (2015). Criminal competence and the choice of legal basis: Space in the margins? European Criminal Law Review, 2, 222–242.
Piris, J. C. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty. A legal and political analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolff, S., Goudappel, F., & de Zwaan, J. (2012). Freedom, security and justice after Lisbon and Stockholm. Lisboan: TMC Asser Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Pasquale, P., Pesce, C. (2021). Article 84 [Promotion of Crime Prevention]. In: Blanke, HJ., Mangiameli, S. (eds) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – A Commentary. Springer Commentaries on International and European Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43511-0_85
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43511-0_85
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43509-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43511-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)