Skip to main content

Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization of the Quality Philosophy into the Upstream Supply Chain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nature of Purchasing

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

In the industrial context, the zero-defect philosophy is the basis of all supplier quality improvement actions. To reach this imperative target, a measurement of parts per million is not expedient, instead measuring incidents shall make the supplier evaluation more effective. Supplier development of course is performed before the serial production processes start. Nevertheless, the yearly recalls, for example, in the automobile industry are increasing (Steinkamp and Reed, in Automotive warranty and recall report 2015, Stout Risius, Ross Global Financial Advisory Service 2016), and supplier development should merge with complaint management, whereas each incident is the start for improvement and optimization. The underlying dataset in this chapter has revealed that most complaints originate from wrongly performed production, logistics and packaging processes, human mistakes or defective machines. Developing a supplier by reducing the number of complaints should therefore be done in five steps: Identify critical suppliers, apply expertise in specific production processes, meet with supplier’s top management, improve the supplier’s processes on a technical level and finally create target agreements. To achieve the ultimate target of zero defects, complaint process handling inside the customer should be investigated and optimized together with a cross-functional team. As a result, the efficiency and effectiveness of the complaint processing can be improved by generating a positive effect on supplier quality improvement. Creating full transparency, addressing each and every failure and supported by the technically and cooperative externalization of a firm’s quality philosophy into the upstream supply chain, will be a success to achieve zero defect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behrens, R. (2008). In Boeing Supplier Strategy and Lean, 93rd Annual Conference on Supply Chain Management, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, C., Blut, M., Evanschitzky, H., & Kenning, P. (2013). Satisfaction with complaint handling: A replication study on its determinants in a business-to-business context. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 319–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, F., & Wagner, K. (2016). Qualitätsmanagement: Leitfaden für Studium und Praxis (6th ed.). München, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, P. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain (1st ed.). New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T., & Liker, J. (2004, December). Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döscher, K. (2014). Recovery Management in business-to-business markets: Conceptual dimensions, relational consequences and financial contributions.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, A. (1993). Creating the quality mindset among senior managers. National Productivity Review, 12(3), 313+.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. (1995). Total quality in purchasing & supplier management (1st ed.). Miami, Fl: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., & Choi, T. (1996). Supplier development: Customers as a catalyst of process change. Business Horizon, 39, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irlinger, W. (2012). Kausalmodelle zur Lieferantenbewertung (1st ed.). Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K. (1976). Guide to quality control, Asian productivity organization (2nd ed.). Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? The Japanese way. London: Pentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, B., Schweißer, S., & Wappis, J. (2011). 2011, 8D und 7 step—Systematisch Probleme lösen. München, Deutschland: E-book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, P. (2018). Digitalisierung im Einkauf from Schupp F., Woehner, H. (pp. 199–108). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. 978-3-658-16909-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1998). Total quality management in the supply chain. In Handbook of total quality management (pp. 275–303).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., & Kim, A. (2002). Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noshad, K., & Awasthi, A. (2015). Supplier quality development: A review of literature and industrial practices. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 466–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production (1st ed.). Portland: Productivity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, J., & Tan, K. (2017). Supply chain quality and pricing decisions under multi-manufacturer competition. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(1), 164–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, K., Mattes, P., & Stahl, D. (2011). Applying advanced FMEA methods to vehicle fire cause determinations. In ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Volume 9, Denver, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1999). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, ISBN: 0684841487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quang, H., Sampaio, P., Carvalho, M., Fernandes, A., Thi, D., & Vilhenac, E. (2016). An extensive structural model of supply chain quality management and firm performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(4), 444–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. (2013 September 12). Top 5 supplier quality management strategies. Quality Digest Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (1998). Competing through supply chain management: Creating market-winning strategies through supply chain partnerships (1st ed.). New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Rodriguez, C., Hemsworth, D., & Martinez-Lorente, A. (2005). Quality management practices in the purchasing function: An empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(7), 666–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See, J. (2012). Visual inspection: A review of the literature. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokri, A., Nabhani, F., & Hodgson, S. (2010). Supplier development practice: Arising the problems of upstream delivery for a food distribution SME in the UK. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(6), 639–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrimali, L. (2010). Analysis of success factors for supplier development (Master thesis). San Diego State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, A., Soltani, E., & Liao, Y. (2017). The influence of supply chain quality management practices on quality performance: An empirical investigation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(2), 122–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinkamp, N., & Reed, J. (2016). Automotive warranty and recall report 2015. Stout Risius, Ross Global Financial Advisory Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supply Chain Council. (2012). SCOR Quick Reference Guide, Item No. 726770, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teonman, S., & Ulengin, F. (2017). The impact of management leadership on quality performance throughout a supply chain: An empirical study. Journal of Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(11–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer, A. (2007). Six sigma: Konzeption und Erfolgsbeispiele für praktizierte Null-Fehler-Qualität (4th ed.). Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. (2017). Qualitätsmanagement-Methoden Assessments Leitfaden (1st ed). Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weißbrich, A., Fuchsbauer, B., Heinrichs, H., & Plegnier, H. (2008). Qualitätsmanagement in der gesamten Wertschöpfungskette: Grundlagen des gemeinsamen Erfolgs, Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift, Ausgabe 01/2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J., Phan, C.A., & Matsui, Y. (2012). Supply chain quality management practices and performance: An empirical study. Published online 13 January 2013. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Schupp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ewald, J., Schupp, F. (2020). Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization of the Quality Philosophy into the Upstream Supply Chain. In: Schupp, F., Wöhner, H. (eds) The Nature of Purchasing. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics