Skip to main content

Identifying the Critically Ill Parturient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Maternal Critical Care

Abstract

In the United States (USA), maternal mortality has increased in the last 25 years. Much of this increase is likely attributable to a higher burden of maternal medical illness [1–6]. Maternal morbidity and “near miss” events have also markedly increased during the same interval, by as much as 75% by some estimates [6]. Maternal critical illness, defined by end organ dysfunction, need for advanced treatment (need for ventilation, vasopressor requirement) or diagnostic criteria (see Chap. 1), is now relatively common in the obstetric population [7]. Admission of a pregnant or postpartum patient to the ICU is estimated to occur in 1 in every 300 deliveries [8], accounting for 12.1% of all ICU admissions for women aged 16–50 [9]. Obstetric patients requiring ICU-level care are also being treated outside of the formal critical care setting, with studies showing that 1–3% of parturients require ICU-level care or are at risk of developing maternal critical illness [10, 11]. Identifying obstetric patients at risk of clinical deterioration and critical illness, therefore, represents an important component of a comprehensive strategy to address the needs of increasingly ill pregnant and postpartum women. Early identification of those at risk may accelerate transfer to high-risk centers and/or allows timely intervention, thereby reversing these trends in morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Banayan JM, Scavone BM. National Partnership for maternal safety—maternal safety bundles. APSF Newslett. 2016;31(2). www.apsf.org/article/national-partnership-for-maternal-safety-maternal-safety-bundles/. Last Accessed 21 Oct 2018.

  2. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980–1004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mocumbi AO, Sliwa K, Soma-Pillay P. Medical disease as a cause of maternal mortality: the pre-imminence of cardiovascular pathology. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27(2):84–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mhyre JM, D’Oria R, Hameed AB, et al. The maternal early warning criteria: a proposal from the national partnership for maternal safety. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014;43(6):771–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Callaghan WM, Creanga AA, Kuklina EV. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1029–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheatly S. Maternal critical care: what’s in a name? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19(4):353–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Einav S, Bromiker R, Sela HY. Maternal critical illness. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2017;7:55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peña-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Garcia-Casal MN, Dowswell T. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD004736.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O’Malley EG, Popivanov P, Fergus A, Tan T, Byrne B. Maternal near miss: what lies beneath? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;199:116–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Kurinczuk JJ, editors. on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care—lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2014. www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/mbrrace-uk/reports/Saving%20Lives%20Improving%20Mothers%20Care%20report%202014%20Full.pdf. Last Accessed 21 Oct 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shields LE, Wiesner S, Klein C, Pelletreau B, Hedriana HL. Use of maternal early warning trigger tool reduces maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):527.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh S, McGlennan A, England A, Simons R. A validation study of the CEMACH recommended modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS). Anaesthesia. 2012;67(1):12–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Alton ME, Friedman AM, Smiley RM, et al. National partnership for maternal safety: consensus bundle on venous thromboembolism. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(4):942–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldhill DR, White SA, Sumner A. Physiological values and procedures in the 24 h before ICU admission from the ward. Anaesthesia. 1999;54(6):529–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rhee C, Gohil S, Klompas M. Regulatory mandates for sepsis care--reasons for caution. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1673–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jerison HJ, Pickett RM. Vigilance: the importance of the elicited observing rate. Science. 1964;143(3609):970–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer ME, Bauer ST, Rajala B, et al. Maternal physiologic parameters in relationship to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(3):535–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bateman BT, Schmidt U, Berman MF, Bittner EA. Temporal trends in the epidemiology of severe postoperative sepsis after elective surgery: a large, nationwide sample. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(4):917–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gauer RL. Early recognition and management of sepsis in adults: the first six hours. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88(1):44–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lappen JR, Keene M, Lore M, Grobman WA, Gossett DR. Existing models fail to predict sepsis in an obstetric population with intrauterine infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(6):573.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clark SL, Cotton DB, Lee W, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(6 Pt 1):1439–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Segal S. Labor, epidural analgesia and maternal fever. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(6):1467–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mackintosh N, Watson K, Rance S, Sandall J. Value of a modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in managing maternal complications in the peripartum period: an ethnographic study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(1):26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dudley M, Wright A, Simons R, et al. Meows—time to review the trigger threshold? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:Fa40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Albright CM, Ali TN, Lopes V, Rouse DJ, Anderson BL. The sepsis in obstetrics score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):39.e31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ryan HM, Sharma S, Magee LA, et al. The usefulness of the APACHE II score in obstetric critical care: a structured review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38(10):909–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aarvold AB, Ryan HM, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Fjell C, Walley KR. Multiple organ dysfunction score is superior to the obstetric-specific Sepsis in obstetrics score in predicting mortality in septic obstetric patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(1):e49–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011;118(Suppl 1):1–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Main EK, Goffman D, Scavone BM, et al. National partnership for maternal safety: consensus bundle on obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berg CJ, Harper MA, Atkinson SM, et al. Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths: results of a state-wide review. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(6):1228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Amaral E, Souza JP, Surita F, et al. A population-based surveillance study on severe acute maternal morbidity (near-miss) and adverse perinatal outcomes in Campinas, Brazil: the Vigimoma Project. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Banayan JM, Scavone BM. National partnership for maternal safety: maternal safety bundles. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2017;7(1):67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moaveni DM, Cohn J, Zahid ZD, Ranasinghe S. Obstetric anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians: improving peripartum care and patient safety. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2015;5(1):65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dennis AT. Transthoracic echocardiography in obstetric anaesthesia and obstetric critical illness. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20(2):160–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cornette J, Laker S, Jeffery B, et al. Validation of maternal cardiac output assessed by transthoracic echocardiography against pulmonary artery catheterization in severely ill pregnant women: prospective comparative study and systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(1):25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):957–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Metcalfe A, Lix LM, Johnson JA, et al. Validation of an obstetric comorbidity index in an external population. BJOG. 2015;122(13):1748–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):561–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Awan N, Bennett MJ, Walters WA. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 10-year review at the Royal Hospital for women, Sydney. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51(3):210–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Epstein NE. Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: a review. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5(Suppl 7):S295–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zwart JJ, Dupuis JR, Richters A, Ory F, van Roosmalen J. Obstetric intensive care unit admission: a 2-year nationwide population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(2):256–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bharwani F, Macarthur A. Review of a high-risk obstetric anesthesia antepartum consult clinic. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61(3):282–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sachs A, Aaronson J, Smiley R. The role of the anesthesiologist in the care of the parturient with cardiac disease. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(5):252–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(3):645–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. American Hospital Association. AHA guide to the health care field, 2015 ed. Chicago, IL: AHA; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kyser KL, Lu X, Santillan DA, et al. The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):42.e41–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian T. Bateman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Padilla, C., Easter, S.R., Bateman, B.T. (2020). Identifying the Critically Ill Parturient. In: Einav, S., Weiniger, C.F., Landau, R. (eds) Principles and Practice of Maternal Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43477-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43477-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43476-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43477-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics