Skip to main content

Determinants of Student’s Entrepreneurial Intentions Toward Their Career Choice in Algeria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities to Develop Organizations Through Creativity, Technology and Ethics (GSMAC 2019)

Abstract

The object of this article is to explain the entrepreneurial intention of Master 1 and Master 2 students of the University of Tlemcen based on their entrepreneurial training or their attendance to support awareness campaigns. The whole mechanism is set up by the Algerian authorities through the supporting device called “l’Agence Nationale pour le Soutien à l’Emploi des Jeunes” (ANSEJ), intended to the creation of micro-enterprises for jobless youth aged between 19 and 40 years old. We want to tackle this issue related to the entrepreneurial intention by drawing upon psychosocial models such as intention theory of planned behavior (Ajzen in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179–211, 1991). Thus, after a short literature review, we present an empirical study conducted among a sample of 215 representative respondents of the University of Tlemcen (Algeria). We started to apply sequentially two types of analyses, an exploratory followed by a confirmatory to test the reliability and validity of the measurement scale. Most of the results that stem from the use of the structural equation modeling confirmed the hypotheses proposed through the positive impact of the attitudes associated with behavior and the positive influence of the subjective norms on intention to undertake. The only negative impact concerns the variable training for entrepreneurial intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Keely, R. H., & Klofsten, M. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: Testing an intent model in Asia. Scandinavia and the USA. In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 133–147). Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (278 pp.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen. (1987). Attitudes, traits and actions : Dispositional prediction of behaviour in social psychology. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 20, 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audet, J. (2004). A longitudinal study of the entrepreneurial intentions of university students. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(1/2), 3–16. Cited by Boisson, et al. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2),122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, A., Merabet, A., Benachenhou, S. M., Grari, Y., Boudia, F., & Merabet, H. (2014). Environmental and individual determinants of female entrepreneurship in Algeria: Applying the structural equation modeling. Entrepreneurial Business and Economic Review, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissin, J. P., Chollet, B., & Emin, S. (2009). Les déterminants de l’intention de créer une entreprise chez les étudiants: un test empirique. Management, 12, 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. J. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453. Cited by Tounes, A. Ph.D. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. J. (1992). The operation of intentions in time: The emergence of the new venture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(1), 11–20 (Fall). Cited by Tounes, A. Ph.D. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, C. (2009). L’enseignement de l’entrepreneuriat: au delà des cours magistraux. des études de cas et du plan d’affaires. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambardo. (2013). La promotion de l’entrepreneuriat dans l’enseignement supérieur. Les enjeux d’une création lexicale. Mots. Les langages du politique (102), 106 (Online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emin, S. (2003). L’intention de créer une entreprise des chercheurs publics: le cas français. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Université Pierre Mendès France de Grenoble. http://asso.nordnet.fr/adreg/these_version_finale_p.pdf. Cited by Boisson, et al. (2009).

  • Emin, S. (2004). Les facteurs déterminant la création d’entreprise par les chercheurs publics: application des modèles d’intention. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 3(1), 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Emin, S. (2006). La création d’entreprise: une perspective attractive pour les chercheurs publics? Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie., 9(3), 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A. (2012). Entrepreneuriat: apprendre à entreprendre 2émé édition Dunod paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2009). Évaluation d’une formation en entrepre neuriat: prédispositions et impact sur l’intention d’entreprendre. Management, 12(3), 176–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasse, Y. (2011). Un modèle de la démarche entrepreneuriale: le cas de l’Université Laval. Entreprendre & Innover, 3(11–12), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.-J., Gergen, M.-M., & Jurtas, S. (1992). Psychologie sociale (551 pp.). Editions Etudes Vivantes. Québec. cite par Tounes ages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazzini, F., Boissin, J., & Jean-Luc, A. (2013). Analyse des modèles mentaux développés par les dirigeants français en matière d’acquisition ou de reprise de PME. Aims Management, 16, 49–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindel, K. (2007). Teaching entrepreneurship at the university. Cited by Fayolle (2012). Entrepreneurial Apprendre à entreprendre. Dunod Paris. ISBN: 976-2-10-0577115-6 P 5. 6. 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Gartner, W. B. (1988), Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429–441. Cited by Boisson, et al. (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, L. M. (1983). Perception opportunity and profit; studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5, 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger. (2009). Quoted by Messeghem, k & Sammut, S. (2011), l’entrepreneuriat, éditions ems management & societé. pp. 93, ISBN : 978-2-84-769-133-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linan, F. (2004). Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education.Paper presented at theIntEnt 2004 Conference, Neaples, Italy. Retrieved from: http://congreso.com.

  • March, J.-G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organisation Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Clelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society (512 pp.). Princeton: D. Van Nostrand. Cited by Tounes Pare, J.-L., & Redis, J. (2011). Réorienter la recherche en finance entrepreneuriale. Gestion 2000, 28(4), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeghem, K., & Sammut, S. (2011). l’entrepreneuriat. édition Ems management & société.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, B. J., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Wright, P. (1998). On the growth of small enterprises: The role of intentions. Gender and Experience. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley. MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pare, -J. -L., & Rédis, -J. (2011), Réorienter la recherche en finance entrepreneuriale,Gestion 2000, 4 Vol. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paturel, R. (2007). Grandeurs et servitudes de l’entrepreneuriat. Revue Internationale de Psychosociologie consacré aux Représentations entrepreneuriales, 13(31), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesqueux, Y. (2011). Pour une épistémologie du risque. Management & Avenir, 43, 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesqueux, Y. (2014). Développement des Systèmes d’Organisation. HAL Id: hal-01068587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, R., & Koivula, J. (2005). La place nouvelle de l’université et le choc des valeurs. Politiques et gestion de l’enseignement supérieur (3), 99–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, P., Durrieu, F., Campoy, E., & el Akrem, A. (2002). Méthode d’équations structurelles. édition Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Quoted by Fayolle – A (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, L., & Haug, M. (2011). International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 111–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., &Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of BusinessVenturing, 22(4), 566–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship entrepreneurial management. Strategie Management Journal, 11, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taouab, O. (2014). Essai Empirique Sur Les Déterminants de L’acte Entrepreneurial Dans Le secteur Textile Marocain. European Scientific Journal, 10(7), 414–424 (March édition)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier-Dargent, C. (2014). Les paradoxes de l’entrepreneuriat de nécessité: Strapontin ou tremplin? Entreprendre & Innover (20), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tounes, A. (2003). L’intention entrepreneuriale: Une étude comparative entre des étudiants d’écoles de management et gestion suivant des programmes ou des formations en entrepreneuriat et des étudiants en DESS. CAAE. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Université de Rouen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tounes, A. (2006). L’intention entrepreneuriale des étudiants: le cas français. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 3 n° 219 (pp. 57–65).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J. (1994). Les fondements de la psychologie sociale (sous la direction de). Gaëtan Morin (888 pp.) cite par Tounes

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreurship from emergence and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, Th., & Fayolle, A. (2005). Paradigmes et entrepreneuriat. Revue de l’entrepreneuriat,4(1), 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, Th., & Saporta, B. (2006). Création d’entreprise et entrepreneuriat. Editions de l’ADREG. janvier. http://www.adreg.net.

  • Verzat, C., & Surlemont, B. (2011). Éditorial. L’enseignement de l’entrepreneuriat: la boîte de Pandore!. Entreprendre & Innover, 3, n° 11–12 (pp. 5–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Aspiring for and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1919–1941.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abderrezzak Benhabib .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boudia, M.F., Benhabib, A., Senouci, B. (2020). Determinants of Student’s Entrepreneurial Intentions Toward Their Career Choice in Algeria. In: Fotea, S., Fotea, I., Văduva, S. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities to Develop Organizations Through Creativity, Technology and Ethics. GSMAC 2019. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43449-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics