Skip to main content

Data Envelopment Analysis and Non-parametric Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Science and Productivity Analytics

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 290))

Abstract

This chapter gives an introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), presenting an overview of the basic concepts and models used. Emphasis is made on the non-parametric derivation of the Production Possibility Set (PPS), on the multiplicity of DEA models and on how to handle different types of situations, namely, undesirable outputs, ratio variables, multi-period data, negative data non-discretionary variables, and integer variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aparicio, J., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio, J. (2016). A survey on measuring efficiency through the determination of the least distance in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 9, 143–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., & Morey, R. (1986). Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research, 34, 513–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camanho, A. S., Portela, M. C., & Vaz, C. B. (2009). Efficiency analysis accounting for internal and external non-discretionary factors. Computers & Operations Research, 36, 1591–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Pastor, J. T., Borras, F., Aparicio, J., & Pastor, D. (2011). BAM: A bounded adjusted measure of efficiency for use with bounded additive models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, application, references, and DEA-Solver software. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., & Amin, G. R. (2009). DEA models for ratio data: Convexity consideration. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, 486–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer Nijhof Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Mardaritis, D., Rouse, P., & Roshdi, I. (2016). Estimating the hyperbolic distance function: A directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 254, 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi Matin, R., & Kuosmanen, T. (2009). Theory of integer-valued data envelopment analysis under alternative returns to scale axioms. Omega, 37, 988–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 1077–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T., & Kazemi Matin, R. (2009). Theory of integer-valued data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2004). Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22, 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2006). Data envelopment analysis of integer-valued inputs and outputs. Computers & Operations Research, 33, 3004–3014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2010). DEA-based pre-merger planning tool. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1485–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S. (2012). Information sharing in DEA: A cooperative game theory approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 558–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S. (2013a). DEA production games. European Journal of Operational Research, 231, 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S. (2013b). Using DEA to find the best partner for a horizontal cooperation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 286–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S. (2014). Company-wide production planning using a multiple technology DEA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65, 723–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, O. B., & Petersen, N. C. (2006). Controlling for socioeconomic characteristics in DEA. North American productivity workshop. New York: Stern School of Business, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, O. B., Petersen, N. C., & Podinovski, V. V. (2015). Effciency analysis with ratio measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 245, 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, O. B., Petersen, N. C., & Podinovski, V. V. (2017). Effciency measures and computational approaches for data envelopment analysis models with ratio inputs and outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 261, 640–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T. (1996). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: A generalization. Annals of Operations Research, 66, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, J. (1998). Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 461–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J. A., Liu, W. B., & Meng, W. (2006). A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(1), l–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Portela, M. C. A., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 1111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens, H., & Vanden Eeckaut, P. (1995). Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects. European Journal of Operational Research, 80, 474–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zofio, J. L., Pastor, J. T., & Aparicio, J. (2013). The directional profit efficiency measure: on why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative. Journal of Productive Analysis, 40, 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out with the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Science and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), grant DPI2017-85343-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Villa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Villa, G., Lozano, S. (2020). Data Envelopment Analysis and Non-parametric Analysis. In: Charles, V., Aparicio, J., Zhu, J. (eds) Data Science and Productivity Analytics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 290. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43384-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics