Skip to main content

Framework for Project Management in Agile Projects: A Quantitative Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions (AITM 2019, ISM 2019)

Abstract

Recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of agile methodologies in project success, but can projects skip several project management tasks and still deliver the expected results? How are traditional project managers engaged in agile projects? Who executes what project management tasks in projects applying agile methodologies? The aim of this study was to define a framework for project management tasks in agile projects. The results quantify subjective and theoretical speculation on who performs the project management tasks in agile projects. Project managers are engaged in agile projects, and the team, the product owner, and the project sponsor are significantly involved in project management tasks. The agile coach is not a substitute for the project manager. This study identifies areas where agile methodologies should be updated to clarify team responsibilities for project management activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Serrador, P., Pinto, J.K.: Does agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(5), 1040–1051 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noll, J., Razzak, M.A., Bass, J.M., Beecham, S.: A study of the scrum master’s role. In: Felderer, M., Méndez Fernández, D., Turhan, B., Kalinowski, M., Sarro, F., Winkler, D. (eds.) PROFES 2017. LNCS, vol. 10611, pp. 307–323. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, K.J.: Adopting Agile software development: the project manager experience. Inf. Technol. Peopl. 29(4), 670–687 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2014-0031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hobbs, B., Petit, Y.: Agile methods on large projects in large organizations. Proj. Manag. J. 48(3), 3–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J.: The Scrum Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shastri, Y., Hoda, R., Amor, R.: Does the “Project Manager” still exist in agile software development projects? In: 2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), pp. 57–64, Hamilton, New Zealand (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.019

  7. PMI: Agile Practice Guide. Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mansor, Z., Arshad, N.H., Yahya, S., Razali, R.: The competency of project managers in managing agile cost management. Adv. Sci. Lett. 22(8), 1930–1934 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.7750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conboy, K., Morgan, L.: Combining open innovation and agile approaches: implications for IS project managers, In: ECIS 2010 Proceedings 21 (2010). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2010/21. Accessed 1 Dec 2018

  10. Sutling, K., Mansor, Z., Widyarto, S., Letchmunan, S., Arshad, N.H.: Agile project manager behavior: the taxonomy. In: 2014 8th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC), pp. 234–239. IEEE, Langkawi, Malaysia (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/MySec.2014.6986020

  11. Sutling, K., Mansor, Z., Widyarto, S., Lecthmunan, S., Arshad, N.H.: Understanding of project manager competency in agile software development project: the taxonomy. In: Kim, K.(ed.) Information Science and Applications. LNEE, vol. 339, pp. 859–868. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46578-3_102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoda, R., Murugesan, L.K.: Multi-level agile project management challenges: a self-organizing team perspective. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 245–257 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sverrisdottir, H.S., Ingason, H.T., Jonasson, H.I.: The role of the product owner in scrum-comparison between theory and practices. Procedia Soc. Behav. 119, 257–267 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayfield, K.M.: Project Managers’ Experience and Description of Decision Uncertainty Associated with the Agile Software Development Methodology: a Phenomenological Study, vol. 3427057, p. 106. Capella University, Ann Arbor (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sheffield, J., Lemétayer, J.: Factors associated with the software development agility of successful projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31(3), 459–472 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner, J.R.: Towards a theory of project management: the nature of the project. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24(1), 1–3 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Turner, J.R.: Towards a theory of project management: the nature of the project governance and project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24(2), 93–95 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundin, R.A., Söderholm, A.: A theory of temporary organization. Scand. J. Manag. 11(4), 437–455 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ISO: ISO 21500: 2012 Guidance on project management. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. APM: APM Body of Knowledge 6th Edition. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. PMI: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Joslin, R., Müller, R.: Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(6), 1377–1392 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beck, K., et al.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://agilemanifesto.org/

  24. Binder, J., Aillaud, L.I.V., Schilli, L.: The project management cocktail model: an approach for balancing Agile and ISO 21500. Procd. Soc. Behv. 119, 182–191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zwikael, O., Meredith, J.R.: Who’s who in the project zoo? The ten core project roles. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 38(2), 474–492 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2017-0274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonner, N.A.: Predicting leadership success in agile environments: an inquiring systems approach. Acad. Inf. Manag. Sci. J. 13(2), 83–103 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, H., Huff, S., Strode, D.: Leadership in software development: comparing perceptions of agile and traditional project managers. In: Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2009, 6–9 August 2009, pp. 184–196, San Francisco, California, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shastri, Y., Hoda, R., Amor, R.: Understanding the roles of the manager in Agile project management. In: 10th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference, pp. 45–55, Jaipur, India (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3021460.3021465

  29. Hayden, C., Molenkamp, R.J.: Tavistock Primer II. AK Rice Institute for Study of Social Systems, Jupiter (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Green, Z.: Boundary, Authority, Role and Task (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. PMI: PMI Fact File. PMI Today, pp. 4. Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stuart, E.A.: Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat. Sci. 25(1), 1–21 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Parsons, L.S.: Using SAS® Software to Perform a Case-Control Match on Propensity Score in an Observational Study. SUGI 29. SAS Institute, Inc., Le Palais des congrès de Montréal Québec, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Field, A.: Discovering Statistics: Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tavares, B., Silva, C., Dinizde Souza, A.: Practices to improve risk management in agile projects. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Know. 29(03), 381–399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194019500165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gloria J. Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Miller, G.J. (2020). Framework for Project Management in Agile Projects: A Quantitative Study. In: Ziemba, E. (eds) Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions. AITM ISM 2019 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 380. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43352-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43353-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics