Skip to main content

Community Governance of Wildlife Resources: Implications for Conservation, Livelihood, and Improvement in Democratic Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Protected Areas in Northern Tanzania

Part of the book series: Geotechnologies and the Environment ((GEOTECH,volume 22))

Abstract

The past three decades have seen increased involvement of communities in the governance of wildlife resources. In northern Tanzania, communities have been involved in wildlife conservation in a variety of ways, from the establishment of Community Wildlife Management Areas, establishment of conservation easements in village lands, to the establishment of land trusts and setting aside areas for wildlife based investments in villages. This chapter presents findings from a number of studies on community involvement in protected area governance in Northern Tanzania. The chapter adopts a V^3 leadership model in analyzing data from key informant interviews, focused group discussions, and a review of relevant documents in villages, districts, and community-based organizations (CBOs). The outcome of these initiatives, although not very impressive, does indicate a gradual change in some key aspects. In conservation, there have been increases in the sizes of land under conservation estate and a notable improvement in populations of key species. With regard to livelihood improvement, there are notable changes as some community members access both direct and indirect employment from wildlife-based organizations and enterprises, as well as the involvement of community members in micro-finance enterprises and wildlife based entrepreneurship. With regard to social benefits, there is more empowerment for community members and more involvement in advocacy and voicing their concerns. This is highly attributed to the involvement and training they received in the establishment of wildlife conservation areas from land use planning to governance and leadership training. There are great achievements, but there are also some notable setbacks. Some notable setbacks include possibilities of power capture by elite groups, recentralization tendency, and inadequate financial management by community-based organizations that give room for corrupt practices and embezzlement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borrini-Feyaraband, Tarnowski (2005) Participatory democracy in natural resource management: a ‘Columbus’s egg?’

    Google Scholar 

  • Communities—a Round Table meeting USAID (2013) Tanzania Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) evaluation report, Dar es Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  • Eustace A, Kisingo AW, Mbwiliza J (2018) Assessment of wildlife damages in villages surrounding Serengeti ecosystem. Parks J 24(1):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurung HB (2010) Trends in protected areas. CRC for Sustainable Tourism, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess K (2001) Parks are for people – but which people? In: Anderson TL, James A (eds) The politics and economics of park management. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, pp 159–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingston ARWG (1931) Proposed British National Parks for Africa. Geogr J 77(5):401–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kideghesho JR, Manongi FS, Kisingo AW (in press) Which matters most to communities? Wildlife benefits, wildlife ownership or both?

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisingo AW (2013) Governance of protected areas in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. PhD Thesis, University of Victoria, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood M (2010) Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: a framework, principles and performance outcomes. J Environ Manag 91(3):754–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makupa E (2013) Conservation efforts and local livelihoods in western Serengeti, Tanzania: experience from Ikona community Wildlife Management Area. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B et al (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human Well-being. Biol Conserv 144(3):966–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwakaje AG, Manyasa E, Wawire N, Muchai M, Ongare D, Mugoya C et al (2013) Community-based conservation, income governance, and poverty alleviation in Tanzania: the case of Serengeti ecosystem. J Environ Dev 22(1):51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson LW, Dearden P, Orozco A (2012) Framework for assessing governance for landscape-level ecosystem-based management draft 2.1. Lance W Robinson, Philip Dearden and June 2012 (June)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachedina H (2008) Wildlife is our oil: conservation, livelihoods and NGOs in the Tarangire ecosystem, Tanzania. University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • TNRF (2011) Wildlife for communities in Tanzania, taking stock of governance of. Wildlife by Communities, Arusha

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit PG, Nshala R, Odhiambo MO, Manyindo J (2008) Protected areas and property rights: democratizing eminent domain in East Africa, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex W. Kisingo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kisingo, A.W., Kideghesho, J.R. (2020). Community Governance of Wildlife Resources: Implications for Conservation, Livelihood, and Improvement in Democratic Space. In: Durrant, J., et al. Protected Areas in Northern Tanzania. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43302-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics