Skip to main content

Community-Based Conservation in Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park: On Livelihoods and Economic Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Borders, Mobility, Regional Integration and Development
  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the livelihood strategies of people in local communities located in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park (GLTP). It also examines, more widely, how the GLTP is managed under the Joint Management Board (JMB) and its interaction with “economic governance” in order to help the local communities benefit economically. The examination is based on the premise that Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs) are the most suitable strategy to pursue conservation and poverty alleviation, mostly through ecotourism. To achieve this, a critical and comprehensive review of literature on this subject was done. The findings suggest that, although there are a few cases of successful community-based conservation partnerships, most of the communities have been negatively impacted by the establishment of the GLTP. In the GLTP, it is evident that the tourism and conservation efforts are prioritised over the local communities’ needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AUC. (2012, February 15). African Union. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://au.int/en/treaties/african-charter-democracy-elections-and-governance

  • Bhatasara, S., Nyamwanza, A. M., & Kujinga, K. (2013). Transfrontier parks and development: The case of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Development Southern Africa, 30(4–5), 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEGAA. (2017). Economic governance: Centre for Economic Governance and AIDS in Africa. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from http://www.cegaa.org/knowledge_center/economic_governance.htm

  • Chirozva, C. (2015). Community agency and entrepreneurship in ecotourism planning and development in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Journal of Ecotourism, 14(2–3), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLTFCA. (2016). Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area: Integrated livelihoods diversification strategy 2016–2030. South Africa: USAID Southern Africa & Peace Parks Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLTP. (2014). Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from http://www.greatlimpopo.org/about-gltp/

  • Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. (2004). International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from https://www.iucn.org/resources/publications

  • Jones, M. (2009). Phase space: Geography, relational thinking and beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (2009). Conservation geographies in sub-Saharn Africa: The politics of national parks, community conservation and peace parks. Geography Compass, 3(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loon, R., Harper, I., & Shorten, P. (2007). Sabi Sabi: A model for effective ecotourism, conservation and community involvement. In R. Bushell & P. Eagles (Eds.), Tourism and protected areas : Benefits beyond boundaries (pp. 264–276). Oxfordshire: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunstrum, E. (2010). Reconstructing history, grounding claims to space: History, memory, and displacement in the great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. South African Geographical Journal, 92(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavhunga, C., & Spierenburg, M. (2009). Transfrontier talk, cordon politics: The early history of the great Limpopo Transfrontier Park in Southern Africa, 1925–1940. Journal of Southern African Studies, 35, 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mombeshora, S., & Le Bel, S. (2009). Parks-people conflicts: The case of the Gonarezhou National Park and the Chitsa community in South-East Zimbabwe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 2601–2623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (2001). Europe as a social process and discourse: Considerations of place, boundaries and identity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (2009). The resurgence of the ‘region’ and ‘regional identity’: Theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies, 35(S1), 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PPF. (2004). Peace Parks Foundation. Retrieved August 22, 2017, from http://www.peaceparks.co.za/news.php?pid=1091&mid=426

  • PPF. (2005). Peace Parks Foundation. Retrieved August 22, 2017, from http://www.peaceparks.co.za/news.php?pid=1092&mid=553

  • Ramutsindela, M. (2007). Transfrontier conservation in Africa: At the confluence of capital, politics and nature (1st ed.). Wallingford: CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramutsindela, M. (2013). Experienced regions and Borders: The challenge for transactional approaches. Regional Studies, 47(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SADC. (2013, October). Southern African Development Community. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from http://www.sadc.int/files/4614/2122/3338/SADC_TFCA_Programme_FINAL_doc_Oct_2013.pdf

  • Spierenburg, M., Steenkamp, C., & Wels, H. (2008). Promises of the economic development in the great Limpopo, Southern Africa: Networks and partnerships in transfrontier conservation. In M. Rutten, A. Leliveld, & D. Foeken (Eds.), Inside poverty and development in Africa: Critical reflections on pro-poor policies (pp. 144–168). Boston: Brill Leiden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, F. J., Naiman, R. J., Biiggs, H. C., & Pienaar, D. J. (2008). The evolution of conservation management philosophy: Science, environmental change and social adjustments in Kruger National Park. Ecosystems, 11(2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witter, R. (2013). Elephant-induced displacement and the power of choice: Moral narratives about resettlement in Mozambique’s Limpopo National Park. Conservation and Society, 11(4), 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolmer, W. (2007). From wilderness vision to farm invasions: Conservation and development in Zimbabwe’s South-East Lowveld (1st ed.). Oxford: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prudence Nkomo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nkomo, P. (2020). Community-Based Conservation in Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park: On Livelihoods and Economic Governance. In: Nshimbi, C., Moyo, I. (eds) Borders, Mobility, Regional Integration and Development. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42890-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics