Skip to main content

Regular and Singular Dislocations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geometric Continuum Mechanics

Part of the book series: Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics ((ACM,volume 43))

Abstract

The theory of continuous distributions of dislocations and other material defects, when formulated in terms of differential forms, is shown to comprise also the discrete, or singular, counterpart, in which defects are concentrated on lower dimensional regions, such as surfaces, lines, and points. The mathematical tool involved in this natural transition is the theory of de Rham currents, which plays in regard to differential forms the same role as the theory of Schwartz distributions plays with respect to ordinary functions. After a review of the main mathematical aspects, the theory is illustrated with a profusion of examples and applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available at https://archive.org/details/lecturesdelivere00clarrich, page 43.

  2. 2.

    On this point, it is pertinent to mention the works of the philosopher of science Mario Bunge [1]. Bunge, though, warns us about the dangers of ‘explicatio obscurum per obscurius’.

  3. 3.

    See [3], p. 6.

  4. 4.

    Ibid., p. 8.

  5. 5.

    We revisit these ideas in greater detail in Sects. 3.4 and 3.5.

  6. 6.

    By virtue of the point-wise vector-space character of \(\varLambda ^p(T^*_X{\mathscr M})\), with \(X \in {\mathscr M}\).

  7. 7.

    In his momentous article [20], Schwartz describes the continuity of a distribution T(⋅) as follows: ‘Si une suite de fonctions ϕ i, ont leurs noyaux contenus dans un compact fixe et si elles convergent uniformément vers 0, ainsi que chacune de leurs dérivées, alors les T(ϕ i) convergent vers 0’. In other words, the requirement placed on the continuity of the functional T is stronger than the mere uniform convergence of the functions, since it entails that each of the sequences of derivatives must also converge uniformly to zero. When generalizing this idea to manifolds, Schwartz and de Rham demand that the supports must all be contained in a single compact set within the domain of a chart. The derivatives are taken with respect to the chart coordinates.

  8. 8.

    See [4], p. 1.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    The existence of this maximal set is proved as a theorem in [4], p. 35.

  11. 11.

    The justification for this statement can be found in a theorem [4] stating that every closed current is homologous to a differential form.

  12. 12.

    A good example in a body \(\mathscr B\) is a loop, or a curve whose ends are not in \(\mathscr B\).

  13. 13.

    See [9], p. 357.

  14. 14.

    For example, \(\mathscr T\) could be a compact submanifold of \(\mathscr M\), or a submanifold such as \(\mathscr S\) in Example 8.

  15. 15.

    See [10], p. 813. The allusion to Kirchhoff’s law of electrical circuits, where the algebraic sum of electrical currents at a node is zero, is very pertinent.

  16. 16.

    Intuitively speaking, each line comes out, as it were, from \(\mathscr M\). This condition guarantees that the restriction to \({\mathscr S}_i\) of each compactly supported form in \(\mathscr M\) is also compactly supported in \({\mathscr S}_i\).

  17. 17.

    Although the cylindrical coordinate system is not well-defined on the z-axis, this fact is not of significance for this example.

  18. 18.

    See, e.g., [22], p. 492.

  19. 19.

    The assumption that these two 1-forms are closed is made explicitly to concentrate on the role of the discontinuity hypersurface \(\mathscr T\), thus ignoring explicitly the possibility of existence of smooth dislocations.

  20. 20.

    A chiral molecule can exist in two isomeric varieties, known as enantiomers. They are mutual mirror images.

  21. 21.

    See, e.g. [19].

  22. 22.

    It is remarkable that n = 3 is the maximum dimension for which all forms are automatically decomposable. This can be used as a somewhat banal argument for our space to be 3-dimensional, but nor more banal than the acoustic argument according to which wave fronts propagate sharply only in odd dimensional spaces. In a 2-dimensional world, we would not be able to communicate by sharp signals.

  23. 23.

    For an illuminating presentation of these ideas, see [21].

  24. 24.

    Following [14].

  25. 25.

    The neologism ‘distriation’ is meant to suggest the disruption of the striated structure implied by the filaments in compatible fascicles.

  26. 26.

    A more rigorous limiting process is presented in another chapter of this volume authored by Kupferman and Olami [13].

  27. 27.

    See, e.g., [12].

  28. 28.

    For simplicity of the exposition, we will assume that \(F{\mathscr M}\) is globally trivializable.

  29. 29.

    More precisely, in a given trivialization of the bundle, at each point \(X \in {\mathscr M}\), Φ(X) amounts to a left translation of the fibre \(\pi ^{-1}(X) = GL(n,{\mathbb R})\) by some element of \(GL(n,{\mathbb R})\).

  30. 30.

    This is the coordinate expression of the map defined in Remark 6.

References

  1. Bunge M A (1998), Philosophy of Science, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cartan É (1899), Sur certaines expressions différentielles et le problème de Pfaff, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supŕieure, Série 3, 16, 239–332

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrasekhar S (1992), Liquid crystals, 2nd. edition, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Rham G (1955), Variétés différentiables, Hermann. English version: Differentiable manifolds, Springer, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elżanowski M and Preston S (2007), A model of the self-driven evolution of a defective continuum, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 12/4, 450–465.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein M and Segev R (2014), Geometric aspects of singular dislocations, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 19/4, 337–349.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein M and Segev R (2014), Geometric theory of smooth and singular defects, International Journal of Nonlinear Mechanics 66, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein M and Segev R (2015), On the geometry and kinematics of smoothly distributed and singular defects, in Differential Geometry and Continuum Mechanics, Ed. by G-Q G Chen, M Grinfeld and R J Knops, Springer, 203–234.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Federer H (1969), Geometric Measure Theory, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frank F C (1951), Crystal dislocations - Elementary concepts and definitions, Phil. Mag. 42, 809–819.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirth J P (1985), A brief history of dislocation theory, Metallurgical Transactions A 16A, 2085–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleman M and Lavrentovich O D (2003), Soft matter physics: an introduction, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kupferman R and Olami E (2020), Homogenization of edge-dislocations as a weak limit of de-Rham currents, In: Segev R and Epstein M (eds), Geometric Continuum Mechanics. Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_6.

  14. Misner W, Thorne K S and Wheeler J A (1973), Gravitation, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noll W (1967), Materially Uniform Bodies with Inhomogeneities, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 27, 1–32.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Nye J F (1953), Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals, Acta Metallurgica 1, 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palais R S (1970), Banach manifolds of fiber bundle sections, Actes du Congrès International des Mathématiciens, 2, 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Read W T and Shockley W (1950), Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries, Physical Review 78/3, 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Romanov A E and Kolesnikova A L (2009), Application of disclination concept to solid structures, Progress in Material Science 54, 740–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz L (1945), Généralisation de la notion de fonction, de dérivation, de transformation de Fourier et applications mathématiques et physiques, Annales de l’Université de Grenoble 21, 57–74.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sternberg S (1983), Lectures on Differential Geometry, 2nd edition, Chelsea Publishing, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Truesdell C and Toupin R A (1960), The Classical Field Theories, in Encyclopedia of Physics, ed. by S. Fl’́ugge, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Volterra V (1907), Sur l’équilibre des corps élastiques multiplement connexes, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 24, 401–517.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Volterra V (1912), Lectures delivered at the twentieth anniversary of the foundation of Clark University, published by Clark University.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang C-C (1967), On the Geometric Structure of Simple Bodies, a Mathematical Foundation for the Theory of Continuous Distributions of Dislocations, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 27, 33–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reuven Segev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Epstein, M., Segev, R. (2020). Regular and Singular Dislocations. In: Segev, R., Epstein, M. (eds) Geometric Continuum Mechanics. Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics(), vol 43. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics