Skip to main content

Posthumanism and Trauma

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism

Abstract

Although trauma studies and critical posthumanism have simultaneously developed, only in the last few years have critics started to see the imbrications of both disciplines. Trauma studies and critical posthumanism acknowledge that the traditional definition of the human as autonomous, exceptional, self-willed, and rational subject, distinct from and dominating other life forms, needs to be revised and reconfigured. Whereas classical trauma theory dwells on the wound and the fragmentation that human subjectivity has endured and is concerned with the process of “acting out” and “working through” that will lead to the reintegration of the self’s bounded internal equilibrium, critical posthumanism sees the wound as an opportunity to redefine subjectivity as relational, interdependent, and co-evolving with other bodies, machines, and material forms. In the last few years, classical trauma studies has evolved from a Eurocentric, event-based, static conception of trauma to a more embedded and embodied vision of the trauma process that takes into account the ties of humans to other organic bodies, machines, and material forms. In turn, critical posthumanism has found in trauma studies the vocabulary to understand and deal with the wound that moving beyond human exceptionalism and exemptionalism produces on us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S. (2018). Trans-corporeality. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 435–438). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (2004). Towards a theory of cultural trauma. In J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser, & P. Sztompka (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 1–30). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ataria, Y. (2017). The structural trauma of western culture: Towards the end of humanity. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badmington, N. (2003). Theorizing posthumanism. Cultural Critique, 53(Winter), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2003.0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2005). Transhumanist values. Journal of Philosophical Research, 30, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2018). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buelens, G., Durrant, S., & Eaglestone, R. (Eds.). (2014). The future of trauma theory: Contemporary literary and cultural criticism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruth, C. (Ed.). (1995). Trauma: Explorations in memory. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collado-Rodríguez, F. (2016). Intratextuality, trauma, and the posthuman in Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 57(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2015.1121860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craps, S. (2013). Postcolonial witnessing: Trauma out of bounds. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craps, S. (2014). Beyond eurocentrism: Trauma theory in the global age. In G. Buelens, S. Durrant, & R. Eaglestone (Eds.), The future of trauma theory: Contemporary literary and cultural criticism (pp. 45–61). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craps, S. (2020). Climate trauma. In C. Davis & H. Meretoja (Eds.), The Routledge companion to literature and trauma (pp. 275–284). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K. (1998). Post-traumatic culture: Injury and interpretation in the nineties. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Santiago, M. (2021). A dystopian vision of transhuman enhancement: Speciesist and political issues intersecting trauma and disability in M. Night Shyamalan’s Split. In S. Baelo-Allué & M. Calvo-Pascual (Eds.), Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative (pp. 142–160). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrández San Miguel, M. (2018). Appropriated bodies: Trauma and the posthuman in Octavia Butler’s “Bloodchild” and James Tiptree, Jr.’s “The girl who was plugged in”. Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 40(2), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2018-40.2.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2014). The 4th revolution. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1966). Lecture XVIII: Fixation to traumas–the unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed. and trans.), Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis (pp. 338–353). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, U. K. (2011). The Posthuman turn: Rewriting species in recent American literature. In C. F. Levander & R. S. Levine (Eds.), A companion to American literary studies (pp. 454–468). Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Blommsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holz, M. (2006). Traversing virtual spaces. Body, memory and trauma in cyberpunk. Universitätsverlag Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • İbrişim, D. G. (2020a). Human sovereignty eclipsed? Toward a posthumanist reading of the traumatized subject in J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace. European Review, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279872000071X

  • İbrişim, D. G. (2020b). Trauma, critical posthumanism, new materialism. In C. Davis & H. Meretoja (Eds.), The Routledge companion to literature and trauma (pp. 230–240). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. A. (2016). Climate trauma: Foreseeing the future in dystopian film and fiction. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckhurst, R. (2003). Traumaculture. New Formations: a Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 50, 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckhurst, R. (2014). Future shock: Science fiction and the trauma paradigm. In G. Buelens, S. Durrant, & R. Eaglestone (Eds.), The future of trauma theory: Contemporary literary and cultural criticism (pp. 157–167). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. (2012). A brief history of geotrauma. In E. Keller, N. Masciandaro, & E. Thacker (Eds.), Leper creativity: Cyclonopedia symposium (pp. 1–38). Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matts, T., & Tynan, A. (2012). Geotrauma and the eco-clinic. Symplokē, 20(1–2), 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menyhért, A. (2020). Trauma studies in the digital age. In C. Davis & H. Meretoja (Eds.), The Routledge companion to literature and trauma (pp. 241–256). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miccoli, A. (2010). Posthuman suffering and the technological embrace. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narine, A. (2015). Introduction: Eco-trauma cinema. In A. Narine (Ed.), Eco-trauma cinema (pp. 1–24). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A. G. (2005). National trauma and collective memory: Extraordinary events in the American experience. M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negarestani, R. (2011). Globe of revolution: An afterthought on geophilosophical realism. Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, 8(2), 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outka, P. (2009). History, the Posthuman, and the end of trauma: Propranolol and Beyond. Traumatology, 15(4), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765609357282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2020). Posthumanism, platform ontologies and the “wounds of modern subjectivity”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(6), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1608690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbeck, T. D. (2015). Onscreen ontology: Stages in the posthumanist paradigm shift. In M. Hauskeller, T. D. Philbeck, & C. D. Carbonell (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of posthumanism in film and television (pp. 391–400). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory: Remembering the holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Portfolio Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, M. (1997). Wound culture: Trauma in the pathological public sphere. October, 80, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2009). Technics and time: Disorientation. (S. Barker, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tew, P. (2007). The contemporary British novel. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kolk, B. A., & van der Hart, O. (1995). The intrusive past: The flexibility of memory and the engraving of trauma. In C. Caruth (Ed.), Trauma: Explorations in memory (pp. 158–182). Johns Hopkins UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinci, T. M. (2014). Posthuman wounds: Trauma, non-anthropocentric vulnerability, and the human/android/animal dynamic in Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 47(2), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinci, T. M. (2020). Ghost, android, animal: Trauma and literature beyond the human. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (2001). Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47(1), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The writing of this article was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under grant PID2019–106855GBI00, and the Aragonese Regional Government (DGA) under grant H03-17R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Baelo-Allué .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Baelo-Allué, S. (2022). Posthumanism and Trauma. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_40-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_40-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics