Skip to main content

Posthumanism and Anthropology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship between anthropology and critical posthumanism, two lines of enquiry that proceed from the fundamental question: what is a human being? From seeds sowed by poststructuralism/modernism, an “ontological turn” in anthropology over the past several decades has decentered and expanded the disciplinary scope and its traditional subject – the human. Along with putting “the anthropos” back in question, longstanding dualisms such as nature and culture, subject and object, human and nonhuman have been subject to radical critique. After tracing influential developments in two key subfields, (1) indigenous multinaturalism and (2) multispecies anthropology, we explore the elective affinities between anthropology, phenomenology, and posthumanism. In the final section, we discuss the anthropolitical implications of critical posthuman perspectives, which open space for thinking and acting otherwise in the Anthropocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Maldonado, M. (2015). Environment and society: Socionatural relations in the Anthropocene. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizpe, L. (1998). Convivencia: The Goal of Conviviability, World Culture Report, 1998: Culture, Creativity and Markets. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette, A. (2015). Herding Species: biosecurity, posthuman labor, and the American Industrial Pig. Cultural Anthropology, 30, 640–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J. (2016). The shock of the Anthropocene. The Earth, history and us. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudier, C. (1986). Phenomenology and anthropology. Man and World, 19, 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Toadvine, T. (2003). Eco-Phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T. (1979). Phenomenology as humanism: The case of Husserl and Sartre. Research in Phenomenology, 9(1), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadena, M. (2015). Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D. (2007). Merleau-Ponty and modern politics after anti-humanism. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Althone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desjarlais, R. & Throop, C. J. (2011). Phenomenological Approaches in Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNovelli-Lang, D. (2013). The return of the animal. Environment and Society, 4(1), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical Posthumanism London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. (2012). Critical anthropological thought and the radical political imaginary today. Critique of Anthropology, 32(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. (2017). Is racism an environmental threat? Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, B. (2017). The scent of time: A philosophical essay on the art of lingering. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto. Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, G. (2015). Phenomenology is a humanism: Husserl’s hermeneutical-historical struggle to determine the genuine meaning of human existence in the crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. In A. T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), From sky and Earth to metaphysics. Analecta Husserliana (Vol. 115). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977a). Letter on humanism. In Basic writings: Martin Heidegger. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977b). The question concerning technology. In W. Lovitt (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 3–35). Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. A. (2017). The ontological turn: An anthropological exposition. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hörl, E. (2017). Introduction to general ecology: the ecologization of thinking, in General Ecology, the New Ecological Paradigm, edited by E. Hörl and J. Burton, (pp 1–73). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C. A. (2016). Mobile lifeworlds. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1973). On the phenomenology of intersubjectivity. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (1996). Things as they are: New directions in phenomenological anthropology. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2005). Existential anthropology: Events, exigencies, and events. Berghahn.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2013). Lifeworlds: Essays in existential anthropology. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalpana, R., & Houston, C. (Eds.). (2015). Phenomenology in anthropology: A sense of perspective. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. (2017). Pyrenean rewilding and ontological landscapes: A future(s) dwelt-in ethnographic approach. In A. Irving, J. F. Salazar, S. Pink, & J. Sjoberg (Eds.), Anthropologies and futures: Researching emerging and uncertain worlds. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Küpers, W. (2014). Embodied Inter-Be(com)ing – The contribution of Merleau-Ponty’s relational Ontology for a processual understanding of Chiasmic Organising, Jenny Helin, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth, Robin Holt, (eds), Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies, (413–431), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpers, W. (2015). Phenomenology for embodied organization – the contribution of Merleau-Ponty for a carnal organisation studies and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpers, W. (2019). Post-Pandoran hope for moving wisely beyond the neo-Promethean Anthropocene. In Daniel Ericsson & Monika Kostera (Eds.), Organizing Goodness and Hope, (pp. 72–84), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpers, W. (2020). From Anthropocene to Ecocene – Eco-phenomenological perspectives on embodied, anthro-decentric transformations towards enlivening practices of organising sustainably. Sustainability, 12(9), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2013). Waiting for Gaia: Six lectures on the political theology of nature. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/%3E. Accessed 6 Mar 2021.

  • Les Convivialistes. (2014). Convivialist Manifesto. A declaration of interdependence. Duisburg, Germany: Käte Hamburger Kolleg & Centre for Global Cooperation Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G., & Clifford, J. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBlane, A. (2016). Expressing corporeal silence: Phenomenology, Merleau-Ponty, and posthumanism. Word and Text, 6, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, S. (2017). Fictionalizing anthropology: Encounters and fabulations at the edges of the human. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). The visible and the invisible. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Nature. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W., & Walsh, C. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11g9616

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, J. (2015). The Anthrobscene; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyyhtinen, O., & Tamminen, S. (2011). We have never been only human: Foucault and Latour on the question of the anthropos. Anthropological Theory, 11(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, G. (2013). Heidegger’s influence on posthumanism: The destruction of metaphysics, technology and the overcoming of anthropocentrism. History of the Human Sciences, 27(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffles, H. (2002). Intimate knowledge. Center for Global, International and Regional Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raffles, H. (2010). Insectopedia. Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, N. (2010). Human nature as capacity: Transcending discourse and classification. Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruuska, T., Heikkurinen, P., & Wilen, K. (2020). Domination, power, supremacy: Confronting anthropolitics with ecological realism. Sustainability, 12(7), 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1207261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, J. F. (2017). Speculative fabulation: Research worlds to come in Antarctica. In A. Irving, J. F. Salazar, S. Pink, & J. Sjoberg (Eds.), Anthropologies and futures: Researching emerging and uncertain worlds. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimelpfenig, R. (2017). The Drama of the Anthropocene: Can Deep Ecology, Romanticism, and Renaissance Science Rebalance Nature and Culture American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 76(4), 821–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1994) Atlas. Julliard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (2004). Futures beyond dystopia: Creating social foresight. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W., Smith, J., & Verducci, D. (2018). Eco-phenomenology: Life, human life, post-human life in the harmony of the cosmos Analecta Husserliana the yearbook of phenomenological research (Vol. CXXI). Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E., & Ernsts, H. (2018). Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticising Ontologies in the Anthropocene. Theory Cult. Soc. 35, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, D. (1995). Arendt and Heidegger: The fate of the political. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. (1990). Experience of the Alien in Husserl’s phenomenology. Research in Phenomenology, 20(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Meyer, M. J. (2019). Theory for the world to come: Speculative fiction and apocalyptic anthropology. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, R. (1993). Only a god can save us: Der Spiegel’s interview with Martin Heidegger (1966). In R. Wolin (Ed.), The Heidegger controversy. A critical reader (pp. 91–116). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher A. Howard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Howard, C.A., Küpers, W.M. (2022). Posthumanism and Anthropology. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_14-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_14-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics