Skip to main content

Assignment of Groups for the Execution of a Collaborative Work Using Emerging Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applied Technologies (ICAT 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1195))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 443 Accesses

Abstract

In educational institutions collaborative work is used as a strategy to enhance active learning. One of the organizational tasks that is in charge of the teacher is the assignment of groups. Hence the purpose of this article, which is to show how emerging algorithms with their self-organization characteristics, can be used in group formation to carry out a collaborative task. Showing that performance and small groups do not necessarily go hand in hand. The methodology used is a case study and the sample corresponds to 62 students of the subject of Artificial Intelligence of Distance Modality of the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, in the academic period April-August/2018, to whom a dichotomous 16-item survey was applied based on the three phases of the Zimmerman self-regulated learning cycle. Among the remarkable results, we can mention that the synergy of individual regulation known as socially shared regulation influenced the execution of the collaborative task. Likewise, the cohesion of a group is not a determining variable to achieve meaningful learning since the less cohesion the greater regulation of socially shared learning. The contribution of the present study is given in the field of Computer Supported Cooperative Learning (CSCL) to alleviate one of the administrative tasks of teachers “Group Assignment”, which can be replicated in classroom learning environments or in any of the variations of e-learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sancho, F.: Algoritmos de hormigas y el problema del viajante (2018). http://www.cs.us.es/~fsancho/?e=71

  2. Márquez, M.: Las metaheurísticas : tendencias actuales y su aplicabilidad en la ergonomía, Ing. Ind. Actual. y Nuevas Tendencias, vol. IV, no. 12, pp. 108–120 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alonso, S., Cordon, O., Fernández de Viana, I., Herrera, F.: La Metaheurística de Optimización Basada en Colonias de Hormigas: Modelos y Nuevos Enfoques, vol. 2014, p. 51 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goss, S., Aron, S., Deneubourg, J., Pasteels, J.: Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant. Naturwissenschaften 76(12), 579–581 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00462870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Depickère, S., Fresneau, D., Deneubourg, J.: A basis for spatial and social patterns in ant species: dynamics and mechanisms of aggregation. J. Insect Behav. 17(1), 81–97 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000025134.06111.be

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, S.: Sistemas emergentes. O qué tienen en común hormigas, neuronas, ciudades y software, EURE., vol. 24, no. 101, pp. 142–145 (2008). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0250-71612008000100008

  7. Aguilar, J.: Introducción a los Sistemas Emergentes, Primera Ed. Mérida Venezuela: Universidad de Los Andes (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Wolf, T., Holvoet, T.: Using UML 2 activity diagrams to design information flows and feedback-loops in self-organising emergent systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Emergence in Decentralised Autonomic Systems, pp. 52–61 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erkens, M., Bodemer, D.: Improving collaborative learning: guiding knowledge exchange through the provision of information about learning partners and learning contents. Comput. Educ. 128, 452–472 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koivuniemi, M., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S.: Teacher education students’ strategic activities in challenging collaborative learning situations. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 19(May), 109–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J.: ¿Cómo autorregulan nuestros alumnos? modelo de Zimmerman sobre estrategias de aprendizaje. An. Psicol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 450–462 (2014). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221

  12. Zimmerman, J.: Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: Self-regulation, pp. 13–40. Academic Press, San Diego, California (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Grau, V., Whitebread, D.: Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: the interplay of individual and group cognition. Learn. Instr. 22(6), 401–412 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., Sobocinski, M.: ¿Cómo los tipos de interacción y las fases del aprendizaje autorregulado establecen un escenario para el compromiso colaborativo?, Aprendiz. e Instr., vol. 43, pp. 39–51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Castellanos, J., Onrubia, J.: Regulación compartida en entornos de aprendizaje colaborativo mediado por ordenador: diferencias en grupos de alto y bajo rendimiento, RIED. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. a Distancia, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 233–251 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.1.14036

  16. Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J.: Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., Miller, M.: Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H., (eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. Educational Psychology Handbook Series, pp. 65–85. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, USA (2011). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch5

  18. Järvelä, S., Hadwin, A.F.: New frontiers: regulating learning in CSCL. Educ. Psychol. 48(1), 25–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalsgaard, C., Paulsen, M.: Transparency in Cooperative Online Education (2009). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/671/1267. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.671

  20. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.I.: Los elementos básicos del aprendizaje cooperativo. In: Aprender juntos y solos. Aprendizaje cooperativo, competitivo e individualista, Primera ed., Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Aique S.A., pp. 107–135 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Engel, A., Onrubia, J.: Patrones de organización grupal y fases de construcción del conocimiento en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje colaborativo, Infanc. y Aprendiz., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 515–528 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayordomo, R., Onrubia, J.: Work coordination and collaborative knowledge construction in a small group collaborative virtual task. Internet High. Educ. 25(2015), 96–104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewicki, R., Bunker, B.: Trust in relationships: a model of trust development and decline. In: Kramer, R., Tyler, T. (eds.) Trust in Organizations, pp. 114–139. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P., Kanselaar, G.: Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Comput. Human Behav. 25(1), 161–170 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3115/1599600.1599657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., Kirschner, P.A.: Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educ. Psychol. 48(1), 9–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.747947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ortega, O.: Dinámica de grupos. Técnicas de organización de eventos. Bogotá, Colombia: ECOE Ediciones (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waddell, S., Khagram, S.: Multi-stakeholder global networks: emerging systems for the global common good. In: Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., Mol, A.P.J. (eds.) Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflections on Theory and Practice, pp. 216–287. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Glos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dunia Inés Jara-Roa , María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya , Marcos Cabezas G. or Luis Barba-Guamán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jara-Roa, D.I., Ramírez-Montoya, MS., Cabezas G., M., Barba-Guamán, L. (2020). Assignment of Groups for the Execution of a Collaborative Work Using Emerging Algorithms. In: Botto-Tobar, M., Zambrano Vizuete, M., Torres-Carrión, P., Montes León, S., Pizarro Vásquez, G., Durakovic, B. (eds) Applied Technologies. ICAT 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1195. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42531-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42531-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42530-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42531-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics