Skip to main content

Pathological Assessment of Fetal Growth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Manual of Fetal Pathology
  • 665 Accesses

Abstract

When analyzing an individual case, collected data have to be compared to the “normal value” for a particular gestational age. It is a long and almost philosophical debate what can be appreciated as normal—or does it exist at all in setting of postmortem material. Recently published data derived from social termination cases—12–20 weeks of gestation—is probably the nearest to the definition of normal and this model is suitable to minimize postmortem artifacts; however, it does not solve the dilemma for later gestation [1] (Tables 1 and 2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Muller Brochut AC, Taffe P, Piaget-Rossel R, de Leval L, Rougemont AL. Fetal Anthropometric features: a postmortem study of fetuses after the termination of pregnancy for psychosocial reasons between 12 and 20 gestational weeks. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2019;22(3):243–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1093526618812528. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Archie JG, Collins JS, Lebel RR. Quantitative standards for fetal and neonatal autopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126(2):256–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Merlob P, Sivan Y, Reisner SH. Anthropometric measurements of the newborn infant (27 to 41 gestational weeks). Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1984;20(7):1–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Omotade O. Facial measurements in the newborn (towards syndrome delineation). J Med Genet. 1990;27:358–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.27.6.358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chitty LS, Altman DG. Charts of fetal size: limb bones. BJOG. 2002;109:919–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01022.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardosi J, Francis A, Turner S, Williams M. Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S609–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perez RG, Carvalho J, Piaggio G, Platt LD. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S619–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Frederick IO, Noble AJ, Pang R, Barros FC, Chumlea C, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khong TY. The perinatal necropsy. In: Khong TY, Malcomson RDG, editors. Keeling’s fetal and neonatal pathology. 5th ed. London: Springer; 2015.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Pryce JW, Bamber AR, Ashworth MT, Kiho L, Malone M, Sebire NJ. Reference ranges for organ weights of infants at autopsy: results of >1,000 consecutive cases from a single centre. BMC Clin Pathol. 2014;14:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-14-18. eCollection 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Scheimberg I, Ashal H, Kotiloglu-Karaa E, French P, Kay P, Cohen MC. Weight charts of infants dying of sudden infant death in England. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2014;17(4):271–7. https://doi.org/10.2350/13-08-1362-OA.1. Epub 2014 May 23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maroun LL, Graem N. Autopsy standards of body parameters and fresh organ weights in nonmacerated and macerated human fetuses. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005;8(2):204–17. Epub 2005 Mar 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D’Antonio F, Thilaganathan B. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:301–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thayyil S, Schievano S, Robertson NJ, Jones R, Chitty LS, Sebire NJ, Taylor AM, MaRIAS (Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) Collaborative Group. A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(2):321–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.013. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Man J, Hutchinson JC, Ashworth M, Jeffrey I, Heazell AE, Sebire NJ. Organ weights and ratios for postmortem identification of fetal growth restriction: utility and confounding factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(5):585–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.16017. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perinatal Institute @ www.gestation.net.

  17. Publications, charts and training recourses of Intergrowth-21 @https://intergrowth21.tghn.org/.

  18. Cain MD, Siebert JR, Iriabho E. Development of novel software to generate anthropometric norms at perinatal autopsy. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015;18:203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beata Hargitai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hargitai, B. (2021). Pathological Assessment of Fetal Growth. In: Martinovic, J. (eds) Practical Manual of Fetal Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42492-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42492-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42491-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42492-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics