Abstract
The growth of cities and populations has a direct impact on people’s development and quality of life. These phenomena make the task of municipalities increasingly challenging in terms of service delivery and preservation of conditions for future generations. United Nations, through its conferences over the last decades, proposed the Agenda 2030. There is a shortage of municipal management evaluation tools that portray the municipal management scenario with a focus on sustainable development. Within this context, this chapter presents a tool developed to evaluate the level of sustainable development of municipalities based on the UN Agenda 2030. The tool presents a set of indicators for the evaluation of each of the 17 sustainable development objectives, generating an index of each municipality that can be compared with an established national goal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andion, C. (2012). Por uma nova interpretação das mudanças de paradigma na administração pública. Cadernos Ebape, 10(10), 1–19.
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 (Emendas Constitucionais de Revisão). Brasília: Congresso Nacional.
Braun, C. C., & Mueller, R. R. (2014). The knowledge management in the municipal public administration in Curitiba with the application of the Organizational Knowledge Assessment (OKA) method. Revista de Administração Pública, 48(4), 983–1006.
Bresser Pereira, L. C. (2008). O modelo estrutural de gerência pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 42(2), 391–410.
De Paula, A. P. (2005). Por uma nova gestão pública: limites e potencialidades da experiência contemporânea. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2005. 204 p. ISBN: 8522505284.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672.
Donner Abreu, A. C., Heinzen Amin Helou, A. R., & Pereira Fialho, F. A. (2013). Possibilidades epistemológicas para a ampliação da Teoria da Administração Pública: uma análise a partir do conceito do Novo Serviço Público. Cadernos EBAPE, 11(1), 608–620.
Ferlie, E., Asburner, L., Fitzgerad, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1999). A nova administração Pública em Ação. Brasília: Publisher of the University of Brasilia: ENAP.
Gaetani, F. (1999). O ensino de administração pública no Brasil em um momento de inflexão. Revista do Serviço Público, 50(4), 92.
Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2016). Climate change and the 2030 corporate agenda for sustainable development. In Climate change and the 2030 corporate agenda for sustainable development. Published online: 14 Dec 2016; 1–6. Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-503020160000019005
Gonzalez-Perez, M. A., & Leonard, L. (2015) The global compact: Corporate sustainability in the post 2015 world. In Beyond the UN global compact: Institutions and regulations. Published online: 13 Apr 2015; 1–19. Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-503020150000017001
Kalentari, Z., Santos Ferreira, C. S., Page, J., Goldenberg, R., Olsson, J., & Destouni, G. (2019). Meeeting sustainable development challenges in growing cities: Coupled Social-ecological systems modeling of land use and water changes. Journal of Environmental Management, 245, 471–480.
Keinert, T. M. M. (2000). Administração pública no Brasil: crises e mudanças de paradigmas. Annablume.
Kettl, D. F. (2012). The global public management revolution (2nd ed., p. 2005). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. 112p.
Magalhães, M. N., & Lima, A. C. P. (2013). Noções de Probabilidade e Estatística. São Paulo: Ed. USP, 7ª Ed.
Nogueira, M. A. (2005). Um Estado para a sociedade civil. São Paulo: Cortez.
Paredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2004). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.
Secchi, L. (2009). Modelos organizacionais e reformas da administração pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(2), 347–369.
Taufick, J., & Alves, A. C. F. (2010). Continuidade Paradigmática Funcionalista no Campo da Administração Pública Brasileira – Uma Abordagem Desde 1900 até 2010. Revista FACUnicamps, 4, 82–93.
Uddin, M. K. (2017). Climate change and global environmental politics: North-South divide. Environmental Policy & Law, 47(3/4), 106–114.
UN. (2005): Mauritius Strategy of Implementation. Permanent link to this document: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/conferences/msi2005
UN. (2016). 17 Objetivos do desenvolvimento sustentável, Agenda 2030. Published online: 25 Sept 2015. Permanent link to this document: https://nacoesunidas.org/conheca-os-novos-17-objetivos-de-desenvolvimento-sustentavel-da-onu/amp/
Wang, M. H., Ho, Y. S., & Fu, H. Z. (2019). Global performance and development on sustainable city based on natural science and social science research: A bibliometrics analysis. The Science of the Total Environment, 666, 1245–1254.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political science quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zeni, A., de Quevedo, D.M., Nunes, M.P., Rodrigues, M.A.S. (2021). Assessment of the Level of Sustainable Development Based on Agenda 2030. In: Park, S.H., Gonzalez-Perez, M.A., Floriani, D.E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in the Digital Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42412-1_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42412-1_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42411-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42412-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)