Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Problematic Animals in the Zoo: The Issue of Charismatic Megafauna

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problematic Wildlife II

Abstract

Zoos worldwide are visited by great numbers of people, and many of these visitors prefer to see large, rare mammals, the so-called charismatic megafauna. Zoos and the researchers who use them also appear to prioritise these species, as evidenced by the number of scientific publications which investigate the welfare of charismatic rather than non-charismatic species. However, the charismatic animals also attract more welfare-related concern from animal activist groups and the media than the non-charismatics. To this extent the charismatics could be regarded as problematic animals in the zoo. In this chapter, we compare three charismatic taxa (elephants, great apes and cetaceans) with three closely matched non-charismatic taxa (tapirs, gibbons and manatees) from the point of view of how frequently they are portrayed in welfare-related stories in the media, how much scientific research is undertaken on their welfare and how many of them are housed in zoos. Undoubtedly, from these perspectives the charismatics receive more attention than the non-charismatics. However, there is also evidence that their popularity helps zoos achieve their conservation mission, both by increasing funding available for field conservation and by contributing towards education and awareness raising of conservation issues. Nevertheless, the non-charismatics are equally deserving of attention, and more work needs to be done on their welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albert C, Luque GM, Courchamp F (2018) The twenty most charismatic species. PLoS One 13(7):e0199149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen K (1995) Ethical parameters for marketing and public relations. In: Norton BG, Hutchins M, Stevens EF, Maple TL (eds) Ethics on the ark. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R, Waayers R, Knight A (2016) Orca behavior and subsequent aggression associated with oceanarium confinement. Animals 6(8):49

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher L, Williams E, Yon L (2015) Developing behavioural indicators, as part of a wider set of indicators, to assess the welfare of elephants in UK zoos. Defra Project WC1081: final report. https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/30334/

  • Azevedo CS, Cipreste CF, Young RJ (2007) Environmental enrichment: a GAP analyses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 102:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Mace GM, Leader-Williams N (1996) Designing the ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. Conserv Biol 10(3):719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates LA, Lee PC, Njiraini N, Poole JH, Sayialel K, Sayialel S, Moss CM, Byrne RW (2008) Do elephants show empathy? J Conscious Stud 15:204–225

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2016) Harambe gorilla killing: zoo defends action. Web site: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36414813. Accessed 18 Sept 2018

  • BBC (2017) Elephant tourism is ‘fuelling cruelty’. Web site: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-40501667. Accessed 13 Sept 2018

  • Boorer M (1972) Some aspects of stereotyped patterns of movement exhibited by zoo animals. Int Zoo Yearb 12:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born Free (2018) Web site: http://www.bornfree.org.uk/about-us/. Accessed 13 Aug 2017

  • Bostock SSC (1993) Zoos and animal rights: the ethics of keeping animals. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr N (2016) An analysis of zoo visitors’ favourite and least favourite animals. Tour Manag Perspect 20:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chester Zoo (2017) Trustees’ report and financial statements, year ended 31st December 2017. https://www.chesterzoo.org/corporate-information/annual-reports/

  • Clegg ILK, Borger-Turner JL, Eskelinen HC (2015) C-well: the development of a welfare assessment index for captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Anim Welf 24:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (1985) The scientific basis for assessing suffering in animals. In: Singer P (ed) In defence of animals. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (2004) Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Anim Welf 13:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (2006) A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends Ecol Evol 21:77–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2017) Secretary state standards of modern zoo practice. Appendix 8, Specialist exhibits, elephants

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia D (2002) Animal rights: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Hamilton I (2009) The current elephant poaching trend. Pachyderm 45:154–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducarme F, Luque DM, Courchamp F 2013 What are “charismatic species” for conservation biologists? Biosci Master Rev 10:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Esson M, Moss A (2014) Zoos as a context for reinforcing environmentally responsible behaviour: the dual challenges that zoo educators have set themselves. J Zoo Aquarium Res 2:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Fa JE, Funk SM, O’Connell D (2011) Zoo conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH, Reinhard EM, Vernon CL, Bronnenkant K, Heimlich JE, Deans NL (2007) Why zoos and aquariums matter: assessing the impact of a visit to a zoo or aquarium. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Springs

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D (2009) Assessing animal welfare: different philosophies, different scientific approaches. Zoo Biol 28:507–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fravel L (2003) Critics question zoos’ commitment to conservation. [Online] Accessed from: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2003/11/news-zoo-commitment-conservation-critic/ Accessed on: 17.09.2018

  • Gallup G (1970) Chimpanzees: self recognition. Science 167:86–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg J (2013) Are dolphins really smart? Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunauer PP, Walguarnery JW (2018) Relative response to digital tablet devices and painting as sensory enrichment in captive chimpanzees. Zoo Biol 37(4):269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian (2017) The dark side of wildlife tourism: thousands of Asian elephants held in cruel conditions. Web site: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/06/thousands-elephants-exploited-tourism-held-cruel-conditions. Accessed 13 Sept 2018

  • Gusset M, Dick G (2010) ‘Building a future for wildlife’? Evaluating the contribution of the world zoo and aquarium community to in situ conservation. Int Zoo Yearb 44:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusset M, Dick G (2011) The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biol 30:566–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hancocks D (1995) Lions and tigers and bears, Oh No! In: Norton BG, Hutchins M, Stevens EF, Maple TL (eds) Ethics on the ark. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill SP, Broom DM (2009) Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice. Zoo Biol 28:531–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosey G, Pankhurst S, Melfi V (2013) Zoo animals behaviour, management and welfare, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Irie N, Hasegawa T (2009) Elephant psychology: what we know and what we would like to know. Jpn Psychol Res 51:177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irie-Sugimoto N, Kobayashi T, Sato T, Hasegawa T (2008) Evidence of means-end behavior in Asian elephants. Anim Cogn 11:359–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson D (1985) Against zoos. In: Singer P (ed) In defence of animals. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson D (1995) Zoos revisited. In: Norton BG, Hutchins M, Stevens EF, Maple TL (eds) Ethics on the ark. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 52–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreger MD, Hutchins M (2010) Ethics of keeping mammals in zoos and aquariums. In: Kleiman DG, Thompson KV, Baer CK (eds) Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques for zoo management, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Leader-Williams N, Smith RJ, Walpole MJ (2001) Elephant hunting and conservation. Science 293(5538):2203–2204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luebke JF, Watters JV, Packer J, Miller LJ, Powell DM (2016) Zoo visitors’ affective responses to observing animal behaviors. Visitor Stud 19:60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas KE, Ross SR (2005) Zoo visitor knowledge and attitudes toward gorillas and chimpanzees. J Environ Educ 36:33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino L (2007) Cetacean brains: how aquatic are they? Anat Rec 290:694–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino L, Lilienfeld SO, Malamud R, Nobis N, Broglio R (2010) ‘Do zoos and aquariums promote attitude change in visitors?’ A critical evaluation of the American zoo and aquarium study. Soc Anim 18:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1982) Behavioral enrichment in the zoo. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H, Schmidt M, Moody A (1978) Behavioural engineering and animal health in the zoo. Int Zoo Yearb 18:190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard L (2017) Media framing of zoos and aquaria: from conservation to animal rights. Environ Commun. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1310741

  • Melfi VA (2009) There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: a case for evidence-based zoo animal management. Zoo Biol 28:574–588

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Holzapfel M (1968) Abnormal behaviour in zoo animals. In: Fox MW (ed) Abnormal behavior in animals. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 476–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LJ, Zeigler-Hill V, Mellen J, Koeppel J, Greer T, Kuczaj S (2013) Dolphin shows and interaction programs: benefits for conservation education? Zoo Biol 32:45–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB, Wilson DE (2013) Handbook of the mammals of the world, vol 3 Primates. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu A (2003) The history of the dolphin. In: Frohoff T, Peterson B (eds) Between species: celebrating the dolphin-human bond. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, pp 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney A (2018) Zoos: does size matter? In: Proceedings of the 20th anniversary research conference, 9–11th July 2018. Living Coasts, Paignton Zoo and South Devon College

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris D (1964) The response of animals to a restricted environment. Symp Zool Soc Lond 13:99–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moss A, Essen M (2010) Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes. Zoo Biol 29:715–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss A, Jensen E, Gusset M (2014) Evaluating the contribution of zoos and aquariums to Aichi biodiversity target 1. Conserv Biol 29:537–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • One Green Planet (2018a) Why elephants don’t belong in zoos! Web site: http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/why-elephants-dont-belong-in-zoos/. Accessed 13 Sept 2018

  • One Green Planet (2018b) New elephant sanctuary will provide safe home for elephants retired from brutal logging industry. Web site: https://www.onegreenplanet.org/news/elephant-sanctuary-retired-brutal-logging-industry/. Accessed 13 Sept 2018

  • Pearson EL, Lowry R, Dorrian J, Litchfield CA (2014) Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo-based educational campaign: ‘Don’t palm us off’ for orang-utan conservation. Zoo Biol 33:184–196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PETA (2017) Web site: https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-in-entertainment/zoos/. Accessed 13 Aug 2017

  • PETA (2018) Get elephants out of zoos. Web site: https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-in-entertainment/zoos/get-elephants-zoos/. Accessed 13 Sept 2018

  • Plotnik JM, de Waal FBM, Reiss D (2006) Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:17053–17057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Powell DM, Bullock EVW (2014) Evaluation of factors affecting emotional responses in zoo visitors and the impact of emotion on conservation mindedness. Anthrozoös 27:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price A, Boeving ER, Shender MA, Ross SR (2015) Understanding the effectiveness of demonstration programs. J Mus Educ 40:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior H, Schwarz A, Güntürkün O (2008) Mirror-induced behavior in the Magpie (Pica pica): evidence of self-recognition. PLoS Biol 6(8):e202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Regan T (1985) The case for animal rights. In: Singer P (ed) In defence of animals. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan T (1995) Are zoos morally defensible? In: Norton BG, Hutchins M, Stevens EF, Maple TL (eds) Ethics on the ark. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 38–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth G, Dicke U (2005) Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci 9:250–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salas M, Manteca X, Abaigar T, Delclaux M, Ensenat C, Martinez-Nevado E, Quevedo MA, Fernandez-Bellon H (2018) Using farm animal welfare protocols as a base to assess the welfare of wild animals in captivity-case study: Dorcas Gazelles (Gazella dorcas). Animals 8(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070111

  • SeaWorld (2010) Tilikum. Seaworld animal profiles [online]. Available at: http://www.orcahome.de/swprofiles1.pdf

  • Shapiro ME, Shapiro HG, Ehmke EE (2018) Behavioral responses of three lemur species to different food enrichment devices. Zoo Biol 37(3):146–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (1990) Animal liberation, 2nd edn. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitati NW, Walpole MJ, Smith RJ, Leader-Williams N (2003) Predicting spatial aspects of human-elephant conflict. J Appl Ecol 40:667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Independent (2014) The killing of Marius the giraffe opens an important debate about genetics, animal rights and zoo inbreeding. Web site: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/the-killing-of-marius-the-giraffe-opens-an-important-debate-about-genetics-animal-rights-and-zoo-9120219.html. Accessed 18 Sept 2018

  • The Telegraph (2017) Berlin’s beloved polar bear cub Fritz diesin Tierpark Zoo. Web site: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/07/berlins-beloved-polar-bear-cub-fritz-dies-tierpark-zoo/. Accessed 14 Sept 2018

  • Tudge C (1992) Last animals at the zoo: how mass extinctions can be stopped. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PI, Mosberger N, Kistler C, Fischer O (1998) The relationship between popularity and body size in zoo animals. Conserv Biol 12(6):1408–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth AW (2012) An investigation into the determining factors of zoo visitor attendances in UK zoos. PLoS One 7(1):e29839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wuichet J, Norton G (1995) Differing conceptions of animal welfare. In: Norton BG, Hutchins M, Stevens EF, Maple TL (eds) Ethics on the ark. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 235–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman A, Hatchwell M, Dickie LA, West C (eds) (2007) Zoos in the 21st century: catalysts for conservation? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bolton, Bolton, UK

    Geoff Hosey

  2. Hartpury University, Gloucester, UK

    Vicky Melfi

  3. School of Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

    Samantha J. Ward

Authors
  1. Geoff Hosey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vicky Melfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samantha J. Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Hosey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FIZV, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Maria Angelici

  2. Museo dell’Ecologia di Cesena, Cesena, Forli/Cesana, Italy

    Lorenzo Rossi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hosey, G., Melfi, V., Ward, S.J. (2020). Problematic Animals in the Zoo: The Issue of Charismatic Megafauna. In: Angelici, F., Rossi, L. (eds) Problematic Wildlife II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42335-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation