Abstract
Valuation studies have shown that drought occurrences have more severe economic impact compared to other natural disasters such as floods. In Kenya, drought has presented complex negative effects on farming communities. The main objective of this chapter is to analyze the economic impacts of drought and identify appropriate climate change adaptation measures in Kenya. To achieve this objective, an empirical approach, combined with secondary data mined from World Bank Climate Knowledge Portal and FAOSTAT databases, has been used in three main steps. First, historical links between population size and land degradation, temperature and rainfall changes with drought events were established. Second, economic impacts of drought on selected economic indicators such as quantities of staple food crop, average food value production, number of undernourished people, gross domestic product, agriculture value added growth, and renewable water resources per annum in Kenya were evaluated. Third, different climate change adaptation measures among farmers in Makueni county were identified using focused group discussions and in-depth interviews, for which the use of bottom-up approach was used to elicit responses. Findings from the binary logistic regression model show a statistical relationship between drought events and a selected set of economic indicators. More specifically, drought events have led to increased use of pesticides, reduced access to credit for agriculture and the annual growth of gross domestic product. One of the main recommendations of this chapter is to involve farmers in designing and implementing community-based climate change adaptation measures, with support from other relevant stakeholders.
This chapter was previously published non-open access with exclusive rights reserved by the Publisher. It has been changed retrospectively to open access under a CC BY 4.0 license and the copyright holder is āThe Author(s)ā. For further details, please see the license information at the end of the chapter.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The agriculture sector in sub-Saharan Africa accounts for about 30% of the gross domestic product (GDP) and 40% exports in the region (Calzadilla et al. 2013). The sector is characterized by rainfed extensive crop and pastoral systems with low yields below potential (Amjath-Babu et al. 2016). TheĀ overreliance on rainfed systems has made the region prone to impacts of increasing temperatures, declining precipitation, changes in surface water run-off, and increased carbon dioxide (CO2) (World Bank 2008). Low precipitation and high temperatures have reduced surface moisture content and increased evapotranspiration rates respectively causing soil degradation. Frequent weather-related disasters such as floods, droughts, tropical cyclones, and landslides have led to deaths and loss of livelihoods (Lumbroso 2017).
Drought is one of the most recurring climate change disasters for countries on the horn of Africa. This extreme weather event has occurred due to lack or inadequate precipitation leading to water shortage for plants, human, and animal consumption (Muller 2014; Maity et al. 2016). Its occurrence has been associated with global climate change, as there exist scientific evidence associating increased human activities with global climate change shocks such as floods and droughts (IPCC 2007). There are four types of droughts: meteorological (shortage in rainfall), hydrological (insufficient water in rivers and reservoirs), agricultural (inadequate soil moisture), and socioeconomic droughts (Maity et al. 2016).
In sub-Saharan Africa, droughts are common and their economic impacts in general have not been adequately studied. The reason behind this could be the complex nature of drought as it presents complex effects to lives on earth (Wang et al. 2014). Drought accounts for about 5% of the natural disasters but the losses that it causes account for about 30% of what is caused by other natural disasters (Wang et al. 2014). It aggravates water scarcity problem by affecting both surface and groundwater resources leading to reduced water supply, quality, and disruption of wetlands (Mishra and Singh 2011). When it persists for months or years, it causes conflicts between pastoral communities due to competition for the diminishing water and pasture resources (Uexkull 2014; Martin et al. 2016).
To demonstrate the economic impacts of drought, this chapter follows the framework by Freire-GonzĆ”lez et al. (2017). The authors establish many pathways and the drivers that contribute to the economic impacts of drought, which they classify into two categories: primary and secondary. The primary impactsĀ of drought are those that affect economic agents such as industries, households, government, and the environment, while the secondary impacts lead to fires, desertification, and migration of people, as well asĀ animalsĀ (Freire-GonzĆ”lez et al.Ā 2017). Further, drought affects tangible assets such as land and vegetation cover differently from other natural disasters such as earthquakes, storms, or floods that affect buildings, machines, and other assets. In the long term, drought leads to soil degradation, damages to buildings due to soil sagging, as well as theĀ ecosystems due to excessive groundwater abstractions without enough rainfall to replenish it (Freire-GonzĆ”lez etĀ al. 2017). Drought leads to an increase in temperature causing excessive loss of water through evapotranspiration thus reducing water availability and quality. People are affected differently by drought depending on their geographical locationĀ (Freire-GonzĆ”lez et al.Ā 2017). For example, the impact of drought on people in developing countries is more pronounced due to limited financial capacity to cope with effects such as malnutrition, starvation, increased pests and disease vectors such as malaria and dengue fever-causing mosquitoes (Freire-GonzĆ”lez et al. 2017), economic burden, and in extreme cases, death. Freire-GonzĆ”lez et al. (2017) framework focuses on how water scarcity caused by drought affects the households and the environment (Fig. 1).
It is important to focus on drought because it exacerbates the water scarcity situation, coupled with the fact that Africa is one of the driest continents in the world (Mishra 2014). Drought severely affects the water sector in many parts of SSA region, and the impact of the drought on the sector negatively affects the economy.
Some of the effects of drought on the agricultural productivity are also tabulated (Table 1), and the resulting socioeconomic impacts. The analysis gives a broad picture of the effects of drought on the agriculturalĀ productivity and the social aspects of theĀ farmers. In some regions of America, the costs relating the effects of drought on the crop and livestock sectors among households have been quantified. For instance, Craft et al. (2017) carried out a study in Kentucky, USA, and reported a reduction in livestocks and hay produced, estimated at a cost of $143.4 due to water shortage caused by drought. However, theĀ quantitative analysis of the impacts of drought on livestock and crop production in SSA has not yet been estimated due to paucity of available data and research capacity. In the context of SSA, a general qualitative analysis based on previous studies such as Wang et al. (2014), Kusangaya et al. (2014), and Adams et al. (1998) is used in this chapter to draw a close context.
Climate Change Adaptation Measures in the Agriculture Sector of Sub-Saharan Africa
Climate change adaptation is one of the coping strategies supported by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to help developing countries, to reduce the negative effects of climate change (UNFCC 2015; Deressa etĀ al. 2009). Countries in sub-Saharan Africa express their adaptation needs in a policy document known as the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) (UNFCC 2015). The implementation of the INDCs is supported by several stakeholders such as government institutions, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), donor organizations, the World Bank, and the United Nations Environmental Programs involved in environment and climate change adaptation implementation in SSA region. These organizations have so far supported adaptation strategies in the agriculture sector such as small-scale irrigation of crop in areasĀ where rains haveĀ failed, crop and livestock diversification, changes in planting dates, use of soil and water conservation techniques, namely terracing, mulching, and organic manure application (Nthambi et al.Ā 2021;Ā Bryan et al. 2013; Calzadilla et al. 2013; Francisco et al. 2010). Previous research has treated climate change adaptation measures in agriculture as a private good because this only involves individual farmersā adapting to the situationĀ toĀ reduce the local impacts of climate change (Lavoro 2010; Hasson et al. 2010). The effectiveness of these adaptation measures depends on the amount of resources available to support the adaptation process. Adaptation measures can, however, be categorized into two classes: autonomous and anticipatory (public). Autonomous adaptation measures are adjustments to respond to climate variability such as (rainfall) by individual farmers. This could be adopting suitable cropping types, changes in planting dates, and investment in irrigation technologies among other strategies (Calzadilla et al. 2013).
Anticipatory (public) adaptation is a planned measure to respond to climate change which is based on a public policy characterized by acceptability, flexibility, and net benefits (Dinar et al. 2008, c.f. Calzadilla et al. 2013). There are already existing studies from different countries in SSA region that have suggested autonomous adaptation measures (Alemayehu and Bewket (2017); Gebrehiwot and van der Veen (2013); Tessema et al. (2013); Deressa et al. (2011); Amdu (2010)). However, there are limited studies that have sought to address the anticipatory (public) climate change adaptation approach from both a scientific and public policy perspective.
Methodology
Study Area
Kenya is one of the SSA countries in the East African region. It covers an area of 581,309Ā km2, which consists of 98.1% land and 1.9% water mass (GoK 2010). The agro-ecological zone distribution map of Kenya is shown in Fig. 2a, and this map identifies four main climate zones including humid, subhumid, semi-arid, and arid regions within the administrative map of Kenya. About 82% of the land mass represents arid and semi-arid areas (ASALs) (Kabubo-Mariara 2009; Rosenzweig et al. 2004), which are naturally prone to drought events. In Kenya, most households found in the ASAL region have limited financial capability to respond to weather shocks such as the severe drought events (Ngāangāa et al. 2016).
One of the counties in the ASALs region of Kenya in focus is Makueni County. It is situated in the eastern part of Kenya and lies between Latitudes 1Ā° 35ā² and 3Ā° 00ā³ South and Longitudes 37Ā° 10ā² E and 38Ā° 30ā² E. It covers an area of 8034.7Ā km2 (GoK 2013) I has four sub-counties (Fig. 2b). Households in Makueni County hold a base area of 1.58 hectares which is more in comparison to the national household land holding size of 0.97 hectares. The area experiences a bimodal rainfall pattern of between 300Ā mm and 1200Ā mm/annum (GoK 2013). The Countyās average temperature ranges between 20.2Ā Ā°C and 35.8Ā Ā°C (SACRED AFRICA 2011). It is prone to frequent droughts which are caused by inadequate rainfall leading to loss of fodder and food crop productivity. The drought events affect crop farming in the lower areas of the County making the communities living there to take a shift from crop production to animal production (GoK 2013).
One of the main drivers of climate change in Kenya is land degradation resulting from unsustainable land use practices due to a growing population. Land degradation occurs mainly due to the excessive conversion of woodlands into agricultural and settlement areas to cater for the increasing demand for foodĀ and shelter among households (Shadeed and Lange 2010). The estimated population in Kenya is approximately 46 million people out of which 34 million people live in rural areas (FAOSTAT 2017). Since the late 1980s, there has been an increasing population trend in the rural areas and the total number of inhabitants in Kenya (Fig. 3). The increase in rural population (Fig. 3) means an increasing dependence on agricultural activities to sustain the daily livelihood of the rural populace.
Muriuki et al. (2011) argue that theĀ population growth in Kenya over the years has led to the massive movement of people from humid and sub-humid areas to arid and semi-arid areas. Resulting land degradation from these migrations has partly contributed to increased temperature and drought frequencies in Kenya since has potential to cause an interruption to the hydrological and ecosystem cycles.
Methods
The selected data mined from databases of the World Bank and the UN FAO websites to evaluate the impact of drought consisted of climate indicators (temperature and rainfall values), population size, average food value, number of undernourished persons, renewable water resources, agriculture value added annual percentage growth, pesticide use, producer prices (US dollars), credit to agriculture (US dollars), and annual % growth of GDP for a period of over 20Ā years. The time series trend analyses of rainfall, temperature, population size, average food value, number of undernourished persons, renewable water resources, and agriculture value added annual percentage growth were done. Logistic regression model of the economic indicators (pesticide use, producer prices (US dollars), credit to agriculture (US dollars), and annual percentage growth of GDP) datasets were implemented in STATA to demonstrate the relationship between drought events and the selected variables. A binary coding approach was adopted to separate the years when drought events occurred which were coded as 1 and 0 otherwise. The binaryĀ logit model estimates the relationship between drought and several other independent variables. The model is applied to variables which are within (0ā¦1) and (āāā¦ā)Ā and isĀ expressed in eqs. 1, 2Ā and 3Ā as specified in Bera et al. (2020).
where P represents the probability of a drought event causing an impact to the agriculture sector. c represents the logit(P) and it is related to the independent variables.Ā Ī²0 denotes theĀ constant value, Ī²k represents theĀ coeficient estimates for the x factors. xk represents selected indicatorsĀ that explain the dependent variable. In terms of the probability that drought events influence the independent variables, the model can be formulated as follows:
To demonstrate the willingness of smallholder farmers to be involved in an appropriate anticipatory climate change adaptation strategy, focused group discussions were conducted among three population groups in Makueni County. The population consisted of farmer groups, NGOs dealing with agriculture and environmental issues in each of the agro-ecological zones, and government institutions charged with the responsibility of food security and environmental protection. The selection of these three populations was guided by the Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (ASDS) 2009ā2020. Six focused group discussions were conducted with six registered farmer groups (a total of 190 farmers; 60 males and 130 females) between February and March 2015. The semi-structured interviews consisted of 17 key informants from the NGOs and government institutions which were used to supplement the information obtained from the smallholder farmers in the focus group discussions. In both cases, farmers and officials of NGOs and government institutions were asked to identify different adaptation measures based on the status quo then.
Results and Discussion
Drought Identification and Historical Trend Analysis
Drought Episodes
The meteorological drought is responsible for hydrological and agricultural droughts types in Kenya. However, a successful integrated water resources management can help prevent the socioeconomic drought caused by the two droughts types. The socioeconomic drought is driven by factors of demand and supply of crop and livestock products (AMS 1997). The meteorological drought events in Kenya recorded were experienced between 1991ā2, 1992ā3, 1995ā6, 1998ā2000, 2004, 2006, 2008ā9 (Ochieng et al. 2016), 2010ā11, 2014ā15, and 2016ā17 (Reliefweb 2017). These episodes affected the agriculture sector and posed a risk on the food production systems. They caused an imbalance in the production and consumption patterns, which are very important components of food security (Kogan et al. 2013; Li et al. 2009; Tubiello et al. 2007). Previous studies in Kenya show that the agriculture sector is adversely affected by drought events leading to water scarcity, food insecurity, and conflict among pastoral communities (Muriuki et al. 2011). In some cases, people, livestock, and wildlife have lost their lives through starvation (Ombis 2013). The most recent instances occurred on February 10, 2017, and the government of Kenya responded byĀ declaring drought a national disaster. This is because 2.7 million people faced the risk of starvation and about 23 out of a total of its 47 Counties were alarm areas, requiring urgent food and water aid (Reliefweb 2017). TheĀ declaration simply means high opportunity costs of other sectoral developmentsĀ would be lost in pursuing food and cash transfers toĀ the affected people inĀ areas such as the Southeast, coastal lowlands, and the northern parts of the country. Although these impacts of drought are real in Kenya, there are limited scientific documentationĀ to evaluate the impact of droughtĀ due to paucity of data. Moreso, there isĀ limitedĀ literature which have studied the frequent droughts and linked them to the historical changes in the rainfall and temperature trendsĀ in the area.
Rainfall Trends
Over the past decades, scientists have carried out studies demonstrating how rainfall variability and increase in temperature have affected the agriculture sector and/or have a likelihood of causing catastrophes in the future. In East Africa, the annual rainfall amounts have declined considerably since the 1990s thus marking the region with frequent severe droughts between 2004ā2005, 2009ā2011 (Bloszies and Forman 2015) and 2014ā2017 (Reliefweb 2017). The severe droughts have caused failures in rainfed crop production systems leading to food insecurity, famine, and political instability in most parts of northern Kenya, and other countries on the horn of Africa such as Ethiopia, southern Sudan (Bloszies and Forman 2015), and Somalia. Kenya has two main rainy seasons between January to May and October to December and a dry season from June to August. However, since the 1960s the amounts of rainfall received have reduced and are expected to reduce in the coming years. Trend analysis of data from World Bank (2017) database demonstrates a declining trend of precipitation and a high variability of rainfall characterized by extreme highs and lows over the past 55Ā years (Fig. 4).
A Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) on the rainfall data from 1961 to 2016 indicates a normal distribution of rainfall. However, a Mann-Kendall (MK) statistic test at 95% and 99% indicate significant annual and seasonal variations of rainfall. The changes in seasonal and annual variations represent a reducing rainfall trend (Fig. 4). The trendline in the illustration indicates decreasing rainfall trend (see blue dotted linear) over time. A further decline may be expected if the diagram does not take into account the years of El NiƱo/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) rains which represent a climate change shock. For instance, the El NiƱo rains caused massive flooding and mudslides in 1998 (Bloszies and Forman 2015). The severe floods in 1998 caused deaths, extensive damage to infrastructure leaving many households isolated and displaced (FAO 1998). If the years of El NiƱo rains are excluded from Fig. 4, the rainfall trend would probably be expected to decrease further.
Temperature Trends
Since the 1960s the mean annual temperature in Kenya has increased by 1.0Ā Ā°C at a mean rate 0.21Ā Ā°C per decade. The increase is higher between March and May (0.29Ā Ā°C) and low between June and September (0.19Ā Ā°C) per decade (World Bank 2017). In the last 55Ā years, trend analysis of temperature data from the World Bank (2017) has increased by 1.1 Ā°C. The increase in temperature affect the agriculture sector as the soil organic matterĀ isĀ depleted leading to degradation (Kirschbaum 1995). Soil degradation affects crop growth,Ā and causesĀ poor production yield. This is because there is a high correlation between soil organic carbon pool and climate (Kirschbaum 1995). The increase in temperature leads to an increase in humidity in the atmosphere due to high evapotranspiration rates (Tian and Yang 2017). The analysis of the temperature time series of Kenya is illustrated in Fig. 5. The result of the trend in the temperature changes is expected to increase further as shown by the trend (blue dotted linear line) line. The temperature increase in Kenya explains the local warming and drying of the country which has manifested in the form of frequent severe drought events since the 1990s.
Global warming has been associated with increased drought frequencies over the last five decades in Kenya. Yin et al. (2014) argue that the dry to very dry areas have doubled in the world due to effect of rising temperature. In Kenya, it is evident that the temperature increase has led to further drying in many parts of the arid and semi-arid region, for example, in the south-east, coastal areas, and northern parts of the country. This hasĀ increased the cases of land-related conflicts, as viableĀ agricultural crop lands encroach into meadows meant for animals of pastoralists who graze in these areas (Reliefweb 2017) .
Evaluation of Economic Impacts of Drought on the Agriculture Sector in Kenya
Impact of Drought on Maize Production
The impact of theĀ global climate change has been linked to the negative effects of economies, governance structures, and communities (Linke et al. 2015). Therefore,Ā many developing economies and poor communities that dependĀ on the agricultural produce can be badly affectedĀ due to the change.Ā For instance, maize is one of the staple food crop in Kenya and contributes significantly toward food security (MALF 2017). The dwindling trend in its production since the 1990s can be attributed to severe droughts, especially during periods of drought episodes. ToĀ illustrate this, the trend in the annual percent change of maize yields corresponding to periods of drought between 1991 and 2014 declined (blue dotted trend line) (Fig. 6). The annual percentage changes in maize production were positive forĀ the years when the drought events of 1991, 1993, 1998, 2008, and 2011Ā occurred. They became negative in 1992, 1995, 2004, 2010, and 2014 and zero for drought event of 1996.
During these drought events there were low maize yields and this led to increase in maize prices and higherĀ demand for substitute food types such as rice, wheat, and root crops among others. The increased demand in the substitute food crop for the staple maize, forced the prices of these cropĀ to go higher.
Impact of Drought on the Average Food Value Production
Drought affects the average value of food production expressed in dollars per capita. Average value of food production is a country-wide measure of the absolute economic size of the food production sector (Land Portal 2018). The relationship between rainfalls and average food value revealed that there were drought events between 1991ā1998 and 2008ā2013. During this period, the average food value in dollars per capita followed a declining trend (Fig. 7). The average food value indicator is estimated over 3 years moving average to reduce the impacts of production errors resulting from complexities that occur due to disparities in major food stocks (Land Portal 2018). The two-person moving average curve (blue dotted curve) in Fig. 7 smoothens the short-term fluctuations in the average food value and shows an increasing or decreasing trend in the long term.
Impact of Drought on the Number of Undernourished People
The agriculture sector in Kenya provides means of livelihood to more than 80% of the population (Faostat 2019). The population of undernourished people between 1990 and 2016 remained relatively high corresponding to the period of drought episodes in the country. These numbers of people are estimated to be in danger of calorie inadequacy and are under hunger threat (World Hunger Education Service 2016). They are thus at a risk of malnourishment. The analysis of the data revealed that the number of undernourished people has been fluctuating, but relatively increasing in number, as shown in the trend plot (Fig. 8). For instance, between 1995 and 2005 there is a noticeable increase in the number of people under the threat of hunger in Kenya due to the 11 drought events that occurred between 1995 and 2005. The implication of this fact is that frequent severe drought events can be a threat to the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 2) of the United Nations on the eradication of hunger and malnourishment because drought limits food availability to the people.
Thus, the number of undernourished people in Kenya have remained high regardless of efforts to meet SDG 2 of ensuring zero (0) hunger. Ensuring zero (0) means ending hunger by achieving food security through access to the right amounts and quality of food from sustainable agricultural practices. To understand the relationship between food and drought, orĀ hunger and water scarcity can be correlated as common phenomena (Loewenberg 2014). This isĀ due to overreliance on rain-fed agriculture which is highly vulnerable to the frequent severe droughts in Kenya. An estimated 75% of the population in the country derive their livelihoods from crop and livestock production (Loewenberg 2014), half of whom survive on less than a dollar a day. People who live on less than a dollar a day to meet their food and water needs are said to be poor (Nthambi et al. 2021; Loewenberg 2014) .
Impact of Drought on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
The agriculture sector contributes approximately 25.9% to the GDP in employment and in providing food to local communities in Kenya (Ochieng et al. 2016). This means that the impact of drought on the agriculture sector is likely to affect the national GDP. Data from the World Bank (2017) show that agriculture, value-added annual % growth values are negative during the years of drought in Kenya. For example, the annual % growth for the valued added in agriculture 1991 (ā1%), 1992 (ā3%), 1993 (ā3%), 2008 (ā5%), and 2009 (ā2%) (Fig. 9). The agriculture, value-added annual % growth describes the net value output of the agriculture sector obtained by summing up all the outputs minus intermediate inputs. When agriculture, value-added annual % growth curve is compared with that of the GDP % annual growth in Kenya for the period between 1965 and 2016, the curves behave similarly. That is, as agriculture, annual % growth increases, the GDP annual growth % also increases and vice versa (Fig. 9). These trends suggest thatĀ the agriculture sector correlates linearlyĀ to the GDP. This means that the impact of drought on the agriculture sector will lead to negative value-added annual % growth, which in turn leads to theĀ reduction of the GDP annual growth %.
Impact of Drought on Water Security
Kenya is water-scarce and has only about 3ā4% of its land cover composed of wetlands. The country experiences loss of wetlands estimated at 7% per annum due to the expansion of land for crop and livestock production (Bƶhme et al. 2016). Therefore, severe droughts have led to decline in surface and groundwater recharge. The total renewable water resources per capita per year between 1988 and 2017 have followed a declining trend (Fig. 10). Total renewable water resources are internal and external water resources (both surface water and groundwater) generated through the hydrological cycle (FAO 2016). The internal water resources are generated through endogenous precipitation while external water resources are the resources that enter the country through the transboundary flow from external surface and groundwater resources (FAO 2016). With the total renewable water resource being finite and the population continuing to grow, the water consumption per capita will dwindle. The drought events will have very harsh impact on the population. Hence, alternative water sources and conservation techniques are required to supplement the deficits caused by the drought.
Statistical Analysis of Drought Impact on Selected Economic Indicators
Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of the dataset obtained from FAOSTAT 2019, consisting of some economic indicators used in the binaryĀ logit regression model. These indicators represent independent variables that were hypothesized to be influenced by drought in the agriculture sector. The producer prices represent the average cost of producing a ton of maize ā the staple food crop per annum. The annual growth of GDP (%) is the macroeconomic indicator representing the status of the economy in which agriculture, forestry, and fisheries are major contributors. Credit to agriculture represents the average amounts of loans that producers in the agriculture sector, forestry and fisheries, household producers, cooperatives, and agro-businesses have borrowed from private/commercial banking sectors per year (FAOSTAT 2019) to support agricultural production.
Regression results (Table 3) show that pesticide use has a positive relationship with drought events while theĀ coefficient estimates of producer prices, number of undernourished persons, GDP, and credit to agriculture have a negative relationship with drought events.
Pesticide use has a positive coefficient of variation and significant relationship with drought events. Increasing drought episodes means increased use of pesticides to control disease causing pests and vectors.
During drought events, soil moisture reduces the level of pesticide uptake. Moisture-deficient crops attract insects as such crops are unable to produce metabolites that prevent them from being susceptible to pest attacks (Yihdego et al. 2018). The annual growth percent of GDP is negative and statistically significant to drought events. Drought decreases food availability leading to decline in agriculture value added %. During drought events, farmersā ability to borrow money to support agricultural inputs declines as collateral for loans in form of farm assets becomes less available and valuable.
Identified Climate Change Adaptation Measures in Makueni County
Autonomous Climate Change Adaptation Measures
Makueni county has pilot private ponds already in place that are owned by a few households (Fig. 11a, b). Water accumulates in theĀ ponds during the rainy season, and the farmers use it to irrigate the farm and/or fish farming. A standard water pond holds a minimum of 200,000Ā L of water and can be used by an individual farmer to farm an acre of maize and vegetables for approximately three seasons (Fig. 12). However, the disadvantage of this adaptation measure is that most farmers are unable to purchase the polythene sheet used as an inner lining of the water pond because it is costly (KES 70,000 exchange rate @ 103.2270 KESĀ =Ā 1 USD as at June 2015). The plastic layer is used to prevent the harvested rainwater from permeating into the groundwater. However, these water ponds can be a health hazard and that canĀ lead to the drowning of livestock and children if not well guarded, as well as act as a breeding ground for malaria-causing mosquitoes.
Anticipatory Climate Change Adaptation Measures
Anticipatory climate change adaptation coping strategies to climate change are those public adaptation measures provided to the rural communities through the support of organized groups such as the farmer networks/groups, NGOs, and government institutions. These measures are in most cases capital intensive and might require highly skilled technical input to put them in place. A universal set of community-based water projects suggested include boreholes, earth dams, shallow wells, water tanks, subsurface, and sand storage dams. The communities chose a sand storage dam as the best option because of the following reasons; (1) it is the worldās cheapest way of providing rainwater to communities in arid and semi-arid areas, (2), a sand storage dam creates an indigenous, reliable, clean water supply up to about 1000 people, (3), water sinks through the sand to the bedrock preventing it from evaporation and pollution as compared to water in shallow wells, and (4) it saves farmers a lot of stress regarding land disputes since it is constructed along seasonal rivers which are owned by the government and (5) sand storage dam reduces the risk of flooding and increases chances of water availability during the dry seasons. A sand dam is constructed across a shallow riverbed such as an ephemeral stream and water is extracted using pumps. An example of sand dam is shown in the following photograph (Fig. 13).
A subsurface sand dam is an underground facility that can be used as an alternative to the surface dams. It has some advantages over the conventional surface dam because it prevents excessive loss of water through evaporation and does not support the breeding of vectors such asĀ malaria-causing mosquitoes on it. However, the subsurface dam is constructed below the ground level to tap from the flowing groundwater in the natural aquifers. It also has enhanced surface permeability to cause faster infiltration of rainwater to the groundwater during the rainy season. The sand-storage dam stores water in the sand which accumulates naturally behind a dam wall (Onder and Yilmaz 2005). The wall constructed across the seasonal river should be tight and stable to withstand the pressure of running water downstream. The riverbanks of the sand storage dam ought to be protected from erosion on sloppy areas and the dam bottom (Nilsson 1988). According to Hanson and Nilsson (1986), the extraction of the water from the sand storage dam can either be through pumping or gravity. The use of gravity means a drain is placed at the reservoir bottom in the upstream direction of the sand storage dam or a pipe downstream as shown in Fig. 14. The construction of a sand storage dam has four stages: the first stage deals with the capacity of the dam. It is described by the height of the dam wall to be constructed and the quantity of water it is expected to hold.
The second stage involves a careful selection of a proper water pumping mechanism and how to incorporate it into the sand storage dam design. The third step involves the protection of the dam banks through the planting of trees on the sloppy areas both downstream and upstream of the river where the sand storage dam is constructed. The fourth stage involves a careful selection of the donor (management structure)Ā to support the construction of the wall and one that would organize the farmers who will be involved in the construction process.Ā The loss ofĀ benefit accruing from the choice ofĀ management structure in the area has been fully documented in Nthambi et al. (2021). Farmers should be involved in the four phases and the actual construction processĀ of the selected climate adaptation measure. Other forms of participation can be accounted through contribution of labor time or cash for the purchase ofĀ raw materials.
Conclusions
The frequent severe drought events in SSA region have heavily affected the growth of the agriculture sector, forcing crop and livestock farmers to work under very dry conditions in countries such as Kenya. In this chapter, the impacts of drought on the economy of KenyaĀ were discussed, andĀ a possible climate changeĀ adaptation measures demonstrated using a case study area in one of the counties. The findings can be summarized in three main ways. First, the analyzed climate indicators revealed frequent drought episodes, which have led to direct and indirect economic impacts on the agriculture sector and the economy. The analysis shows drought events have a positive relationship with pesticide use and negative relationship with credit resources, producer prices, number of undernourished people, and annual percentage growth of gross domestic product (GDP). Again,Ā drought events negatively affect the number of undernourished people as the quantities of crop yields, for example, maize as the staple food crop in Kenya reduces. During the years of drought events, the agriculture value added % growth declines reducing the annual GDP. Producers and householdsā access to credit resources reduce during drought episodes. The amount of water from renewable water resources also declines due to decreasing rainfall amounts causing water scarcity.
Second, farmers and households can adapt to the negative impacts of drought using either autonomous or anticipatory climate adaptation measures. The major concern is the dryness that comes with drought events, and given the arid and semi-arid natureĀ in most parts of Kenya, rainwater harvestingĀ in sand dams would be the most suitable adaptation measureĀ to reduce the impact of drought. Generally, farmers in the areaĀ prefer a sand dam overĀ water ponds or boreholes. However, the lack of financial supportĀ hamperĀ farmersā desire to execute this type ofĀ anticipatory climate change adaptation measure.
Third, from a methodological perspective, the use of available secondary data to avail important literature required for climate change research in SSA region was promoted. It demonstrates a simple way of relating climate variables with economic indicators using existing qualitative and quantitative approaches. In terms of determining suitable climate change adaptation measures, we consulted stakeholders to suggest the adaptation measures and propose aĀ practical approach to implement them.
Two main recommendations were suggested in this chapter. First, the Kenya National Adaptation Plan (NCCAP) 2015ā2030 highlights financing as one of the limitations in the mainstream of climate change adaptation in the water sector. The country is keen on providing adequate water management strategies that can ameliorate the water scarcity problem caused by drought events. WeĀ establishedĀ the involvement of stakeholders to participate in constructing sand dams to harvest rainwater across seasonal rivers. Thus, the NCCAP, 2015ā2030 should integrate community participation strategy to provide local materials such as water, sand, and stones or cash when possible, as a way for farmers to partially finance theĀ provision of adaptation measures for sustainable water harvesting techniques. A bottom-top approach to adaptation measure is necessary to understanding farmersā willingness to take part in adaptation projects such as the construction of a sand dam in the SSA region.
The National Drought Management Authority (NDMA) in Kenya, charged with the responsibility to identify risks, end drought emergencies, and ensure adaptation for sustainable livelihoods, should encourage farmers to form community-based organizations. NDMA should also encourage farmers to form farmer networks/groups and register them under the Self-help Association Bill (2015) to provide legal protection to farmers who wish to participate in sand storage dam construction. Membership of community-based organization would encourage collective action efforts that enhance trust among farmers thus strengthening stakeholdersāĀ participation in community adaptation projects. Government institutions and non-governmental organizations should work with farmer networks to ensure adaptation measures are implemented in a way that is acceptable to the communities that benefit from them.
References
Adams MR, Hurd BH, Lenhart S, Leary N (1998) Effects of global climate change on agriculture: an interpretative review. Clim Res:19ā30
Alemayehu A, Bewket W (2017) Determinants of smallholder farmersā choice of coping and adaptation strategies to climate change and variability in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Environ Dev:77ā85
Amdu B (2010) Analysis of farmersā perception and adaptation to climate change and variability: the case of Choke Mountain, east Gojjam., Available via http://docplayer.net/60845560-Analysis-of-farmers-perception-and-adaptation-to-climate-change-and-variability-the-case-of-choke-mountain-east-gojjam.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2018
American Meteorological Society (1997) American meteorological society policy statement: meteorological drought bulletin. Am Meteorological Soc 78:847ā849
Amjath-Babu TS, Krupnik TJ, Kaechele H, Aravindakshan S, Sietz D (2016) Transitioning to groundwater irrigated intensified agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: an indicator-based assessment. Agri Wat Manag 168:125ā135
Bera B, Saha S, Bhattacharjee S (2020) Forest cover dynamics (1998 to 2019) and prediction of deforestation probability using binary logistic regression (BLR) model of Silabati watershed, India. Trees, Forests and People 2:100034
Bloszies C, Forman SL (2015) Potential relation between equatorial sea surface temperatures and historic water level variability for Lake Turkana, Kenya. J Hydrol 520:489ā501
Bƶhme B, Becker M, DiekkrĆ¼ger B, Fƶrch G (2016) How is water availability related to the land use and morphology of an inland valley wetland in Kenya? Phy Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 93:84ā95
Bryan E, Ringler C, Okoba B, Roncoli C, Silvestri S, Herrero M (2013) Adapting agriculture to climate change in Kenya: household strategies and determinants. J Env Manag 114:26ā35
Calzadilla A, Zhu T, Rehdanz K, Tol RSJ, Ringler C (2013) Economywide impacts of climate change on agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Ecol Econ 93:150ā165
Craft KE, Mahmood R, King SA, Goodrich G, Yan J (2017) Droughts of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries: influences on the production of beef and forage in Kentucky, USA. Sci Total Environ 577:122ā135
Deressa T, Hassan RM, Alemu T, Yesuf M, Ringler C (2009) Analyzing the determinants of farmersā choice of adaptation methods and perceptions of climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Glob Environ Chang 19:248ā255
Deressa TT, Hassan, RM, Ringler C (2011) Perception of and adaptation to climate change by farmers in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. J Agr Sci 149 (1):23ā31
Dinar A, Hassan R, Mendelsohn R, Benhin J (2008) Climate change and agriculture in Africa: impact assessment and adaptation strategies. EarthScan London series
FAO (1998) Global information and early warning system on food and agriculture, special report. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/w7832e/w7832e00.htm. Accessed 10 Jul 2017
FAO (2016) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: In Statistics. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=en. Accessed 19 Sep 2017
Faostat (2017) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: In Statistics http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ Accessed 25 Jul 2017
Faostat (2019) Credit to agriculture. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/IC. Accessed 10 Dec 2019
Francisco A, Fredrik C, Maria AN (2010) Farmersā adaptation to climate change. A framed field experiment. Environ for Dev Discussion paper series http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/EfD-DP-09-18-REV.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2017
Freire-GonzĆ”lez J, Decker C, Hall JW (2017) Methodological and ideological options. The economic impacts of droughts: a framework for analysis. J. Ecol Econ 132:196ā204
Gebrehiwot T, van der Veen A (2013) Climate change vulnerability in Ethiopia: disaggregation of Tigray region. J E Afr Studies 7(4):607ā629
GoK (2010) Constitution of Kenya. http://www.kenyalaw.org/lex/actview.xql?actid=Const2010. Accessed 18 Mar 2017
GoK (2013) Makueni County Annual Development plan 2013ā14. http://makueni.go.ke/sites/default/files/2013%20Annual%20Development%20Plan.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2017
Hanson G, Nilsson A (1986) Ground-water dams for rural-water supplies in developing countries. Groundwater 24(4):497ā506
Hasson R, Lƶfgren Ć , Visser M (2010) Climate change in a public goods game: investment decision in mitigation versus adaptation. J. Ecol Econ 70:331ā338
IPCC (2007) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_wg1_report_the_physical_science_basis.htm. Accessed 6 Apr 2018
Kabubo-Mariara J (2009) Global warming and livestock husbandry in Kenya: impacts and adaptations. J Ecol Econ 68:1915ā1924
Kirschbaum MUF (1995) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Bio Biochem 27(6):753ā760
Kogan F, Adamenko T, Guo W (2013) Global and regional drought dynamics in the climate warming era. Rem Sen Letters 4(4):364ā372
Kusangaya S, Warburton ML, Garderen EMV, Jewitt GPG (2014) Impacts of climate change on water resources in southern Africa: a review. Phys Chem Earth 67-69:47ā54
Land Portal (2018) Average value of food production (constant I$ per person) (3-year average). https://landportal.org/book/indicator/fao-21011-612. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
Lavoro ND (2010) Adapting and mitigating to climate change: balancing the Choice under uncertainty. Sustainable dev Series: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. http://www.feem.it. Accessed 29 July 2015
Li Y, Ye W, Wang M, Yan X (2009) Climate change and drought: a risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Clim Res 39(1):31ā46
Linke AM, OāLoughlin J, McCabe TJ, Tir T, Witmer FDW (2015) Rainfall variability and violence in rural Kenya: investigating the effects of drought and the role of local institutions with survey data. Glob Environ Chang 34:35ā47
Loewenberg S (2014) Breaking the cycle: drought and hunger in Kenya, special report. Lancet 383(9922):1025ā1028
Lumbroso D (2017) How can policymakers in sub-Saharan Africa make early warning systems more effective? The case of Uganda. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 27:530ā540
Maity R, Suman M, Verma NK (2016) Drought prediction using a wavelet-based approach to model the temporal consequences of different types of droughts. J Hydrol 539:417ā428
MALF (Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries) (2017) Economic Review of Agriculture (ERA). http://www.kilimo.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Economic-Review-of-Agriculture_2015-6.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2017
Martin R, LinstƤdter A, Frank K, MĆ¼ller B (2016) Livelihood security in face of drought ā assessing the vulnerability of pastoral households. Environ Model Softw 75:414ā423
Mishra AK (2014) Climate change and challenges of water and food security. Int J Sustainable Built Environ 3:153ā165
Mishra AK, Singh VP (2011) Drought modelling ā a review. J Hydrol 403(1-2):157ā175
Muller JCY (2014) Adapting to climate change and addressing drought-learning from the red cross red crescent experiences in the horn of Africa. Weather Climate Extremes 3:31ā36
Muriuki G, Seabrook L, Seabrook L, McAlpine C, Jacobson C, Price B, Baxter G (2011) Land cover change under unplanned human settlements: a study of the Chyulu Hills squatters, Kenya. Landsc Urban Plan 99(2):154ā165
Ngāangāa KS, Bulte EH, Giller KE, Mclntire JM, Rufino MC (2016) Migration and self-protection against climate change: a case study of Samburu County, Kenya. World Dev 84(2016):55ā68
Nilsson A (1988) Groundwater dams for small-scale water supply. IT publications, London
Nthambi M, Markova-Nenova N, WƤtzold F (2021) Quantifying Loss of Benefits from Poor Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Projects: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Farmers in Kenya. Ecol Econ 179:106831
Ochieng J, Kirimi L, Mathenge M (2016) Effects of climate variability and change on agricultural production: the case of small-scale farmers in Kenya. NJAS āWageningen J Life Sci 77:71ā78
Ombis GO (2013) Study of climate change impacts using disaster risk reduction interventions to enhance community resilience, case of Makueni County. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/71725/Ombis_Study%20of%20climate%20change%20impacts%20using%20disaster%20risk%20reduction%20interventions%20to%20enhance%20community%20resilience.%20Case%20of%20Makueni%20county..pdf?sequence=4. Accessed 15 Apr 2018
Onder H, Yilmaz M (2005) Underground dams. A tool of sustainable development and management of groundwater resources. Eur Wat 11(12):35ā45
Reliefweb (2017) Kenya: drought ā 2014ā2018. http://reliefweb.int/disaster/dr-2014-000131-ken. Accessed 15 Feb 2017
Rosenzweig C, Strzepek KM, Major DC, Iglesias A, Yates DN, McCluskey A, Hillel D (2004) Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: international case studies. Global Environ Chang 14:345ā360
SACRED AFRICA (2011) Sorghum marketing baseline survey for Nakuru and Makueni Counties for the KAPAP project technical report, Kenya Agricultural Productivity Programme [Unpublished report]
Shadeed S, Lange J (2010) Rainwater harvesting to alleviate water scarcity in dry conditions: a case study in Faria catchment, Palestine. Wat Sci Eng 3(2):32ā143
Tessema Y, Aweke C, Endris G (2013) Understanding the process of adaptation to climate change by small-holder farmers: the case of east Hararghe zone, Ethiopia. Agri Food Econ 1(1):13
Tian Q, Yang S (2017) Regional climatic response to global warming: trends in temperature and precipitation in the yellow, Yangtze and Pearl River basins since the 1950s. Quat Int 440:1ā11
Tubiello FN, Soussana JF, Howden SM (2007) Crop and pasture response to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(50):19686ā19690
Uexkull NV (2014) Sustained drought, vulnerability and civil conflict in sub-Saharan Africa. Pol Geog 43:16ā26
UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris agreement. UNFCCC, Paris (2015) https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2017
Wang Q, Wu J, Lei THB, Wu Z, Liu M, Mo X, Geng GLX, Zhou H, Liu D (2014) Temporal-spatial characteristics of severe drought events and their impact on agriculture on a global scale. Quat Int 349:10ā21
World Bank (2008) World development report 2008: agriculture for development. World Bank Washington, DC. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/WDR_00_book.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2018
World Bank (2017) Climate Knowledge Portal for Development Practitioners and Policymakers. retrieved fromĀ http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/index.cfm?page=downscaled_data_download&menu=historical. Accessed 13 Jun 2017
World Hunger Education Service (2016) World hunger and poverty facts and statistics 2016. https://www.worldhunger.org/2015-world-hunger-and-poverty-facts-and-statistics/. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
Yihdego Y, Salem SH, Muhammed HH (2018) Agricultural pest management policies during drought: case studies in Australia and the state of Palestine. Nat Hazards Rev 20(1):05018010
Yin Y, Zhang X, Lin D, Yu H, Wang J, Shi P (2014) GEPIC-V-R model: a GIS-based tool for regional crop drought risk assessment. Agri Wat Manag 144:107ā119
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
Ā© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nthambi, M., Ijioma, U.D. (2020). Retracing Economic Impact of Climate Change Disasters in Africa: Case Study of Drought EpisodesĀ and Adaptation in Kenya. In: Leal Filho, W., Oguge, N., Ayal, D., Adelake, L., da Silva, I. (eds) African Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42091-8_66-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42091-8_66-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42091-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42091-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences