Abstract
The present study deals with the numerical simulation of a fluid–structure interaction problem. The fluid is represented by the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and the structure is described by an ODE depending on two degrees of freedom. A recent fictitious domain method on a fixed mesh is considered. For that choice, we provide several tricks to meet the difficulties arising from the fluid–structure interaction. All developed tools can be applied to very general geometries and deformations of the structure. Finally, numerical simulations are conducted in a realistic aeronautics configuration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alauzet, F., Fabrèges, B., Fernández, M.A., Landajuela, M.: Nitsche–XFEM for the coupling of an incompressible fluid with immersed thin–walled structures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 301, 300–335 (2016)
Angot, P., Bruneau, C.-H., Fabrie, P.: A penalization method to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows. Numer. Math. 81(4), 497–520 (1999)
Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P., Huhdanpaa, H.: The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 22(4), 469–483 (1996)
Bordas, S.P.A., Burman, E., Larson, M.G., Olshanskii, M.A.: Geometrically Unfitted Finite Element Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2017)
Court, S., Fournié, M., Lozinski, A.: A fictitious domain approach for the Stokes problem based on the extended finite element method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 74(2), 73–99 (2014)
Delay, G.: Étude d’un problème d’interaction fluide–structure: Modélisation, Analyse, Stabilisation et Simulations numériques. Ph.D. thesis. Université de Toulouse (2018)
Delay, G.: Existence of strong solutions to a fluid–structure system with a structure given by a finite number of parameters. Available on https://www.math.univ-toulouse.fr/~gdelay/ (2020)
Dillon, R.H., Li, Z.: An introduction to the immersed boundary and the immersed interface methods — from Interfaces problems and methods in biological and physical flows. Lect. Notes Ser. Inst. Math. Sci. Natl. Univ. Singap. 17, 1–67 (2009)
Dolbow, J., Moës, N., Belytschko, T.: An extended finite element method for modeling crack growth with frictional contact. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190(51–52), 6825–6846 (2001)
Fernández, M.A., Mullaert, J., Vidrascu, M.: Generalized Robin–Neumann explicit coupling schemes for incompressible fluid–structure interaction: stability analysis and numerics. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 101(3), 199–229 (2014)
Fournié, M., Lozinski, A.: Stability and optimal convergence of unfitted extended finite element methods with Lagrange multipliers for the stokes equations. In: Bordas, S.P.A., Burman, E., Larson, M.G., Olshanskii, M.A. (eds.) Geometrically Unfitted Finite Element Methods and Applications, pp. 143–182. Springer, Berlin (2017)
Hou, G., Wang, J., Layton, A.: Numerical methods for fluid–structure interaction – a review. Commun. Comput. Phys. 12(2), 337–377 (2012)
Hu, H.H., Patankar, N.A., Zhu, M.Y.: Direct numerical simulations of fluid–solid systems using arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian technique. J. Comput. Phys. 169, 427–462 (2001)
Kamensky, D., Hsu, M.-C., Schillinger, D., Evans, J.A., Aggarwal, A., Bazilevs, Y., Sacks, M.S., Hughes, T.J.R.: An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid–structure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 284, 1005–1053 (2015)
Landajuela, M., Vidrascu, M., Chapelle, D., Fernández, M.A.: Coupling schemes for the FSI forward prediction challenge: comparative study and validation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 33(4), pp.e02813 (2017)
Lefebvre, A.: Numerical simulation of gluey particles. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 43(1), 53–80 (2009)
Massing, A., Larson, M.G., Logg, A., Rognes, M.E.: A Nitsche–based cut finite element method for a fluid–structure interaction problem. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 10(2), 97–120 (2015)
Maury, B.: Numerical analysis of a finite element/volume penalty method. SIAM Numer. Anal. 47(2), 1126–1148 (2009)
Mittal, R., Iaccarino, G.: Immersed boundary methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 239–261 (2005)
Peskin, C.S.: The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer. 11, 476–517 (2002)
Renard, Y., Pommier, J.: Getfem finite element library. http://home.gna.org/getfem/
Richter, T.: A monolitic geometric multigrid solver for fluid–structure interactions in ALE formulation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 104(5), 372–390 (2015)
Sethian, J.A.: Level Set Methods – From Volume 3 of Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Acknowledgements
The first author has been supported by IFSMACS ANR-15-CE40-0010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Delay, G., Fournié, M. (2020). Practical Contributions on the Fictitious Domain Method for a Fluid–Structure Interaction Problem. In: Barrenechea, G., Mackenzie, J. (eds) Boundary and Interior Layers, Computational and Asymptotic Methods BAIL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41800-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41800-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41799-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41800-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)